Russian electronic warfare creates serious interference with Western satellites over Crimea

12

The European satellite Sentinel-1 once again tried to film the Crimean region and the territories adjacent to the peninsula to monitor the situation with Russian weapons and manpower. However, it was not possible to take high-quality photographs.

The satellite images came out blurry and colored because Western equipment Russian electronic warfare systems interfered. Sentinel-1 takes pictures at 5,405 GHz, and electronic warfare systems adjusted to this data, exposing the frames received by the satellite.



The image demonstrates the result of the work of technical equipment of the Russian Armed Forces, which created interference for a European aircraft with oncoming radiation.

Meanwhile, the Russian Federation is quite capable of destroying Starlink satellites owned by companies associated with American billionaire Elon Musk. These devices help the Ukrainian Armed Forces control drones.

As the British newspaper The Telegraph wrote, based on expert opinions, space satellites are not subject to the Geneva Convention if they are used by one of the parties to an armed conflict. In this regard, the publication recalled the words of Musk himself, who defined the main purpose of satellites in providing Internet communications and the operation of streaming services.
12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    29 November 2023 15: 12
    Meanwhile, the Russian Federation is quite capable of destroying Starlink satellites owned by companies associated with American billionaire Elon Musk. These devices help the Ukrainian Armed Forces control drones.

    Firstly, we can’t, and secondly, even if we could, we ourselves would be left without satellites (of which there are much fewer than Western ones)...
    1. +1
      29 November 2023 21: 07
      Actually, we can and have shown how this is done by our own example, but we can’t because we signed some kind of treaty on “peaceful space”
      1. 0
        30 November 2023 13: 44
        Quote: Jackie
        Actually, we can and have shown how this is done by our own example, but we can’t because we signed some kind of treaty on “peaceful space”

        belay lol
  2. +1
    29 November 2023 19: 04
    Have you tried to hack Starlink satellites? It’s cheaper to subjugate an armada of enemy satellites and use them for your own purposes, where are the super Russian hackers?
  3. -1
    29 November 2023 19: 40
    And what is the connection between jamming and the possibility of destruction?
    1. -1
      29 November 2023 22: 41
      The impulse is more powerful, and hello. Starlink satellites fly lower than Sentinel. It’s not at all a fact that it was Musk who turned off something over Crimea. Putin, speaking about weapons based on new physical principles, was clearly not talking about missiles. Yes, even if they just learned to suppress (not destroy) satellites at an altitude of 700 kilometers, then this is very cool.
  4. +1
    30 November 2023 06: 38
    Time to delink Starlink.
  5. +1
    30 November 2023 07: 47
    Starlinks and Sentinels appeared before the age of 22. The question is - where were our people looking?
    1. 0
      30 November 2023 10: 19
      They looked into the mouths of their “partners” and thought that the Nazis would get scared, self-destruct and surrender to the Russian army, like in Crimea in 14!
  6. +1
    30 November 2023 10: 16
    If they don’t destroy satellites, then they can’t, and that’s it!
  7. 0
    30 November 2023 11: 45
    Quote: Zeroded
    Have you tried to hack Starlink satellites?

    At such a height, given their size (a thin plate of 5 sq.m.), they are not caught by radar.
    1. 0
      30 November 2023 12: 42
      Come on! Seriously? Also tell me that they don’t emit anything. Portable stations catch them, but more complex equipment is not able to do this. They themselves did not understand what they wrote.