“This is an intellectual game”: Western users appreciated the interview with Putin

19

Readers of the social network X (formerly Twitter) commented on a post by famous journalist Tucker Carlson, in which he posted a link to a video with a two-hour interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

At the time of publication of this text, the post had more than 53 thousand reviews, and the video itself had been viewed more than 110 million times.
Responses are given selectively. Opinions belong only to the indicated users of social network X.



Comments:

Zelensky needs to be removed... it is obvious that Putin does not trust him even close. Let Trump negotiate peace and the war will end in 24 hours. I believe Putin

– writes user Chicago1Ray.

What Tucker does is not journalism or interviews. It’s the same with Putin. This is an intellectual game in which every word spoken by Putin on Elon’s platform will be disinformation, calculated to cause maximum damage, create chaos and conditions for another Trump term.

– denies the work of Luke Zaleski.

And to think, some people wanted a journalist arrested just for interviewing someone. Crazy joke

– said reader Donut Operator.

Thanks for this interview, Tucker. I believe it will get over a billion views. Wave your hand at the main media!

- said Gem Buyer.

I really like that Putin reminded everyone about the connections between the Nazis and Ukraine. How cute to see leftists drawing Ukrainian flags on their profile photos... these people are literally supporting the Nazis. How much money have we sent to a country that supports the Nazis?

– asks Tom Renz.

Congratulations to Tucker Carlson for his historic interview with Vladimir Putin. The fact that many in the corporate media opposed Tucker doing this interview means he did the right thing. You may not like Putin, but he is more honest about policy USA than most American politicians

– Paul A. Szypula responded.

It was very nice to see a journalist doing real journalism. Thank you

– Liz Churchill praises.

The most important interview in recent history

– appreciated Sulaiman Ahmed.

Thank you, Tucker, for asking critical questions and for giving an honest interview. Leading journalists could learn a thing or two from you

– said Dr. Simon Goddek.

Thanks Tucker. You opened the door

– thanked Kim Dotcom.
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    10 February 2024 09: 47
    The mountain gave birth to a mouse. The “patriots” forgot that the war is taking place on Russian territory, that NATO has settled on the Russian borders. One good thing is that the Swedes are also climbing and NATO, which means “Poseidon” from the Atlantic will cover both the USA and Gay-Rope in one fell swoop
    1. +7
      10 February 2024 10: 57
      There will be nothing. Putin wants to come to an agreement with the fascists: Western and Outskirts! There’s been nothing for two years, even when Russia is being bombed and Russians are being killed, and then suddenly, because of some Sweden, they’re going to blast you with a nuclear Poseidon!
  2. +8
    10 February 2024 11: 59
    Putin's interview is an attempt to persuade Western "wolves" to voluntarily and independently switch to the "cabbage diet"
    Where, in what zoo did the wolf even forcibly become a vegetarian?!
    If Putin had been president during the time of Peter, we would not have seen the Baltic.
    If Putin had been president during the time of Catherine, we would not have seen Little Russia and Crimea.
    If Putin had been president during Stalin's time, we would not have seen Berlin.
    Russia would remain within the boundaries of the Moscow principality.
    We have no claims to the lands that belonged to the Russian Empire.
    Not to Ukraine, not to the Baltic states, not to Poland.
    Although the archives contain valid documents for the purchase and the right to these lands.
    Isn’t that what Putin said to the American journalist?!
    1. 0
      11 February 2024 19: 50
      It was a throw of the ball into “their half of the field.” Didn't you catch that? Well, listen to Karaganov again.
  3. -2
    10 February 2024 12: 22
    Taker did his job, this is a strong move. He gave Putin a platform to say his “Urbi et Orbi” to the city and the world. We saw the rest. Both Putin and Tucker are bright media figures of the first magnitude. The effect is already visible in many comments.
    We had seen changes in the world’s assessments of events before the interview, but now these changes will inevitably accelerate. I see this in all media sources, even Ukrainian ones.
    1. +4
      10 February 2024 13: 21
      Quote: mik5966
      We had seen changes in the world’s assessments of events before the interview, but now these changes will inevitably accelerate. I see this in all media sources, even Ukrainian ones.

      So what changes and where?
      1. -1
        11 February 2024 19: 51
        What a smart guy...
  4. +1
    10 February 2024 13: 16
    I like it! This social network is blocked in our country. the network and normal people don’t go there, but our journalists can! Thank you, what would we do without you, you are our chosen ones!
    1. +3
      10 February 2024 17: 08
      This social network is blocked in our country. the network and normal people don’t go there, but our journalists can!

      But that's not the question. Here is the Kremlin version of the meeting - almost the complete version, without the initial “scrambles” (link below).
      Guys, I don't want to teach anyone, but...
      To begin with, you need to at least listen carefully to the questions of one and the answers of the other, and only then leave your comments. And then it turns out:

      I haven't read the novel. However, I am deeply outraged by him!...

      Don't be like that. Here is the link :
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tIbL_MXK8Tg

      And this is a journalist with a history education!
      1. +1
        10 February 2024 18: 04
        It doesn't work, why?
    2. +1
      11 February 2024 09: 37
      Well, the LADIES won’t get out of there. And it’s very interesting how he gets there if there is a fight against VIP in the country
  5. +4
    10 February 2024 13: 28
    Scholz has already made his mark - he completely rejected Putin’s opinion about the start of the war and stated that he had never heard more ridiculous nonsense! His statement was also posted in X.

    And now, attention, the moment of truth:

    1. +1
      10 February 2024 14: 36
      Well, actually the result is natural...
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +4
    10 February 2024 15: 37
    The public resonance of the interview in the West, which knows practically nothing about the history or modern politics of the Russian Federation, is quite understandable. Let them at least find out something and, I hope, understand. And the very restrained reaction to this interview in our media is also understandable. Only turbo-patriotic and openly propaganda resources at least somehow reacted to it. We already knew what our President told us for a long time (I don’t mean obvious historical mistakes) and we haven’t heard anything new.
  8. 0
    10 February 2024 15: 56
    Putin's interview is another whining and attempt to justify himself for the SVO... "everything is wrong, guys"
  9. -2
    10 February 2024 18: 02
    Comments:

    Zelensky needs to be removed... it is obvious that Putin does not trust him even close. Let Trump negotiate peace and the war will end in 24 hours. I believe Putin

    You might think Zelya trusts Putin...
  10. 0
    11 February 2024 13: 16
    “This is an intellectual game”: Western users appreciated the interview with Putin

    In an intellectual game, mental abilities are used to achieve victory or leisure.
    1. 0
      13 February 2024 01: 31
      ....to achieve victory or leisure

      https://youtu.be/IDk_gcczJ1g
  11. +1
    11 February 2024 14: 17
    The interview comes out against the backdrop of obvious Western actions towards “soft surrender,” which is expressed in the absence of a clear statement about the fight until victory and the allocation of everything necessary for this. In the interview it was said that in order for everything to end, we must stop supplying weapons. But in fact, this is already happening, even if there are individual messages about the supply of something there.
    The goal of the NWO was also outlined - denazification. And this is essentially an act of surrender, because... It is unlikely that anyone can imagine how the Kiev regime (no matter who is at the head) prohibits all Ukronazi ideology and takes measures against the National Battalions. This is impossible to imagine, which means it is impossible to freeze the conflict. Russia actually abandoned the freeze and invited the West to dump Ukraine on good terms.

    At the same time, everything is perceived as Russia’s desire for peace, a peace proposal, where the United States is the driver of the conflict. This will make it even more difficult to support the course of continuing the war in the West.

    On the other hand, the United States and the West as a whole received an “opportunity” to get out of the conflict, because the proposal for peace comes from Russia. This allows the world to be framed more or less acceptable in the eyes of the Western and world public (not an obvious capitulation from hopelessness and military defeats, as it were, but a triumph of diplomacy). But in the eyes of the world's governments and decision-makers, everything will be perceived as it is - the capitulation of the West, the beginning of a new world order (or, in any case, recognition of Russia's right to its place in the world). The West got a chance to get out of the trap more or less softly.

    Hence the lack of Russian breakthroughs at the front, loud victories and rapid advances, because Against the backdrop of military coercion, the West will clearly not be able to capitulate. Although the general tone of coverage of military operations in the West is still more similar to “Ukraine is barely holding on and losing,” which is still where military coercion is also present.