On the birthday of Stepan Bandera, the Russian Armed Forces destroyed the Roman Shukhevych Museum in the Lviv region

23

Pilots of the Russian Aerospace Forces presented a unique gift to Ukrainian nationalists. On New Year's Eve they hit the Roman Shukhevych Museum in the Lviv region. It is noteworthy that this happened on the birthday of another prominent Ukronazi, Stepan Bandera.

Judging by the footage published online by the authorities of the Lviv region, the museum was struck with pinpoint precision. By the way, it is possible that this building was used by militants of the Kyiv regime for military purposes. Despite all their “sympathy” for Ukrainian nationalists, Russian pilots would hardly waste ammunition on a historical building.



On the birthday of Stepan Bandera, the Russian Armed Forces destroyed the Roman Shukhevych Museum in the Lviv region

However, it is impossible to exclude the possibility that the night blow was still a gift. In addition to the Roman Shukhevych Museum, Russian ammunition also hit the university building in Dublyany. It was at this university that Stepan Bandera, who later became the leader of Ukrainian nationalists, studied a century ago.



Let us recall that Stepan Bandera was liquidated by Soviet intelligence agent Bogdan Stashinsky in 1959 in Munich. The KGB officer had been preparing for this action for several months. For the liquidation of the leader of Ukrainian nationalists, Stashinsky received the Order of the Red Banner of Battle and permission to marry his longtime girlfriend, the East German Inga Pohl.
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    1 January 2024 12: 39
    And it is right.
  2. +3
    1 January 2024 13: 10
    I would be glad to hear about the destruction of Lvov along with the museum of this scum...
    1. -2
      1 January 2024 13: 33
      It’s not about Lviv as a city, or the museum as an institution, or the city’s residents. But the point is the ideology of Nazism and its bearers. And only them. And everything else is the property of humanity. Lviv is a beautiful city, and the museum is needed for people to remember. This must not happen again
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        1 January 2024 15: 02
        to remember what? Volyn massacre, Khatyn and Babi Yar? for this, a memorial to the victims is enough, but not to the executioner and murderer
      3. 0
        2 January 2024 23: 36
        Quote: In passing
        and the museum is needed for people to remember.

        By this logic, a Hitler museum is then needed. I will say right away that I do not share this logic.
    2. +7
      1 January 2024 15: 05
      It is not Lviv that needs to be destroyed, but the houses of the most odious personalities of the Kyiv regime and ideologues and propagandists. There are cottage villages around Kyiv (like our “rublevka”), so they should target them purposefully, where the Kiev elite live on their property. But first, recognize the Kiev regime as terrorist, and “have a short conversation” with terrorists. At the very beginning of the 2nd Chechen campaign, missiles were fired at mansions in Grozny belonging to Basayev and other terrorist leaders. Then the effect was more propaganda, because in reality the terrorists were not there. But what! Everyone immediately understood the hint that whoever was in their place would be “washed in the toilet.” Now we also need to make it clear: whoever serves the terrorist regime will be destroyed, and his house (apartment) will be attacked by weapons. Serving a terrorist regime must be unprofitable and dangerous! Yes, their relatives and friends (formally innocent) may suffer, but who, for example, in the USA or Israel bothers about this? So we need to “take off the white gloves” and destroy the Nazi regime in the person of its leaders and their accomplices “for real.” In this regard, the blow to the Shukhevych Museum is a step in the right direction, because the symbols of the Nazi regime are being destroyed, this is a blow to the “very heart” and hits the sacred places of Ukrainian Nazism.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +5
    1 January 2024 13: 57
    Good news from Lvov!!!! More of these!
    I’m already 80 years old...I still want to see the capitulation of Banderrostan!!!
    1. -2
      1 January 2024 14: 09
      yet another and perhaps not the last. they capitulated twice in the last century alone.
  5. -4
    1 January 2024 14: 07
    Well, then we need to take out T. Shevchenko’s museums too. It was he who was the ideological inspirer of Bandera.
  6. -2
    1 January 2024 14: 37
    Costs of decommunization. After all, what is Shukhevych famous for? Yes, only because he fought against the “Bolsheviks”. How can we erase communists from the memory of the people, but without affecting Shukhevych? After all, then it will turn out that he fought against something that does not exist and did not exist. So, the cynical Banderas still have to say thank you for eliminating the contradictions in their edited version of history! laughing
    1. +4
      1 January 2024 15: 01
      what are Bandera and UPA people known for??? the execution at Babi Yar, the burning of Khatyn and other lesser-known settlements, the Volyn massacre...

      Is THIS what the war with the “communists” is??? they were doing poorly fighting the COMMUNISTS...the only battle between the Galicia division and the Red Army ended in the defeat of the Ukrainian nationalists...

      oh yes, these “heroes” meanly killed Vatutin from around the corner...
      1. +3
        1 January 2024 20: 19
        Quote: Nikolai Volkov
        these “heroes” meanly killed Vatutin from around the corner

        And Kuznetsova
      2. 0
        2 January 2024 14: 42
        Everything you listed is, of course, true. But this is not what neo-Nazis are telling the younger generation about, namely that Shukhevych fought against the communists. At the same time, they are carefully trying to erase these same communists from history. Absolutely not understanding that they are thereby devaluing their “idol” Yes
    2. 0
      2 January 2024 00: 05
      Costs of decommunization. After all, what is Shukhevych famous for? Yes, only because he fought against the “Bolsheviks”. How can we erase communists from the memory of the people, but without affecting Shukhevych? After all, then it will turn out that he fought against something that does not exist and did not exist. So, the cynical Banderas still have to say thank you for eliminating the contradictions in their edited version of history!

      too ornate and confusing - explain your words.
  7. -1
    1 January 2024 14: 43
    The head physician of a hospital in a small Ukrainian town was asked:
    - But it’s true that it can inexpensively help you avoid the army, the trenches, the front...
    To which the head physician of a small Ukrainian town responded with contempt:
    - They're making a mistake!
    - They are brazenly lying!!
    - They brazenly lie that it’s inexpensive!!!
  8. +3
    1 January 2024 14: 58
    If I understand correctly, this is the same house where Shukhevych was liquidated by the valiant soldiers of the MGB and VV.

    yes, our ancestors knew how to “work” with “respected partners”... it would be nice for today’s people to take an example...
  9. +3
    1 January 2024 18: 47
    To be honest, I am not satisfied with the result of the response for the shelling of Belgorod.
    At the site of Shukhevych’s house, the hotel in Kharkov and the university building, only craters and brick dust should have remained. And everywhere there are walls of buildings.
    I wish the retribution was complete.
  10. +1
    1 January 2024 22: 26
    Now they will hit museums.
  11. +1
    1 January 2024 23: 59
    On the birthday of Stepan Bandera, the Russian Armed Forces destroyed the Roman Shukhevych Museum in the Lviv region

    Good news, this should have been done a long time ago, I don’t understand why it was only granted now.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. +1
    2 January 2024 00: 12
    In this context, the entire prehistory of the revival of Banderaism and Nazism as a state ideology in Ukraine is interesting. There were many questions about how our special services had not seen since 14 how the CIA and MI6 were instilling fascism in Ukraine at the state level, forcing the Kiev regime, which at that time was still in shock at such turns, to elevate the Ukrainian Nazis into the ideological basis of the state. Couldn't they really shoot Nazi leaders and somehow influence these processes through the same corruption and intelligence services?

    This project of the CIA and MI6, which had only one goal - to create such a ukro-fascist monster in Ukraine that a civil war became inevitable and Russian military intervention, too, which was needed as a basis for demonizing Russia and destroying its economy through sanctions, was already possible then seemed to our intelligence services as a basis for completely different purposes. Perhaps it was already clear then that the ugly fascist state that was killing Russians in eastern Ukraine would not create any moral or other objections in Russian society if it had to be ended by military means. It is also unlikely to expect condemnation in the world of a military operation against such a monster. It was this ugly monster that was the basis that could make possible Russian military intervention in the affairs of Ukraine, which was becoming a security threat due to the encroachments of the West.

    It is quite possible that the CIA and Mi-6 were confident in the genius of their plan and hardly imagined that it would become an epic fiasco, that they themselves, with their brilliant thoughts and deeds, would create something that would become the basis for the revival of Russia, the breakdown of the world order and the complete perhaps the Western world. It’s still interesting, which of these two was the author of the creation of fascists in Ukraine? CIA or Mi-6?
    1. 0
      2 January 2024 02: 28
      Both. Nuland, Johnson. Plus the Brussels bureaucracy.
  14. 0
    2 January 2024 05: 55
    Why is he still standing? Then they will restore it ;)
  15. 0
    2 January 2024 21: 07
    Quote: Suvorov
    It is not Lviv that needs to be destroyed, but the houses of the most odious personalities of the Kyiv regime and ideologues and propagandists. There are cottage villages around Kyiv (like our “rublevka”), so they should target them purposefully, where the Kiev elite live on their property. But first, recognize the Kiev regime as terrorist, and “have a short conversation” with terrorists. At the very beginning of the 2nd Chechen campaign, missiles were fired at mansions in Grozny belonging to Basayev and other terrorist leaders. Then the effect was more propaganda, because in reality the terrorists were not there. But what! Everyone immediately understood the hint that whoever was in their place would be “washed in the toilet.” Now we also need to make it clear: whoever serves the terrorist regime will be destroyed, and his house (apartment) will be attacked by weapons. Serving a terrorist regime must be unprofitable and dangerous! Yes, their relatives and friends (formally innocent) may suffer, but who, for example, in the USA or Israel bothers about this? So we need to “take off the white gloves” and destroy the Nazi regime in the person of its leaders and their accomplices “for real.” In this regard, the blow to the Shukhevych Museum is a step in the right direction, because the symbols of the Nazi regime are being destroyed, this is a blow to the “very heart” and hits the sacred places of Ukrainian Nazism.

    Aren’t you afraid that the answer will arrive along Rublyovka later? Putin said that he does not shoot at civilians