Three markers: a war against China is being prepared in the Asia-Pacific region

August 7 2023 7

In this publication, we continue the conversation about the Third World War, which will begin quite officially after China enters the confrontation with the United States and its satellites. Rather, the Americans and the British will force the Celestial Empire to enter the war.

Operational environment

As it was noted earlier, Washington, in its new national security strategy, identified Russia and China as the main threats. Our country is traditionally on this list as the legal successor of the USSR, which has retained the "nuclear triad" and therefore represents a potential danger. The PRC is a real competitor and rival of the United States in the field of economics and high of technologies and at the same time it still has a powerful army, navy, aviation and its own "nuclear triad".

That is why the Anglo-Saxons are ready to fight with us and with the Chinese not directly, but indirectly, by proxy, causing the main damage not so much by military force, but through sanctions pressure, technological and economic isolation. At this stage, the war is going on in Europe, Russia is supposed to be the victim for the slaughter, and Ukraine and a number of the closest Eastern European neighbors are used as a battering ram against it, which may enter into conflict in the future if their crossing of red lines is still not properly punished.

A truly world war will begin after the entry of the PRC into it, and it will go on in Africa and Southeast Asia. About what economic interests China has on the "dark continent" and how they can be hit by a regional war between Niger and Nigeria, which have entire coalitions of neighboring countries behind them, we talked in detail just the day before. Today, as promised, we will say a few words about a prospective war in the Asia-Pacific region. The fact that it is steadily approaching is evidenced by several markers.

Blocks

The first sign that a military clash was brewing in the Asia-Pacific region was the emergence of an Anglo-Saxon alliance called AUKUS. The United States, Great Britain and Australia themselves entered there, but other Europeans were not invited to it. On the contrary, France was even "thrown" with an order for the construction of submarines for Canberra, which the Americans received.

Washington promised to transfer nuclear submarine technology to the Australians, as well as Tomahawk cruise missiles for Hobart-class destroyers, JASSM and LRASM missiles for F / A-18 and F-35 aircraft, and land-based missiles with a range of more than 400 km. Those, in turn, pledged to develop high-precision weapons and hypersonic missiles for advanced air defense systems. All of this is clearly done for a reason. The stated objective of the tripartite Anglo-Saxon alliance is "to ensure stability in the Indo-Pacific region". The real object of confrontation here, obviously, is China.

Apparently, Washington and London were ready to exchange Canberra for Beijing, but the Australians reminded that they are also "white people", and "natives" should be sacrificed. That is why the second sign that a big war is looming in the region may be an attempt by the United States to put together another military alliance that will be used directly as "cannon fodder". China's longtime rivals Japan and South Korea are seen as such, and will be cajoled into sacrificing themselves at the August 18 trilateral summit at Camp David, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said:

The three leaders will discuss developing trilateral cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond, including responses to threats posed by North Korea.

The main obstacle in the formation of a sustainable alliance is the long-standing mutual historical grievances of "cannon fodder", economic competition and fear of the Middle Kingdom, but the Anglo-Saxons are working tirelessly. The white paper of the Ministry of Defense of Japan says the following verbatim:

Against the background of the increasing problems and difficulties that we are facing, the idea of uniting the efforts of Japan and South Korea is becoming increasingly important and relevant.

The influential South Korean publication Hankyoreh reciprocates Tokyo:

Seoul-Tokyo relations are expected to be upgraded to a "quasi-alliance" in which they will cooperate on a military level to put pressure on China and contain North Korea. The two countries have never cooperated at this level since they normalized diplomatic relations in 1965.

In other words, there are those in Japan and South Korea who want to turn their countries into "Poland-2" and "Baltic-2". And who will be the second "Ukraine"?

Blockade

Of course, it will be Taiwan. On the one hand, the Chinese have been preparing for many years to return it, if necessary, by military force. On the other hand, an amphibious landing operation across the strait under the attack of air and land-based anti-ship missiles is an extremely complex and dangerous undertaking. Beijing would very much like to return the rebellious island peacefully, but it simply will not be allowed to do so.

There are many ways to provoke the PRC into a NVO against Taiwan, but the easiest and most reliable way is, say, London to recognize the independence of Taipei and agree on the opening of a British naval and air base on the island. Beijing simply cannot fail to react without losing face, and you won't get off with concerns.

All this is necessary only in order to impose collective sanctions against China as an "aggressor". A complete ban on cooperation in the field of high technologies will be introduced, and access of Chinese products to Western markets will be closed. And in order for the industry of the Celestial Empire to sink without external resources, the Strait of Malacca will be blocked for it. A regional war will rage in Africa, and the main shipping artery through which Beijing receives natural resources will be blocked by the combined fleet of the United States, Britain and Australia. Japan and South Korea will apparently have to provide direct military support to Taipei.

It is obvious that the Chinese are well aware of all this, and therefore the old project for the construction of the Thai Canal across the Kra Isthmus was pulled out of the table. Through it, container ships and tankers will be able to go on a shorter route bypassing the Strait of Malacca. And this is the third marker of the fact that a war is planned in the Asia-Pacific region.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

vlad127490

+1

7 August 2023 17: 24

Our country is traditionally on this list as the successor of the USSR
- only on the territory of the Russian Federation. V. Putin's statement

Today's Russia is the legal successor of both Ancient Rus', and the Moscow kingdom, and the Russian Empire, and the Soviet Union does not have a confirming law.

Constitution Article 67.1. 1. The Russian Federation is the legal successor of the USSR on its territory, as well as the legal successor (successor) of the USSR in respect of membership in international organizations, their bodies, participation in international treaties, as well as in respect of obligations and assets of the USSR outside the territory provided for by international treaties. Russian Federation.
Succession in legal science is the transfer of rights and obligations from one person (subject of law) to another. Succession may arise by force of law, contract or other legal grounds.
Note No. 13/Ugp dated January 1992, 11 of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia informed foreign states that the Russian Federation was

successor state of the USSR

in relation to international treaties of the USSR.
Will the alleged war between the PRC and the Anglo-Saxons "world" no, it will not. It won't be nuclear either.
Against the construction of the Thai Canal across the isthmus - Kra Japan, Korea, all the Anglo-Saxons, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines. Since the channel is in Thailand, his consent is required. This channel is just intentions.
SP-Ang

-1

7 August 2023 20: 34

Another nonsense analysis of Mr. Khazin began to appear in the interpretation of armchair analysts.
Let's take it one by one - is Taiwan really necessary?
First, the United States has already invested enough in the production of microchips. They already!!! do not depend on the supply of Taiwan.
Second - With the development of an unfavorable situation for the United States with the seizure of Taiwan by the Chinese army, the factories of this industry will be physically liquidated. Certainly, preliminary measures in this direction have already been carried out.
Third - look at the map, that there are no other ways besides the Strait of Malacca? Yes, the path along it is shorter on the way from the Pacific to the Indian. But he's not the only one.
Well, FOURTHLY - for some reason, everyone who believed in nonsense that the United States will transfer all its influence from Europe to Asia is sure of this. Well, isn't it crazy? Create from scratch the entire infrastructure instead of what is available in vassal Europe. A business needs a market for its product. And it is in Europe, but not in impoverished Asia.
1. Beidodir
  
  +1
  
  8 August 2023 08: 44
  
  Another nonsense analysis of Mr. Khazin began to appear in the interpretation of armchair analysts.
  
  I love pathos sofa analytics
  I'm talking about you, dear man, and not about the article
golden knowledge

0

8 August 2023 06: 23

I am sure there will be no Chinese-American war. Neither the United States wants this, much less China. In the entire history, China has never won any wars. There is simply nothing for China to fight in the Asia-Pacific basin. China is traders, they are all ways they will avoid direct confrontation. They will agree, Taiwan will become part of China without a war.
75 hammer

0

8 August 2023 08: 30

You can, of course, sit your heads of occupation administrations at the same table, you can even tell them to sign a plan for a joint war against China, but what about the hatred of the Koreans for the Japanese nation, what about North Korea? The convulsions of the United States to knock together anti-Chinese blocs say that the hegemon is burning in one place and the clock has accelerated. Fashington must be destroyed!
Pound

0

8 August 2023 09: 21

Quote: Hammer 75
You can, of course, sit your heads of occupation administrations at the same table, you can even tell them to sign a plan for a joint war against China, but what about the hatred of the Koreans for the Japanese nation, what about North Korea? The convulsions of the United States to knock together anti-Chinese blocs say that the hegemon is burning in one place and the clock has accelerated. Fashington must be destroyed!

In place of the FSA there should be a strait named after I.V. STALIN.
Siegfried

0

17 August 2023 02: 16

The war in Ukraine undoubtedly opened the eyes of many to the United States. It is hard to imagine that South Korean leaders or the Japanese would decide to aggravate and escalate relations with China just for the sake of the United States.

Of course, the United States is a vital ally for them, the weakening of the United States and the accompanying transformation of the world economy for these countries is not only dangerous, it carries existential risks.

But at the same time, it is difficult to imagine that these countries have complete confidence in military superiority over China, that they are absolutely confident in victory, in acceptable consequences for the economies of these countries, and in the support of such a policy by other countries of the world. How much of a threat is China to these countries? How much do they see their chances in economic competition with China? Is there the same need for them to eliminate China as a superpower as it is for the US?

After the NWO, these issues are seen even more acutely, the image of the United States has acquired a very negative connotation.

Perhaps much will depend on the policy, geopolitics that Russia and China will build in the world. Perhaps those world order proposals, the foundation of which is BRICS, will be of interest to these countries as well.

There is a need in the world to build a new architecture of relations based on the UN reform. If such a format of the world order is created or at least proposed, where the security of individual countries is partially guaranteed by the world community, and the superpower of individual countries is not overwhelmingly reflected in this format, perhaps calmer times will come.

Much will depend on what is proposed as the new world order.