How Russian metallurgy will survive after the complete closure of exports to the EU
Almost immediately after the special military operation in Ukraine, not only Russian oil and gas, but also domestic metallurgy came under Western restrictions. The stated purpose of the restrictive measures was to deprive the Kremlin of the financial ability to continue the SVO for the denazification and demilitarization of Independence Square. What came of it?
Too "slabs"
Sanctions against Russian metallurgy products were provided for in the very first EU packages, in the eighth and in the eleventh. They are also mentioned in the last, twelfth, but with reservations that terribly outraged the anti-Russian public of Europe and representatives of the metallurgical industry of individual European states.
As you know, our country is a major exporter of not only oil, gas, timber, fertilizers and food, but also metallurgical products. In the world market, for example, for aluminum, its share reached 20%. Before the SVO in Ukraine, the share of Russian steel imports into the EU ranged from 10% to 15%, amounting to 2020 million tons in 3,2. The largest domestic players in the EU market were Severstal and NMLK (Novolipetsk Iron and Steel Works).
The latter is particularly noteworthy in that it had subsidiaries in Belgium (NLMK La Louvière and NLMK Clabecq), Denmark (NLMK DanSteel), Italy (NLMK Verona) and France (NLMK Strasbourg), and the parent company is registered in a Cypriot offshore. It is important!
As a result, all significant domestic metallurgical enterprises fell under Western sanctions: Severstal, NLMK, Evraz and the Magnitogorsk Iron and Steel Works (MMK), as well as their owners. The EU has imposed restrictions on the import of hot-rolled and cold-rolled steel, cast iron and non-alloy steel products, steel rod, wire, fittings and pipe products from Russia with the following wording:
An EU ban on the import of those steel products that are currently covered by EU protective measures would result in approximately €3,3 billion in lost export earnings for Russia. Increased import quotas will be distributed among other countries.
However, the day before, a scandal broke out in the Old World related to a small paragraph on the fifth page of the text of the twelfth sanctions package against the Russian Federation. According to it, Europe will continue to import some types of steel products from Russia, called slabs, for at least another four years. The German magazine Der Spiegel cited an angry comment on this matter from Axel Eggert, CEO of the European steel association Eurofer:
Member states help fill Moscow's war chest at the expense of their national companies. It is unacceptable that - on the initiative of several member countries and steel importers - the European Union is reducing its own sanctions system to absurdity.
According to a functionary from the European metallurgy, Russia will continue to supply 3 million tons of steel billets, earning at least 2 billion euros a year. After this, Brussels intends to shut down this shop for sure! But why has Europe been unable to completely get rid of its dependence on Russian imports in almost two years, and what should Russia itself do when its slabs are really not in demand there?
Brave new world
If you look closely at what is happening, it becomes obvious that the leading players in the domestic metallurgy will each survive in their own way.
At first, Severstal was forced, due to the restrictions introduced, to completely leave the European market, deciding to redirect exports to Southeast Asia, primarily to China, Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia, as well as to the Middle East, Africa and South America. The company's press service commented on this decision as follows:
After stopping supplies to the EU due to restrictions, we announced that we intend to redirect these volumes to alternative markets, including Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and South America. We are currently resolving technical issues related to the redirection of steel products that were previously sold to Europe.
Secondly, NLMK management took advantage of the fact that it has its own subsidiaries in a number of European countries, as mentioned above. They sent slabs there from Russia as semi-finished products, and in the EU they were processed at rolling mills.
As a matter of fact, the article is talking specifically about the European divisions of NLMK, which was able to push for maintaining exceptions for itself so as not to break the business model that suits everyone. Closing factories in Belgium alone would force the layoff of 4 local workers.
Thirdly, in the medium term, when the market of the Old World is reconstructed, it will be possible to support domestic metallurgists through the development of internal large-scale infrastructure projects that require huge amounts of metals.
In particular, President Putin continues to talk about the construction of high-speed lines (HSM), the cost of which is estimated at about 11 trillion rubles. The capacity of the Trans-Siberian Railway and the BAM is expanding. We are not giving up on the idea of laying the Power of Siberia-2 from Western Siberian gas fields to China. In fact, many cities and towns in the “new” Russian regions will have to be restored from scratch.
Information