How monopolist China is forcing the EU to play by its own rules

13

Almost all semi-finished and finished products of a strategic nature consumed by Europe are imported. The economically developed continent does not have its own natural resources and the capacity to process them in the required quantity. This is its weakness, and Russia has successfully taken advantage of this up to a certain point. Now, to a certain extent, it has been replaced by China.

EU dependence on Chinese rare earths and non-ferrous metals


The PRC gradually adjusted the cycle of extraction and processing of its own scarce minerals and metals necessary for the production of modern equipment. Having turned into a solid monopolist, it began to use its status as a lever of economic pressure. To get away from this, the European Union is trying, firstly, to diversify the supply of strategic goods from China, and secondly, to begin processing raw materials independently. But as it turns out, it is much easier to abandon Russian gas than to abandon Chinese non-ferrous metals and other minerals that are not common in the earth’s crust.



We are talking about 34 elements of D. Mendeleev’s periodic table: boron, vanadium, tungsten, germanium, lithium, silicon, nickel, scandium, titanium, etc., which are used in the manufacture of batteries, wind turbines, smartphone components, chips.

The Chinese are the masters of the situation here: they have impressive reserves of rare earths and precious metals and cheap labor. Therefore, God himself ordered them, in addition to mining, to organize their enrichment. Further more. Investments began to be made within the state and industrial chains were built between enterprises. As a result, clusters emerged where most of the technological modules required for production are manufactured. Thus, the need for imported components disappeared.

The rapid and imperceptible expansion of the Celestial Empire


Subsequently, the Chinese became cramped in their native lands and they rushed first to Indochina, and then further. Deposits of rare earth metals were acquired in Myanmar and throughout Africa, where a third of the planet's mineral wealth is concentrated. Suffice it to say that in 2003-2021, investments in the Dark Continent increased from $75 million to $5 billion.

Finally, it got to the point that businessmen from China began to buy Australian and even American assets. Washington regarded this as crossing a red line, especially since official Beijing prohibits the sale of stakes in its own mining companies. True, the conflict was diplomatically resolved, and enriched Chinese raw materials began to flow for export. The CCP subsidized domestic producers without burdening them with environmental and labor obligations, as is common in the West. So Chinese metals found themselves out of competition.

At first, local companies smelted the metal, and overseas they produced final products from it. Placing toxic and energy-intensive enterprises in China was beneficial to everyone except himself. He wanted to extract as much added value as possible locally, that is, to control the extraction, processing of raw materials and its transformation into a finished product. At some point, this began to affect the interests of developed countries - members of the G7.

In the 2010s, Beijing resorted to a trick, limiting the export of bismuth, magnesium and heavy metals for several years, seemingly in favor of competitors. This was enough for him to master the production of complex equipment used in green technologies: electric vehicles, solar panels, wind generation.

Trade wars: 2:0 in favor of the Chinese


Chinese goods, due to obvious circumstances, have a lower cost than Western ones. Attempts at legitimate competition on the part of Europe and America are failing. Thus, in 2010, the European Union refused to introduce draconian customs duties on Chinese solar panels. The story ended with the Celestial Empire capturing 80% of the market in a matter of years. There is a similar trend with electric vehicles: in Europe, the share of products from Shenzhen BYD has grown from 0 to 8% over the five-year period, and in 2025 a 15% level is expected.

By 2018, the United States realized that China has a number of objective and individual advantages, and decided to impose additional duties on its trade flow. A trade war with the New World began, although the EU still preached the principles of “free trade”. But today the European Commission is faced with a dilemma: raise duties on Chinese goods or allow its own industry to go bankrupt.

However, China will respond to every unfriendly gesture with counter-sanctions. He has something to counter: the country controls 56% of the world's nickel processing capacity, 60% each of germanium and lithium, 80% each of gallium and rare earth metals.

Time is on the Chinese side. Economic their potential is almost limitless, and the demand for “green” developments is only growing. Washington and Brussels are losing on all fronts, from the extraction of raw materials to the extraction of profit from finished products. The EU is already considering increasing the import duty on Chinese vehicles. In response, Beijing may limit access to strategic raw materials for production equipment in the Old World. This is fraught with a new trade war, this time with the EU.

Plan A and Plan U


And the conclusion from all this is simple: no matter how much the West (especially Europe) would like to jump off the Beijing hook, hopes for a quick abandonment of the Chinese technological and raw material base are just a dream. First, the ore is either located in China or controlled by its companies. Secondly, in Canada, the USA, Australia, and Scandinavia, alternative mines and processing plants to the Chinese ones will have to be built from scratch under conditions of strict environmental standards and expensive energy resources.

That leaves Africa, although it will be difficult for the Chinese to start long-term projects there, especially since, unlike the West, the PRC does not interfere with its African partners with its “democratic values” and does not blackmail them with sanctions. This pragmatism has earned Beijing the favor of many regimes in the Global South, most of which are authoritarian. There is also, however, Ukraine, whose mineral resources, rich in germanium, graphite, lithium, and titanium, the Europeans also secretly count on. All that's left to do is defeat the Russians. So they try: maybe the business will burn out!
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    3 February 2024 10: 10
    However, China will respond to every unfriendly gesture with counter-sanctions. He has something to counter: the country controls 56% of the world's nickel processing capacity, 60% each of germanium and lithium, 80% each of gallium and rare earth metals.

    Additional duties on Chinese goods have shown their effectiveness, especially in the United States.

    First, the ore is either located in China or controlled by its companies. Secondly, in Canada, the USA, Australia, and Scandinavia, alternative mines and processing plants to the Chinese ones will have to be built from scratch under conditions of strict environmental standards and expensive energy resources.
    That leaves Africa, although it will be difficult for the Chinese to start long-term projects there, especially since, unlike the West, the PRC does not interfere with its African partners with its “democratic values” and does not blackmail them with sanctions.

    if it has to, the USA, Canada, Australia and the Scandinavian countries will quickly deal with China. China may not interfere in African affairs, but it does not have the military power that the United States and the countries supporting the United States have and no one has lifted sanctions, if it is necessary to include sanctions in addition to additional duties, and this would be very bad for China.
    1. 0
      4 February 2024 09: 51
      but it doesn’t have the same military power as the United States

      Where do these conclusions come from? Analyst, or just blurt it out? But analysts from the United States themselves write that they are increasingly inferior to China in military power.
  2. +1
    3 February 2024 10: 37
    There are a lot of rare earths in Australia, Canada, and the USA. As well as more cheap energy resources than in China. China buys gas and oil from the US and Canada, and coal from Australia, and not vice versa. So if it becomes profitable, they will launch it with all their might. And ecology...do you really think that in the damned Anglo-Saxon world anyone thinks about ecology? Article pulling an owl onto a globe.
    1. 0
      4 February 2024 09: 56
      Wow. And everywhere on the internet they write that China’s proven rare earth reserves account for almost 90% of the world’s reserves. China buys oil from Russia. I had a fight with Australia and gave up on its coal. Still available in the public domain.
      1. -1
        4 February 2024 10: 25
        At the end of 2008, the reserve data is as follows: China 89 million tons, Australia 58 million tons, CIS 21 million tons, USA 14 million tons, India 1,3 million tons, Brazil 84 thousand tons.

        In 2011, a Japanese team discovered rare earth ore deposits on the floor of the Pacific Ocean by testing soil samples from 80 locations at depths ranging from 3,5 to 6 km. According to her estimates, these deposits may contain up to 80-100 billion tons rare earth materials.

        So there are a lot on the planet. There's enough for everyone.
        1. 0
          4 February 2024 10: 34
          There are different types of rare earths.

          China controls the mining and processing of more than 90% of the total volume of 17 key rare earth elements (samarium, terbium, lanthanum, lutetium, thulium and others) in the world. Beijing has recently lowered export quotas for these metals because its own industry needs them.
          1. +1
            4 February 2024 11: 45
            Rare earth elements (Rare earths; abbr. REE, English TR, REE, REM) - a group of 17 elements, including scandium, yttrium and lanthanides (lanthanum, cerium, praseodymium, neodymium, promethium, samarium, europium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium , holmium, erbium, thulium, ytterbium, lutetium).
            As a rule, rare earth elements occur together in nature.


            I agree about extraction and processing. Because other countries did not have to invest in the development of deposits - a rather dirty business in terms of environmental impact - China provided for everyone. China will refuse to provide - they will begin to develop their own - the world's reserves are enormous, significantly exceeding the current needs of humanity. This is what we're talking about. There's just a lot of hype. Like around lithium. Smart people make huge money from this hype. Meanwhile, look at the dynamics of lithium prices, for example. You will be surprised hi
  3. 0
    3 February 2024 10: 51
    Any rapid development will first encounter stagnation and then degradation.
    Everything has a limit. China will not escape this, no matter how it develops.
    If we chase China, then when it stumbles, we will definitely fall with it.
    Do we need this?
    Maybe it’s worth thinking about how the crisis of any superpower could have a minimal impact on the economy of our country. But this requires our own economy, our own production, and not absolute dependence, as is the case now, for example, in the automotive industry.
    1. 0
      4 February 2024 09: 58
      I don’t understand, where in the article is it about us and who to “chase”? It seems to be about Europe and China.
  4. 0
    3 February 2024 12: 28
    If we take the conventional West, then this is a union of money and new technologies. This union is trying to prevent the creation of other unions of countries that have land and other resources. Even if there is talk of unification, the Western union immediately intervenes with an armed invasion. This was the case in Libya, when Gaddafi announced the creation of the African Union. If we talk about China , then it is not devoid of many features of Western countries. Its penetration into Africa is not always of a non-mercantile nature. And this is a feature of modern states, which the West has conventionally placed at a different stage of development, and prevents these countries from acquiring true independence.
  5. 0
    3 February 2024 17: 47
    The media make a profit out of the usual “export of capital”.
    That is, build mining factories in neo-colonies
    As long as Russia, China, and Africa are selling cheap resources, why should they worry? And they are already building in other places, they wrote
    1. 0
      4 February 2024 10: 01
      How can you turn everything upside down? In an article about the EU and China. And it is in China that processing plants are being built, and Europe is closing them.
  6. 0
    5 February 2024 09: 20
    He also forces the Russian Federation and has been very successful in this.