How NASA is trying to regain American primacy in lunar exploration

53

Two American companies will launch unmanned spacecraft to the Earth's natural satellite with an interval of several decades. This will happen at the start of next year from different sites of the Space Center. Kennedy. Such events have not happened since NASA's Apollo program half a century ago. But unlike it, this is not a national-federal project, but the first private project called Artemis.

The lunar boom has begun


It is not yet known which operator will reach the surface of the planet first. According to preliminary data, the Pittsburgh corporation Astrobotic will launch its own Peregrine spacecraft on January 8 with a Vulcan launch vehicle from the United Launch Alliance joint venture (Boeing + Lockheed Martin), which is scheduled to land on the Moon on February 23. In turn, a module developed by Intuitive Machines will take off into the sky in February with a SpaceX Falcon 9 launch vehicle and arrive on the Moon a week after launch. The second launch was originally scheduled for January 12, but was postponed by SpaceX due to unfavorable climatic conditions expected during this period at Cape Canaveral in Florida. All this makes up the so-called commercial lunar activities program, which started 5 years ago.



The lunar boom began when recently a number of countries, one after another, sent research expeditions to the Moon. For example, the Japanese, who launched their robot module on September 7 of this year, expect it to land on January 19. This will make the Land of the Rising Sun the fifth member of the “moon club” 4 months after India. It is no secret that when conducting a largely risky experiment, emergency situations sometimes arise. Therefore, several accidents occurred. At the end of the year, the Japanese iSpace lost its landing module during the lunar landing, and the Russian Federation also failed to land the descent module.

For some time now, China has been exploring the cislunar space with enviable regularity. Suffice it to recall the satellites launched into lunar orbit in 2007 and 2010. In 2013, Chang'e safely reached the surface of the planet, after which China became the third lunar power after the USA and the USSR (Russia). However, the Celestial Empire did not stop there, distinguishing itself in 2019, when its space envoy, to the envy of everyone, softly landed on the far side of the Moon. Finally, in 2020, he delivered soil samples to Earth, which became another milestone in the history of lunar exploration.

NASA is losing its monopoly on space


The ambitious, comprehensive Artemis program ultimately envisions landing astronauts on the Moon around 2025 or later. Americans are cautious on this issue. After the successful flyby of the Moon in November 2022 by the unmanned multi-purpose spacecraft Orion, a similar mission with a crew on board is planned. Initially, the flight was planned for the end of next year, but due to additional tests, the timing will most likely be adjusted. The space agency will present the final updated schedule after the New Year.

As a dress rehearsal, NASA is planning to organize a series of automatic landings. The most interesting product in this sense is the first robotic rover specifically designed for lunar conditions, which will be sent on the Astrobotic module. A functional actuator, codenamed VIPER (similar to a compact forklift), will be equipped with a drilling unit to search for ground ice near the pole.

For our part, we will add that the future lies precisely in the robotic exploration of the Moon (the mentioned landing of astronauts is intended primarily to establish the image of arrogant Americans). And in fairness, we note: the pioneers in this direction are precisely the Soviet scientists who explored the Moon using Lunokhod-1 and Lunokhod-2 in 1970-1973. Retired head of NASA's scientific division for the implementation of modern projects, Thomas Zurbuchen, knows what he is talking about:

This is a unique means of enabling exploration of the lunar surface without human intervention and conducting experiments using methods that were hitherto unknown.

The principle of space commercialization, which has been intensively implemented recently by the leading space powers, according to Mr. Zurbuchen, “needs a more detailed justification”:

Space is a strategic area where I would allow business only as a last resort. There are too many secret nuances.


He who doesn't take risks never goes to the moon


Be that as it may, having two companies striving for the same goal creates a spirit of competition. Intuitive Machines CEO Stephen Altemus confirmed the readiness of his brainchild:

The device has been brought up to standard and is functioning normally. Testing carried out; Additionally, extensive dynamic testing has been completed to ensure it performs as advertised. And now we responsibly declare: we have figured out the problems by studying how the product behaves in a given situation.

Astrobotic CEO John Thornton recently publicly admitted that he believes the risk percentage is too high:

We took on a super difficult task. And because of the uncertainty, I will experience trepidation and horror at every stage of the experiment. Overnight we can lose the billions invested, but the main goal of the plan - the creation of sustainable commercial traffic between the Earth and the Moon - pushes us towards the feat. There is too much at stake, and the future of the industry depends on the success of the upcoming flight. If we fail, the program will be cancelled.

The fact is that this will be the debut of the Vulcan launch vehicle, and Peregrine costs $79,5 million.

Thus, the Americans admit: their return to the Moon is a difficult mission, but entrepreneurs must be involved in this matter. They summarized the experience of previous mistakes, including those of others. Let us remind you that Washington has not previously been involved in the implementation of lunar business projects from scratch and on a turnkey basis. And the emergence of private space companies of a wide profile in the United States is a serious challenge to China in the field of prospects for exploring the Universe.
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    30 December 2023 09: 32
    An interesting idea. If private owners succeed, it will be a big step in development. Perhaps it will come to the development of the resources of our satellite.
    1. +1
      4 January 2024 01: 43
      Quote: Strange guest
      An interesting idea. If private owners succeed, it will be a big step in development.

      The English, Dutch, French and Spanish had East India Companies to explore India and Asia. The English one lasted the longest.
      I wonder if the Americans will be able to create the East-Lunar Company and how long will it last?
    2. +1
      6 January 2024 08: 01
      And at this time... In one of the states they are scratching their heads over what to do with the space heritage of one power, in the absence of space tourists.
      1. 0
        11 January 2024 04: 12
        Meanwhile, the Artemis project has already successfully failed. There is also an official statement from Astrobotic on this matter. It's strange that there is no new article about this. Probably not convenient after such generous advances
  2. +2
    30 December 2023 09: 42
    But our Rogozin taught us how to live and is again a leader somewhere! Just like my son.
    And Roscosmos arrested someone again, they wrote. For corruption...
    “you can’t catch up with us, you can’t catch up with us..” - just an association
    1. +1
      30 December 2023 09: 57
      With Musk, of course, he made a big mistake. The trampoline went down in history.
      And yes, it’s even a little enviable that in the West private owners are already raising their eyes to space. And we were once pioneers in the development...
      1. 0
        2 January 2024 01: 13
        If you are jealous of someone else's plans to send unmanned vehicles to the Moon, you can declare your own plans to send vehicles to Alpha Centauri. Perhaps there will also be those who will begin to envy you. Plans before they are implemented are just plans. For example, there was the Google Lunar X PRIZE competition. The work of decades ended like this - with plans, statements, without implementation.
  3. +6
    30 December 2023 09: 59
    When Korolev calculated the radiation on the Moon, spacesuits should weigh up to 300 kg, what are you talking about, what kind of conquest are we talking about, space is the most extreme sphere for life, only bacteria survive in low-Earth orbits.
    Not a single man has been on the moon and enough about that, but America is an empire of lies and evil!
    1. 0
      30 December 2023 10: 17
      Yes, I don't argue. Maybe it will work out, maybe it won't. But I want it to work out. Or humanity is tightly tied to this planet.
    2. -7
      30 December 2023 10: 51
      So the witnesses to the sect of “theirs” began to catch up.
      1. +1
        3 January 2024 01: 43
        Not only the USSR lunar rockets for human flight were destroyed, but also the drawings. It’s not serious to explain this by saying that they didn’t want to be second. In all human endeavors on Earth there were second, third, fourth, etc. And in the sect of supporters of flights there are 2 categories - ill-informed and paid.
      2. +2
        6 January 2024 08: 03
        Quote: k7k8
        So the witnesses to the sect of “theirs” began to catch up.

        A witness to the sect said, “They were there.”
    3. +2
      3 January 2024 01: 36
      When the Politburo in the USSR realized that human flight beyond the Earth’s radiation belt was impossible (and they were clearly not fools), they apparently decided to make at least something out of this situation. This is how VAZ and KAMAZ appeared. pipes to Europe and sports cars from the General Secretary. And they decided not to tell the citizens anything, not to upset them. Which is what they still do. And apparently someone pays the Apollo apologists.
    4. +2
      9 January 2024 17: 50
      I will add that it is doubtful that the pins/dos were on the Moon.
      Where is 300 kg. lunar soil, which was allegedly delivered to Earth - ? There is none and there is no evidence that they (pins/dos) were on the moon.
  4. +4
    30 December 2023 10: 55
    Even now, humanity is not able to RETURN a man from the Moon. Delivery is possible. But return is not possible!
    And what can we say about the 60s, the 20th century. The entire US Lunar program is the “Scam of the Century”. They launched an audio recording of rehearsed negotiations so that the signal would come from the Moon. They shot a movie in the Hollywood pavilion and voila!
    They forgot about technology, they lost samples of lunar soil. Well, yes! We believe!
    1. -2
      30 December 2023 12: 59
      And then the Americans launched a Chinese satellite into lunar orbit to provide fake photographs of the Apollo landing sites. feel And a bunch of Indians and Japanese were also attracted to this vile business. And this is without mentioning LRO - its own lunar orbital station, since it cannot be trusted by default laughing
      1. +2
        30 December 2023 13: 30
        And that's without mentioning LRO

        LRO "saw" only those traces that were officially confirmed. But the routes in official documents are incomplete. And for some reason, LRO did not see those parts of the route that are not posted on official websites. So it turns out that the route of our Lunokhod in the LRO photo is dotted.... Why would that be?)
        1. -2
          30 December 2023 14: 09
          Quote: sannyhome
          those traces that are officially confirmed

          So after all, officially confirmed i.e. recognized as reliable? You just said it yourself.

          Quote: sannyhome
          the route of our Lunokhod in the LRO photo is dotted

          As I understand it, the concept of landscape and the optical distortions associated with it are unknown to you, and therefore do not exist.
          Regarding the Chinese photographs, in which even traces of the rover and landing modules are visible, you decided to simply brush them off like annoying flies.
          To listen to you, everything in the world has been reliably researched and invented exclusively by Russians. And how do you, in this case, differ from the oldest nation of Black Sea diggers in the world?
          1. +4
            31 December 2023 00: 30
            k7k8, enough about the landscapes. You cannot give advances to crooks. That's why people want to see confirmation. That's all. laughing
          2. 0
            31 December 2023 09: 21
            And how do you, in this case, differ from the oldest nation of Black Sea diggers in the world?

            But nothing winked . As VVP said - one people wink he understands that laughing
            1. 0
              6 January 2024 08: 05
              Quote: Strange guest
              And how do you, in this case, differ from the oldest nation of Black Sea diggers in the world?

              But nothing winked . As VVP said - one people wink he understands that laughing

              GDP meant the people passing along the bottom between the waves.
      2. 0
        2 January 2024 00: 16
        Have you even seen those photographs yourself? It’s an amazing thing, when you need a photograph from earth orbit, you can even distinguish a car through the atmosphere, but when it comes to pictures from lunar orbit of fake landing sites, in the absence of an atmosphere, then for some reason the pictures are all in wild pixels, where you can’t make out anything at all , that you have to draw arrows and fonts in graphic editors “here is the Apollo number...”, “and here is the Apollo number...”. And there are people who, seeing this set of incomprehensible pixels, firmly believe in something that humanity is still not capable of. Well, let’s say, we managed to bombard the Moon with some reflectors, photographs of which no one will show in normal quality, but where is the evidence of the presence of people? Apart from fake photographs, the falsification of which has long been proven repeatedly, there is nothing. Even here is a shot of the “lunar surface” in cement colors, although it has already been proven that the surface of the real Moon is brown
    2. 0
      3 January 2024 01: 53
      Why hasn’t anyone tried to lift astronauts to a higher orbit using the Van Allen belt? After all, it’s easier than flying to the Moon? 1000 km, 10000 km? The biggest scam of humanity since the existence of HOMO SAPIENS.
  5. +1
    30 December 2023 14: 16
    Quote: k7k8
    So after all, officially confirmed i.e. recognized as reliable?

    This is your problem - you are confusing cause and effect.
    Again. The Lunokhod route is not fully posted on our official websites. And photographs of the LRO, oddly enough, also do not show the entire route of the Lunokhod. If the filming had been carried out in reality, they would have seen the entire route of the Lunokhod, and not just those sections that had already been officially and documented. This is the interesting strangeness of filming LRO.
    1. -3
      30 December 2023 14: 36
      You constantly avoid a direct answer and stubbornly ignore questions that are inconvenient for you, that do not fit into your brain, corroded by conspiracy theories.
    2. -3
      30 December 2023 19: 35
      Quote: sannyhome
      you are confusing cause and effect

      And the second.
      Let's confuse cause and effect once again. And purely theoretically, let’s assume that the LRO filmed everything he saw. In this case, it will turn out that the traces of our Lunokhod are really visible only in certain areas. In this case, this can only mean that these traces are fake (naturally, if one is guided solely by conspiracy theories). How do you like this turnaround? I even know that now you will burst into a moralistic tirade about how Russians never lie. But in reality everything is much simpler. And I already told you why this is so, a few posts above. If you had a slightly higher level of education and a somewhat broader outlook (not to be confused with education, although it is necessary but not sufficient for the formation of education and outlook), then you would know that the simplest explanation is usually the most correct. As the saying goes

      It is very difficult to look for a black cat in a dark room, especially considering that it is not there.
      1. +2
        30 December 2023 22: 48
        Quote: k7k8
        Let's confuse cause and effect once again.

        Let's go without any fantasies. Based only on facts. And the facts are very simple. I don’t know about others, but the Japanese certainly did not publish photos of American landings, although they flew in that direction. I haven’t seen any from the Chinese either. If you have other information, please post a link, I will be grateful. It has already been said about the LRO - it is very strange that they did not see anything other than what was officially already known.
        1. -2
          30 December 2023 23: 33
          Quote: sannyhome
          Let's go without let's go and without fantasies

          Let's. Only you (and characters like you) are engaged in fantasies from the very beginning of the conversation.

          Quote: sannyhome
          I haven’t seen any from the Chinese either. If you have other information, please post a link, I will be grateful.

          Are you banned for life from Google? I sympathize, but I won’t do your work for you. Even on the website of the Chinese Institute for Lunar Research they are in the public domain (and the text is in angelic language). You are lazy, but I work. I consider further discussion of the issue with you futile - I have sworn off communicating with you, apologists for conspiracy theories, so many times. It’s easier to make plasticine from overheated bricks with your bare hands.
          Bye
          1. +2
            31 December 2023 13: 36
            The moon is also nearby, let them fly away. The United States itself has earned a reputation for crooks. laughing
  6. +2
    30 December 2023 18: 03
    NASA is trying to regain American leadership in lunar exploration.

    Yes, let them move there with all the States and swallow moon dust there.
    What is the use of this Moon for all the time it has been explored? kilogram of moon dust?
  7. -4
    30 December 2023 18: 42
    Why should they try to return something? They were the first on the Moon, and this is a fact. Nobody disputes the fact that the USSR was the first to launch a man into space.
    1. 0
      1 January 2024 18: 03
      The fact is that the United States achieved success in cinema first, and only then in flights to the moon. laughing
      1. 0
        3 January 2024 01: 21
        I live in the forest. I have not heard about the achievements of the Americans in the Lunar program. I don't watch Hollywood.
        1. 0
          3 January 2024 19: 55
          Have you installed Internet in your forest? laughing
    2. 0
      3 January 2024 01: 25
      Man's flight to the Moon is the greatest scientific achievement (discovery). However, this needs to be proven before other scientists, and not before the Papuans. There is no evidence. Who knows, President of the USSR Academy of Sciences Keldysh refused to meet with actors posing as astronauts.
  8. +2
    31 December 2023 05: 17
    Private companies participated in all US programs, including military ones. The state acts exclusively as a customer. All profits are provided by the budget. Let him be taken away for such undertakings as they will continue to finance the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Transport stones from the moon selling a gram for a million? - The idea is so-so. Automata do not need bases on the Moon. It may be useful to transfer astronomical instruments to the Moon; the earth becomes too littered. The race itself only proves the level of technological achievements of states; no one announces development programs, much less plans to move to the Moon.
    1. 0
      3 January 2024 01: 20
      Does anyone know for sure that the Americans returned at least something to Earth at the second escape velocity? The USSR returned the turtles, which later died.
  9. +1
    31 December 2023 06: 56
    It will be interesting if after several attempts they fail to land on the moon in 2028-2030. how could they do it in 1968?
    1. 0
      3 January 2024 01: 17
      In 1968 they allegedly flew around the Moon. In 1969 they allegedly sat down. They fooled everyone except the Soviet engineers. They did not have an engine with the required thrust. Therefore, there was no rocket with the required thrust. Therefore, there was nothing to fly on. As in the famous parable with the general who surrendered the fortress. When they asked him why, he gave many reasons, and in the end he said that the gunpowder had run out.
  10. +3
    31 December 2023 20: 00
    An interesting photo is presented. The Lunokhod track of the path traveled is not visible. Wheels with rubber tires, which is nonsense, both in terms of weight and functionality. - 6 times lighter gravity does not require pneumatics (for example, the wheels of all lunar rovers), and the weight is significant and the whole cart is huge - what about transportation in a small lander? There is a mountain in the photo. There are no such mountains on the Moon, but there are a lot of craters. There are too many inconsistencies, it seems from the staged “landing”, filmed by director S. Kubrick in Yugoslavia. (The fact is reliable according to many sources.)
    1. 0
      1 January 2024 23: 13
      Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
      Lunokhod rut track of the traveled path is not visible

      Take a closer look

      Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
      Wheels with rubber tires

      After the New Year's libations, what can you imagine?

      Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
      as with transportation in a small lander

      Folded on external sling

      Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
      There is a mountain in the photo. There are no such mountains on the Moon.

      No comments

      Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
      filmed by director S. Kubrick in Yugoslavia. (The fact is reliable according to many sources.)

      This fake was only planted once, but took deep roots, by the wife of the late Kubrick after his death
      1. 0
        2 January 2024 23: 45
        Replica. Your doubts do not correspond to the facts. (from photo). You are not aware of the latest statements of Stanley Kubrick and some of those present, etc. The astronaut who was the first to walk on the Moon, L. Armstrong, until the end of his life, publicly refused to speak out on the topic of astronautics, why? Conclusion: you don’t know the topic and unfounded statements are not evidence.
        1. -1
          3 January 2024 01: 11
          What could the actor say? I didn’t fly anywhere, I didn’t see anything. What kind of leadership? They first flew into space in 1981. I do not like ? Let them prove that they flew. You cannot prove the unprovable. And now they have helicopters flying on Mars. The air there is as thick as a nose. But if you accelerate the propeller to a million revolutions, air appears out of nowhere.
    2. 0
      6 January 2024 03: 20
      There are not rubber tires, there are mesh on the rims. It looks beautiful, otherwise we wouldn’t understand.
  11. +2
    1 January 2024 14: 13
    And I want to add, only Russia-China can conquer the moon! Mind and resources! And America only has flying green candy wrappers!
    1. 0
      1 January 2024 23: 15
      Without a doubt! Everything in the world is made (at least invented) by Russians.
      You are no different from the Black Sea diggers.
      1. 0
        2 January 2024 00: 02
        Everyone knows that the Black Sea was not dug. Everyone knows that the US is a liar. Yes
        1. 0
          2 January 2024 21: 16
          Quote: isofat
          Everyone knows that the Black Sea was not dug

          What are you doing!? And I’ve already been told the opposite a thousand times! wassat
          1. 0
            3 January 2024 19: 50
            You are no different from the Black Sea diggers. laughing
  12. 0
    5 January 2024 19: 56
    The Russian Federation has screwed everything up, this holiday will be without us, alas.
    1. 0
      8 January 2024 01: 40
      Roscosmos has nothing to demonstrate at this fair now; it could cope with the minimum until the end of the decade, and that would be fine. But the opening hours of the fair itself are unknown. As practice shows, we don’t like to come when everyone has already left.
  13. 0
    6 January 2024 03: 18
    Here is a photo of a mannequin riding with its arm suspended. Hollywood Puncture.
  14. 0
    14 January 2024 09: 27
    And for your information, the only honest shooting by an amateur take-off camera showed that at 107 seconds Apollo passed through the clouds at 7,5 km, which means that the rate of climb was no more than 80 m/s, and our lunar rocket was 400 m/s, which Apollo never could go into space, so our ships took ballistics with radar, calculated exactly where the capsule of the device would float, and found and built KAMAZ and other factories for us, and practically for nothing! Here's the truth, we ruined our country for bucks! There has never been anyone on the Moon except robots, and corner laser reflectors are on our lunar rovers! And the Moon is brown and there is no gray color there!