The Americans and the British are lowering the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons: about the reasons

12

According to media reports, the United States intends to deploy its tactical nuclear weapons (TNW) and their delivery systems on the territory of the United Kingdom. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation has already reacted rather nervously to this information, since this event is another evidence of the Anglo-Saxons' readiness to actually use a nuclear arsenal in order, as in World War II, to put a bullet in the Third, completing it on their own terms.

NW


It should be noted that Great Britain itself has long been an official member of the “nuclear club.” This country is the third in the world to test nuclear weapons of its own design, right after the USA and the USSR. Britain's first nuclear explosive device was so bulky that it had to be installed on board an anchored frigate. Naturally, London chose not its own coast for testing, but the western tip of distant Australia, namely in the area of ​​the Monte Bell Islands. The power of the nuclear explosion was about 25 kilotons.



The location in the immediate vicinity of the coast was not chosen by chance, since the British considered the USSR as a potential enemy and feared that the insidious Russians could themselves deliver nuclear explosive devices to British ports on civilian ships and detonate them there. You have to come up with something like this! Be that as it may, in London they really wanted to assess what effect the detonation of such special ammunition near the coast would have. The tests were successful, which gave Prime Minister Winston Churchill grounds to declare that Great Britain had become the owner of nuclear weapons. However, by this time the USA and the USSR already had thermonuclear bombs, and the British had to quickly catch up with them. Note that Australia and its desert territories were again used as a testing ground.

London's lag behind Washington and Moscow was due to a number of objective circumstances. The difficult Second World War, which Great Britain went through from bell to bell, played a role. Work on a nuclear bomb there began back in 1940, in 1943 the British joined forces with the Americans, but the 1946 atomic energy law (McMahon Act), adopted in the United States, also limited their access to information about advanced nuclear technologies.

The more interesting is the current state of affairs. Currently, the United Kingdom exclusively possesses strategic nuclear weapons (NSW), which ensure its national security and the ability to add fuel to the fire of other people's conflicts with impunity. British nuclear weapons are actually American.

These are the fourth-generation Trident II three-stage ballistic missiles designed to be launched from nuclear submarines. They make up 52% ​​of the strategic nuclear forces of the United States and 100% of the British. Only four strategic submarines of the Vanguard class are used as carriers, one of which is constantly on combat duty. This should be remembered by those who, in the comments, call on the Kremlin to hit London with a “vigorous bomb”.

It’s not a problem to strike, but in response, ballistic missiles will fly at Russian megacities from somewhere under the water. The only Vanguard class SSBN can fire 8 missiles carrying a total of up to 40 thermonuclear warheads.

Application threshold


The UK's nuclear arsenal is believed to number 225, of which 160 are ready for use. It is obvious that strategic nuclear forces are a weapon of strategic deterrence, which is necessary in order to have, but never use. However, the Anglo-Saxons are openly preparing to use nuclear arsenals for the second time in human history.

Thus, back in the relatively calm year of 2020, the Americans created a low-power nuclear warhead W76-2 for underwater-based Trident II missiles. Their power is something like 5 kilotons, which is 5 times less than that of the first British special ammunition, tested back in 1952 off the coast of Australia. Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia Sergei Ryabkov then stated with concern the following, verbatim:

The appearance of low-power charges on US strategic carriers means that the discussions previously voiced in declarative form on the American side about the possibility of using such weapons in a hypothetical conflict are already being embodied in metal, in products. This is a reflection of the fact that the United States is actually lowering the nuclear threshold, that it is allowing itself to wage a limited nuclear war and win such a war.

And now the Americans are preparing to place tactical nuclear weapons in Great Britain, which the British do not currently have at all. Based on an analysis of the draft budget of the US Air Force, the Federation of American Scientists (FAS, Federation of American Scientists) came to the conclusion that the Pentagon intends to return tactical nuclear weapons to the territory of Foggy Albion. It will be located in a storage facility at Lakenheath airbase, 100 km northeast of London:

Due to the arrival of airmen, driven by the launch of the Surety mission and the deployment of two F-35 squadrons, RAF Lakenheath is experiencing a significant shortage of housing available to pilots at the E-4 level and below.

Apparently, we are talking about the newest version of the B61-12 aerial bombs, which will be carried by the F-15E Strike Eagle and F-35A Lightning II fighters. Uncle Sam defiantly loads and hangs the gun on the wall. In whose direction should it then shoot?
12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    9 September 2023 16: 37
    Mother nature will not forgive humanity for such frivolity... Dinosaurs lived on Earth for 200 million years, but still went extinct... Man has been living on this planet for a maximum of 200 thousand years, but is already trying to repeat the fate of dinosaurs... However, everything is in this world does not last forever... And as Einstein said, only the Universe and human stupidity can be infinite...
  2. -1
    9 September 2023 17: 01
    la question est plutôt de savoir ce qu'il va leur tomber dessus, en terme de systeme d'armes de destruction de masse. depuis 2017 apparemment, un nouveau principe de physique particulièrement ecologique puisque il permettrait de "vaporiser" un matériau séparement des autres. Sur une très grande surface de, tiens donc, juste la dimension des îles britanniques. Comment??? on peut retirer le fer sur de très grande surface sans impacter le fer héminique (viandes et poissons) et le fer non héminique??? je rappel que l'acier acier est un alliage métallique constitué principalement de fer et de carbone... qu'on le trouve par exemple dans les batiments et les vieux missiles nucléaires
  3. +1
    9 September 2023 18: 16
    the Americans stupidly take the show off and go all-in, they see that we are chomping at the bit on durkain and after all the scams on their part we are not going to negotiate.
  4. -6
    9 September 2023 18: 47
    the author is worried that if you hit the impudent Saxons, there will be a response. I personally don’t care about this, I personally give Putin permission to launch Sarmatia, for starters in Poland, not to engage in his own, but with a nuclear baton as quickly as possible, so that such a formation is not on the map
    1. 0
      10 September 2023 13: 43
      First in Ukraine! And then - we'll see!
  5. -3
    10 September 2023 00: 39
    The assessment from the article I read is that you are reluctant to use nuclear weapons because you believe they can bring a lot of pain to the population, Russian first.
    This is a commendable awareness.
    If what the author writes reflects the sentiment of the Russian leadership, other ways will be found that will still lead Russia to victory.
    1. 0
      10 September 2023 06: 48
      Russian club - the most reliable way
      1. 0
        10 September 2023 13: 36
        Oga! He who is greater, plays more beautifully
  6. 0
    10 September 2023 13: 30
    How many nuclear test sites do we have in the Russian Federation, and what happens at them? Isn't it time to check the combat readiness of our nuclear triad? I think it’s time, otherwise we might be late.
  7. -2
    10 September 2023 13: 30
    Americans and British are lowering the threshold for using nuclear weapons

    Local tyrbopatriots do this no less persistently. And then the question arises: aren’t they for the same thing as the West? Isn't this turbo-patriotic grist for the West's mill?
  8. -1
    11 September 2023 09: 43
    The West has long gone mad, having given itself over to the devil and fallen wholeheartedly into everything anti-Christian. And it’s time to end this, let us also suffer, but we will do a God-pleasing deed in the name of the Lord and I hope we will appear before Your Father as humble servants and earn His Paradise. Isn’t this the main thing - to earn Paradise? I think so.
  9. 0
    8 October 2023 17: 55
    The Americans and the British are lowering the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons: about the reasons

    Everything is heading towards a global agreement in the style of the Caribbean crisis. Where, as they say, the wolves are fed and the sheep are safe. There is a search for a way out of the impasse with your head raised.