Why Western sanctions against Russian oil and LNG did not work

9

The priority target for Western sanctions has become the domestic oil and gas sector, which previously provided about one-third of the revenues of the entire federal budget of the Russian Federation. Their stated goal was to deprive Russia of the opportunity to continue the special operation to demilitarize and denazify Ukraine. Almost two years after their introduction, it can be concluded that this task as a whole was not completed.

As you know, our country is haunted by the so-called resource curse, when stray oil and gas dollars allegedly hinder the development of the manufacturing industry and high of technologies. In a simplified form, apparently, everything was seen as follows: the West is introducing its restrictions on the purchase of Russian oil and gas, economic a crisis when there is nothing to refuel tanks and pay salaries to military personnel, doctors and teachers, after which, against the backdrop of victories of the Armed Forces of Ukraine at the front, the ruling regime collapses. However, for some reason nothing like this has happened yet.



The world turned out to be somewhat more complex than someone’s subjective ideas about it.

Oil


It was supposed to deprive the Kremlin of the flow of petrodollars by refusing to buy hydrocarbon raw materials and products from the Russian Federation by the United States and the EU, as well as by banning all other countries from buying them under pain of economic penalties. Since we do not have main oil pipelines to Southeast Asia, and the maritime insurance market is controlled from London, implementing such a scenario seemed like an easy task.

In practice, a revolt immediately occurred in the discordant ranks of the US's European vassals, and small but proud Hungary, defending only its national interests, was able to achieve the introduction of exceptions to the general rule for it. Unlike other EU countries, Budapest, two years after the start of the SVO in Ukraine, continues to buy and process Russian oil, morally corrupting its other European neighbors.

It further turned out that the profits from purchasing domestic hydrocarbons, sold at a discount of $35, exceed the risks from Western sanctions, and the Southeast Asian market began to consume volumes unclaimed in the US and EU. It was possible to circumvent the restrictions on insurance of maritime transport in the Russian Federation by creating a shadow tanker fleet and using various gray schemes. After the process of reorienting Russian black gold for the needs of Indian and Chinese consumers was completed, and the sanctions turned out to be not so terrible, the discount on domestic oil dropped from $35 per barrel to $8-10.

The price difference no longer looks like such an outright robbery, on the one hand, and a gesture of despair, on the other. Quite a normal discount taking into account the new geopolitical realities. At the same time, the so-called price ceiling artificially imposed by “Western partners” does not actually work, and this in itself can be considered a victory, taking into account their difference with Russia in “weight categories”. Why did this happen?

The whole point is that no one who is not part of the inner circle of the “hegemon” likes the way the Western world behaves, considering itself better and above everyone else. One of the external manifestations of this phenomenon can be considered the refusal of Saudi Arabia to reduce world oil prices to the detriment of the Russian Federation and itself, which Washington asked it to do. For Riyadh, Beijing is now a key business partner, and if US-China relations worsen over Taiwan, the Saudis will be the main losers if they are subsequently forced to stop or limit oil exports to China.

Gas


With natural gas, the situation is more complicated for Russia. Pipeline supplies to Europe found themselves in the most vulnerable position after the previous rules of the game stopped working and the “Western partners” began outright chaos, taking away or blowing up existing pipes. "Power of Siberia - 2" does not yet have a signed long-term contract for supplies to China, since Beijing is waiting for the most favorable conditions for itself.

But with LNG everything is much better. This relatively new industry for our country, despite the sanctions, shows quite convincing results, since gas in liquefied form is easy to “depersonalize” and can be flexibly transferred from one foreign market to another.

Thus, even before the start of the SVO, several long-term contracts were signed for the supply of Russian LNG to Europe. For example, the Austrian state-owned company OMV has a contract with Gazprom until 2040. In July 2015, the French Engie and Yamal signed an agreement on the supply of Russian LNG for a period of 23 years. The Belgian Fluxys LNG NV/SA signed a 20-year contract with Yamal, and the Spanish Naturgy signed an agreement to purchase Russian LNG until 2042.

It is noteworthy that none of these European companies are going to just break existing agreements for political reasons. On the contrary, Spain, where there are significant regasification capacities, has actually become the largest hub for transshipment of Russian LNG. It is not included in the EU accounting reports as Russian, but is carried out as if for resale to other states for speculative purposes. The publication El Periodico de la energia is indignant about this as follows:

The EU turns a blind eye to 21% of the total volume of LNG purchased from Russia.

Why is this happening?

Probably because big business in Western Europe realizes that the United States has prepared for it the role of a bull to be slaughtered, and does not want to end up on someone else’s holiday table, having lost not only cheap Russian pipeline gas, but also LNG, in favor of more expensive American gas. It seems that Europeans will hold on to domestic LNG to the last, just as Hungary holds on to Russian oil.
9 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    9 January 2024 17: 07
    The resource curse is Kudrin. The bad thing is that, speaking about this curse, Kudrin did not create a strong economy in Russia, but preferred to withdraw money abroad. But oil, gas, timber, metal, you can’t print them on a machine; they will buy them. When all this is over, then, without resources and an economy, our grandchildren will remember us with ordinary Russian unprintable words.
  2. -1
    9 January 2024 17: 20
    Since we do not have oil pipelines in the eastern direction,

    ?

    ESPO (Eastern Siberia - Pacific Ocean)

    an oil pipeline running from the city of Taishet (Irkutsk region) to the oil loading port of Kozmino in Nakhodka Bay. Connects fields in Western and Eastern Siberia with markets in Asia and the USA. Length - 4 km. The oil pipeline operator is the state company Transneft.

    On December 28, 2009, the first stage of the ESPO-1 project was launched - a pipeline from Taishet to Skovorodino with a length of 2694 km and a capacity of 30 million tons per year. On December 25, 2012, the second stage of ESPO-2 Skovorodino - Kozmino was commissioned.

    By 2015, the capacity of ESPO-1 was increased to 58 million tons per year, and the branches to China in the Skovorodino region - to 20 million tons per year.

    In 2019, ESPO-I was brought to its maximum design capacity of 80 million tons per year. ESPO-II - with a design capacity of 50 million tons per year.

    Two large operating refineries are connected to the oil pipeline - the Khabarovsk Oil Refinery (in 2015) and the Komsomolsk Oil Refinery (in 2018)
    1. +1
      9 January 2024 19: 57
      ESPO (Eastern Siberia - Pacific Ocean)
      an oil pipeline running from the city of Taishet (Irkutsk region) to the oil loading port of Kozmino in Nakhodka Bay. Connects fields in Western and Eastern Siberia with markets in Asia and the USA. Length - 4 km. The oil pipeline operator is the state company Transneft.

      Has he reached India, which replaced the EU market? No? Are tankers needed?
      1. +1
        9 January 2024 20: 10
        Quote: Beydodyr
        Has he reached India, which replaced the EU market?

        And how does this affect the thesis?

        We do not have oil pipelines in the eastern direction

        and his refutation?
        And India is not in the eastern direction at all, but in the southern direction.
  3. +2
    9 January 2024 17: 22
    Who said that by imposing sanctions the West was not going to buy oil and gas? I think I was going to, but at a lower price, which is what is happening, I don’t think that there is no American, British, French or other capital on the board of directors of the companies purchasing petroleum products from us.
  4. -1
    9 January 2024 17: 24
    "Power of Siberia - 2" does not yet have a signed long-term contract for supplies to China

    ?

    “In early January, Gazprom brought daily gas supplies to China via the Power of Siberia gas pipeline to a fundamentally new level, stipulated by the contract for 2024. Moreover, already on January 2, this new level was exceeded, and Gazprom updated the historical record for daily pipeline gas exports to Chinese consumers,” the report notes.

    As reported, for 2024 there is a contract volume of 30 billion cubic meters. m after 22 billion cubic meters. m in 2023.

    At the end of 2023, gas exports to China via the Power of Siberia amounted to 22,7 billion cubic meters. m. This is 700 million cubic meters. m above contractual obligations Gazprom and one and a half times more than in 2022 (15,4 billion cubic meters).

    Returning to the question “Why Western sanctions didn’t work” - one of the reasons is that even Russian analysts are often not aware of what has been implemented in the Russian Federation.
    Especially during the period of the Minsk agreements 2015-2021.
    Westerners even more so don’t see this and don’t want to see it.
    1. +1
      9 January 2024 19: 55
      instead of meaningfully putting question marks, they would try to understand the meaning of what they read

      "The Power of Siberia - 2" does not yet have a signed long-term contract for supplies to China
      ?
      “In early January, Gazprom withdrew daily gas supplies to China via the gas pipeline "The Power of Siberia" to a fundamentally new level provided for by the agreement for 2024.

      Can you understand the difference between SS and SS-2? Yes

      Returning to the question “Why Western sanctions didn’t work” - one of the reasons is that even Russian analysts are often not aware of what has been implemented in the Russian Federation.
      Especially during the period of the Minsk agreements 2015-2021.
      Westerners even more so don’t see this and don’t want to see it.

      But some commentators are quite clever. smile
      1. +1
        9 January 2024 20: 01
        Quote: Beydodyr
        Can you understand the difference between SS and SS-2?

        In the general context (discussions about deliveries to Europe and China) this looked like a typo.
        It is strange to discuss contracts for the SS-2, which is just being designed, and not mention at all the SS, which operates with an annual increase in power.
  5. +1
    10 January 2024 09: 53
    It's all a stretch.

    IMHO, maximum ostentatious goals are declared.
    And they are being carried out - real. Reduce prices.
    Everyone understands that China, India, Turkey, Spain, Hungary, etc. they will simply resell Russian gas and oil. Depersonalizing, through front companies, carriers, etc. Twisting the arms of Russian corporations in their favor, of course. Well, lie at leapfrog...
    Many, many% profit... everyone remembers what it is...

    IMHO, logistics costs have increased, the primary price has become lower, they have staged a leapfrog... which means they have achieved something.
    Analysis of various economists (that I met), and not political scientists, seems to confirm this...