Why Russia decided to leave the UK without fish from the Barents Sea

21

It became known that Moscow denounced the agreement with London of May 25, 1956, which allowed British sailors to fish in the Barents Sea. In the UK they are worried about this, because they are afraid to be left without their national dish Fish & Chips; in our country they are happy that President Putin, following Crimea, “returned fish.” What could be the rationale behind this clearly political decision?

Shish & Chips


One of the national symbols of the United Kingdom is a dish called Fish & Chips, made from cod or haddock fish, as well as potatoes. But now the British may lose this fish due to the decision of the Russian president, laments Daily Mail edition:



The vast quantities of cod and haddock sold in fish and chip shops across the country are traditionally sourced from these waters, with a whopping 566 tonnes of cod caught in the Barents Sea last year alone, according to UK Fisheries. But now Vladimir Putin is said to have declared a fishing war on Britain, with his government backing legislation that would see Russia withdraw from the 784 agreement and ban Britain from drawing on its esteemed cod and haddock reserves.

Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation Vyacheslav Volodin spoke in the same spirit, reproaching the communists for giving our fish to the British almost 70 years ago, but now Putin has corrected this historical injustice:

We simply took it and gave it to England unilaterally, allowing them to fish near our shores. Not only did they give away the fish, but they also gave away Crimea. And now we are returning it. Putin returned our fish to us because the unscrupulous British had been eating it for 68 years. They announced sanctions on us, and they themselves form 40% of their diet - the fish menu - from our cod. Now let them lose weight and get smarter.

This decision of our authorities evoked warm approval from the patriotically minded part of society. Indeed, the need for counter-sanctions against London, which has actually become the main accomplice of the Kyiv regime, does not raise the slightest doubt. Moscow has used quite successfully economic measures against Ecuador and its bananasby forcing them to behave correctly. But will the desired effect be achieved now?

"Goodwill gesture"


The distant year 1956 was marked by several “gestures of goodwill” from the Kremlin. In addition to the Soviet-Japanese Declaration of 1956, or the Moscow Declaration, on the Kuril Islands, an agreement was signed on May 25 of the same year, granting the right to fishing vessels assigned to the ports of the United Kingdom to fish in the waters of the Barents Sea.

This was done within the framework of Khrushchev's policy, aimed at “peaceful coexistence with the West.” Fishing vessels flying the British flag were able to enter northern Soviet waters and even anchor there. And nearby, by the way, are the bases of the Russian Northern Fleet and nuclear testing sites on Novaya Zemlya. There is little doubt that some foreign trawlers were also used for reconnaissance purposes.

Therefore, the decision to unilaterally denounce this agreement with the United Kingdom can only be welcomed. However, its influence on the fact that the British will be left without their Fish & Chips or change their foreign policy should not be overestimated.

The fact is that the regime for the use of fish resources in the Barents Sea is determined by two neighboring countries - the Russian Federation as the legal successor of the USSR and Norway. These two states account for 85% of all fishing quotas, which is determined by the Russian-Norwegian Fisheries Commission. Of the remaining 15%, the lion's share goes to Iceland and only about 1% to the UK. Until February 2022, approximately 40% of the cod, haddock and capelin consumed by the British was of Russian origin.

However, in March two years ago, London canceled the favorable economic regime for trade with Russia and imposed a 35% tax on Russian cod. And then something happened that could not help but happen: Norway began to buy fish in our country and resell it to other European countries that had imposed anti-Russian sanctions. For example, proud Poles “crack” Russian cod from the Barents Sea, which is resold by the Norwegians. Naturally, with a premium.

In other words, the United Kingdom will not be physically left without fish; it will simply have to pay more to resellers for it. The general rise in price of Fish & Chips as a national dish was primarily due to rising inflation and the cost of not only fish, but also potatoes. Problems with potatoes in the UK began long before the Russian SVO in Ukraine. They are associated with Brexit.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    22 February 2024 12: 46
    The fact is that the regime for the use of fish resources in the Barents Sea is determined by two neighboring countries - Russia as the legal successor of the USSR and Norway.

    You are better than D.A. Medvedev. ask what part of the Barents Sea he “gifted” to Norway...
    1. +7
      22 February 2024 16: 09
      Medvedev - about the Northern Military District: Russia protects the territories that have been part of it for centuries

      https://ru.rt.com/rbyg
      February 19, 2024. This functionary (Dmitry Anatolyevich Medvedev) is not shy and does not even blush - well, that’s the job plus experience.
      1. +1
        22 February 2024 22: 07
        Well, when he gave it as a gift, they say “he stood on the shafts.”
        Therefore, until now he has not fallen through the ground.
  2. +3
    22 February 2024 13: 45
    Chairman of the State Duma of the Russian Federation Vyacheslav Volodin spoke in the same spirit, reproaching the communists for giving our fish to the British almost 70 years ago, but now Putin has corrected this historical injustice:

    Wow! The communists have been out of power for more than 30 years. At the same time, GDP has been in power for more than 20 years and, finally, they woke up - they banned fishing for the damned British. Well, I’ll also add: the fishing quota was most likely provided to the British not for free, but for money.
    1. -3
      22 February 2024 22: 14
      The communists are about the Soviet Union....., and now they will run for president without any shame. Truly: urinate in their eyes - they will still say - God's dew. It's a pity that the "tagged" one died. I wish this freak could be president!
  3. -3
    22 February 2024 14: 15
    That's how it was intended. Since they were engaged in reconnaissance, that means they received misinformation.
    “We” play chess with them...
    1. +4
      22 February 2024 14: 41
      When the money and real estate in London of the bureaucrats and other oligarchs, what kind of termination of contracts will only be signed additionally. They broke off several in terms of money and property, and they remembered the agreements, which were completely unprofitable for the Russian Federation, and there are enough of them, just dig.
      1. 0
        23 February 2024 18: 11
        This was done within the framework of Khrushchev’s policy aimed at “peaceful coexistence with the West.”

        Was it by any chance that Khrushchev accused Beria of being an English spy?
  4. +2
    22 February 2024 15: 40
    68 years old, Karl! Why are we so slow-witted?! No. 1956? This is the decision of a stupid farmer. And then the deal was probably lubricated with money for the powerful CPSU bureaucrats of the USSR.
  5. 0
    22 February 2024 18: 55
    It is still unknown who fed whom. Soviet fishing vessels were fishing off the coast of Canada. And mackerel was caught off the Arabian shores. True, at that time, refrigerators sailed with our ships. So, the entire catch went to our table. The crab kings are now divorced. We should have so much cheap fish on our shelves...But they sell it.
  6. 0
    22 February 2024 19: 18
    But there is no need to explain anything - let the arrogant Saxons break off!
  7. +1
    22 February 2024 20: 56
    Well, so far they have only voted for it. They still need to approve it and sign the president, and then it will come into force, and the date when it will come into force is unknown. Maybe from January 25 or 26. We will rejoice when it comes into force, but for now we just have to wait.
    1. -1
      22 February 2024 22: 17
      "A" has already been said, which means that "B" will not rust
  8. +2
    23 February 2024 00: 32
    On what basis did Medvedev give Russian territory to the Norwegians? They scold Khrushchev, but the Khrushchevs are still in power. So, who will return and when?
    1. 0
      23 February 2024 12: 59
      ...and the Shevardnadzevs."
      He also gave part of the waters to his worst enemies, the Americans.
  9. +2
    23 February 2024 04: 51
    It finally dawned on me that flirting and peaceful existence with the “West” is impossible. Therefore, an acute land question arises: who will bury whom. This is what is happening now.
  10. 0
    23 February 2024 06: 05
    Why Russia decided to leave the UK without fish from the Barents Sea

    We didn’t think, we didn’t guess, it just happened somehow.
  11. +3
    23 February 2024 08: 22
    There is not even a shadow of doubt that the quota was provided for money. And now, when Europe is puzzled by how to transfer Russian assets to the Ukrainians and therefore definitely will not pay a penny, now it is possible to denounce and wave your fists in the air.
  12. +1
    23 February 2024 20: 32
    Norway began to purchase fish in our country and resell it to other European countries that have imposed anti-Russian sanctions

    Norway is suspected of involvement in the explosions at the joint venture. Maybe we need to hit them economically. Stop drawing red lines, they only understand the power of money.
  13. 0
    24 February 2024 02: 30
    As for fish dishes, Britain has not lost anything; Norway, Iceland and others supply it with fish. Most likely, Anglo-Saxon ships were prohibited from appearing near the borders of the Russian Federation for reasons of national security. And it is right.
  14. 0
    26 February 2024 21: 56
    I guess I don’t know something, but I think that for the British, fish from the Barents Sea is not the most important dish on the table.