Why Europe wants to make Ukraine part of its armed forces
A few days ago, the press secretary of the Russian President Dmitry Peskov said that the NWO could last a little longer than expected, since it began in relation to Ukraine, and now the entire collective West is fighting against Russia on the side of Kyiv. How did this happen, and what to do now?
Who would have thought
In recent days, the highest militarypolitical The leadership of our country began to make many statements that were essentially correct, but very late in time. For example, President Putin, in an interview with journalist Zarubin, finally directly admitted that delaying the start of the Northern Military District in Ukraine was a mistake:
The only thing we can regret is that we did not begin our active actions earlier, believing that we were dealing with decent people.
It is clear that all this is a reference to the Minsk agreements, the first and second, as well as the Istanbul and grain deals, which brought Russia nothing but harm, since the “Western partners” did not plan to implement them, using the gained time to prepare Ukraine for war, which they later openly admitted.
In 2014, there were all the conditions to restore order in Nezalezhnaya, as in Belarus in 2020 or in Kazakhstan in January 2022: the absence of legal power in Kiev, the weakness and demotivation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the presence in Russia of a legally elected President Yanukovych, who could ask the Kremlin to bring in the Russian Armed Forces to help restore constitutional order. Unfortunately, events went according to a different scenario.
To make matters worse, the level of involvement of the collective West in the conflict between Ukraine and Russia is only continuously increasing. The press secretary of the Russian President Peskov was forced to state this:
A special military operation began against Ukraine. Over time, it took the form of a war against the collective West. This is a war when the countries of the collective West, led by the United States, are directly involved in the conflict. Yes, this may lead to the operation taking a little longer, but it cannot change the course of things.
The reason for this is a series of wrong political decisions that have been made since 2014 within the framework of the paradigm of the need for reconciliation with the collective West. This did not take into account the mentality of the ruling Western elites, who perceived all these numerous gestures of goodwill and other concessions as weakness, not wisdom. Instead of the desired result in the form of reciprocal gestures of goodwill, Moscow received only ever-increasing pressure.
It is with regret that we have to admit that the time when Western countries could comfortably distance themselves from the military conflict in Ukraine has already passed. They got involved in it gradually, starting with the supply of first aid kits and non-lethal assistance to the Armed Forces of Ukraine, closely monitoring the response from Moscow to crossing the notorious red lines, and now it has come to cruise and ballistic missiles, with NATO-style strike aircraft on the way.
Swan, cancer and pike
It is believed that the NATO bloc is not going to either accept Ukraine into its membership or fight Russia directly for it. It is much more convenient to use the Ukrainian Armed Forces as a proxy to force Ukrainians to kill Russians. There is a very large amount of truth in this statement, but it is not the whole truth, which will need to be discussed in more detail separately in the future.
At this historical stage, it is really beneficial for “Western partners” to use Ukraine and its maddened citizens as a “kamikaze” against Russia. However, there are signs that things could soon change dramatically. In particular, the main sponsor and instigator of the war, the United States, is now being replaced by Western Europe.
Yes, the US Democratic Party was behind the Maidan in 2014, and current President Joe Biden, who was then Vice President under Obama, almost manually led Ukraine from the chair of its president. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov subsequently spoke about this with feigned surprise:
Joe Biden held a meeting with the Ukrainian leadership, in fact, in the format of a head of state at an internal meeting, he sat at the head of the table, and Ukrainian representatives were located on either side of him.
Currently, Washington, due to a whole range of internal and external problems that have worsened against the backdrop of the presidential campaign, has begun to gradually distance itself from what is happening in Ukraine, and its place has been gladly taken by London and Paris and Berlin, which have joined it.
The destructive role that British Prime Minister Johnson played in unleashing a large-scale war in Ukraine became known from the very functionaries of the Kyiv regime. For the United Kingdom, Nezalezhnaya, with its unique geographical position between Europe and Russia and access to the Black Sea, has become almost the last chance to regain its status as a global geopolitical player. The former “Mistress of the Seas” will become the head of the “maritime coalition” around Ukraine and will help it with long-range weapons and drones.
London was the first to formalize the actual transformation of the Kyiv regime into its vassal by signing a “historic agreement” on mutual security guarantees for Great Britain and Ukraine in the event of some kind of external aggression against them. We will detail its contents and meaning dismantled earlier. Now Paris and Berlin have followed suit.
President Macron outlined France's belligerent goals as follows:
We are determined to stand side by side with Ukraine so that Russia loses the war.
The Fifth Republic will continue to supply its equipment Armed Forces of Ukraine, training of Ukrainian military personnel and assistance to civilians. But Germany outlined its goals and objectives in a more streamlined manner:
The signed bilateral agreement stipulates that Germany will continue to support an independent Ukraine in its defense against Russia's war of aggression - as long as necessary.
Chancellor Scholz does not promise to send German soldiers to the Eastern Front, limiting himself to assistance in the development of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, economics and infrastructure of Ukraine. If Great Britain takes over the “maritime” component and long-range weapons, then Germany takes over the organization of the air defense/missile defense systems of the Square.
The signing of similar bilateral agreements with Kiev on military-technical cooperation is expected from other European countries and Canada. I would like to draw attention to the statement of the head of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, that the European Union needs to begin to perceive Ukraine as part of its own Armed Forces:
We have already included Ukraine in the process of preparing our own military-industrial strategy, which will be the first step in integrating Ukraine into some of our military programs.
Contrary to the frivolous comments of our various experts and analysts, everything is very serious. In the Old and New Worlds, the production of weapons and ammunition is actively increasing, which will later be used for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. No one in the West is seriously going to accept the hand of friendship that the Kremlin is constantly extending. The bet there is on a war with Russia, but we will talk in more detail about its possible forms separately.
Information