Can ROSS turn into a BRICS orbital station

20

On July 26, 2022, Russia officially decided to withdraw from the International Space Station (ISS) project after 2024. Instead, it was decided to focus on the national project of its own ROSS orbital station. What can be the real Russian "Mir-2"?

From ISS to ROSS


The International Space Station is a product of cooperation between 14 countries, which, in addition to Russia, also includes the USA, Canada, Japan and France, Germany, Belgium, Denmark, Italy, Spain, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands and Switzerland, which are members of the European Space Agency. In general, entirely "partners" with whom we do not go along the way.



The fact that our country could withdraw from this project began to be discussed even before the start of a special military operation in Ukraine, when all the above-mentioned countries introduced unprecedented anti-Russian economic sanctions and launched an active militarytechnical assistance to the Kyiv regime. The reason for this was the venerable age of the ISS, which began to function in 1998, gradually acquiring more and more new modules. The first and cornerstone, by the way, was the Russian functional cargo block Zarya. The aging of the orbital station objectively led to an increasing number of technical problems, which are becoming more and more difficult and costly to fix. The new head of Roskosmos, Yuri Borisov, stated the following verbatim on this issue last summer:

There is such a thing - "aging of iron", many engineers know what it is. Today, the intensity of various kinds of emergencies, failure of equipment, the appearance of microcracks is beginning to increase. This is a natural process at the end of the life cycle of any product. It is unlikely that such a specialist in any country in the world today will be able to predict exactly when this process will begin to turn into an avalanche and create a real threat to the crew. All these predictions are rather probabilistic. But, according to the authoritative opinion of many experts, the likelihood of such a process is just possible after 2024, which is why I announced this period.

However, in October 2022, Deputy Prime Minister and Head of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation Denis Manturov hastened to argue with him in absentia:

As a result, it was found that there are no unsolvable technical problems preventing the extension of the ISS RS operation after 2024... We consider it possible to extend the operation of the ISS for the period of deployment of the Russian orbital station in the minimum configuration, that is, until 2028.

You can understand the fears of the sislib responsible for the industrial development of the country and the spending of budgetary funds: the ISS is here, and the national orbital station so far exists only in the project.

It was announced that ROSS (Russian Orbital Service Station) will be formed from modules previously intended for docking to the ISS, namely NEM, MLM and UM, to which the Gateway (SHM) and Transformable (TM) will be added later. That is, in total, our station should consist of at least five modules and be in a high-latitude orbit with an inclination angle of 97 °, taking control of the Arctic and the territory of a potential enemy. Due to such an orbit, where there is an increased level of cosmic radiation, the ROSS will not be inhabited, but visited. The first stage of deployment is planned for 2027-2030, the second - for 2030-2032.

In general, this is a very useful thing from a scientific and especially military point of view, but not cheap and not fast. Therefore, there is nothing surprising in the fact that Moscow is looking for partners to implement such a large-scale space project.

BRICS station?


Speaking to President Putin, Roscosmos chief Yuri Borisov recently made the following statement:

We are actively looking for cooperation opportunities with countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America.

Following the results of his trip to Egypt and Algeria, Rogozin's successor spoke about the interest in the project from these countries:

We talked about the creation of multi-satellite constellations, launch services, and manned space. I proposed participation in the Russian Orbital Station, and full-blooded participation, not just the training of cosmonauts, but up to the construction of national modules. I will say that the interest in our proposals is very high.

It is not worth ironic that the Russian Federation is looking for partners in space programs in Africa. Despite the obvious technological backwardness today, the "black continent" has a huge potential for economic growth in the near future, attracting investments from the most developed countries. Algeria and Egypt, in particular, are among the recognized leaders of the Arab world, long-term partners of the USSR and the Russian Federation. South Africa is a member of the BRICS club and a site where elements of the NES system (system for tracking the situation in near-Earth space) are located. If, however, a new cosmodrome appears in the equatorial part of the African continent with the participation of Roscosmos, launches from there will have a significant competitive advantage.

In addition to separate negotiations with individual countries of the “black continent” on participation in the ROSS project, the domestic state corporation proposes that the entire BRICS join it, in general, creating a separate module at the Russian orbital station:

I would like to invite BRICS partners to consider the opportunity to take part in this project and, by joining forces, create a full-fledged module that, being part of the ROSS, would allow the BRICS countries to use the possibilities of low Earth orbit to implement their national space programs.

In the new geopolitical and economic realities, cooperation with the BRICS club in the space sector seems to be the most realistic and desirable format for the development of our own orbital station.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    27 July 2023 12: 56
    it will definitely become, just like the Brix bank, at present it has become especially fashionable in the West to "throw" Russia
  2. +1
    27 July 2023 13: 21
    Due to such an orbit, where there is an increased level of cosmic radiation, the ROSS will not be inhabited, but visited.

    I hope this is a delusional fiction of the author, because if this is real ...
    1. +1
      5 August 2023 02: 38
      I hope this is a delusional fiction of the author, because if this is real ...

      No it is. And not so much because of radiation, at first it is supposed to work for 240 days until everything is fine, and then: they flew in, sat down, flew away. Apparently it is very expensive: to ensure a permanent stay in space. When astronauts are in space, dozens of people sit in the MCC around the clock. And not only in tsupe. And so it flies itself and flies, but you need to change something on it, they flew in and changed it. Manned astronautics has outlived its usefulness.
  3. +1
    27 July 2023 13: 28
    Russia should have full sovereignty for such an object, passionaries tied to the west are unacceptable to one degree or another, and whether the inclination of the station’s orbit designed for Russian interests will suit foreigners.
    Conclusion - BRICS needs a separate station on a commercial basis and should not be mixed with ROSS.
  4. +2
    27 July 2023 13: 34
    The BRICS Bank, which has joined the US and EU sanctions, is of course a parable, but as long as its assets are in dollars, you should not count on anything else. No operation license, no maintenance. Interest - interest, but only the high-latitude ROSS project is focused on the needs of terrestrial consumers and servicing the satellite constellation of the Russian Federation. Scientific programs are autonomous without the participation of the crew. He came, put it in, took it out, took a selfie and left. This is how Roskosmos sees it. Where is the place for curious newcomers from the BRICS countries is unclear. The ends don't match.
  5. 0
    27 July 2023 14: 08
    Another projector...
    Moreover, the deadlines are already too high, and then you can safely forget about them, everyone is already used to it ....

    Who already remembers the promises "Moon by 2015", "nuclear tug - tug to all tugs"? Here YouTube will be closed, and they will be forgotten ...
    It will be like in patients with amnesia - every day new joyful discoveries ...
  6. +1
    27 July 2023 17: 57
    Quote: Ivan Ivanovich 68743684
    it will definitely become, just like the Brix bank, at present it has become especially fashionable in the West to "throw" Russia

    Yeah:

    BRICS bank refuses to invest in Russia due to sanctions
  7. 0
    27 July 2023 23: 47
    That’s all nonsense.

    If you make a station, then on some advanced technologies. To repeat the world and ISS is a waste of money.

    For example, there was the Nadezhda station project. You can find it on the Internet. She had electrically conductive cables that created a repulsive force from the Earth's magnetic field. The station itself could support itself in orbit.
    Here is the topic. And the rest is nonsense.
    1. 0
      28 July 2023 09: 21
      Quote from Savage3000
      Repeating the world and ISS is a waste of money.

      It means to leave manned space altogether, and in 10 years to lose all technology.
      Maybe he is not needed, that manned space.
      Here, Germany-Japan does not have it, but no one considers them backward.

      But it is for the Russian Federation that this is a kind of fetish, which is a pity to abandon, and it is pointless to allocate serious funds. Accordingly, one way or another, NEM * is tormented, and for another 20 years it will denote our presence in space.

      *science and energy module, is "in a high state of readiness".
      Well, "science" in a high degree of readiness spent 20 years on earth, in 2021, nevertheless, they successfully launched and docked to the ISS.
      1. 0
        29 July 2023 17: 36
        I think that this means something else: you need to do everything right.

        Yes, and the country now needs satellites and communications, and not a station using old technologies.
    2. 0
      27 August 2023 10: 21
      They would have said right away: "perpetual motion machine"!
      With Luna-25, they screwed up!
  8. +3
    28 July 2023 00: 47
    What, again there is not enough money to create your own station, not depending on anyone ?! And for some reason, the USSR had enough. Probably because they didn’t build all sorts of Ramovichs, Rottenbergs and other Jewish clans in Rus' for themselves yachts at the price of nuclear cruisers, houses at the price of any regional center and salary for directors of 50 million dollars a year! And they didn’t buy football and basketball clubs from Western enemies for billions, real estate, and then they were given them as gifts!
    And in general, people's oil, gas, gold and 300 billion dollars were not given to enemies for free!
    And now our power (is it ours?) is rushing from one addiction to another. Looking for partners!
  9. 0
    28 July 2023 07: 57
    Everyone is looking for who they are ... caresses, warms ... Passive, however ...
  10. 0
    28 July 2023 16: 35
    I still don't understand one "strangeness"
    If the countries of the "African continent" cannot create space technologies
    Then why does Russia need their participation in the creation of a new station?
    I'm not asking - what will it be expressed in, I'm wondering - why is it?
    Simplified - why bring dogs to a dairy farm if they will never give milk?
    And more interesting:
    Can Russia itself create a station or not?
    If so, why "partners"?
    If it cannot, then what can "partners" who cannot change in this either?
    And most importantly - why do we need a station? I mean specifically, and not "to conduct a wide range of scientific research" - after all, "Mir" was flooded precisely "because" it was "impossible" to conduct them on it, and the ISS was created specifically for them, but nothing has been done? Does anyone know what important discoveries that gave at least some effect for Russia in economic terms were made on the ISS?
    Such are the questions.
    I know for sure that our country can create any station in space and there are a million scientific problems that need to be investigated at such a station. But our state does not need it.
    1. 0
      31 July 2023 09: 48
      Quote: yakisam
      If the countries of the "African continent" cannot create space technologies
      Then why does Russia need their participation in the creation of a new station?

      In order to buy technologies and equipment from the West through them, which will not be sold to Russia directly.
      1. 0
        31 July 2023 12: 03
        Yes, I get it, it's a smart idea
        But if some "technologies" and even more so "equipment" have to be purchased in a "roundabout" way, then - maybe - it is better to master them at home? Because when the purchased item is in orbit, it cannot be purchased a second time, and the entire station will become a hostage of someone else's component. Like all "domestic" technology today.
        Not to mention that it is possible to create technology based on such fundamental solutions that do not require missing technologies and equipment, but allow their use in the future in the process of improvement or modernization.
        I joked about "smart", you probably understood :) This is Gaidar's idea (Egor, of course, and not Arkady or Timur, of course) and in the conditions of OUR country is not just erroneous, but simply criminal.
        My opinion is simple - if our country is going to send something somewhere, then "it" must be produced by ourselves. I don’t consider the arguments “no one does this” and “impossible” to be serious. The USSR could, so it is possible. Whoever cannot, let him go to the unemployed, and give way to those who want to be able and are ready to bear responsibility for "I could not." For example, me.
        This is my primitive point of view.
        1. 0
          27 August 2023 10: 33
          And why not Arcadia and not Timur?
          After all, the USSR collapsed. So they were wrong! Practice -- the best " criterion of truth " !
    2. 0
      27 August 2023 10: 26
      Space must be abandoned.
      At least for a while, Because we have no order on earth!
  11. 0
    9 August 2023 02: 23
    Station world, international station, moon, mars....Okaztsa money can not only be buried, but also let go. And at this time, somewhere in the suburbs, an old woman kneads the dirt in her village to go to the store.
    1. 0
      9 September 2023 02: 14
      In any country, regardless of its space activity, grannies will continue to stir up dirt on the way to the local village store. One has never interfered with the other, there is no need for illusions. And in New York, there are more homeless people than dirt and grannies are also forced to walk around with pistols.