Why the Russian Armed Forces need unmanned attack helicopters

6

One of the leading roles in repelling the first wave of the Ukrainian offensive was played by Russian aviation, front-line and army. Bombers and attack aircraft hit the mechanized columns of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, remaining outside the range of their air defense, but attack helicopters were already hunting for the Leopards, moreover, at low altitude and under continuous attacks by enemy MANPADS. I would like to talk more about the difficult work of army aviation.

"Leopard Hunters"


Helicopters Ka-52 and Mi-28NM, which form the basis of the shock fist of army aviation, have been taking part in the NWO since the very first days. Their main purpose is to destroy armored and unarmored equipment the enemy, his manpower and even low-speed air targets. Unfortunately, during the special operation, painful losses were suffered among these formidable rotorcraft, since the very specifics of their use forces the crews to operate at extremely low altitudes, hitting enemy armored vehicles with anti-tank missiles.



The reason for this is the oversaturation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with Western MANPADS, as well as the fact that Ukrainian air defense has not yet been completely suppressed. On the contrary, the number of quite modern NATO-style anti-aircraft missile systems in service with the Kyiv regime is only increasing. To save the helicopters and their crews, the Ka-52 and Mi-28NM often had to be used as aerial rocket artillery, firing unguided rockets from behind the front line along a hinged trajectory. The effectiveness of such attacks raises certain doubts. However, in the course of repelling a large-scale counteroffensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the Ka-52 and Mi-28NM showed the maximum of what they are capable of.

In the Zaporozhye direction, Russian attack helicopters literally smashed Ukrainian tanks and infantry fighting vehicles, including the vaunted German Leopards and American Bradleys. Why was the deadly potential of army aviation able to reveal itself to the maximum right now?

Obviously, the point is in the competent organization of the defense system. The mining of the area forced the enemy to stretch out into columns, which became a fairly easy target for front-line aviation and artillery. The fact that the Armed Forces of Ukraine could not provide each attacking column with a Buk-type mobile air defense system also played a role, or they were destroyed in a timely manner. This allowed attack helicopters to hit enemy armored vehicles with anti-tank missiles at low altitude with an effective range of up to 10 km. Despite this, our Ka-52 and Mi-28NM were subjected to massive attacks from the ground with the help of MANPADS.

Currently, it is being actively discussed how the Ka-52 helicopter was able to survive after the attack of as many as 18 anti-aircraft missiles from portable systems! Only the Vitebsk airborne complex, specially designed for this purpose, allowed to save the rotorcraft and its crew. Praise our developers, but 18 missiles, Carl! This is a real game with death, and you should seriously think about how to reduce the risks for ground attack and army pilots operating at low and ultra-low altitudes.

UAVs


One of the most promising areas in this area is considered to be unmanned aircraft. If necessary, a UAV can be made not only from an airplane, but also from a helicopter. The United States, our main geopolitical adversary, has interesting developments in this area that require consideration.

first - This is a conversion of already produced helicopters into unmanned aerial vehicles. The American company Aurora Flight Sciences has developed a tactical autonomous piloting complex TALOS (Tactical Autonomous Aerial Logistics System), which includes video surveillance systems, sensors, an on-board computer with an interface for connecting to helicopter avionics and a pilot-operator workstation based on a standard tablet PC with specialized software security. This product is the result of the US Marine Corps program to create an autonomous piloting aviation system for transport and logistics units of the USMC AACUS (Autonomous Aerial Cargo / Utility System).

The TALOS system has been tested on various types of helicopters, including the Bell 206 and the legendary UH-1 Huey. The rotorcraft is controlled from a regular tablet. During tests at the USMC Quantico base, an American serviceman who did not have the appropriate experience, after a 15-minute briefing, managed to land the Huey.

Second direction involves the development of unmanned helicopters based on existing manned models. An example is the Northrop Grumman MQ-8B Fire Scout unmanned helicopter, commissioned by the US Navy. The UAVs of this family were based on the light single-engine Schweizer 330/333 and Bell 407. The devices were significantly lightened by removing everything necessary for the crew, an additional fuel tank was installed, the electronics were brought into line with army standards, equipped with equipment protected from electromagnetic effects. What can they do?

The RQ-8A and MQ-8A unmanned helicopters are capable of taking off and landing independently, without the participation of an operator, they have an autopilot with the function of maintaining the specified course and output to a given point, the ability to control the operator at any time and at any point on the route is retained. To monitor the situation in a given area, the machine is equipped with a video camera, a thermal imager and a laser rangefinder. The video signal is transmitted to the operator's control panel. Onboard equipment allows you to monitor and detect targets. Also, the device can be equipped with a radar station and guided missiles and unguided.

Thus, an unmanned helicopter turns out to be an excellent reconnaissance aircraft capable of monitoring vast water areas or territories, as well as independently delivering air strikes. Undoubtedly, such equipment would find its application in the Russian troops as reconnaissance and assault vehicles.

Curious developments in the field ethereal helicopters currently in Belarus, where the "Hunter" was created, armed with machine guns, unguided rockets and anti-tank bombs. In cooperation with Belarusian partners, we have developed an unmanned drone of the BAS-200 helicopter type, designed for reconnaissance and cargo delivery. However, the experience of the SVO is literally pushing to force unmanned helicopters to fight as reconnaissance, spotters and attack aircraft.
6 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    10 June 2023 15: 45
    The stump is clear, and unmanned helicopters, and airplanes, and UAVs, and transport workers, and tanks, and air defense, and unmanned mortars, submarines, boats, snipers, etc. are required.
    Yes, where can I get them? It is necessary to allocate money, find smart developers, develop, find economic capacities, produce in serial quantities, paint application tactics .......

    As they wrote all the past years - go into business, guys and don't worry ..

    There is already a lot for parades, NIAMs are whole families of Uranus, Hunters, and others
  2. +1
    10 June 2023 17: 11
    To begin with, the Ka-50M needs to be brought to mind, and then on its basis to create an unmanned helicopter, the coaxial scheme is easier to pilot, I had to fly the Mi-8 and various Kamov machines, I still take my breath away from the memories of both the Ka- 27 from a speed of 120 in a few seconds you hover and land on the site, the Mi-8 beam would immediately hit the ground with a beam, and there are no vibrations when entering on Kamov machines.
  3. 0
    10 June 2023 18: 50
    An unmanned helicopter, in my opinion, will not justify itself. Very expensive, it requires excellent electronics to work under the influence of electronic warfare, plus the speed of its production will certainly be comparable to manned helicopters. Isn't it cheaper and faster to produce disposable UAV shells? They do not require a state-of-the-art factory, do not require a large staff, and they can be launched from anywhere.
  4. -1
    11 June 2023 03: 44
    Why the Russian Armed Forces need unmanned attack helicopters

    Because it is cheap, reliable and practical. Well, flight schools can be optimized, again, save money on the pilot's salary, save on subsequent payments to the pilot. Beneficial from all sides.
  5. 0
    11 June 2023 09: 24
    Do you really need an airplane, helicopter or drone to lift an ATGM into the sky?!
    Why not lift a balloon with the necessary weapons on a cable 5-7 kilometers from the front line?
    A hot air balloon is much simpler and cheaper than any drone.
    Place guidance and launch devices on the car, to fill the balloon - the required number of gas cylinders. There is a minimum of electronics on board, control from the ground.
    They lifted several such systems into the air in a shallow rear or in the second line of defense and protected tank-dangerous areas. There are long-range ATGMs for this.
  6. +1
    11 June 2023 21: 29
    Why... ! Which one to ask? Unmanned helicopters of the "Hunter" type, armed with S-8L guided missiles and machine-gun installations according to the Gast scheme, were needed at the very beginning of the NWO to escort columns of Russian troops and detect ambushes of the Armed Forces of Ukraine! They were supposed to be in columns and launched from special armored vehicles! There was no such tool in the Russian troops! As for the "conversion" of manned helicopters into drones, I had to read on the Internet that it was planned to create a combat drone helicopter on the basis of the Ka-50 helicopter! And in the end ... all questions to the RF Ministry of Defense!