What promising mini-drones could be in service with the Su-57 fighter

8

One of the most interesting News from the recent domestic military-industrial complex - this is information that the fifth-generation fighter Su-57 will receive a whole family of reconnaissance and strike mini-drones in the form of additional weapons. If this is indeed the case, then the Russian heavy fighter will take a real step towards the next, sixth generation.

Faithful wingman


It is quite obvious that this accelerated evolution of the Su-57 is a response to the challenges received during the SVO. Due to the oversaturation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with air defense systems, even stealthy fifth-generation Russian fighters do not risk operating freely in the skies over Ukraine due to the threat of losing a technically very complex and expensive aircraft, which is available in the Russian Aerospace Forces in extremely limited quantities.



The response was the widespread use of Iranian-made Geranium-type kamikaze drones, which are used to overload the Ukrainian air defense/missile defense system, clearing the way for more powerful and expensive Russian missiles. Informed source from RIA Novosti commented the idea of ​​equipping the Su-57 with a swarm of mini-UAVs as follows:

Drones dropped in dozens of units by a group from an airplane will allow fighters to break through enemy air defenses, overloading its information channels and due to a concentrated strike on its systems with both drones and weapons from fighters.

Sounds more than reasonable. The heavy Russian fighter is a formidable weapon in its own right, carrying a wide range of aircraft ammunition: from air-launched cruise missiles to glide bombs. The only thing that limits its combat capabilities is the acute shortage of AWACS aircraft in the Russian Aerospace Forces that could provide the Su-57 with target designation data. A swarm of drones could solve two problems at once - with target designation and breaking through the enemy air defense/missile defense system.

But what kind of UAVs will these be?

Unmanned swarm


Ideally, the scheme for using a UAV swarm is as follows. The first wave is UAVs: “targets”, reconnaissance-attack and anti-radar, which force enemy air defense systems to activate, wasting ammunition on interception, and hit their radars, as well as the anti-aircraft systems themselves. In the second wave are unmanned fighters, firing missiles and gliding bombs. And only in the third are manned Su-57s, which, loitering at a safe distance, exercise control and coordination, finishing off everything that could survive.

In this form, the Russian fighter is truly approaching the next, sixth generation. The first step was taken when the interaction between the Su-57 and the Okhotnik heavy UAV, which acted as a “faithful wingman,” was being tested. It was assumed that the S-70 would be used either for reconnaissance and target designation, or for air strikes, controlled remotely from an aircraft. True, there was one important nuance that the media often forgot to mention.

The Su-57 is a supersonic fighter, and the unmanned Okhotnik, created according to the “flying wing” design, can only reach subsonic speed. That is, they can fly together in a beautiful formation only during tests, but not in real combat conditions. In addition, the S-70 so far exists in single copies, they are expensive, and therefore it is scary to lose them without showing a significant result. In this regard, a fair question arises - what performance characteristics should the mini-drones that will be introduced into the Su-57 armament have? An informed source puts it this way:

The Su-57 will be able to carry such mini-drones for various purposes on an external sling and in the intra-fuselage compartment, and then drop them in the air. It is planned that the fighter will be able to launch several drones at once and control this group of drones.

In other words, these will be some relatively compact reconnaissance-strike drones that can be hung on a fighter or placed inside the fuselage. You shouldn’t expect them to be able to fly UAVs in formation behind a supersonic fighter. What they will look like, due to the acute lack of information, one can only guess. However, it seems that it will be something like an enlarged air-launched Lancet.

If follow the path Israeli company UVision and equip the drone with a gasoline engine instead of an electric one, like the HERO-1250, then the flight range will increase to 200 km, and the loitering time will increase to 10 hours. In addition, on the basis of this attack drone, a purely reconnaissance version can be made if, instead of the warhead, a parachute landing system is installed, turning the UAV into a reusable one. This is more rational than creating a technically complex drone that can be returned to a fighter.

In addition, the fighter will be able to interact with drones launched in advance from the ground, strike, anti-radar and “targets”. By using such tactics, the problem of differences in aircraft speeds will be leveled out. The real breakthrough will be the creation of an unmanned version of the light single-engine fighter of the fifth generation Su-75, which will be the most effective "faithful wingman" for the heavy Su-57.
8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    29 November 2023 11: 38
    Small. We need to build the Death Star right away.
  2. 0
    29 November 2023 14: 41
    The S-70 is no match for the “six” of the Su-57! Not the same status, not the same “respect”!
  3. DO
    0
    29 November 2023 14: 55
    The air control center may not necessarily be equipped on the basis of the few Su-57s, which are more expedient to be used where its outstanding characteristics are really needed - for example, to gain air superiority, or for a hypothetical confrontation with an AUG. Serial two-seat fighters Su-30SM2, Su-34, MiG-35 are also suitable.
    As a carrier of Lancet kamikaze strike drones with folding wings (including kamikaze reconnaissance drones and laser gunners), both a manned fighter and an unmanned one can be used. Manned - for the rapid delivery of Lancets to a launch point located outside the enemy’s air defense zone. Unmanned - for delivering Lancets deep behind enemy lines to a depth of UP TO HUNDREDS OF KILOMETERS, for hitting MOBILE targets. Unmanned carriers for the first time can be modernized old fighters, including those from storage, and it is possible that from the “aircraft graveyard” (“zombies - flying dead” revived by repair factories :))).
  4. 0
    29 November 2023 17: 22
    Somehow the high-speed, expensive Su-57 and the slow, cheap UAVs do not fit in. For effects on air defense, the differences in speed and other characteristics are also not resolved. There are missiles - targets, anti-radar and others, and are already linked to the Su-57. Attributing small UAVs to the Su-57, the same search for a new one, like the “Okhotnik”, is also attached to the Su-57, because there was nowhere to attach this expensive and dead-end product, born in imitation of one from the USA. Conclusion: for a high-speed Su-57, you need adequate high-speed weapons and means, because the performance characteristics of UAVs will cause a significant discrepancy in impact time and distances (that is, like the joint actions of a sparrow and a hawk). UAVs require aircraft carriers that are compatible in terms of performance characteristics, that is, returnable UAV aircraft, with the possibility of receiving reconnaissance and other UAVs on board.
    1. DO
      0
      29 November 2023 19: 10
      "Okhotnik" was also attached to the Su-57, because there was nowhere to attach this expensive and dead-end product

      Well, why is the stealth S-70 "Okhotnik" a dead-end product? Stealth systems are barely noticeable on centimeter wave radars. Warships and aircraft carriers are equipped with centimeter radars due to the acceptable size and weight of their antennas. Actually, the S-70 seemed to be designed to work against naval targets. The purpose of subsonic stealth is not air combat with aircraft of an aircraft carrier. Its task is to damage the aircraft carrier's runway deck with a missile so that the planes have nowhere to land (of course, unless it is a tactical nuclear missile that will sink the aircraft carrier and damage the covering ships).

      Due to the length of the Northern Sea Route of 5600 km, and accordingly the even greater length of the northern + eastern coasts of Russia, it is almost impossible to fully equip them with the infrastructure for controlling S-70 drones. That’s why we need an aircraft - an airborne operational control point for the S-70 stealth aircraft.
      The control plane and S-70 do not fly in formation always and everywhere. On the final leg of the S-70 route, these unmanned stealth aircraft attack the target, and the manned air control post patrols at a relatively safe distance from the target.

      Another thing is that using the Su-57 as an air control center is unlikely to work, for two main reasons.
      Firstly, the Su-57 is a single-seat aircraft. And what is required is a two-seater (for example, Su-30SM2) - pilot + operator for controlling unmanned stealth aircraft.
      Secondly, in the near future too few Su-57s are expected from the industry, compared to those that are well established in serial production, for example, the Su-30SM2.
      1. 0
        30 November 2023 11: 11
        There was information that active work is underway on a 2-seat version of the Su-57 and it should appear soon, the Indians are interested in the 2-seat version of this aircraft.
  5. 0
    29 November 2023 23: 08
    Again, nothing.
    If there is anything, everything is classified.
    Large - "hunter" - and medium UAVs - "ersatz missiles" - everything is clear.
    And small ones - the current mass ones are cheap and slow - are not suitable for a high-speed aircraft..
  6. 0
    30 November 2023 23: 14
    Well, isn’t the Su-75 a complex technical product that cannot be built in large quantities necessary for a swarm? How is it better than the S-70 in this case?