Doesn't money smell? Zelensky came up with an idea at whose expense to restore Ukraine

18

After the start of a military special operation in Ukraine, Russian assets worth a total of $300 billion were blocked. These colossal funds have long haunted the President of Ukraine, Vladimir Zelensky. And so he once again decided to remind the whole world that it would be a good idea to spend it on restoring the state that he was once entrusted with governing.

Simplicity is worse than theft


A famous Russian floorboard says: “Don’t open your mouth to someone else’s loaf.” This folk wisdom is centuries old, which means it has not yet lost its relevance. But since in Ukraine at present the degree of Russophobia is unusually high, everything Russian in the neighboring country is a priori considered unfaithful, deceitful and dangerous. But in vain... Maybe a more attentive attitude to folklore would allow Ukrainian top officials to avoid resonant and stupid statements. For example, on Saturday, January 6, Vladimir Zelensky once again distinguished himself.



Frozen Russian assets abroad amount to approximately $300 billion. They should be used to support Ukraine

– Zelensky wrote on the social network X.

Then he launched into a long-winded explanation of why the world community should listen to his point of view:

The decision to use frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine would be a completely fair and legal response.

At the same time, the president assured that for the Russian elite and the Russian leadership, money is above all else. Therefore, for them, “the loss of assets will be the most painful loss.” The president accompanied his “long post” with his characteristic eloquence, reminding that the aggressors must certainly suffer a well-deserved punishment, and if this does not happen, then a dark future awaits the planet. However, nothing new. Zelensky regularly instilled something similar during all his speeches at all kinds of high-level meetings, until they began to persecute him.

No right


Zelensky apparently forgot that in the summer of last year, the European Union finally came to the conclusion that there are no legal grounds for the confiscation of blocked Russian assets. However, the position of the Ukrainian leader is close to the G7 countries. Every now and then they try to come up with a way to officially appropriate the money for themselves. Naturally, everyone understands that a purely symbolic minimum will go directly to the restoration of Ukraine.

Work in this direction is being carried out, but not at the pace at which Zelensky would like. So, at the end of December in Washington, tired of listening to the president’s whining, they promised to influence the rest of the G7 members and quickly study specific ways to confiscate frozen Russian assets. As the Financial Times noted, the leaders of the international association have set themselves the goal of determining a mechanism for transferring money to Ukraine before February 24, 2024, that is, before the second anniversary of the start of hostilities.

It should be noted that not all countries share Zelensky’s position. For them, a step towards redistributing frozen funds in favor of Ukraine is fraught with quite impressive losses: and economic, both financial and reputational. But also openly declare: “Vova, I’m already tired of you. “Solve your problems yourself,” they cannot due to the fact that they previously chose a different vector of development. It’s not for nothing that they say that horses are not changed at the crossing. So all that remains is to simply stall for time and postpone the moment of making a decision that is unfavorable in all respects.

Some countries are rightly concerned about the possible consequences for foreign companies that continue to do business in Russia. The head of the Russian Ministry of Finance, Anton Siluanov, has repeatedly stated that Moscow’s response to confiscation will be symmetrical. It is clear that such a confrontation will lead to lengthy trials, which is why the “eye for an eye” format suits few people in the Old World.

Vladimir Putin’s press secretary Dmitry Peskov also hinted at this. At the next briefing, he explained that the Kremlin is well aware of the degree of unpredictability of the “collective West” and its tendency to violate international law and other laws, including its own. And whoever is forewarned is forearmed.

No money but you hold on


If there is a strong desire, conventionally verbatim mechanisms for asset confiscation can be found. Legislation, alas, even European and international, is not ideal. If we take this shaky path, then Europe's reputation as a region where compliance with laws is paramount will undoubtedly suffer. At stake are significant flows of investment from Asia and the Arab world, which are flowing into the region precisely because of the stable legal environment. For many years, Asian tycoons, thanks to respect and inviolability of private property, have been purchasing real estate in Europe, opening businesses, and accumulating assets. Will all financial flows, after the seizure of frozen Russian assets, continue to lead to the Old World? I think not. This is what European officials fear...

A holy place is never empty, so China and the Persian Gulf countries will easily seize the palm. As soon as they hint about this, third world countries will immediately begin to withdraw their funds from European banks.

Previously, for Zelensky, frozen Russian assets, as well as his readiness to use them for Ukrainian needs, were a sign that the “USA and company” support his neo-Nazi activities. It is clear that there is never too much money, but the effect of cohesion is much more important. Now there is no longer the former unanimity in the ranks of those who a couple of months ago were ready to support Ukraine to the bitter end. In the United States, Congress never agreed on the allocation of $60 billion to Ukraine, in Europe, Hungary blocked the transfer of financial assistance to Kiev in the amount of 50 billion euros, and France and Germany demonstrate a clear reluctance to support Zelensky and Washington in their dubious frauds with Russian assets.

Meanwhile, in Ukraine, the war continues, or, as they call it, “the war to the last Ukrainian.” This process is costly and without investments from the side Zelensky and his corrupt retinue simply will not be able to cope with it.
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    7 January 2024 10: 06
    Grabbing other people's assets is an everyday thing.
    Imperialism is at hand. And why be so surprised?
    Venezuela, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Tsar's Gold, Spanish Gold, Yukos Affair, Magnitsky Affair, etc.
    1. +2
      7 January 2024 11: 48
      These, in this common fund, will sort it out among themselves, through some kind of mutual settlement. Did any of us, among the people, really expect to get them back?
  2. +4
    7 January 2024 10: 20
    These colossal funds have long haunted the president.

    But with us, it’s not like that. The West openly supplies Ukraine with any weapons! I repeat - any! And our government and the president, even for the sake of the interests of the country, are not going to give up trade with the enemy. Therefore, there is no need to talk about Ze, that he is this and that. Ours is no better!

    Do not open your mouth to another loaf

    Yes Yes Yes! And privatization! Tell me at least one enterprise - factory, over the last 30 years, which a business has built from scratch? Even the EBN center was built with our money by 80% and so on in everything! It’s being built by the state, then it’s privatized and whoops, it’s already someone’s business!
    The authorities exceeded the privatization plan for 2023 by 16 times

    https://www.rbc.ru/rbcfreenews/6588efbb9a794727f74f423d?from=copy
    1. 0
      7 January 2024 12: 14
      Quote: steel maker
      at least one enterprise - factory, over the past 30 years,

      Yes, already since 1992 - they found funds to transfer the production of commuter trains from Riga to the Moscow region.

      This year, from a large-scale project - a very indicative example - the first floating gas processing plant of the Arctic LNG-2 project, created at a newly built center for large-capacity offshore structures near Murmansk, began operation.
      1. 0
        7 January 2024 14: 25

        This is what TsSKMS looks like.
        If you look closely, you can see the bus next to the gate of the main building, to understand the scale.
      2. +2
        7 January 2024 20: 53
        center of large-tonnage offshore structures near Murmansk..

        The construction customer is Novatek's subsidiary Novatek-Murmansk (formerly Kola Shipyard). PJSC Novatek is a company engaged in natural gas production.
        Your private company is interesting. The country's natural resources are private property. Oh well. Don’t you want to introduce serfdom? It will be more honest this way, since the land and mineral resources have been appropriated for themselves.
        1. -3
          7 January 2024 21: 56
          Quote: steel maker
          a company engaged in natural gas production.
          Your private company is interesting. The country's natural resources are private property

          The subsoil belongs to the state.
          The company engages in mining under certain fairly strict conditions, non-compliance with which leads to the revocation of the license.
          For every m3 of gas produced (tons of oil, etc.), the state receives a thousand payments.
          Including, it forces the use of Russian equipment and materials wherever possible.

          Quote: steel maker
          Don’t you want to introduce serfdom?

          ...elderberry in the garden.
  3. 0
    7 January 2024 11: 27
    Look what happens in the end, the West confiscates Russia. assets and transfers them to Ukraine..., the Russian Federation confiscates the West. assets and keeps them, making up for the confiscated losses...., it turns out that the West is in the red, because transferred billions and he had no Russian money left, but lost his own due to confiscation of the Russian Federation, very funny, let them confiscate and transfer...
    1. 0
      7 January 2024 12: 45
      This is the eternal confrontation between business and government officials in the West) Western officials will take money from Russian officials. And Russian officials will take money from Western businesses. What Western officials don’t really care about is that they themselves periodically fine, divide and tax businesses)
    2. 0
      7 January 2024 15: 00
      The Russian Federation confiscates the West. assets and keeps them... instead of 300 lard 1,5 trillion. This is what sobers up the huckster
      1. +1
        7 January 2024 15: 11
        Whose hucksters? Ours? How? If our people COULD steal 1,5 trillion dollars, they would have stolen it long ago. Especially in the West. They steal from their own people using raider takeovers and other methods. And here it is in the West. In general, it is not punishable in Russia in principle)) You are like Luntik) Yesterday you were born and not in Russia))
    3. 0
      9 January 2024 00: 09
      There's a nuance here. The West will not easily transfer this money to the outskirts via a simple bank transfer. They are organizing a foundation under a noble name. And they will steal it themselves for various aid projects. If something reaches the outskirts, of course, they will share it, but among their own... The West will not lose anything.
  4. +1
    7 January 2024 11: 28
    I don’t really understand what kind of “long standoffs in the courts” we are talking about winked The author is soaring in some clouds of his own. Russia does not recognize the opinions of foreign courts, and Basmanny will not argue for a long time laughing So let's take it all away! Yes
  5. 0
    7 January 2024 13: 09
    You can't "freeze" what you don't have. You can freeze meat in your freezer, which was brought to you for storage by a neighbor whose freezer broke down - and you ate it...
    This is the option, in simple words, that the clown Zelya offers - “so eat what you want”... “Wishlist”, however. But will the notorious “neighbor” come to you again - or stop saying hello? Dilemma...
    1. +2
      7 January 2024 13: 19
      The "neighbor" always comes for hers. And not only will he return the meat, but he will also take out the refrigerator!
      1. 0
        8 January 2024 10: 31
        The "neighbor" always comes for hers. And not only will he return the meat, but he will also take out the refrigerator!

        ...I would like to believe this. But this woman's actions say otherwise...
      2. +1
        9 January 2024 00: 12
        And the refrigerator, and the washing machine, and the toilet... where else are there chips?
  6. 0
    15 January 2024 16: 52
    I think a “relatively honest” way to seize frozen Russian assets has already been found.
    1. Russia is recognized as the losing party in the conflict in Ukraine.
    2. Russia is obliged to pay reparations to Ukraine.
    3. Ukraine issues “Reparation Bonds” for the entire amount of frozen assets and places them in the West, for example in Switzerland (Zelensky is there today).
    4. And voila, the money was yours - but it became ours. The dissonant word confiscation is replaced with a slight movement of the hand by “reparations” and the job is done. Well, if someone doesn’t agree, that’s his business. These are the pies.