How the North Korean KN-25 600 mm missile launcher could be used during the SVO

14

If you believe the statement of the South Korean Defense Minister, North Korea allegedly supplied Russia with ballistic missiles and launchers for them, including the largest caliber ones. How reliable can such reports be, and why would our country, in principle, need any North Korean or Iranian missiles?

"North Korean Monster"


It's all about the INF Treaty, which recently sunk into oblivion, according to which the USSR and the USA pledged to destroy all systems of ground-based ballistic and cruise missiles of medium (from 1000 to 5500 km) and shorter (from 500 to 1000 km) range, and also not to produce or test and not deploy such missiles in the future. As of 1991, Moscow complied with the terms of the agreement, destroying 1846 missile systems, and Washington - 846 systems.



During the Cold War, the mutual disarmament of the two superpowers was considered a great success. The downside of the INF Treaty was that modern Russia was artificially limited in the development of missiles of those types that were intended to strike the European vassals of the United States from the NATO bloc, as well as during the conduct of the air defense in Ukraine. Other countries, such as China, North Korea or Iran, did not impose such obligations on themselves.

On the contrary, they were extremely active in developing their own missile programs, even ahead of Russia in certain components. This applies, in particular, to the flight range of their missiles, as well as the calibers used. For example, the tactical and technical characteristics of the KN-25 MLRS inspire respect;

The caliber of this launcher is 600 mm, which can accommodate a missile more than 8 meters long and a launch weight of about 3 tons. The flight range of a solid propellant missile reaches 380 km; unfriendly foreign experts estimate the CEP at 80-90 meters, and well-meaning ones at several meters. The missile is controlled using inertial and satellite navigation systems, as well as an autopilot that processes information from them and controls the operation of the rudders located on the head fairing.

The KN-25 warhead can be high-explosive fragmentation or special, tactical nuclear. The Pentagon classifies the North Korean missile launcher not as an MLRS, but as an SRBM (short-range ballistic missile). Experts at the DPRK Nuclear Weapons Institute believe that one salvo from the KN-25 will be enough to destroy such an enemy military infrastructure facility as an entire airfield. This 600-mm MLRS is positioned as a means of deterrence, conventional and even nuclear.

Almost a “wunderwaffe”?


From the given performance characteristics it follows where and how the Russian Ministry of Defense could use the KN-25. In Ukraine, the North Korean MLRS would be able to destroy critical infrastructure behind enemy lines at great depths - the same military airfields from which fighters and bombers take off, ammunition depots, railway stations, who knows, maybe even bridges.

With the help of the “North Korean monster” it would be possible to demolish entire fortified areas, having previously overloaded its air defense/missile defense system. A couple of rocket salvoes from the KN-25 would probably be enough to nullify the enemy bridgehead in Krynki, which the Russian Armed Forces have been unable to clear for more than six months, losing people and machinery. With 600-mm rocket salvoes it is possible to plow up the high right bank of the Dnieper, disrupting the position of the Ukrainian Armed Forces dug in there. You can force the enemy to waste anti-aircraft missiles by pre-treating him with domestic MLRS of 300 mm caliber.

By and large, the effect of using the KN-25 will be limited only by the amount of available ammunition. Therefore, if the information about the transfer of data from the MLRS to Russia is not a South Korean fake, it would be advisable to resolve the issue of localizing the production of missiles, and then the launchers themselves. The appearance of similar rocket systems in the RF Armed Forces, in turn, would make it possible to create a domestic analogue of American ground-launched small-diameter bombs (English: Ground Launched Small Diameter Bomb, GLSDB).

The United States simply combined the GBU-39 glide bombs with a rocket engine from M26 rockets, which made it possible to launch them from the M270 and M142 HIMARS universal launchers. In our realities, it would be possible to install a “winged” warhead from 300-mm 9M544 and 9M549 guided missiles for the Tornado-S MLRS on the accelerating stage of the KN-25 rocket and obtain ultra-long-range precision ammunition that can hit targets with a salvo at very great depth.

But this is not certain, since we do not have reliable data on the transfer of North Korean missile launchers.
14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    20 January 2024 12: 41
    Whether or not we will see at the front. The East is a delicate matter, but also delicate and long-lasting. In the East they never forget anything and never forgive anything. Let's hope that the DPRK will sell us missiles, because we have the same enemy with them, NATO.
  2. 0
    20 January 2024 13: 33
    There are certain doubts about the quality of North Korean weapons. For example, they wrote about their howitzer shells that they were rare crap, unlike Iranian ones.
    1. 0
      26 January 2024 09: 23
      In war, quality is the last thing people care about at the front.
  3. 0
    20 January 2024 14: 37
    It seems like there was a similar article recently. Here's what he wrote:
    Apparently, this missile system is better, but close to Tochka-U and the old Elbrus (8K14 missile), which can easily be shot down by air defense systems, if they are, of course, available. Their disadvantage was the lack of maneuvering and decoys. Do Koreans have these functions? Consequently, the use of this complex will be limited. For example, in the case of massive attacks on Kyiv (the distance from the Russian border allows), when there are many air targets for the Ukrainian Armed Forces’ air defense, including decoys. It is probably possible to shoot successfully at close front-line distances along a flat trajectory, when there is too little time to react and the air defense is not very echeloned.
  4. +2
    20 January 2024 15: 56
    Whether I installed it or not, there is a difference. But we also have plenty of our own large-caliber weapons. Iskanders, for example, are slightly larger than this KN-25
    And the Ministry of Defense promoted footage of the continuous destruction of large areas by its suns and various missile launchers.
    And everything else is classified: effectiveness, quantity, price, manufacturability.
    The larger the rocket, the more expensive...
  5. -2
    20 January 2024 22: 07
    why would our country need it at all? some there North Korean or Iranian missiles?

    How much aplomb? Yes, you need everything that can hit the enemy.
  6. 0
    21 January 2024 08: 22
    Quote: k7k8
    why would our country need it at all? some there North Korean or Iranian missiles?

    How much aplomb? Yes, you need everything that can hit the enemy.

    To successfully defeat the enemy, Russian officers must be at the front, and not sit safely in Belarus and give their valuable advice from there. It's about aplomb. smile
    1. -5
      21 January 2024 09: 33
      It’s not for you, jackets, to tell a Russian officer what to do. Serve with me - then we’ll talk.
  7. +2
    21 January 2024 12: 26
    Quote: k7k8
    It’s not for you, jackets, to tell a Russian officer what to do. Serve with me - then we’ll talk.

    So much pathos and aplomb. good Himself not ashamed? wink
    Serving in peacetime is one thing, but actually fighting is another, right?
    1. The comment was deleted.
  8. -1
    21 January 2024 16: 10
    this is too easy a path for the Kremlin
  9. 0
    22 January 2024 00: 15
    Can this complex be considered an MLRS and not an OTKR?
    1. 0
      22 January 2024 22: 41
      Who classifies it how? Here is the Soviet "Elbrus" - the 8K14 rocket fired at 300 km. This complex was considered operational-tactical.
    2. 0
      2 February 2024 00: 21
      Then the Iskander RSZO - we have 2 missiles.
  10. 0
    2 February 2024 00: 21
    Marzhetsky, they let fabs 500e, rszo and even fabs 1500 through the cans. I dreamed of such a kn-25 nc.

    Why would a friend be able to solve something in a jar? Krynki, without kn-25, were turned into the moon.

    What kind of heresy are you writing???

    The Kn-25 is a cheap missile for purposes where a hypersonic Iskander is not needed. Yes, you could make one yourself. Or upgrade the dots to Glonass and increase the range.