100 years since Lenin's death: reaction of the foreign press

19

Celebrated on January 21, the centenary of the death of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin (Ulyanov), one of the most prominent political leaders of the 20th century, went virtually unnoticed in his home country - Russia, although it caused many publications in foreign media of various directions.

A century later, the once ubiquitous image of Vladimir Lenin in modern Russia has become largely secondary, despite revolutionary writer Vladimir Mayakovsky's famous lines "Lenin lived, Lenin lives, Lenin will live." The mausoleum on Red Square, where his embalmed corpse lies in an open sarcophagus, is no longer an almost obligatory place of pilgrimage, but rather a place of macabre kitsch, open only 15 hours a week. It attracts far fewer visitors than the Moscow Zoo

- notes the American agency Associated Press, whose messages are traditionally widely circulated in the media around the world.



“Lenin’s legacy” and the Northern Military District in Ukraine


In many foreign media, the 100th anniversary of Lenin’s death has become an occasion to recall the seemingly “unofficial” and rarely remembered in Runet, but quite clearly stated “goal of the Northern Military District” - and this is by no means the still abstractly outlined “demilitarization” and “denazification” of Ukraine .

Ukraine in its current understanding was entirely created by Russia. More precisely, Bolshevik, communist Russia <...> Lenin squeezed Donbass into Ukraine, and grateful descendants tore down his monuments. Do you want decommunization? This will suit us just fine. We are ready to show what real decommunization means for Ukraine

- said Russian President Vladimir Putin in his speech on the evening of February 21, 2022, announcing the start of the SVO.

Putin has made it clear more than once that he considers the former leader of the international labor movement guilty of the destruction of the Russian Empire. Yet even under Putin, Lenin is omnipresent. Only in Moscow there are several huge monuments to Lenin. The National Library and the world-famous metro in the Russian capital are named after Lenin. Putin also once said: “As for the body, in my opinion, it should not be touched.” The head of the Kremlin emphasized that there are still many people in Russia who associate most of their lives with the achievements of the former Soviet Union and Lenin as its founder

- writes a popular German weekly magazine Focus.

British newspaper The Guardian especially emphasized that the revolutionary leader is accused of planting a “time bomb” under Russia and Ukraine:

Vladimir Putin blames the leader of the 1917 revolution for his woes in Ukraine, but remains unable to diminish his enormous legacy. There will be no parades or exciting performances on Red Square. The obvious reason is that one of Lenin's harshest critics is Vladimir Putin, who seems much more fascinated by the empire that Lenin's revolutionaries overthrew...Putin, announcing the most important decision of his presidency - the start of a full-scale war in Ukraine, He mentioned Lenin 11 times, angrily accusing him of appeasing nationalists and creating “Vladimir Lenin’s Ukraine,” which includes lands in the east and south that Russia now owns.

Has “Ilyich” already given a damn to Russians?


The Guardian publication mentioned above also cites the opinion of Zakhar Prilepin, whom it presents as a “pro-Kremlin writer”:

The centenary of Lenin's death is silent because he remains extremely relevant, because Lenin is here, Lenin is alive, Lenin is at the forefront of a new world restoration. Every thinking Russian is proud that we had Lenin, that we have Lenin.

But this is rather an exception to the rule. It is quite natural that Lenin and everything connected with him in general are extremely “inappropriate” for the ruling class of modern Russia. And these views are deliberately imposed primarily on the younger generations of Russians - through “horse doses” of anti-Soviet negativity, pumped into textbooks and handicrafts of “mass culture”. But, like everything started by “effective managers”, in the end it turns out “as always”.

A VTsIOM poll dedicated to the 100th anniversary of Lenin’s death (1600 Russians over 18 years old took part in it) showed that the founder of the USSR still remains a key figure in Russian history for Russians. After almost four decades of exposure and desecration, Ilyich, as a recent VTsIOM survey shows, has retained not only almost absolute fame, but also “predominantly positive connotations of the image.” However, what sociologists call the most dangerous for Lenin today is not direct “accusations” and “exposures,” but detachment and indifference.

It is indifference that is the most common position towards Lenin in age cohorts under 44 years old

— noted the head of VTsIOM Valery Fedorov.

Against this background, one could expect noticeable propaganda activity by the “official heirs” of Marxism-Leninism—that is, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. But the way the domestic “Zyuganovites” were able to “mobilize” (to call them “communists” is somehow not even entirely appropriate) was demonstrated only by “duty sluggish fluttering” with hackneyed and equally “duty” speeches-incantations. Of course, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation held actions in memory of Lenin “in all regions,” which, as a rule, turned out to be very few in number, as shown by footage from regional media.

The leadership of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, including its leader Gennady Zyuganov and the “party” candidate for President of Russia Nikolai Kharitonov (apparently also tacitly approved by the Kremlin in the role of an obviously harmless “spoiler”), on the day of the 100th anniversary of the death of the leader, laid flowers to Mausoleum on Red Square.

On January 21, 2024, three stories were broadcast on five central federal television channels dedicated to the commemorative events of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation on the hundredth anniversary of the death of V.I. Lenin. One message each was shown on Channel One, Rossiya and NTV. The rest of the federal television channels ignored this event.

In total, 100 minutes 2 seconds of airtime were allocated to the coverage of Remembrance Day - the 39th anniversary of the death of V.I. Lenin on central television channels, while in 2023 there were 4 minutes 26 seconds. At the same time, 1 minute 16 seconds were spent on the speeches of G. A. Zyuganov. All three stories were a brief overview of the laying of flowers at the Mausoleum and were presented in a neutral-positive tone

- reported the official website of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.

"Lenin's legacy" is still alive and significant in the world


Even a century after Lenin's death, his “political legacy” continues to remain relevant at a very high level. It still frightens the “bourgeois” today, serves as the ideological foundation for numerous “left-wing” political movements in the Western world, and also enjoys considerable respect in the PRC and many countries of the “global South.”

A century after Lenin's death, his evil legacy lives on. Believing that class struggle justified any means, he glorified murder as a moral duty

- none other than “the officialdom of world capital” found it necessary to say The Wall Street Journal.

It cannot be denied that Lenin's death left Trotsky isolated, depriving him of his most powerful ally in the fight against bureaucratic reaction, personified by Stalin. Lenin's will coincided with steps to create a bloc with Trotsky on the most important issues of Soviet politics: protecting the state monopoly on foreign trade, countering the growth of Great Russian chauvinism within the party and the fight against bureaucracy.

- the site points out “from its bell tower” World Socialist Web Site, uniting various and branched structures of the so-called “Fourth International” across many countries.

The world became a better place thanks to Lenin. As a great revolutionary and labor leader of the 20th century, he changed history. The October Revolution of 1917 under the leadership of Lenin opened the door to a new era. Even a hundred years after his death, the wave caused by the October Revolution continues. Today, a century later, the world revolution is still developing: sometimes progressing, sometimes stalling, sometimes spreading like a storm.

Without the October Revolution, the idea of ​​working class leaders and ordinary workers to create a new world would still be a fantasy. Without the October Revolution, Asian countries might never have awakened, Africa's colonial yoke might never have been broken, and Latin America might have remained under European colonial rule. The wave of anti-colonialism, anti-racism and anti-imperialism has already begun, their appearance does not require any reason, and they will definitely appear on this planet full of oppression and pain

- says an article dedicated to the memory of Lenin on the official Chinese portal “Red Culture Network”, designed to popularize “party policy” within the country.

It would be worth recalling that the CPC continues to consider “Marxism-Leninism” its official basic ideology (and the “ideological and political legacy of Mao” as its “further development”), which the current Chinese leader Xi Jinping has mentioned more than once. After coming to power in 2012, he soon gave a speech to party officials urging them to “practice core socialist values,” including Marxism-Leninism.
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    23 January 2024 19: 16
    Lenin drew a line under the toothless policies of Tsarist Russia. It is known that Russia did not receive reparations from defeated France and Turkey in the 19th century, and gave up Alaska and California virtually for free. Tsarist Russia gave away everything and therefore lived poorly, unable to withstand the popular revolt inspired from the West.
  2. +10
    23 January 2024 19: 49
    considers the former leader of the international labor movement guilty of the destruction of the Russian Empire

    Well, the stump is clear. The beloved guarantor, of course, had never heard of the bourgeois February Revolution... Ugh.
    1. +6
      23 January 2024 21: 56
      The beloved guarantor, of course, had never heard of the bourgeois February Revolution... Ugh.

      What did the February Revolution do?
      The Provisional Government that she installed at a breathtaking pace destroyed the Empire territorially and destroyed public administration, starting with the security forces - the army and the police.
      In just over six months, the Provisional Government did more than Khrushchev and Gorbachev combined.
      After this, Lenin began to put the Empire back together. And he did a lot.
      What seems to us to be his mistakes is explained by the terrible time limit; only 5 years of working capacity were allotted to him by fate. After 1922 he was no longer able to work fully. Therefore, I stitched the country together using the fastest option. The restoration of the army, industry and sustainable government was carried out without him.
      He did what he could.
      In addition, he launched the process of developing education at all levels (starting with universities and research institutes).
      He began to provide the people with unprecedented social guarantees that have survived to this day. In response to this, the West was forced to develop the same guarantees at home. Exactly - in response, later.
      In the same, last year, 1922. The international isolation of Soviet Russia was broken - the Treaty of Rapallo with Germany. A precedent has been created. The agreement was concluded quietly. When the arrogant Saxons found out, they scared the Germans to such an extent that they ran to our delegation and asked: “maybe we can win back?” Our people answered that “if she died, she died,” there would be no reversing.
      And also the NEP, a very controversial and risky move. Also from lack of time.
      It was all very difficult. They just forgot about it. They completely forgot history. Quite recent.
      1. RUR
        -1
        24 January 2024 14: 35
        Treaty of Rapallo with Germany

        - violated the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles, marking the beginning of the remilitarization of Germany - this and the Protocol with the Pact led to WWII... - very wise and far-sighted decisions were made, taking into account the consequences for the USSR
        1. 0
          24 January 2024 15: 18
          But at the same time, it gave us the opportunity to rapidly develop our industry.
          Otherwise, we would have faced the war unarmed and five years earlier.
          The whole West developed industry for us together.
          But we didn’t sign the Treaty of Versailles, what questions do we have...
          1. RUR
            0
            24 January 2024 16: 22
            Industry in the USSR is mainly the USA, it’s true that the treaty was not signed, but now there are a lot of loud cries that WWII is the merit of the USA, Poland, the West, etc.... - however, it looks ridiculous
  3. +1
    23 January 2024 20: 29
    We live in a time when right-wing forces determine the fate of humanity. The left forces lost their orientation after the loss of the proletariat. There is no need to expect anything good. Nationalism is thriving everywhere. This is a direct path to confrontation. Without this, the right-wing forces cannot live. This is their dope. They are hampered by their own activities in relation to young people, who do not want to admit anything other than their own egoism. Perhaps I’ll add something later.
  4. +4
    23 January 2024 20: 40
    Unfortunately, the majority of even those over 44 do not understand the disastrous nature of such a guarantor for the country. That is why we are where we are, and China is where China is. Anti-Soviet Russophobia from the guarantor of our permanent climbs to the last, even when one could remain silent and pass for smart: they did nothing except galoshes in the USSR, Lenin gave something to Ukraine... It should be clear to a thinking person that Lenin found those brilliant moves that made it possible, in the 5 years allotted to him, to win the war and reassemble the empire that had scattered into smoke.
    Instead of learning from the great ancestors and being proud of them, after a quarter-century of sitting, the current guarantor, several hundred kilometers from Moscow, is fighting with the Bandera moth, which has swollen to the entire horizon, with which he has such a common anti-communist denominator that outweighs all his schizophrenic patriotism
  5. 0
    23 January 2024 20: 53
    In Russia everyone is a caliph for an hour. Name at least one person who wouldn’t be “spit in the back.”
    This tradition.
  6. +3
    23 January 2024 21: 21
    Lenin cannot please the bourgeois authorities, the fight against which he dedicated his life. During the 5 years that he led the country, Lenin actually created it anew and laid the foundations for its development, future victories and achievements. But Lenin still wrote a lot. He left behind a rich theoretical legacy. Lenin and Stalin are like a bone in the throat of the current rulers. After all, almost everything great that happened to Russia in the XNUMXth century is connected with their names. It was under the leadership of these two people that the USSR (actually Russia) became a superpower, the first representative of which flew into space. The current ones don’t have much to boast about, and that’s what probably infuriates them. They tried to land a probe on the Moon unsuccessfully. We still live by Lenin's legacy. Lenin even introduced a federal form of government. It would be interesting to see if Putin had been in Lenin’s place in those days, how he would have acted. Lenin is certainly a genius and we should be proud that our country gave the world such a person. Before criticizing Lenin, let's admit that most of us, with rare exceptions, are descendants of workers and peasants, poor white-collar workers of some kind. And if it weren’t for the achievements of the October Revolution, we would now be working as laborers somewhere, and Putin would hardly have risen to the head of state.
  7. 0
    23 January 2024 21: 35
    The fact that Lenin was the greatest politician cannot be denied. In addition, he created a whole teaching and many works that are still relevant today. And China has reached its present heights, largely due to the fact that it adheres to his teachings. There probably haven’t been any politicians of this rank since. It’s just that some things spelled out in his works, whether we like it or not, are the laws of life, and some terms, for example “comrade,” are still used in the army. “Mister” somehow didn’t stick.
    1. +1
      24 January 2024 12: 21
      Quote: Pro100
      China has reached today's heights largely due to the fact that it adheres to its teachings

      China has reached today's heights not thanks to the behests of grandfather Ilyich, but thanks to the efforts of grandfather Kissinger and Western companies, which essentially carried out the modern industrialization of China at the end of the twentieth century.
      1. 0
        24 January 2024 13: 43
        Grandfather Kissenger tried everywhere, in India and Pakistan and many other places, but for some reason China was ahead...
      2. RUR
        0
        24 January 2024 16: 28
        yeah, they took... themselves to one place - now they don’t really understand what to do with China... the Jewish genius of Kissinger... you can’t say anything else here...
  8. +3
    23 January 2024 22: 13
    Well, Imperialism is imperialism everywhere.
    Both the GDP and the capitalists alike hate him and flirt with his memory, and they alike send flowers to Yeltsin’s grave...
  9. +2
    24 January 2024 06: 52
    Frankly speaking, I used to think that with such a large country, it doesn’t matter what the social system is. But the commercialism of the powers that be dashed my hopes. The uncontrolled power of these people leads society to very negative things. They simply don’t care about politics. For the sake of personal gain, they can direct a default against the union state. And all together they lower the intelligence of themselves and the citizens of our country.
  10. +3
    24 January 2024 10: 44
    Lenin did not seize power in Russia.
    He raised it from the ground, from the mud, where tsarism, the liberal intelligentsia, together with the church and the provisional government trampled it.
    He saved the collapse and death of Russia.
    He gave the country and people an idea, a meaning to life.
    What can today's government give, what idea? Minimum wage and a meager pension at 65?
    And demands that people also give birth for these handouts?
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. +1
    29 January 2024 07: 54
    Lenin is the head. Our people silence the teachings of Marx and Lenin because they fear the specter of communism like fire. And China is not afraid and the second economy in the world. Although, when the USSR flew into space, China cooked cast iron in clay ovens.
  13. 0
    2 February 2024 00: 42
    The Russian Empire was destroyed (more precisely: BROUGHT to the beginning - landslide destructive processes!) by the then Judas-oligarchs, liberal democrats of the provisional government, direct traitors - Russian generals of the highest command level, who arrested the Commander-in-Chief at the height of the war...
    The Bolsheviks, at that time, were hanging around in prisons, hard labor, abroad... Many of them no longer believed in the possible and imminent victory of socialist ideas in a backward, monarchical, semi-feudal country... - THESE ARE OBVIOUS AND PROVEN FACTS!

    ...But it was the Bolsheviks who had to SAVE THE EMPIRE... ...Providence decreed it!..
    That they, yes with mistakes, and at the cost of huge sacrifices, but, on the whole, PERFORMED VERY SUCCESSFULLY...

    But in that incredible Historical Time Trouble, in the Real Hostile Environment, in a country lying in ruins after many years of wars (By the way, the Bloody Civil War was not unleashed by the Bolsheviks, but by the same Russian generals and Okhvitser white scum and bastards and rabble, who, for the “English uniform”, “French shoulder straps”, “Japanese tobacco” - and for once again beating up the lower ranks with impunity - wrote off her Motherland for Western masters...),
    with a semi-literate population and total rampant banditry of all stripes and types (from “green” to banal crime), etc., etc. - was it possible to avoid these miscalculations and mistakes, yes, often bloody ones? ..
    Once again: It was the Party created by Lenin - the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) - that SAVED and RESTORED the Great Empire... Even if not within the same borders...

    And it’s ugly, after listening to various semi-literate “advisers”, to kick DEAD LIONS like a jackal!..
    (Where does he even get them?!)

    WELL DONE CHINESE:

    ...The world has become a better place thanks to Lenin. As a great revolutionary and labor leader of the 20th century, he changed history. The October Revolution of 1917 under the leadership of Lenin opened the door to a new era. Even a hundred years after his death, the wave caused by the October Revolution continues. Today, a century later, the world revolution is still developing: sometimes progressing, sometimes stalling, sometimes spreading like a storm.

    Without the October Revolution, the idea of ​​working class leaders and ordinary workers to create a new world would still be a fantasy. Without the October Revolution, Asian countries might never have awakened, Africa's colonial yoke might never have been broken, and Latin America might have remained under European colonial rule. The wave of anti-colonialism, anti-racism and anti-imperialism has already begun, their appearance does not require any reason, and they will definitely appear on this planet full of oppression and pain...

    ...Excellent and Wisely said!..