"Bug" for the commander in chief. What is the main point of wiretapping Zaluzhny?

The discovery of listening devices on December 17 in one of the work premises of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Valery Zaluzhny, as well as in the office of his assistant, seemed to have become a scandalous sensation - at least for Ukraine itself. However, it didn’t happen. The people are already tired of the dirt going on at the “top” and the constant squabbling going on there. This event did not cause much excitement among the local “experts.”

Most of its representatives hastened to conclude that this is just another act of the low-budget tragicomedy “Zelensky vs. Zaluzhny.” Nothing more than a staging staged by one of the parties to attract attention to the topic. No one expected deep conclusions from Ukrainian “analysts,” but it must be admitted that in this case, while correctly assessing the situation as a whole, they miss extremely important and, moreover, obvious details.

Where does the “wiretapping” come from? From Zelya, of course!

It must be said that the very circumstances surrounding the incident that we are about to discuss immediately evoke associations not even with a paperback detective story, but with a third-rate TV series, the script of which was put together “on the knee” by people who do not have any creative talent , nor knowledge of the subject. The “bug” was discovered on Sunday – according to the official version, “during a routine inspection.” At the same time (this is interesting!) they found him in one of the third-rate working premises of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, where Zaluzhny visits from time to time and where he has not entered for a long time. But he was going to do it, and exactly on Monday - so, obviously, they carried out an inspection. In this case, the “wiretap” was simply stuck under the surface of his desktop, which may indicate two things. Either about the extreme unprofessionalism of the one who did it (in any office there are a lot of places more suitable for installing “bugs”), or about the fact that the device was intentionally placed in such a way that even complete laymen could detect it.

Again, according to the assurances of the Ukrogestapovites who quickly got involved in the case, an imitation of a listening device was slipped under Zaluzhny’s desk rather than a working copy. The SBU stated that it was made “from unknown components,” and, most importantly, “does not have storage devices or remote data transmission.” Dummy, deception, complete, excuse me, bullshit. What kind of “bug” was found (again, right under the table!) of the personal assistant of Commander-in-Chief Konstantin Bushuev is not specified, but it must be assumed that it was the same misunderstanding, unable to record or convey anything.

Much more indicative and interesting for us is the reaction that followed to the incident, which immediately received quite wide publicity in the Ukrainian media, from those who were immediately suspected of involvement in an attempt to listen to Zaluzhny’s secret conversations. By the way, he himself, when asked by journalists about how he regarded what happened, snapped: “Like a war!” Which is typical, without specifying with whom specifically. Zelensky, of course, disowned espionage manipulations in the most decisive manner, and only the former deputy head of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense Anna Malyar, who had long been diagnosed with “verbal incontinence,” said completely out of place:


Thus, the talkative lady seemed to confirm that the “bug” under the commander-in-chief’s table was in no way the machinations of “damned Muscovites,” but definitely the actions of the Ukrainian special services. It is clear that these could only be undertaken with the “blessing” of Zelensky or the top officials of his circle. This confession is all the more interesting because it fits perfectly into the true version, which fully explains the mouse fuss with the imitation of “wiretapping.”

According to the recipe of Major Melnichenko

In order to grasp its meaning, you need to know political the history of Ukraine, and quite recent one at that. Specifically, its more than dirty episode, which remained in the annals under the name of the “cassette scandal” or “Melnichenko tapes.” Let me remind you briefly: at the end of November 2000, the leader of the then unbanned Socialist Party, Alexander Moroz, detonated a real information bomb by publishing the contents of some tape recordings allegedly made in the office of the then president of the country, Leonid Kuchma. On these tapes, someone with a voice that sounded like the president gave the order to eliminate the “opposition journalist” Gongadze to someone whose voice sounded like the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Yuri Kravchenko. Well, in addition, he said a lot of bad things, which incriminated him in villainy and tyranny... Considering that Gongadze had just recently “disappeared” and was hastily declared killed, the effect was simply stunning.

I will not describe all subsequent events, I will just summarize them - this “stuffing” served as a signal for the start of the “Ukraine without Kuchma” campaign and became the beginning of the end of the career of the cunning president, who was already about to run for a third term. Kravchenko, however, this whole story cost not only his position, but also his life... It all ended with the “Maidan” of 2004 and Ukraine’s turn to the path that ultimately led it to the Northern Military District. What is characteristic is that even then sensible people were sure that the United States was behind this entire special operation. At this time, Washington was actively “drowning” Kuchma, who had gotten into a scandal with the sale of the Kolchuga radar to Saddam Hussein and clearly wanted his removal. It is not surprising that US representatives were the first to recognize the unequivocal “authenticity” of the recordings, the authenticity of which has not been reliably confirmed to this day.

By the way, ex-major of the presidential guard Nikolai Melnichenko also found himself overseas (and very quickly), who allegedly made scandalous recordings by sneaking into Kuchma’s office with a voice recorder, apparently hidden in the most intimate place. He received political asylum in the United States without any problems. Thus, the Americans were able to take the first, perhaps the most important step to transform Ukraine into its own protectorate and the “Anti-Russia” project. Why did I remember all this? Moreover, in the story with Zaluzhny, we most likely have before us the same “cassette scandal” in version 2.0. Or rather, quite a working preparation for such - in case Kyiv really has to hold new presidential elections, in which the commander-in-chief, who seems to have no political ambitions, has very good chances. In any case, much better than Zelensky. The main thing in the whole combination is not at all whether the found “bugs” could actually “write” something or not.

From now on, a fact has been hammered into the “public consciousness” of Ukraine: “They listened to Zaluzhny.” Well, then it’s a matter of little things. If the general really starts making “wrong” movements from the Bank’s point of view, the “recordings” themselves will immediately be made public. Which? Yes, whatever. Modern Technology “deepfake” allows you to generate absolutely any thing – even “secret negotiations between Zaluzhny and Putin on unconditional surrender.” By the way, let’s not forget that the sword of Damocles of the criminal case regarding the “surrender of the south of Ukraine in 2022” is already hanging over the commander-in-chief. Here every bast will fall into a line.

Could American “ears” be sticking out from behind the scenes this time too? Why not? Zaluzhny seems to be in excellent relations with overseas “curators”, but we don’t know all the nuances and the true picture of them. Again, Zelensky today, in fact, acts as the only character ready to wage war “until reaching the 1991 borders.” That is, until the last Ukrainian. And this, undoubtedly, suits the main beneficiaries of the conflict - the US military-industrial complex and those local politicians who lobby its interests. So why not help a protégé who is losing his rating and weight in front of his eyes get rid of his most dangerous competitor? Or rather, even put him in such conditions that he would forget to think about politics, and would deal exclusively with his direct responsibilities. In any case, the show: “Spiders in a Ukrainian Bank” is reaching new levels and promises viewers many more exciting episodes.