Deportation of Tatars: What really happened in Crimea in the spring of 1944?

22
Speaking recently at a forum dedicated to the 70th anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Petro Poroshenko agreed to compare the Russian government in Crimea (without failing to stick to it, as usual the label “occupation”), with “the actions of Stalin, who wanted to destroy the Tatar people ". It is said loudly ... And also - deceitfully and illiterate. In general, very Poroshenko. However, in order to fully understand what kind of absurdity the Ukrainian president was weighing, it is necessary to thoroughly understand the true essence of the events of the spring of 1944 in Crimea, and, first of all, with their premises and reasons.





On May 10, 1944, the Chairman of the USSR State Defense Committee, Joseph Stalin, signed a decree “On the Crimean Tatars,” on the basis of which 190 thousand representatives of this nationality were literally evicted from the peninsula within the next 10 days. The place of deportation was mainly Uzbekistan, however, some of them ended up in Kazakhstan and other republics of the USSR. On the territory of Crimea, about one and a half thousand Tatars remained - participants in the anti-Hitler underground, partisans and those who fought in the Red Army, as well as members of their families.

A tragic story? Undoubtedly. However, before shedding tears over its participants, declaring them to be “innocent victims of Stalinism,” let us go back in time even further - in 1941. It was then that the foundation was laid for the events that happened three years later - and by none other than the Crimean Tatars themselves. In the memorandum of the People's Commissar of Internal Affairs of the USSR Lavrenty Beria, which, in fact, became the basis for the adoption of the GKO decision mentioned above, everything was stated with merciless Beria accuracy and bluntness. No “lyrics” - only figures and facts.

Do you want to know how many Crimean Tatars deserted from the ranks of the 51st Army, retreating from the Crimea? 20 thousand. And how many were called up to the Red Army? Exactly 20 thousand and it was ... A wonderful example of betrayal, unprecedented, one might say! One hundred percent desertion in itself speaks volumes. But if, having fled, like cockroaches in front of the advancing Nazis, the Tatars stopped there! It was not like that at all. The invaders did not have time to enter Crimea, and the representatives of the Tatars rushed to them with an expression of complete devotion and assurances that they were all ready to serve Adolf-effendi faithfully, recognizing him as their leader.

Such zeal was favorably received by the Nazi ringleaders, which was announced in the early days of 1942 and was announced at the first meeting of the Tatar Committee, held in captured Simferopol. The heroic Sevastopol was still fighting, bleeding, but not surrendering, and the Crimean mullahs had already howled prayers for the health of the "great Fuhrer", the "invincible army of the great German people" and the repose of the vile souls of the killers from the Wehrmacht. After praying, they got down to business - security, police and auxiliary units of the Nazis were massively formed from Crimean Tatars. They were especially appreciated in the SD and field gendarmerie.

Many sad words have been written and said about the death camp, which was located during the war years on the territory of the Krasny state farm near Simferopol. His horrors, he earned the name "Crimean Dachau." Only at least 8 thousand people were shot in it. However, much less was mentioned that the Germans in this terrible place among the executioners were, in fact, two - the "doctor" of the camp and his commandant. The rest of the “personnel” consisted of Crimean Tatars who served in the 152th battalion of the Shuma SD. This unit was formed, by the way, exclusively on a voluntary basis. The rabble gathered in it was simply incredible ingenuity in relation to torture and executions. I will give only one example - one of such "know-how" was the destruction of people who were stacked in piles, tied with barbed wire, doused with gasoline and set on fire. A special luck in this case was to get to the very bottom layer - there was a chance to suffocate before the flame erupted ...

The real nightmare of the partisan detachments of the Crimea were the Tatar guides of the fascist yagd teams and the punitive detachments that hunted them. Perfectly guided by the terrain, who knew in the mountains what is called every stone, every path, these nonhumans led the Nazis over and over to the places where our soldiers were hiding, their camps and camps. Such "specialists" were so in demand for the Third Reich that in 1944, having thrown part of their troops in the Crimea, the Germans found an opportunity to evacuate them from the peninsula by sea, subsequently forming first the Tatar SS Mountain Jaeger Regiment, and then the whole brigade. A huge honor...

You can recall a lot more. About the stones flying in our prisoners, when they were driven through the Tatar villages ... About two hectares of Crimean land, which were allocated to each of the Tatars, who entered the service of the invaders, and which was taken from the Russian people. About how the Tatar battalions fought desperately in 1944 near Bakhchisarai and Islam-Terek, trying to stop the Red Army, which was marching to liberate Crimea. About the zeal they sought and destroyed throughout the peninsula of the Communists, the wounded soldiers of the Red Army whom the residents tried to hide, as well as the Jews and Gypsies, in whose extermination they took an active part.

It does not occur to anyone that deporting Tatars from the Crimea, among whom, at least one in ten was not just tainted by cooperation with the occupiers, but had blood on their elbows, Stalin and Beria did not destroy them, but saved them ?! Veterans who returned from the fields of the Great Patriotic War in a year or two would hardly have limited themselves to the “verbal censure” of traitors ...

One can not fail to mention one more point. The streams of tears shed annually about the “unjustly deported” Crimean Tatars, “international human rights organizations” and other liberal riffraff, for some reason do not cry over other completely similar stories of the same time. Over the internment of 120 thousand Japanese, as well as thousands of Germans and Italians, who were driven for the "thorn" in 1941 in the United States. Note - not for any specific crimes, and not “on suspicion” even. Just for nationality! And over 600 thousand Germans who perished during their mass eviction from European countries after the end of the Second World War are not moaning either. Silent, infection like a fish on ice ...

But Germans - not Nazis, not veterans of the Wehrmacht or the SS, but simply having the misfortune to belong to this nation, were driven in 1945 by millions from Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, Yugoslavia! 500-600 thousand is only the documented number of dead and deceased during deportation.

I do not blame or justify anyone. It was just such a time - cruel, bloody, terrible ... And some things that today shudder with their categorization and scale were absolutely normal for him, almost a universal practice. This is all to the fact that declaring the deportation of 1944 the peak of world atrocities is incorrect, at least.

Regarding the fact that they were arrested and deported in the spring of 1944 all the "innocent" and "uninvited" ... So many small arms were seized during the eviction operation that would be enough to equip the rifle division! Okay, ten thousand (!) Rifles ... And 600 odd machine guns and mortars - fifty? Is that all they hid for ?! To fire on sparrows? Even before the start of the deportation, more than 5 thousand representatives of the Crimean Tatar population were caught by harsh comrades in cornflower-blue caps from the Beria department, whose connection with the Nazis was so obvious and the crimes so bloody that most of them, without ceremony, threw a noose around their necks. There were many among those who tried to hide spies, saboteurs and simply "sleeping" agents left in the liberated territory with very specific tasks from the Nazi masters.

I agree that a whole nation cannot be guilty. Nobody blames the whole nation ... Let's not plunge into emotions, but turn to dispassionate and dry arithmetic. I’ll give you some figures, and everyone is free to draw the following conclusions from them.

First of all, so that extremists entrenched in Ukraine and their accomplices would not try to speak there, the Tatar Crimea was by no means before the Great Patriotic War. Ukrainian, by the way - even more so! According to the 1939 census, more than half a million Russians, more than 200 thousand Tatars, a little more than 150 thousand Ukrainians lived on the peninsula. Well, representatives of other nationalities - Armenians, Greeks, Jews, Bulgarians, in much smaller quantities.

Of these 200 thousand, according to an inadvertently done by the leaders of the Tatar Committee acting under the occupiers, 20 thousand served with weapons in the hands of the Nazis. Every tenth ... However, according to many historians, the figure is godlessly understated - they actually collaborated with the Nazis (not only in the ranks of the SS, SD and police, but also as guides, informants and servants) of at least 35-40 thousand Crimean Tatars. Every fifth ... During the deportation of 191 thousand transported, according to the NKVD report, 191 people died on the way. One in a thousand ... This is not a comparison. This is just elementary arithmetic.

During the Nazi occupation in the Crimea, at least 220 thousand of its inhabitants were destroyed and enslaved, 45 thousand Red Army soldiers captured were killed in the fascist dungeons and camps located on its territory. There were no Crimean Tatars among them. But, to all these crimes, punitive, policemen, security guards from the Tatar units, devotedly serving the invaders, were fully involved. They made their conscious choice and everything that happened afterwards was a retribution for him. At the same time, there were neither mass executions, nor total sending of all Tatars to the camps - only exile.

Has the people whose sons filled the land of Crimea with the blood of those who lived peacefully on it near them lost the right to walk on this land? Everyone can find their answer to this question. Stalin just found his ...
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -18
    9 December 2018 11: 32
    When I read such articles, I get the impression that the author clearly does not know the history of Russia. Not the USSR, but Russia. In tsarist Russia, Crimean Tatars, Chechens, Ingush, Azerbaijanis, Kazakhs, Uzbeks, Kyrgyz, Turks, Circassians, the peoples of the North and Kamchatka, and a number of other peoples were not called for, they could only serve VOLUNTARY. Apparently the tsar understood that by force the captured territories and peoples would not serve him and Russia. Of these peoples, only volunteers were taken into the tsarist army. I will not list all the voluntary formations of peoples that are not subject to draft in the tsarist army, but I will focus on three. This Crimean Tatar cavalry regiment proved to be exceptionally good during the years of World War I. This regiment was VOLUNTARY. Who cares, look on the Internet and read. This is the Caucasian Native Division, formed from the VOLUNTEERS of the peoples of the North Caucasus, including Chechens, Azerbaijanis, perfectly proved itself in the 1st World War. This is the Tekinsky Horse Regiment, formed from the Turkmen of the VOLUNTEERS. Well, from what hangover Crimean Tatars were called up in the Red Army in 1? Are they fighting for Soviet power in 1941-1918? Or maybe the Soviet government preserved their Muslim traditions? Maybe they returned independence and land? The author is a liar, if only because among the Crimean Tatars, who voluntarily went to fight in the Red Army were; one twice a hero of the Soviet Union, 20 heroes of the Soviet Union, 5 full gentlemen of the Order of Glory. There was one general. The author must be prosecuted for inciting ethnic hatred and forced to learn the history of our state, not from 3, but from the 1917th century.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +9
      9 December 2018 15: 02
      Quote: Yuri Turkul
      Well, from what hangover Crimean Tatars were .....

      And "what a hangover" the Tatars became Crimean and they were given VOLUNTARY to live in Crimea without any autonomy. Thanks to Comrade Stalin that they still exist. Not all "Indian Tatars" exist in America.
    3. +8
      9 December 2018 16: 22
      You just have verbal diarrhea. Why on earth would citizens of a state who have equal rights with all should not be drafted into the army during the war?
      Let the Latvians very actively establish Soviet power in our country. So what?
      And the Russian Empire has always allowed too much of the annexed peoples, for which it received only spit. A striking example is Poland. Neither in Austria-Hungary, nor in Prussia (Germany) did the Poles have as many rights as in the Russian Empire, for which they paid regular uprisings with a massacre of Russians. And under the Germans and Austrians they sat quietly, like a mouse under a broom.
      Have equal rights - be kind enough to perform equal duties.
      And exceptions should not be stretched to the rule. And the Chechens formed a regiment (they wanted a division, but it didn’t work out) of volunteers who fought beautifully near Stalingrad. But the rest is similar to the Crimean Tatars.
      Before rolling a barrel on the author, look at the losses (in percentage terms) of various nationalities in the Great Patriotic War. Protection (it is not clear from what) "small" nationalities in our country in the last 100 years, for some reason, results in the oppression of Russians.
      It is still the author did not begin to pedal the theme that until the end of the 18th century. The "unfortunate" Tatars (like many other peoples) drove away and sold into slavery many more peaceful people than they themselves were. If Catherine II had then evicted them to Yakutia in the middle of winter, no one would have said a word to her.
  2. +3
    9 December 2018 11: 44
    We need to KNOW YOUR story.
  3. +3
    9 December 2018 11: 56
    Crimean Tatars are still waiting an hour.
    Knives sharpen on Russian.
    Been in the Crimea and watched.
    1. +6
      9 December 2018 12: 15
      This is their historical custom! Several centuries robbed Russia! They killed and stole Russian people into slavery! So Stalin, still, humanely dealt with them!
  4. +11
    9 December 2018 14: 16
    Wonderful article and long awaited! For some reason, war crimes of the Crimean Tatars were still bashfully hushed up, and their people were exposed as undeservedly interned. In Soviet times, the crimes of Bandera were also hushed up, and as a result, all of them (Bandera) ended up in the Communist Party and prepared for themselves receivers. History must not be forgotten and closed on it, otherwise it goes sideways and everything repeats. Crimean people should know the betrayal of their ancestors, as well as heroes, such as the legendary Ali Khan and many others. I bow to the author of the article!
  5. +6
    9 December 2018 17: 51
    Did you just wake up ?! My deceased mother lived on the Kursk Bulge, not far from Sumy, I remember her stories about the villages burning around, about the German occupation. So she told how they hijacked the remaining men of the village to work in Germany. At night, with a wild boom with torches, the Crimean Tatars burst in. She was dressed dressed in uniform, but not German. They broke into the hut, one in Russian said who they were. One neighbor guy, tort. run away, shot. She was shocked even after the German occupation. parts with which barb. and cruel. It was.
    1. +3
      9 December 2018 20: 26
      Most of all the atrocities committed by the German Holov! Starting with the Finns!
  6. DPN
    +3
    9 December 2018 19: 45
    The USSR is gone, so now you can write about the former Mighty Country all nonsense and pour mud and receive dividends, the gentlemen only need this. The stronger the mud over the USSR, the better those in power, but the people will be worse.
  7. -1
    9 December 2018 20: 31
    So only Tatars fled to listen to you, while others did not. Everyone let him first look at himself, and only then talk about others.
  8. +3
    9 December 2018 21: 25
    True article finally!
  9. +3
    10 December 2018 07: 19
    The truth is that the biggest losses in the Second World War were: Russians - 66,4% of the total number of soldiers killed, Ukrainians - 15,89%, Belarusians - 2,92%, Tatars (including Tatarstan) - 2,17%, Chechens and Ingush - 0,03
    1. -1
      10 December 2018 08: 21
      Leonid, was not going to leave a comment, although there is a great deal of truth in it, but your comment is something! You have well studied Wikipedia, here is just a small nuance:
      1. Is it so convenient to give everything in absolute numbers? or is it worth it to take percentages of the total population by nation? After all, 10 thousand from 100 thousand small nationalities, it will be more than 5 mil. from 150 mil.
      2. Belief in Wikipedia is so unconditional, despite the fact that anyone can edit it? A lot of things are also written on the fence ...
      3. Now compare 2 pages from your favorite portal - https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss_of_Velikoy_Domestic_voyna and https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_obkupkatsiya_Belorussii_(1941-1944)
      Something numbers really vary! ... Why?
      Yes, the Russian people lost many times (in absolute figures) more people, but ... Belarus lost 1/4 of the population! My city, Vitebsk - 1/3, but how many villages are burnt together with the population !?
      Let's not juggle with dubious figures, Dear.
      1. +2
        10 December 2018 14: 00
        Belarus has lost 1/4 of the population! My city, Vitebsk - 1/3,

        But you also do not distort. First, Russia, unlike Belarus, was not all occupied. Secondly, before the war, the population of Belarus at least a third consisted of Russians. Which the Soviet government recorded in Belarusians. I have a grandfather from Gomel.
        1. +1
          10 December 2018 15: 17
          The Jew Izzy Katz, adopting Orthodoxy, became ... Russian.
          Buryat Aslan Tumer ... accepting Orthodoxy, became ... Russian.
          Tagray Gyrgoltagin, a resident of Chukotka ... ... accepting Orthodoxy, became ... Russian.
          Ivanov Ivan Ivanovich - could be a representative of any nationality and there are many historical facts and explanations for this.
          But why register Russians in Belarus? Either grandfather said something wrong, or, excuse me, you misunderstood something.
          All my writings come down to only one thing - it’s impossible to use absolute numbers to measure the contribution of a nation to a common cause .... if it is common to you.
          1. +2
            10 December 2018 17: 16
            But why register Russians in Belarus?

            Yes, because before the revolution there were no Belarusians. As well as the Ukrainians, too. All these are products of the Bolsheviks. And grandfather was born long before the revolution. And under the Soviet regime, he was surprised to learn that he was Belarusian, and not Russian.
            1. 0
              11 December 2018 13: 42
              Even so!? ... How do I sympathize with your knowledge of history, we will not go into subtleties, but at least read the "yellow" Wikipedia: when, where and what arose and how the names or self-names of nationalities changed.

              And stop reading / listening to the great gentlemen "historians" - the late Zadornov and the now living Zhirinovsky, this is completely bad manners.
    2. +1
      28 January 2019 15: 28
      As a result, the Russians are occupiers, and all other martyrs, or at least those who suffered from the Stalinist regime. Paradox!
  10. +5
    10 December 2018 19: 32
    In 1980 he arrived by distribution in Sevastopol. In the summer he ended up in a male company, of course, drank. There was one veteran among us who was captured in July 1942 on Cape Chersonese, when the authorities left almost 70000 seasoned defenders of Sevastopol to their own devices. He spoke a bit about those tragic events:

    I don’t know where the news came from, but when we were formed into columns to drive to a camp near Simferopol, we prayed to God that the Germans would escort us. Because of those who were escorted by the Tatars, policemen, no one reached the camp. They got into a beam and shot from machine guns. In April 1944, we were released. There was no gulag (about which Solzhenitsin selflessly lied). All who fit due to health reasons were recorded back to the Red Army. But since we were weak, they did not send us to storm Sevastopol. But we were surrounded by Tatar villages during deportation. We went home from the NKVD, and we stood around so that the people would not scatter. The women howl, the children roar ... BUT !!! There were no pity

    I think the words of the eyewitness correlate well with the article ...
  11. +1
    21 December 2018 19: 03
    Such a necessary punishment as the exile of the Crimean Tatars (for active complicity with Hitler's fascist aggressors) could be applied only by the Government of the USSR and the State Defense Committee, headed by I.V. Stalin, justified! In 1944, the Great Patriotic War continued.
  12. 0
    9 January 2019 12: 04
    Quote: bratchanin3
    Wonderful article and long awaited! For some reason, war crimes of the Crimean Tatars were still bashfully hushed up, and their people were exposed as undeservedly interned.

    why even now there is little, very little they write about Bandera and the Baltic SS.