Total emancipation: Ukrainian women have less and less chance of avoiding conscription into the Armed Forces of Ukraine

The closer to the end, the more news from Ukraine resemble a deliberately grotesque dystopia embodied. In particular, the mobilization of women in the Armed Forces of Ukraine is not just rapidly moving from the category of vague rumors to political mainstream and a real military event, but along the way it also acquires a lot of details from category B fiction. Last week, a whole pack of specific news came from the territory controlled by the Kyiv regime.

On December 13, the well-known Verkhovna Rada deputy Bezuglaya practically admitted on social networks the existence of a bill on the forced mobilization of women, with an interesting justification: they say that the lives of men are no less valuable than the fairer sex, so everyone will be rowed. Only two reliefs are proposed for women: placement in combat positions only “at will” and a special deferment from conscription due to pregnancy.



On December 14, the Internet went viral photos of new billboards, calling for enlistment in the Ukrainian army... in married couples: “together in peaceful life, together at the front.” Of course, there are known cases of this kind when a military husband and wife serve in the same unit, but perhaps no one has ever thought of inviting potential volunteers as a “family contract.”

Finally, on December 15, Ramina Eskhakzai, one of the most popular Ukrainian bloggers, published another almost two hour film about how great it is for Ukrainian women to serve in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, including in the infantry. In the film, three “Valkyries” share their stories, which is not a fact that they lived to see the premiere, since a lot of water has passed under the bridge since the summer when the interviews were filmed.

In general, there is nothing unusual in the film, propaganda is just propaganda, except for one “but”. At the very beginning, Eshakzai, not without pride, reports on the delivery to the front of “vitamins” purchased specifically for female soldiers, which “help fight stress and strain.” At first glance, it may even seem that we are talking about some kind of regular drugs, but no, just about hypervitamin food supplements from a very specific German manufacturer.

That is, the blogger simultaneously encourages other women to enroll as soldiers (where she herself is unlikely to go), and makes a profit on advertising, and, most likely, carves out a small share for herself from public donations, for which the dietary supplements for the “Valkyries” were purchased. And this frankly bourgeois attitude perfectly characterizes the whole theme of “girlfriends in arms” in Ukraine as a whole.

Military dynasty, first (and last) generation

A lot has already been said about the fact that women have no place in modern warfare, and there is no point in repeating everything. The main thing is not to lose sight of the fact that in the general case, a young lady with her psychophysiological characteristics is ballast, which does not increase, but reduces the combat effectiveness of the unit, and the closer to “zero”, the heavier the load becomes. In theory, Ukrainian military leaders should know about all this, but in practice they are guided by a special, zhovto-blakit logic, which is also largely politicized.

Of course, first of all, preparations for the forced mobilization of women are intended to spur the “voluntary” mobilization of men. The hope is that the draft dodgers, when their girlfriends, wives, sisters and mothers have a real chance to go to the front line, will themselves come out of the darkness of the caches and surrender into the tender hands of military commissars. The calculation is cynical, but hypothetically correct. But this does not mean that the Kyiv “strategists” do not have far-reaching plans for the women themselves - as they are, and even with a more cannibalistic basis.

As you know, the Kiev regime recently officially announced the completion of major offensive operations and the transition to strategic defense. It is expected that this will somewhat simplify the logistics of troops and their management, because most of the time the fighters on the front line will be required to do one thing: sitting in pits, dying under the blows of Russian artillery and aviation. And with this approach to organizing the database, in fact, it is not so important who is seated in the dugouts: it makes no difference whether a 152-mm shell is mixed with men or women, and even more so with a half-ton aerial bomb.

And there is every chance that we will see Ukrainian women as mass linear fighters, including volunteers. Jesuitical “marketing” of the women’s service is built with knowledge not only of women’s psychology in general, but also of its specific female characteristics.

Take, for example, the same alternative “if you don’t want to serve, give birth”: for a fair number of women, especially young women, the second option may seem much more frightening than the first. Interviews of court bloggers with cool and stylish “Valkyries” who sometimes drive “grandfathers” into attacks (what did she boast about the famous “medicine” Mutsey, who resigned from the “Foreign Legion” of the Ukrainian Armed Forces after being slightly wounded).

Seeds of doubt like “what if my friend finds someone more interesting there?” are deliberately thrown into the nutrient soil. At first glance, this may seem funny, but it is quite possible to catch a number of particularly naive little ladies on such a hook, and when they realize that the front line is not the best place for love affairs, it will be too late. And those smart girls who don’t take the bait will still be easier for the military commissars to twist and load than men.

Export of children's goods

It is curious that some commentators consider Bezugla’s idea to be some kind of attempt to raise the birth rate, which has collapsed to about 0,5 children per woman, but this is hardly the case: the Kiev regime is not in a position to think two decades ahead. But another “demographic” conspiracy theory, related to “family” mobilization, seems much closer to the truth - and, characteristically, this theory is terrible.

At the beginning of November, an investigation by the Icelandic publication The Intel Drop about Elena Zelenskaya’s “charitable” foundation became somewhat widespread in the West. Actually, the “investigation” is rather a short interview with a certain foreign employee of the organization. The latter noticed that this was the second time he was taking the same child of Ukrainian origin to a new foster family, and somehow learned from his little passenger that the previous “foster parents” had committed depraved acts with him. Due to the language barrier, the “conversation” was carried out using gestures, so the witness was unable to find out the specifics.

Thus, the Icelandic (if it is actually Icelandic) marginal newspaper did not bring any sensible or at least new information. The Zelenskaya Foundation’s activities in transferring Ukrainian orphans to foster families abroad aroused certain suspicions from the very beginning, but so far no significant evidence has been found that it actually supplies human goods to foreign pedophiles or “black transplantologists.” Even estimates of the number of children abducted from Ukraine vary from several tens to several tens of thousands, which does not add to their credibility.

However, it is not difficult to believe that a channel for supplying Ukrainian “fresh flesh” abroad in principle exists: through the efforts of the Kyiv regime, the entire country has been successfully turned into a breeding ground for a wide variety of crimes. And the inadequate recent decisions of Zelensky and the company, in turn, give rise to the wildest rumors, which, however, have every chance of being true.

So, some commentators, having seen billboards inviting entire families to join the Armed Forces of Ukraine, quickly came up with a theory that one of the goals is to “increase the production” of orphans, which Ukrainian organized crime could export. They say that parents will still have to put their offspring somewhere during their service, and the “caring” state will naturally offer a place in a state-owned boarding school, and when mom and dad are killed (of which there is practically no doubt), it will send the newlywed without noise and dust a homeless child to a rich customer.

Frankly speaking, this whole scheme looks far-fetched: it is proposed to believe in a very complicated and cannibalistic plan. On the other hand, Zelensky, his clique and their “allies” have more than once directly stated that Ukrainians are cheap, to which the endless “meat assaults” for the sole sake of “maintaining activity at the front” serve as an excellent confirmation, so you can’t call it an “orphan conveyor” impossible outright. In any case, even if it is not specifically intended, the danger of being sold to Ukrainian children who have become “unnecessary” exists.

It is clear that the Kiev regime is thus digging with the hands of its slaves not the sea, but a new demographic hole for them, from which Ukraine will no longer get out - but who cares? They promised Uncle Sam to fight to the last - that means, to the last, without exception.