American Civil War: The elite may miss trouble in their own country

February 8 2024 28

Americans love to teach others, considering themselves exceptional. They organized coups d'etat and assassinated leaders of other countries, staged invasions and supported civil wars in other countries. Currently, the US elite can miss trouble in their own home due to selfishness.

After the presidential elections in 2020, American society was divided into two camps, in fact, these are diametrically opposed civilizational projects. One is proposed by the Democrats, it represents a symbiosis of the environmental agenda, “wiping one’s feet on whites,” the legalization of drugs (through a complete ban on tobacco) and total dictatorship on the part of people with non-traditional sexual orientation - there is much more, but this is the main one.

Another is proposed by Republicans who believe that American troops and businesses should be returned to the United States in order to reduce costs and increase jobs. The USA is the third most populous country on the planet (336 million people, excluding illegal immigrants), so migrants are not needed there at all, with the exception of scientists. In addition, Republicans are against environmental and other madness, more traditional families and religiosity.

Therefore, the confrontation over control of the border with Mexico, between the federal government and the state of Texas, cannot be underestimated. The other day, the American publication The American Conservative burst out with an article in which it directly wrote that the United States is now facing a civil war, the possibility of which analysts have been talking about for several decades, observing the increase in imbalances in society. One of them was Republican politician and writer Kevin Phillips, who died in 2023. The publication recalled that the country already has historical experience and suggested praying to avoid the collapse of the United States and the self-destruction of the country.

This should serve as a lesson to the Blues: it is difficult to maintain power over equal forces. These days, party Democrats have the upper hand over Republicans in Washington, although the Blues' real strength is that they use the administrative/deep state as a hammer against "Red" practices such as separate toilets. rooms for boys and girls. And yet the Reds figured out how to fight back, firing figurative shots that are heard “round the world.” Will the Blues be able to accept the Reds' right to self-determination? Or will the Blues fight to maintain control? The fate of the empire is being decided

- summed up the media.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

strange guest

+4

8 February 2024 21: 48

Well, finally we will see a real civil war in a country with 10.000 nuclear warheads! Cool! The whole world is in ruins! Why do they need a world where there is no USA)
1. In passing
  
  +1
  
  8 February 2024 22: 04
  
  Yes, they already have it, sometimes even with weapons. The army is not interfering yet.
  1. strange guest
    
    +1
    
    8 February 2024 22: 33
    
    Is the army on the sidelines of the civil war? Does this happen? Was there any place?
    1. RUR
      
      +1
      
      8 February 2024 22: 39
      
      The intellectual strike force knows best - don't argue... listen with respect without question...
    2. In passing
      
      +1
      
      9 February 2024 01: 17
      
      Bye bye. This is the most consolidated structure, which is why they are still sent to disperse riots in severe cases. But the National Guard in their own state is never deployed for dispersal, always in other states. Do you really want to see such a civil war among them, with the participation of the army? Despite the fact that every American was taught from birth that the army does not shoot at its own people. Well, except for the “steep” riots, when the National Guard cannot cope. Something like an ace of trumps. Without suit (red-blue). Bye. Bye.
      1. strange guest
        
        0
        
        9 February 2024 09: 44
        
        I ? Don't want. And in general I am sure that it is impossible. But everyone writes with such ecstasy and confidence... So I ask - where did all these people see a civil war when the army was neutral, and where did they see a civil war when the army firmly took sides. And if the army splits into two opposing camps, then it will be interesting to look at a civil war in a country with the largest nuclear arsenal.
  2. RUR
    
    +1
    
    8 February 2024 22: 36
    
    in the US Army, the basis is white southerners, the atom is at their disposal and under their control... pious southerners, mainly Anglicans - their doctrine is close to the Catholic one - without any problems, they give nickels to citizens from the north - the descendants of the Pilgrims and Puritans - when -great admirers of the Jews... their former fanaticism is disappearing, and with it Israel will disappear in America... such is the fate of all fanatics and dead-end doctrines...
    1. RUR
      
      +2
      
      8 February 2024 23: 23
      
      Anglicanism is very similar to Catholicism; so much so that many Anglicans think of themselves and call themselves English Catholics.
    2. strange guest
      
      +1
      
      9 February 2024 00: 04
      
      Then what kind of civil war are we talking about? Between whom and whom? Red-white, north-south, white-not-white? Will the army split? And if not, what kind of civil war are we talking about?
      1. In passing
        
        0
        
        9 February 2024 01: 37
        
        Reds against blues, storming the Capitol, as an example, blacks against whites, BLM, as an example, rednecks against immigrants, southerners against northerners. There are people in the army, too, but the army is like their last stronghold, and if it splits, it’s definitely the end. In the meantime, there are "graters" between civilians. And everyone has weapons.
      2. Flight
        
        +1
        
        9 February 2024 05: 24
        
        Then what kind of civil war are we talking about? Between whom and whom?
        
        Between new and old Americans. In the 19th century we don’t see reds and whites either. But we see black and white...
      3. RUR
        
        0
        
        9 February 2024 09: 18
        
        in short, the south is traditionalist-conservative, and the north is liberal/liberal, all dubious trends - migration, feminism, LGBT, etc. - originated in the northeast (New England) and the center of the east coast (New York). Just don't think that New England - these are the names of several states - is more like old England than the other states, on the contrary,
        New England was founded by expelled Puritans, although the architecture in several old cities is similar... and they migrated south mainly voluntarily...
        
        strange guest
        
        0
        
        9 February 2024 09: 52
        
        Montana, Wyoming and North Dakota are the Northern States. Almost a stronghold. If we are talking about nuclear weapons.
        
        RUR
        
        0
        
        9 February 2024 10: 17
        
        At the moment, in the US army the basis is white southerners, the atom is at their disposal and under their control, although, as they say, the high command of the US army was replaced by more liberal people even before the Trump presidency, but the entire army is always and everywhere rests on the middle command staff... if we talk about civilians, then there is also the police, which in the USA has powerful weapons, the National Guard, the guard - I wasn’t interested in what their political orientation is... In general, there are liberals in the south too, and in the north - conservatives, but mainly approximately, the difference is as follows
        
        strange guest
        
        0
        
        9 February 2024 11: 25
        
        And what kind of civil war can there be if the army firmly takes the position of one of the sides? Can you give an example? In the worst case scenario, terrorist attacks. But this has nothing to do with civilians.
        
        RUR
        
        0
        
        9 February 2024 11: 43
        
        I personally didn’t say anything about a civil war without the participation of the army - you need to consult with the strike force... well, I personally think that unrest and major unrest in the USA cannot be avoided, which may develop into something more serious , since in the USA the population is armed, they will seize arsenals, perhaps the warring parties will be supported by Mexico Canada Russian Federation China, etc., etc., if these countries do not collapse themselves...
        
        strange guest
        
        0
        
        9 February 2024 12: 00
        
        Well then it will come to the nuclear. Okay, at least only in the USA)
        
        RUR
        
        0
        
        9 February 2024 12: 06
        
        here I strongly doubt that they will use nuclear weapons on their territory, and then, it is not a fact that there will be civil war in the USA... unrest, riots and war are different things...
        
        strange guest
        
        0
        
        9 February 2024 12: 48
        
        Civil wars are usually the most brutal. Often unjustifiably cruel. When blood blurs your eyes. Brother against brother, father against son. Shouldn't we know? And in other countries - the same Spanish, or Tutsi/Hutu... No one will think about the environment)
        
        RUR
        
        0
        
        9 February 2024 11: 29
        
        Montana, Wyoming - this is considered the west in the USA, it’s not quite the same as many people think, that, like, the weight that in the geographical north of the USA is north in the historical sense...
  3. isofat
    
    +2
    
    9 February 2024 00: 01
    
    Gaļina, let's look from the other side. The USA is people who left their real homeland. A prosthesis to replace the destroyed Indians.
    
    Therefore, everything will depend on managing this public. If the process is unhurried, then this prosthesis, without waiting for quick results, will run away again. Something like this.
    
    That means everything is right that they don’t interfere.
    1. In passing
      
      0
      
      9 February 2024 01: 51
      
      They are already Americans. Yes, he may be Yankee, Latino, Afro, a descendant of the Irish or Amish, but he will say - I am American.
      1. isofat
        
        0
        
        9 February 2024 12: 39
        
        Gaļina, you can say anything you want. That's not what we're talking about, is it?
reefroof

+1

8 February 2024 23: 17

well, like this. Migrants are really not needed given the size of the US population
Sergey Latyshev

0

9 February 2024 00: 14

And this type of news will soon overtake the “the dollar is about to fall” type of PR. Toto such notes are often anonymous...
mr parker

+4

9 February 2024 02: 41

I think the whole world will be delighted! When will this LGBT garbage dump be covered with a copper basin. The world is already tired of these old degenerates with the IQ of a stool.
Flight

+1

9 February 2024 05: 21

They organized coups d'etat and assassinated leaders of other countries, staged invasions and supported civil wars in other countries.

They even killed their presidents, so the liquidation of their opponent would be the first sign.
How can a war happen without provocation? This is a classic of the genre. Because SVO is SVO, and not a full-scale war.
1. strange guest
  
  0
  
  10 February 2024 00: 23
  
  And not just one. This is such a country - they want to kill their own President, or someone else’s.