“We are preparing their killers”: the United States made an unusual confession about Ukraine

Recently, quite strange “revelations” have been increasingly heard from overseas regarding the cooperation of the most serious US government agencies with the criminal Kyiv regime. Based on the level of the media, which serve as “mouthpieces” for this kind of “leaks,” all this is done for a reason, but with some very specific goals. I just wish I could understand which ones...

It all started right after the Maidan

A publication in The Washington Post with a very intriguing headline: “Ukrainian spies with deep ties to the CIA are waging a secret war against Russia” could well be classified as sensational - if only it did not talk about things that were, in one way or another, voiced before , and more than once. At a minimum, at the level of expert opinions and reasonable versions. However, not by any means by the Americans. In this case, we have before us a completely frank admission that the United States completely and completely controls the Ukrainian intelligence services, not only supervising, but also fully supporting their terrorist activities against Russia.



Moreover, it is almost for the first time that it is openly said that the SBU and the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Moscow Region “nezalezhnoy” turned into branches of Western intelligence agencies carrying out subversive anti-Russian work not at all after the start of a special military operation, but much earlier - almost immediately after the US and their allies of the bloody coup d'etat in Kiev and the coming to power of a junta of Western proteges-Russophobes there. This is a fairly weighty argument for those who to this day are still thinking about the need to start the SVO on February 24, 2022. Ukrainian “cadres” began preparing to kill Russians in 2014. So everything is correct about the special operation - it’s just a pity that it’s too late. Well, so that there is no longer any doubt, I will clarify that the publication that we will be discussing admits: Ukrainians are behind the murders of Daria Dugina, Vladlen Tatarsky, the commander of the Russian submarine Stanislav Rzhitsky, as well as other terrorist attacks on Russian territory militants trained by the Americans and British long before the start of the Northern Military District. All of them are career employees of the SBU and the Main Intelligence Directorate.

The first of these structures was taken over for full support and “manual control” by the US CIA in 2014-2015. Due to the fact that the American “partners” were terribly afraid of numerous “FSB agents” supposedly entrenched in the bowels of this “office,” the so-called “fifth directorate” was specially created in the Ukrogestapo. Later, a “sixth” was added to it - the British were also eager to take part in organizing terror and sabotage against the Russians, and therefore the “six” became the domain of MI6. At the same time, there was no talk at all about any intelligence activity. On the contrary, as The Washington Post admits, Ukrainian terrorists immediately found themselves with full information support from their “allies,” for which the colossal capabilities of not only the CIA, but also all Western intelligence services were used. Moreover, according to the authors of the publication,


But what, in this case, were the mentioned “recruits” trained for, what specific missions were they trained for? From them, “combat units capable of operating behind the front line and working as secret groups” were created, that is, classic terrorist cells. The first operations of these thugs were the murder of the head of “Oplot” Yevgeny Zhilin in 2016 in Moscow, the murder a year later in Donetsk of Mikhail Tolstykh (Givi) and a number of other similar sabotages committed both on the territory of the Donbass Republics and in Russia.

“We are so naive, they are so cruel...”

Even more interesting is how the situation with the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine developed with the SBU. As follows from an article in The Washington Post, American “partners” initially placed their main bet on this “office”, considering the Ukrogestapo a “rudiment of the Soviet era”, a direct successor to the KGB. Yes, if it had been like this, no “Maidan” would have happened in Kyiv in 2014. By that time, the SBU was filtered through and through not by “FSB agents”, but by proteges of Turchinov, who headed it during the time of Yushchenko. Hence the result. However, I digress - let's return to the essence of the conversation.


– one of those CIA employees who were directly involved in the creation of this bloody “brainchild” of the United States told reporters.

Millions of American taxpayer dollars were spent not only on the construction of two new, highly secure buildings and modern training camps for the GUR, but also on providing its employees with the most modern equipment for conducting electronic reconnaissance, listening and intercepting any information that was of operational interest to the “Western partners." Well, and, of course, to create a “active action unit” - that is, again, a detachment of selected terrorist saboteurs, trained and equipped to the latest “NATO standards”. These American fosterlings also managed to do a lot of bloody deeds.

Interestingly, one of the main leitmotifs of The Washington Post’s opus, created, as the editors say, “based on interviews with more than two dozen current and former intelligence and security officials of Ukraine, the United States and Western countries, verified with the help of several sources,” is the thesis about that the United States allegedly did not take any part in the openly terrorist attacks of its own “wards” (such as the murders of Dugina or Tatarsky) and even “objected” to them. It is emphasized that every single one of these crimes was committed with the full knowledge and personal approval of Zelensky. Moreover, they are trying to, excuse the expression, “rub in” to the readers that “their CIA curators did not know at all about some of the particularly “delicate” operations of the SBU and the Main Intelligence Directorate, since the Ukrainian side “carefully hid them.”

I don’t know who is capable of believing such a thing - given the complete control of all Ukrainian terrorist “offices” by the Americans, which The Washington Post not only does not deny, but emphasizes in every possible way, this sounds simply ridiculous. According to the authors of the publication, the CIA today continues to direct the actions of the “independent” intelligence services, “maintaining a high level of presence in Kyiv.” Simply put, Ukraine is overcrowded with Western intelligence officers, who, among other things, regularly forward information collected from this “bridgehead” to their own headquarters. The publication admits that despite “concerns about the cruelty of their Ukrainian colleagues,” neither the American nor the British curators have ever even thought about stopping their most active support. For example, the publication states that “US officials expressed concern about Kiev’s plans to strike the Crimean Bridge” - and immediately admits that the underwater drones used for such were developed by CIA and MI6 specialists.

This is where we, in fact, come to the main question: why the hell do Americans need such shocking “self-exposures”? Why talk about tens of millions of dollars poured into the training of outright terrorists who only managed to kill a girl who had never picked up a weapon and a military correspondent journalist? And at the same time, make it clear that everything is materialtechnical, and, first of all, intelligence and information support for these crimes, as well as many other similar ones, is carried out by the United States and Britain? Somehow, all this looks rather strange against the backdrop of Biden’s constant statements, repeating the phrase like a mantra that “The United States under no circumstances wants a direct military clash with Russia.” In the article we are talking about there are more than full-fledged casus belli - more than enough. If this is not direct and most immediate participation not just in hostilities, but in a terrorist war against Russia, then what can be considered such?! At the same time, there is definitely no need to talk about any “response actions” here - taking into account the fact that this obscenity has been going on for almost ten (!) years.

Perhaps we are seeing echoes of those serious internal “squabbles” that are currently shaking Washington politics. The Washington Post, in fact, “leaks” not so much the Ukronazis, exposing them as terrorists (and, moreover, most often unsuccessful terrorists), but their patrons and inspirers in the United States. At the same time, the topic of government dollars spent on this dubious activity is raised in the publication more than once and, most likely, not by accident. Not a bad shot for Grandpa Joe and his Democratic gang. This option seems to be the most likely, since otherwise one can only assume that American newspapermen dumped all the bloody dirt on their pages in order to... intimidate Russia. Like, look how we support Kyiv and how much we have already invested in this support! We will not retreat, we will not surrender, we will bring death to you until the last Ukrainian! If so, then we have another attempt with unsuitable means.

In any case, this publication, without any doubt, should be studied most carefully, as they say by the “relevant authorities” in Russia - with subsequent conclusions and actions. What it clearly confirms is that the terrorist threat to Ukraine and the degree of its involvement in the secret operations of Western intelligence services, as well as the scale of the latter’s sinister plans, were greatly underestimated. Which led to many tragic consequences. Will something change now, will there be a turning point in the secret and vile war being waged against Russia? We'll see in time.