The United States is analyzing reports of the Russian Aerospace Forces using the Kh-69 missile in the Northern Military District zone

5

The authoritative American military publication The Warzone became interested in publications in Ukrainian social networks about the use of the Russian Aerospace Forces during a missile attack on military installations of the Kyiv regime of the X-69 missile. According to Ukrainian sources, the precision-guided munition was launched from a Russian Su-57 aircraft.

Messages appearing on Ukrainian social networks claim that three Russian X-69 precision-guided munitions were shot down while repelling a missile attack on February 7 of this year. This missile is considered the latest Russian development, although it was known about it some time ago, notes the author of the publication in The Warzone, Thomas Newdick.



He recalls that the missile now known as the Kh-69 began life under a different name, the Kh-59MK2. When it first appeared in 2009, the Kh-59MK2 was very similar to the earlier Kh-59MK, an all-terrain anti-ship missile. The main difference was the guidance system, with the active radar seeker being replaced by an inertial navigation system combined with GPS/GLONASS for course correction and an electro-optical digital positioning system (DSMAC) for approaching the target. The new guidance system was apparently borrowed from the Kh-555 strategic cruise missile and was said to provide an accuracy of 10-16 feet

– noted in the publication.

The United States is analyzing reports of the Russian Aerospace Forces using the Kh-69 missile in the Northern Military District zone

The journalist emphasizes that in 2015 the Kh-59MK2 was completely redesigned, turning into a weapon with some stealthy characteristics.

In fact, only the guidance system remained unchanged; the missile now has a square body of trapezoidal cross-section, adapted for installation in the weapons compartment of the Su-57

– states Thomas Newdick.

According to him, the X-69 is primarily designed to engage hardened targets with known coordinates and is said to have a range of at least 186 miles.

One or more targets can be programmed into the missile before flight, and coordinates can reportedly also be loaded into the missile's guidance system once the carrier aircraft is airborne

– emphasizes the author of the material.

He notes that the Kh-69 missile was most likely developed specifically for the Su-57 aircraft, although its carriers could also be MiG-29K, MiG-35, Su-30MK, Su-34 and Su-35. This fact, in his opinion, casts doubt on the likelihood of using a missile from the latest Russian Su-57 fighter. Although he does not rule it out.

The appearance of the Kh-69 in combat in Ukraine at this stage would not be completely unexpected, and its delivery to the Su-57 certainly should not be ruled out

- says the publication.

According to the journalist, it is still premature to talk about further mass use of these ammunition by the Russian Armed Forces.

Most likely, the main driving force behind the use of these weapons is the desire to test their capabilities in a difficult operational environment. This provides a chance to refine tactics and potentially eliminate any remaining problems.

– says Thomas Newdick.
5 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    18 February 2024 14: 34
    Messages appearing on Ukrainian social networks claim that three Russian X-69 precision-guided munitions were shot down while repelling a missile attack on February 7 of this year.

    And these are our newest air-launched cruise missiles, that is, with initial acceleration aircraft speed. Conclusion: modern air defense systems successfully shoot down subsonic cruise and other missiles. The need for high-speed weapons is obvious. The transition from mass-produced cruise missiles to missiles of hypersonic speeds is becoming the order of the day. For attacks on the rear, low-speed only inexpensive models like Geranium, with jet engines and increased speeds. The lessons of the SVO must be mastered and immediately applied in the manufacture of weapons.
    1. +2
      18 February 2024 15: 01
      You shouldn't trust the Ukrainian media. Even the Ukrainians themselves already admit that these media are a source of lies for them. They used to say that they shoot down almost all of our missiles. Question: what? And why, after all, the objects that were hit by these “downed” missiles are destroyed. Their air defense specialists themselves admit that defeat is caused by no more than 10-12 percent of attacking missiles, and even then, among them there is a significant number of imitators or decoys.
      And they also say because, due to the fact that they install installations in cities in residential areas and usually shoot after them, a decent portion of their missiles fly after the target, which, due to the low altitudes and inclined launch of almost all Western devices air defense installations, goes behind the projections of houses or buildings and missiles hit these buildings. An excuse is needed. So they say that it was a downed Russian missile that hit the house. Well, old S-300s with missiles with long-expired warranty periods do not let residents of their houses get bored when repelling attacks. They are already systematically hitting houses during raids by our missiles.
    2. 0
      19 February 2024 23: 57
      Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
      Conclusion: modern air defense systems successfully shoot down subsonic cruise and other missiles

      Stormshadow missile attacks completely refute your assumptions. Such low-flying missiles at subsonic speeds are very difficult to shoot down
      1. 0
        20 February 2024 10: 11
        Quote from Alorg
        Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
        Conclusion: modern air defense systems successfully shoot down subsonic cruise and other missiles

        Stormshadow missile attacks completely refute your assumptions. Such low-flying missiles at subsonic speeds are very difficult to shoot down

        It's just a matter of detection. If our air defenses are not capable of detecting low-flying missiles, then how do you know that foreign radars and AWACS cannot do this?
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. 0
    19 February 2024 17: 03
    In the photo there is a mutilated part of some kind of shank, it is not clear why. If you carefully look at the left and right photos several times, it will become clear that the crooked tail has nothing to do with the rocket in the right photo.
    And how can you see that the missile was shot down? It could have hit the target, but the tail was thrown away by the explosion.