This is war: the US is preparing to attack the Syrian army

24
According to the American newspaper The Washington Post, senior US officials continue to hatchet aggression against Syria, bypassing the UN Security Council.





The newspaper published material about the fact that US President Donald Trump last week held a meeting with Pentagon chief James Mattis. The discussion was also attended by Presidential Chief of Staff John Kelly and Assistant to the Head of State for National Security Herbert McMaster. It was about a possible “punishment” of Damascus for the alleged use of chlorin in the East Guta region. During the meeting, the US president requested possible options for action on Syria.

As an anonymous source in the US ruling circles told the newspaper, Trump has not yet decided on exactly what steps Washington will take against the Syrian army. So far, it has been decided to "monitor the situation."

Agency RIA News reports that the Pentagon itself has refused to comment on the aforementioned material from The Washington Post.

As a rule, we do not discuss future military plans.

- Adrian Rankin-Galloway, spokesman for the US Department of Defense, told the agency.

Another representative of the Pentagon, Dana White, gave a very strange and controversial comment: firstly, “there was no discussion,” secondly, “Mattis did not participate in the meeting.”

Maybe you should not worry about such messages? If it were not for American practice in relation to other states, it would not be worth it. However, in a situation where the situation around Syria is extremely tense, when the information war against the Middle East state directly affects Russia (constantly accused of the death of mythical "civilians"), when many American officials openly call for striking at the Syrian army, and moreover, when such attacks have already taken place, information on the secret meeting deserves close attention at least.

So, on March 4, a telephone conversation took place between US President Trump and British Prime Minister Theresa May. The rhetoric was maximally anti-Syrian and anti-Russian: they say, "the responsibility for the heartbreaking human suffering lies with the Syrian regime and Russia."

Earlier, the US Secretary of State claimed that Damascus used chemical weapons in Eastern Ghout on January 22. He voiced such “information” at a meeting in Paris, which was dedicated to countering chemical weapons.

The Russian Ministry of Defense has repeatedly stated that all attempts by Western countries to accuse Syria of using poisonous substances are based only on messages from the “Syrian opposition”, which are distributed on social networks. No serious investigation has ever been conducted. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad also recently indicated that all talk about the use of chemical weapons in his country is blackmail and an attempt to create a pretext for airstrikes.

It remains to add that Donald Trump, speaking recently in Florida, sharply criticized one of his predecessors, George W. Bush, for the war in Iraq. He called the American invasion of this country "the worst decision in history." It would seem that Trump returned to where he started, going to the presidential election. The question is: why is he now repeating the criminal “mistake” of Bush Jr. and taking out the same empty test tube with nonexistent chemical weapons from the past?
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    6 March 2018 14: 21
    Regarding the "punishment" ... They will cut them with axes at another Syrian airfield .. Our people will say that they intercepted, although the equipment is in the trash. Everything is as usual..
    1. 0
      6 March 2018 16: 32
      This is sad. Although, perhaps, there will be an answer, simply non-public.
      1. +1
        7 March 2018 08: 12
        "non-public" is not the answer. This is the resistance of the weak.
  2. 0
    6 March 2018 15: 35
    not at all. this time will be easier_ the answer will fly. Listen Dim, how can I get into a dialogue? I press to answer, nothing comes out.
    1. +2
      6 March 2018 15: 47
      the answer in what form? and for whom? will destroyers sink? )
      1. +2
        6 March 2018 16: 00
        in your opinion, it’s acceptable to monitor the destruction of our equipment and the death of the military. Yes, and the Russian language said that we will beat for the allies. I think we will keep the word.
        1. +2
          6 March 2018 16: 33
          God grant that it be so. It is high time.
        2. +3
          6 March 2018 19: 09
          this is not the case. Russia will not sink American ships - this should be understood by a fool. for the third world. shoot down their missiles - yes, it’s possible. and most importantly safe for everyone, including us. we intercept the weapons of attack, and not attack the Americans directly
          1. 0
            8 March 2018 06: 41
            The Russian Federation is not "not a statute" - it CANNOT sink American ships. Compare the Russian navy and aviation with the American ones. WHAT to drown with - a long soft pink tongue?
    2. 0
      8 March 2018 06: 39
      Will it be easier this time? WHAT is easier? Long soft pink tongue?
      1. +1
        8 March 2018 08: 59
        You have this clearly "obsession" - "long soft pink tongue".
  3. 0
    6 March 2018 16: 33
    The Washington Post is still on the side of the Democrats and everything negative about Trump always finds a place on its pages. Well, and a link to an anonymous source reduces the reliability to zero.
    But in war, as in war. The error of the pilot or gunner of the gun and a retaliation immediately, but while the command reacts, it is itself, mutual damage, that requires satisfaction. And as a result, an international scandal.
    Israel, in this sense, is much easier. In any situation, he will traditionally be to blame! As for the United States, they do not accept charges, and how Russia, in a difficult case, will simply veto it. And silence...
    1. +2
      6 March 2018 17: 17
      If there were no attack on the Shairat airbase, almost everything would be true. But that attack took place. There is no guarantee that this will not happen again.
      1. 0
        8 March 2018 06: 44
        This will almost certainly happen again. And Shairat was not at all the first and not the last BELL-OPERATED SHOULDER Russia. Before Shairat, there was a rout of the Russian-Iranian tank fist in At Tanf; after Shairat, there was the elimination of the Russian Wagner shock fist.
  4. +1
    6 March 2018 17: 04
    What did we want? The termination of the contract with Naftogaz, and Nord Stream 2 is already a reality, Putin’s statements, a demonstration of weapons, is this not a statement, so the situation is heating up, that's what scares
    1. 0
      6 March 2018 17: 18
      Yes, every day more and more alarming
      1. 0
        8 March 2018 06: 49
        In Moskvabad, everything is calm.
  5. +3
    6 March 2018 18: 49
    The Supreme will not allow a full turnover. It is fraught with consequences (bills, kids, nondvizhuha there at "who do not leave their own"). On Nusra, with mattress specialists, they will recoup. And elections are just around the corner. The reaction of the population to the full-fledged makhalovo with the Sakskaya inhuman is not known. Unfortunately not a monolith like the USSR. Suddenly they will not vote like that. They taught people that "their own shirt is closer to the body" and every man for himself. The interests of the Russian Federation in the SAR are, for many, very abstract. Military victories must be consolidated politically, as Stalin did. The division of spheres of influence and Nuremberg (which Truman and Churchill actively resisted, but he pushed through and was not afraid. Although the "mushrooms" showed him vigorous). Assad will be pressed and persecuted for a long time and competently. In fact, the country is occupied and the source of the nation's income is the oil fields under the amers. And our specific task is not to let someone else's thread of energy resources into the gamerope.
    1. +1
      7 March 2018 00: 23
      You are partly right. But there is, in parallel, another tendency - to strengthen Russia's position in the world. We will root for it and, as far as possible, we will strengthen it. Who how can
      1. 0
        8 March 2018 06: 47
        After a public slap in the face of Wagner, Russia's military prestige passed away. Now everyone who is not too lazy is shooting at the Russian troops. An airplane with 39 Russian officers and generals is an example of this. And it will increase day by day.
        1. +1
          8 March 2018 08: 13
          This is war. People die in war. About the plane - no one said that they shot at it. Heroes' death does not contradict military prestige
  6. +1
    7 March 2018 08: 16
    The problem is that Russia's policy changes significantly with the advent of the new government. All costs and losses from a people's pocket do not pay off. There is no systematic approach and vision between leaders. What can not be said about the West. With any puppets on the throne, there is a common approach and principle - to dominate at all costs.
    In Russia, agronomists and selyuki, yugists and financiers, communists and Yavlinsky are a shameful shusher who kills his people for the sake of peace.
    1. 0
      8 March 2018 08: 12
      Who is the Communists Killing?
  7. +1
    10 March 2018 20: 58
    Putin made it clear that we will defend Russia and his friends.
    We have concluded a mutual assistance agreement with Syria. So that
    just an attack on Syria will not end.