Heroism involuntarily: problems with digital communications in the troops require a systematic solution

14

Over the past year and a half since the beginning of the NMD in Ukraine, the Russian army has taken a big step forward in increasing its real combat capability. Valuable experience was gained at a high price, coordination and interaction between units and subunits, various branches of the military improved. However, the remaining problems of a logistical nature prevent the maximum disclosure of the offensive potential of the RF Armed Forces.

The reason to touch upon this painful topic again in detail was given by one military episode that took place a few days ago on the Zaporizhzhya Front and became public knowledge. The video shows how the crew of the only Russian tank destroys an entire armored group of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, including two tanks and several MRAP armored personnel carriers, within a few minutes. Unfortunately, due to the abundance of obscene language, which UAV operators could not refrain from at the sight of such an impressive spectacle, we cannot present the video here, but it can be easily found in a search using the keywords “one man in the field”.



One Alyosha


This is a brilliant example of the true heroism of a Russian soldier, and all tankers have earned the title of Hero of Russia. But, as sometimes happens, personal heroism becomes a forced phenomenon when you have to solve problems caused by the unprofessionalism of others. The author of the lines was inspired to write this publication by comments on a video recording of a tank battle, given by several Russian volunteers involved in the supply of the army, and Andrey “Murz” Morozov, a serviceman of the Ghost BTRO, who went to fight to Donbass as a volunteer back in 2014.

So, here is Morozov's comment from his telegram channel:
The UAV operator who is filming all this is sitting at the control room. You hear how for several minutes, critical minutes, there are attempts to call fire at least some kind of fire weapons on the column so that the tankers do not take out one for all. With an observable result, including the comment at the end "No ATGMs, they all ran out."

Question - do you hear the radio exchange of the control room with the tank? Do not hear. Because he has been gone since the moment when the tank commander, sitting on the turret of the vehicle standing in ambush, heard in a Chinese portable device “THEY ARE GOING TO THE 144th point in a column!” or something like. He commands "On the horses!", puts the portable in his pocket, dives into the hatch, and the car rushes into battle.

The key point in all this is the lack of communication with the armored vehicle directly during the battle. This is a very serious problem, since tanks without infantry support are extremely convenient targets. The fact that the problem really exists, confirmed in his telegram channel military volunteer Roman Alekhin:

In February, when I went to one of the brigades of the Western Military District, I had to work on the T-90 from a closed firing position. The tank is very good not only for combat against a visible enemy, but also for long distances, like from artillery. But it bothered me that the gunner was in the tank, and the commander had to sit on the armor to communicate with the UAVs. Firstly, in an oncoming battle, this will not work. Secondly, even then, when working from the PDO, the commander's hands froze, and the radeyka itself was buggy in the cold. I asked: you have a radio in your tank, a headset in your helmet, why don't you work? The answer killed: Roman, there is an analog walkie-talkie, it's like shouting into a megaphone.

Of course, it is very strange why in the 21st century the second army of the world suddenly had communication problems. But it must be clarified that we are talking about digital communications, which must be protected from listening by the enemy. And this is difficult.

No, and there is no court?


The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation relied on the new generation Azart radio stations, which have impressive characteristics, but for some reason everything ended with a criminal case against the former deputy chief of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces, head of the main communications department of the armed forces, Colonel-General Khalil Arslanov, head of the orders department for improvement technical the basics of the command and control system of the RF Armed Forces, Colonel Pavel Kutakhov and military acceptance officer Igor Yakovlev. They are charged with fraud on an especially large scale under military contracts for the supply of equipment from Voentelecom JSC.

Previously, they were also accused of fraud with the purchase of Azart radio stations, which belong to the products of the first category, that is, they should be produced entirely in Russia, but in reality they almost entirely consisted of Chinese components, were purchased at inflated prices, partially understaffed and assembled on the spot. These episodes were removed from the criminal case, but you know, dear readers, what arguments did the defense of the ex-deputy chief of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces cite in support of this? The fact that "the market for such means of communication in Russia simply does not exist", пишет "Kommersant".

After such an explanation, it remains only to shrug our shoulders and see how this problem has been solved since 2014 in the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the NM of the LDNR. Our adversary, after heavy defeats in 2014-2015, began the process of digitalizing his armored vehicles with the help of civilian radio stations, пишет in his LiveJournal "Murz":

The enemy, having much more resources than the Republic, almost immediately after the start of the war, as soon as the problem surfaced and was realized, instead of trying to adjust, he began to select radio stations for open analog radio communication of the armor in Lowband, to replace the radio equipment on the armor with modern basic digital Motorola ". Firstly, this is already a closed, more or less securely encrypted connection, and secondly, you can also buy a lot of portable radio stations and repeaters of the same standard, closing the problem in the bud. The only technological problems remained in this case, not very large-scale difficulties with the integration of the station into the on-board electrical network of armored vehicles, tank intercoms (TPU) and antenna-feeder (AFU) devices. Adaptation of DMRs "Motorol" was carried out by the Kiev office "SHARE I CO. Ltd., these “adaptations for the military” are called “Libid”, and specifically for armored vehicles - “Libid” K-2RB.

Having studied the experience of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the People's Militia of Donbass went the same way, when it was not yet an integral part of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. How is the digitalization process describes the Andrey Morozov himself, who is directly involved in this issue in the Ghost brigade:

In the "Corps of the People's Militia" the only part where all the armored vehicles, on their own, with the help of volunteers, put a "figure" was the "Ghost". The attitude of command to this initiative? While the battalion fought, no one was interested in how it does it in terms of communications. But in the summer of 2021, when the battalion for the first time in a very long time was taken to the training ground for several weeks, the Motorola corps authorities ... ordered to withdraw! And put back R-123 and R-173. Although de facto "Motorolas" have already become the standard of closed communication not only in the "Ghost" itself, but also in the 4th brigade, in the band of which the battalion has been fighting all these years. "NOT ALLOWED".

There is a serious contradiction between the army standards of how it is “supposed” and what is forced to be implemented on the ground by handy craftsmen with the assistance of volunteers. For my part, I would very much like this problem with the digitalization of communications to be solved “from above”, systematically and centrally, without unnecessary delay and taking into account the prevailing sanctions realities, for a victorious result. And the tankers, who single-handedly destroyed an entire armored group of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, without having secure digital communications, are doubly Heroes.
14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    1 August 2023 16: 03
    Such problems must be solved by mobilizing all the forces that can solve this problem. But the Kremlin keeps hoping for persuasion and the free market of private enterprises that do not know how to work for the good of the country, but understand only profit, and therefore it is often enough for them to grab a piece of the allocated money, and then write an explanation about the difficulties. In our system of irresponsibility and impunity implemented by the authorities, 20 years of this is enough.
  2. +1
    1 August 2023 16: 07
    Looking at the video, it's hard to believe that the tankers were out of touch. There was a landing between our tank and the enemy, which our tank pierced through, as if blindly, on a tip. The enemy tanks were clearly waiting for him to appear in the line-of-sight sector, deploying their trunks there. Armored vehicles crowded behind the tanks, hoping for their dynamic protection. And it flew through the greenery, from where it was not expected. Most likely, the enemy knew about our tank, but did not hear his conversations. I only heard the broadcast of the control center or saw only the approach of the tank from afar through the "bird", from my side.
    What was it ? The connection of our tank with a spotter located directly above the point, or new sighting devices? Or is it just battle luck? We'll find out soon.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. DO
      +2
      1 August 2023 17: 33
      Lev Nikolayevich, what happened on the video looks more like an initiative of the tank crew than an order over a closed communication to the tank commander to attack the column of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. For with the presence of another “bird”-spotter that you assume, it would be more logical to hit the column with artillery, MLRS or aircraft than to send a single tank into battle, almost to certain death. And the fact that there was an opportunity to hit the column not from the tank follows from the orders from the command post not to shoot at the column so as not to get into your tank.
      1. 0
        1 August 2023 19: 12
        DO Dmitry, I agree, it would have been more logical to hit with artillery, unless this bird was "tame", attached to this particular tank. After all, he was sitting in an ambush, and in such a position, his "initiative" is perceived as quite thought out. Part of the video was filmed in such an angle, as if from a UAV hovering directly above our tank. It is hard to believe in this, therefore only the option with a new sight remains unexamined. By the way, has someone already determined the modification of the tank?
        1. DO
          +1
          1 August 2023 21: 14
          Judging by the video, the crew was informed from the command post that a convoy of the Armed Forces of Ukraine was heading towards them. But for some reason, at the command post, they were very surprised at the further actions of the tank crew, and even twice gave the order not to shoot at the column, so as not to hook their own. It is possible that at the CP they expected the tank to move in a completely different direction, or that it would not stick out of cover. For the enemy could have Western sights more abruptly than ours, brilliant green could be with holes in both directions, and a bird on their side probably also hung. And one tank for a well-thought-out ambush on a convoy with tanks and not on something less dangerous is somehow not enough.
          Most likely, no one, including the enemy, expected such aggressive actions from the crew of our only tank.
          1. +1
            1 August 2023 22: 07
            Most likely, no one, including the enemy, expected such aggressive actions from the crew of our only tank.

            But this is precisely what gave him a tactical advantage. Military fart!
            And for a tank, the most dangerous thing is the birdmen scattered across the field, presumably.
            Finding them is difficult, and the time of the rocket's approach can be minimal.
            In this episode, they apparently did not have time to dismount.
            1. DO
              +1
              2 August 2023 15: 42
              https://dzen.ru/a/ZMkbDpFxNUrSZatK
              In an interview, the tank commander said that the enemy's jammers were working, and there was no communication at all. We jumped out for some stirring behind the forest belt ...
  3. DO
    +4
    1 August 2023 17: 03
    Heroism reluctantly

    It can be seen and heard in the video that the decision to attack the column of the Armed Forces of Ukraine was taken by the commander of the Russian tank.
    For judging by the conversations of the observers at the command post, they were very surprised at the deadly risky actions of the tank crew,
    1. 0
      1 August 2023 22: 50
      And who made the decision to attack the convoy without communication, except for the commander, mechanic driver, gunner or UAV operator?
      1. DO
        +1
        2 August 2023 00: 07
        Twice-born, in a tank, the decision is made by the tank commander, the rest of the crew must follow his orders. Otherwise, in battle, everyone is a guaranteed tryndets.
        While the tank was standing, there was communication - on the video, the crew was informed about the approach of the enemy column. Whether there was a connection during the movement of the tank, it is definitely not possible to establish from the video. Yes, in general, in this dynamic situation, after deciding to attack the convoy, the tank commander was not in the mood for talking, even if there was a connection.
  4. +1
    1 August 2023 22: 44
    This state of affairs in the army is not just gouging and inertia of command, but open sabotage! How long will they forgive? Before the war, Stalin fought with the same things from the age of 37, and the Jews told us stories about causeless repressions in books, films and the media! And after all, he dealt with thieves, traitors, pests, thieves, and then we won.
    And now the extermination of Russians is just going on, and from the other side, too, under cover, they say, they are not hefty.
  5. -1
    2 August 2023 14: 45
    You wrote:

    The video shows how the crew of the only Russian tank destroys an entire armored group of the Armed Forces of Ukraine within a few minutes,

    None of this is visible on the video. And he did not destroy any column.

    Learn the materiel.
  6. 0
    3 August 2023 16: 57
    ... The problem of disgusting communication in the troops has been going on since the very first Chechen ... (Through the Second and the War with Georgia ...)
    And it turned into some strange harmful tradition...
    ... It is hard to believe that for three decades in the Russian Federation there were no domestic talented engineers-patriots capable of solving this problem at least at an acceptable level ... There are such people. They just aren't allowed to work...
    ... Thus, we can fully draw the following conclusion: the creation and implementation of high-quality communication systems in the troops has long been not only a military-technical problem ... but, first of all, this is already an extensive field for work and the task of the FSB ..., to identify outright pests (primarily - agents of influence), and others - military and civilian traitors, securely entrenched in the relevant structures of the army and the entire defense complex of the Russian Federation ...
    ... The army cannot be considered modern and truly combat-ready without the latest means and communication systems in the troops ...
  7. 0
    13 August 2023 02: 51
    Unfortunately for us and the author, it is easier for our elite to make gold stars than to solve serious problems with emerging problems. Because that's not what they're in for.