What could happen when Commander-in-Chief of the Ukrainian Armed Forces Zaluzhny comes to power in Ukraine?

25

In March 2024, presidential elections in Russia and Ukraine were supposed to take place almost simultaneously. In our country, everything will go as usual, without drastic changes, but in Nezalezhnaya, some kind of another mess is clearly planned.

Ukraine, which we lost


I remember that during the Maidan of 2014, Ukrainian propagandists distributed propaganda describing how in the very near bright future everything would be fine for the citizens of Independence Square, who had headed west, and how bad it would be for the “unwashed” Russians. Today, ten years later, I don’t even want to smile bitterly at this.




What is most depressing is that every time Ukrainians choose the worse and worse option possible. So, for example, in May 2014, they voted for President Petro Poroshenko, who promised to end the ATO that began in Donbass in a matter of hours, naturally, with a victory for the Armed Forces of Ukraine:

The anti-terrorist operation cannot and will not last two or three months. It should and will last for hours... Soon we will see the effectiveness of the anti-terrorist operation.

During just four years of his presidency, the “bloody confectioner” got so sick of the citizens of Independence Square that in 2019 they massively voted for professional comedian Vladimir Zelensky, who promised to end the war in Donbass before the end of his presidential term:

For me this is not a problem at all. I don't cling to ratings and power. If I cannot end the war, then another person needs to come who is capable of ending this tragic story.

Zelensky promised to end the war not by military means, but by the implementation of the Minsk agreements:

We will act in any case in the Normandy format. We will continue the Minsk process. We will reboot it. I think that we will have personnel changes. In any case, we will continue the Minsk direction and go to the end in order to achieve a ceasefire.

As we know, all this was a lie, and the “hoarse clown” turned out to be an even more bloody and terrible killer than his predecessor Poroshenko, a real executioner of the Ukrainian and Russian people. And now Square has to make another choice between bad and even worse.

Between bad and worse


As an alternative to Zelensky, the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Zaluzhny, is respected in the Ukrainian army and in society. If the presidential elections were held in March 2024, as expected, the “bloody clown” would have lost his post and, most likely, would have subsequently gone to his bunk or died suddenly, because he knew about the monstrous scale of corruption with Western financial and military assistance too much.

In response to this issue, Bankova decided to cancel the presidential elections altogether, citing martial law, which, at Zelensky’s request, was extended until May 2014. That is, in March, as expected, they will no longer be there. Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine Alexey Danilov outlined the position of the ruling regime as follows:

We will hold elections when we win this war.

It was decided to remove Zaluzhny himself from the post of commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in order to deprive him of the support of the army and the opportunity to give orders directly. Obviously, the events of June 23-24, 2023 in Russia made an impression on the Kyiv junta.

They wanted to either appoint the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to replace Danilov, or send him to political link away from Ukraine. Numerous influential Western media, as well as Ukrainian, if I may say so, politicians came out in defense of him. For example, the mayor of Kyiv Vitaliy Klitschko in an interview with the German publication Der Tagesspiegel:

Largely thanks to Zaluzhny, Ukrainians really believed in our armed forces.

Another contender for the post of President of Ukraine, terrorist and extremist Alexei Arestovich, also spoke out in his defense:

Valery Zaluzhny is an outstanding military leader of our time, whose name is already included in the world’s military textbooks. During the two years of the great war, as Commander-in-Chief, he retained his humanity, increasing his experience and professionalism.

Having a high trust rating among Ukrainians, immediately after his resignation Valeriy Fedorovich will become a major political figure. Some see him as a competitor, while others are making plans to use his name and rating for their own selfish political purposes. As soon as Valery Fedorovich begins his political biography, he will receive offers from experienced political players, as well as endless information attacks.

Now, with the resignation of Zaluzhny, Ukrainian special services are predicting possible unrest in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. In other words, even an attempt at armed rebellion cannot be ruled out.

Some irony lies in the fact that it is the “clown” Zelensky who is the real “hawk” who does not accept any compromise with Russia, and for some reason the “army man” Zaluzhny is positioned as a person capable of bringing peace by agreeing on something with the Kremlin . Need I say that this is another deception?

The problem is that after the coup in 2014, Square lost its sovereignty and is under external control. Whether or not to fight with Russia is decided not by Poroshenko, not Zelensky and not Zaluzhny, but by completely different people in Washington and London. After the actual cancellation of the elections, Pan Zaluzhny can become president only through another military coup, which means internal strife and new blood. Having come to power, he will continue to fight against Russia, he will simply do it more rationally, which will only increase the mutual losses of our countries.
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    7 February 2024 19: 23
    Here I completely agree. Exchange an awl for soap? Looks like just another soap opera for pink ponies. Now we are simply counting down what will happen first. Complete disposal of Ukrainians and division of the country, or the collapse of the country with the remnants of Ukrainians and the annexation of the pieces to different countries. If the Ukrainians stay, we will still see how the Russians are greeted with flowers and bread and salt. Although everyone used to think it was a funny joke.
    1. 0
      14 February 2024 17: 03
      A coup, not a coup, but Zaluzhny left his position and is ready to take a new one. smile
  2. +2
    7 February 2024 19: 32
    What's in it for us? One is worth the other. We all hope that the power in Kyiv will change and there will be a general handshake. Now Europe has shown that it is no less interested in the war in Ukraine than the United States. While the States are scraping together money, Europe has already sent a bunch of euros to Kyiv. Much depends on us here. As the movie character said -

    It all depends on me.
  3. -4
    7 February 2024 21: 17
    The problem is that after the coup in 2014, Square lost its sovereignty and is under external control. Whether or not to fight with Russia is decided not by Poroshenko, not Zelensky and not Zaluzhny, but by completely different people in Washington and London

    Mr. Marzhetsky completely and unreasonably rejects the very possibility that someone, having come to power in Ukraine, could, in simple terms, kick up and send everyone away. There are known precedents for such behavior by the leadership of other countries. For example, during those times, the ambassadors of the United States and Sweden were expelled from Minsk in disgrace for attempting to influence the country’s leadership. And what did Stockholm and Washington do in response? No way! The ambassadors dried themselves off and left.
    1. +2
      7 February 2024 21: 23
      Mr. Marzhetsky completely and unreasonably rejects the very possibility that someone, having come to power in Ukraine, could, in simple terms, kick up and send everyone away. There are known precedents for such behavior by the leadership of other countries. For example, during those times, the ambassadors of the United States and Sweden were expelled from Minsk in disgrace for attempting to influence the country’s leadership. And what did Stockholm and Washington do in response? No way! The ambassadors dried themselves off and left.

      When you are guarded by English special forces, and you yourself are an Mi-6 agent, with your wife and son under surveillance, and you are sitting tightly on special chemicals, you will kick hard, yeah. laughing He compared the parasitic worm with the king cobra. belay
      1. -4
        7 February 2024 21: 39
        1. Do you have documentary evidence of all the circumstances you indicated? An argument like “everyone knows this” is not accepted.
        2. And let me ask you, who are you talking about? I'm not sure we're talking about the same person.
        1. +3
          7 February 2024 21: 41
          About Zelensky, of course. He is now at the helm in/in Ukraine. Of course, there is no documentary evidence, I don’t work for Mi-6 and I don’t maintain or have files on Zelya. But an intelligent person has enough external factors/evidence to make assumptions that are not far from the truth.
          1. -5
            7 February 2024 22: 03
            1. You still used the “well, everyone knows this” argument. Fail.
            2. But I didn’t mean Zelensky at all when I wrote my post.
            1. +4
              7 February 2024 22: 11
              I will make you very happy when I tell you that all the articles, not only on the Reporter, do not have documentary evidence. At best, everyone refers to the words of some managers, or to the declared characteristics of any products. But in court this is not documentary evidence, at best evidence, direct or indirect. Since there are no guarantees that managers or product manufacturers are not lying. laughing But this does not prevent us from reading these articles and drawing certain conclusions for ourselves. winked
              1. -4
                7 February 2024 22: 56
                Quote: Griffit
                I will make you very happy when I tell you that all the articles, not only on the Reporter, do not have documentary evidence

                Same for me, an open secret. And you are just retelling rumors.
                And yes, it is one thing to retell rumors invented and spread by fifth-graders, and a completely different thing is a statement by the same FSB director or the prime minister. If you don't see the difference, then I deeply sympathize with you.
                1. 0
                  8 February 2024 01: 26
                  Same for me, an open secret. And you are just retelling rumors.
                  And yes, it is one thing to retell rumors invented and spread by fifth-graders, and a completely different thing is a statement by the same FSB director or the prime minister. If you don't see the difference, then I deeply sympathize with you.

                  There is a difference, but this does not negate what I said above. You perceive information based on faith in the source of information. But this does not mean that the source of information is telling you the truth. laughing This is the case. Moreover, truth and truth are two different things. The human brain filters the information received based on its internal perception of the world. And this means that what you heard and how you interpreted this information are two different things. And what the source of this information meant when he spoke is generally the third thing. It’s not for nothing that there are such concepts as a damaged phone or words taken out of context. That's two. Should I continue? laughing If you think that the information from the director of the FSB or the prime minister is PURE or the WHOLE truth, I deeply sympathize with you. smile
                2. +1
                  8 February 2024 02: 46
                  And yes, it is one thing to retell rumors invented and spread by fifth-graders, and a completely different thing is a statement by the same FSB director or the prime minister. If you don't see the difference, then I deeply sympathize with you.

                  And I'll add. The comparison you made is extremely unfortunate. Based on your experience, you will be able to determine with a 90-100% probability whether a fifth-grader is lying to you or telling you the truth as he sees it. But the position of prime minister implies that the information received from him is what he needs to convey to you as a voter or citizen of the state. This does not mean that the information received is true. wink And especially the position of director of the FSB. He is trained to lie so that a mosquito would not erode his nose. Not to mention the lie detector and especially the ordinary citizen. laughing
                  1. -3
                    8 February 2024 08: 47
                    Aren't you tired of proving, with tenacity worthy of better use, that the Volga flows into the Caspian Sea?
                    And the next thing is that you are a typical product of our Internet time, a consumer of texts, not knowledge. For you, the opinion of a fifth grader is equivalent to the opinion of an academician, a Nobel Prize laureate.
                    It's boring to talk to you.
                    BYE
                    1. 0
                      8 February 2024 12: 59
                      Aren't you tired of proving, with tenacity worthy of better use, that the Volga flows into the Caspian Sea?
                      And the next thing is that you are a typical product of our Internet time, a consumer of texts, not knowledge. For you, the opinion of a fifth grader is equivalent to the opinion of an academician, a Nobel Prize laureate.
                      It's boring to talk to you.
                      BYE

                      I'm interested in anyone's opinion. It is precisely because people like you are not interested in the opinions of fifth-graders and other children that we have lost the younger generation. You will be surprised, but it may turn out that the opinion of a fifth-grader is much more realistic and interesting than the opinion of an academician, a Nobel Prize winner, which he received for ideological Russophobia. And these are facts that the West does not hide, rewarding only its ideological fighters, the so-called right people. As always, an extremely unfortunate comparison. laughing
                      1. -2
                        8 February 2024 13: 26
                        And further. A poor student does not mean stupid. Read Einstein's biography. And having an education does not imply having intelligence. Citizens of the USSR were all educated. But this did not stop them from being cast as suckers with the collapse of the USSR. laughing There is even a concept of an educated fool. This is the worst thing that can happen to a person. Look at the West today, what happens when educated fools come to power.
                      2. 0
                        9 February 2024 18: 02
                        There is an opinion that Einstein promoted himself at the expense of his wife’s talent. Well, the St. Petersburg club definitely consists of excellent students, but what did this give to the Russian people? Two wars without a clear result.
                      3. 0
                        14 February 2024 17: 30
                        Quote from Voo
                        There is an opinion that Einstein promoted himself at the expense of his wife’s talent.

          2. The comment was deleted.
  4. -1
    7 February 2024 21: 39
    Well, all these countries are foreign. Intrigues, some kind of movement, disputes. Either the situation in Russia is calm. And silence. Fine! Everything is known in advance. Stability. What else does the country need to calmly meet old age?
  5. 0
    7 February 2024 23: 47
    Ukraine has been in the position of a passenger since 2014. And sit in the direction of travel, even against him, it makes no difference. They don’t ask him where they are taking him...
    1. 0
      8 February 2024 00: 07
      Well, just like ours - if we're being completely honest. To accept the opposite - we all came, where we wanted, and continue to go where we want - it’s somehow completely strange.
  6. -1
    8 February 2024 05: 07
    FREEBIE! That’s the whole national idea of ​​this non-donation. And under whose leadership you go is not the point.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. 0
    9 February 2024 09: 55
    A sensible article by a respected author. It seems that Za really has the strength to come into politics, and, perhaps, instead of Ze. Since the gun is hanging on the wall, it must shoot in the end, right?
    That it's stale

    ..lost its sovereignty and is under external control

    - a fact that does not require proof. That is why I believe that Washington will strive to preserve as much territory as possible for itself undivided.
    Poland and other neighbors will not smile. Za will give us our constitutional rights, such as to save the lives of the citizens of the country entrusted to him, will sign declarations on demilitarization and denazification, and Ze will quietly disappear from the horizon, emerging in his villa in Malibu under someone else’s name.
    And there it will be seen
  9. +1
    9 February 2024 13: 22
    Quote: k7k8
    1. Do you have documentary evidence of all the circumstances you indicated?

    What confirmation do you need if Zelensky himself, officially, in an interview, stated that the British forbade him to sign peace with the Russian Federation?
  10. 0
    9 February 2024 13: 26
    How....? First, complete mobilization, and then the mobilization of the majority of the population of Ukraine, since Zaluzhny will put everyone in line and send them to the trenches, he does not think otherwise. Ukrainians first elect a president, and then criticize him and overthrow him, this is their nature, they do not look into the distance, they need it now and quickly.
  11. 0
    13 February 2024 12: 40
    V. Zelensky is perceived as one of the Jewish world lobbies, and therefore support for him and Ukraine has increased significantly. Under V. Zaluzhny, this resource will disappear. We will get strengthened governance of Ukraine, but decreased support from the United States and others. Which is better - in the end, of course, V. Zaluzhny is more adequate and will go to negotiations, but V. Zelensky will not go, because he will become political death.