Levashovo airfield as a necessary alternative to Pulkovo

22

Levashovo is a joint airport in St. Petersburg. In 2021, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation and the Gazprom company agreed to reconstruct this facility. It is assumed that the new airport complex in the north of the city will be able to be used by civil aircraft in the future, which will help relieve some of the congestion at Pulkovo Airport. In addition, there is a possibility that the project may have an extremely interesting future for passengers of the Northern capital.

The Levashovo airfield acquired the infrastructure that existed until recently after modernization in 1950. For quite a long time, various aviation units of the Armed Forces of the Soviet Union were based on its territory. Since 2007, according to a decree of the government of the Russian Federation, Levashovo has become a joint airfield.



For the first time, plans to endow this airfield with civilian functions appeared in the information space back in 2006. It even came to the point of signing a protocol of intent between the Levashovo Airport company and the military leadership, after which there was some calm, caused, according to some experts, by the fact that the authorities of St. Petersburg considered it unnecessary for a new player in the civil aviation service market to appear in the city. which could in the future become a competitor to Pulkovo Airport.

However, already in 2008, a similar initiative was made by Gazprom-Avia Aviation Enterprise LLC, which was a subsidiary of a well-known gas holding company. The general director of the company, Andrei Ovcharenko, then stated that there are serious plans to use the Levashovo airfield for the development of charter programs - both business and tourist. By that time, Gazprom-Avia’s portfolio already had a successfully implemented similar project. We are talking about Ostafyevo Airport, which is located near Moscow. It is worth noting that the approximate volume of investment in the implementation of this project, according to some experts, could amount to $50 million. The company itself has never disclosed the final cost of modernizing a small capital airport for business aviation.

In 2016, a contract worth 81,516 million rubles was signed to develop documentation for the construction of the airport complex. The customer of the project was Gazprom Sotsinvest LLC, and the investor was PJSC Gazprom. It included the reconstruction of the existing artificial runway and the construction of an apron for seven airliners. In addition, it was announced the construction of an air terminal with a capacity of 50 passengers per hour to serve international and domestic flights. Construction work after preparation of all necessary technical documentation should have started in 2020. It was also planned to connect the future passenger airport to the ring road (Ring Road) of St. Petersburg in the area of ​​Parachute Street; this was supposed to be done for the convenience of Gazprom’s top management. The development of transport infrastructure would reduce travel time from the airport to the headquarters of the gas company, which is located in the Primorsky district of the Northern capital.

In 2021, things finally got off the ground; the Russian Ministry of Defense and Gazprom signed a concession agreement for the reconstruction of the Levashovo airfield. The total investment in the implementation of this project was estimated at 41 billion rubles. Of these funds, 10 billion will be allocated under a concession agreement between Gazprom and the Russian military department. The main work in 2022 consisted of reconstructing the runway, which is 2,6 kilometers long. It was also reported that to receive civilian passengers in Levashovo, two air terminal complexes will be built, the total capacity of which will be 250 people per hour. The first of them will have a throughput capacity of 50 people per hour and is expected to be put into operation in December 2023. The second terminal, which will be the main one, will be able to receive 200 passengers per hour. It should be built by the end of 2024. It is also necessary to pay attention to the fact that all design decisions related to the construction of the airport presuppose its further development, therefore, if passenger and cargo transportation begins to develop, all conditions will be created so that Levashovo can handle a larger number of passengers.

The question of the existence of a second airport in St. Petersburg remains debatable. You may recall that until the 90s of the last century, Rzhevka Airport operated in the city, from which regular flights were operated to different cities of Russia. However, in the situation with Levashovo, a slightly different picture is observed; the Gazprom-Avia company is building this airport primarily for the needs of its own business aviation. Similar experience is used in many European cities, where small airfields are used for “small” aircraft, which creates additional convenience for the business community, for ordinary passengers, and for aviation and navigation services. Of course, in the future, its capabilities will make it possible to intercept some of the civil or cargo flights from Pulkovo, given that the capacity of the main airport of St. Petersburg is also not unlimited. The main question is how realistic is this scenario in the current circumstances? economic и political conditions.

To summarize, I would like to add that from the point of view of the infrastructural development of St. Petersburg, this project looks quite feasible. Despite the fact that its prospects remain vague, it is worth recognizing that for a city with a population of more than 5 million people, the presence of only one airport, the capabilities of which could become insufficient at any moment, looks rather strange. Situations are different, so the emergence of an alternative landing site in the immediate vicinity of St. Petersburg can be considered as logical as possible.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    14 December 2023 10: 14
    for a city with a population of more than 5 million people, the presence of only one airport, the capabilities of which may become insufficient at any moment, looks rather strange

    Doesn’t it look strange that in Russia there will soon be nothing to fly at all?!
    1. 0
      14 December 2023 10: 23
      It looks, of course.
      But I think that we can speculate on this topic, suddenly the situation will change.
    2. 0
      14 December 2023 11: 20
      Yes okay.. They’ll bribe the Gulf Streams then..
  2. +1
    14 December 2023 13: 25
    Come on...
    Still, you probably read the reviews that the main thing is not the success of the project. For example, an airport.
    The main thing is to master money. For example, for its reconstruction. (Or to the stadium. Or facilities in Sochi. Or a pipeline. Transport route, etc.)
  3. 0
    14 December 2023 17: 23
    Why all this talk about a “second airport” if there are no plans to operate regular flights from there in the interests of “mere mortals”? All this needs to be considered within the framework of the further formation (or rather, restoration) of class society in Russia. It is simply inappropriate for the new boyars to use only airports with stinkers. And in this context, of course, this airport is necessary. The question is - to whom? Well, the fact that budget money is spent on it is also more than understandable - that’s what the boyars are for, to manage the budgets, and the job of the common people is to fill these budgets, and not ask what they are spent on.
    1. +1
      14 December 2023 18: 53
      Did you read the article, or did you just decide to speak out?
      1. 0
        14 December 2023 20: 16
        Have you actually studied the issue, fortunately, there is enough information in the regional press of St. Petersburg, or did you immediately start writing your article without even reading the “works of your predecessors”? It has been written more than once that no one plans to launch regular flights from this airport, and I have not heard anyone deny this fact. And taking this into account, any talk about a “second airport for the city” loses all meaning. Talk about its use for charters delivering shift workers to fields is an untenable smokescreen, precisely to avoid completely legitimate accusations of wasting budget billions for the sake of the interests of a small handful of Gazprom top executives. There aren’t many flights for rotation workers, and they don’t live only in St. Petersburg, so what about building a second, “Gazprom” airport in every city in the country?
        For the 5 million residents of St. Petersburg, no benefit is visible from this facility. Or are you one of those respected St. Petersburg residents for whom the convenience of using business aviation services is really important? Then that's another matter!
        1. +2
          14 December 2023 20: 32
          Please read the regional press. Apparently, you need to become more familiar with this issue. Maybe you will change your mind that nothing is planned there.

          In the future, Levashovo will be used not only for the needs of PJSC Gazprom, but also for business aviation of other large organizations in our country, civil aviation. The capacity of the future airport will allow this to happen.

          https://www.dp.ru/a/2022/11/10/Arhitektori_predstavili_p

          This spring, a project was presented for the reconstruction of the airfield and the construction of the necessary infrastructure, as well as a passenger terminal. It is expected that charter flights, business aviation and small cargo transportation will be served here.

          https://www.bn.ru/gazeta/articles/262113/

          Or are you too simple a person for charter flights? So maybe all airports should be closed? Ordinary people can travel by train or on foot.
          1. -3
            14 December 2023 21: 13
            Okay, I see you don’t understand that it makes no sense to present it as a kind of “second Pulkovo” airport, from which no one expects regular flights, which you yourself confirmed with the above quotes. And yes - I have never used charter flights, only regular ones. And I had a suspicion... do you even know what the term “charter” means? Otherwise, I cannot explain your passage in the last paragraph - if there are no charters, then airports can be closed.
            1. 0
              14 December 2023 21: 38
              I want to give up, but I’ll try again.
              You understand that unloading Pulkovo does not only involve the stupid transfer of regular flights to Levashovo, which is not planned at the moment, and I didn’t say a word about it in the article.
              That Pulkovo’s capacity is being consumed by the same business aviation, charters, and cargo flights. Planes need to be parked somewhere, and top managers need to be served by someone in the terminals. This all consumes Pulkovo's resources. Do you understand that the navigation capabilities of Pulkovo are also not unlimited?
              Or do you have little idea what the alternative is?
              What if, for example, Pulkovo is closed for a couple of hours in the event of some kind of terrorist threat, then planes will have an ALTERNATIVE landing site within the city to land?
              Or are you not able to think so globally, and you see everything as an infringement of the rights of the ordinary Russian peasant from the factory? Like, look, for the bourgeoisie, they built a new airport, separate from the servants.
              Then I will surprise you, and for the common man the appearance of Levashovo will have its advantages, because the freed-up resources of Pulkovo will be redistributed specifically to regular passenger flights.
              1. -2
                14 December 2023 21: 50
                Sorry, I will no longer interfere with you doing your job, but professional PR and lobbying is quite a job - needed (by the customer), well paid. This concludes the dialogue. All the best.
                PS I couldn’t resist one last thing: if we’ve already decided to spoil grandma, in terms of alternative sites in the event of Pulkovo’s closure, then Levashovo’s purely military purpose (and its reconstruction as a purely military airfield would require investments that are many times smaller than the current option, it would be enough to modernize SEVERAL bases Air Force) would have prevented planes from being redirected there if people's lives were at stake? Maybe we shouldn't put an owl on the globe?
                1. 0
                  15 December 2023 17: 37
                  I confirm that in the past, civilian aircraft, in isolated, extreme cases, landed at military airfields.
                2. 0
                  19 December 2023 12: 14
                  Now let’s imagine that you are a passenger who finds himself in such a situation that your plane lands at an alternate airfield. Where would you like to land, at a military airfield, where there is no corresponding infrastructure and the military, most likely, will treat you in such a way that you would prefer not to land here at all, because the facility is “secure”?
                  Or do you still want to land near your original boarding point in a normal passenger terminal with adequate conditions?
        2. DO
          0
          14 December 2023 21: 39
          UAZ 452,

          For the 5 million residents of St. Petersburg, no benefit is visible from this facility.

          Well why not? Apart from the attempts of the Ministry of Defense to attract private investment to modernize the airport, it has been a military airfield since the Second World War. He has not stopped being a military man to this day.
          In the context of the threat of NATO countries to block the Gulf of Finland, and, of course, the inevitable subsequent military escalation, the benefit of the St. Petersburg Levashovo military airfield in ensuring the security of the North-Western region of Russia is quite visible.
          1. -2
            14 December 2023 21: 46
            If you believe what is written in the article, then out of 41 billion required investments, investments amounted to 10 billion. And where did they get and will they get the remaining 31 billion? Apparently - from the budget. With this money, it was not only Levashovo that could be modernized. So, excuse me, but the defense component of this project is also just a smokescreen to justify budgetary injections of tens of billions. In addition, the status of a jointly based airfield will allow operating costs to be borne by the budget, even if a military aircraft lands there once a month, and then only as part of a visit by the Ministry of Defense and senior generals.
            1. -1
              14 December 2023 23: 51
              It is already good that they will build an additional second airport for the metropolis. The fact that Gazprom carries its own on business jets from special airports is something that those rich in oil and gas can afford. The second side of the coin, the use of the airport by the Russian Defense Ministry, is kept silent, because at the beginning it was designated as joint. For the center of a huge conglomerate of a new military district, the military component of a separate airport will be more than in demand. That’s why there are two separate buildings with different flows; the second, larger one, seems to be intended for the Russian Defense Ministry. This dual situation seems to be the essence.
            2. DO
              -2
              15 December 2023 01: 18
              UAZ 452,

              even if a military aircraft lands there once a month

              Do you have current statistics on how many military aircraft take off and land at Levashovo airfield per day, and how many civilian airliners do the same?
              1. 0
                15 December 2023 20: 35
                Replica. Important systems are always duplicated, which is why the metropolis needs a second operating airport. (Moscow has three large ones). Moreover, both are located in diametrical places. According to passenger flows, everything depends on requests and needs, which tend to change.
  4. +1
    14 December 2023 17: 37
    A slightly familiar airfield, it was in a somewhat disrepair, including all the equipment. The implementation of the idea of ​​co-location is primarily due to the interests of Gazprom (from there it will be possible to quickly get to the “tower”), everything else was assessed last. Levashovo will not become a full-fledged airport for mass use, otherwise it would have been easier to preserve and reconstruct the purely civilian airport Rzhevka at one time...
  5. 0
    15 December 2023 11: 36
    We need to build! On Direct Line, Putin said that by 2030 Russia will build “more than a thousand” of its own aircraft!
    1. 0
      16 December 2023 00: 05
      a thousand will be decommissioned, a thousand will be built. That's right.
      1. 0
        17 December 2023 10: 46
        The first statement is certainly true, the second... well, let's hope, but for now these terms and volumes do not look remotely realistic.