Russian kamikaze drone "Privet-82" began to be mass-produced

36

The kamikaze UAV “Privet-82” developed by Russian volunteers began to be mass-produced. Now the 33rd such device is in production. At the same time, volunteers are already working on creating an improved version of this UAV.

Recall that the Hi-82 kamikaze drone is a development of the Oko volunteer design bureau. According to the declared characteristics, the drone can carry a 5,5 kg payload and has a flight range of up to 30 kilometers.




With the help of this device, Russian military personnel will be able not only to conduct reconnaissance of the area, but also to destroy personnel and military machinery militants of the Kyiv regime.

At the same time, the Oko design bureau does not hide the fact that an improved version of the Privet-82 drone, which will be called the Privet-120, is currently being developed.

According to the developers, the new device will be an ultra-cheap cruise missile. It is assumed that the cost of one such kamikaze drone will be no higher than an ordinary washing machine.

Russian kamikaze drone "Privet-82" began to be mass-produced

It is already known that the device under development will be able to carry a 16 kg payload and will have a flight range of up to 250 kilometers.

We add that military journalists and experts have repeatedly spoken about the need to develop and produce their own cheap UAVs. One such device is able to disable equipment, the cost of which is estimated at tens of millions of dollars.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    16 March 2023 10: 46
    Good name laughing
  2. -5
    16 March 2023 10: 55
    cheap cruise missile.

    By the way, I don’t understand where the fashion came from to call cheap cruise missiles drones.
    So is art. a shell, and even an air bomb - the same unmanned and flying ...
    1. +3
      16 March 2023 12: 47
      A rocket is an aircraft that is propelled by jet propulsion. A cruise missile is a missile whose trajectory is determined by the aerodynamic lift of the wing. Thus, a rocket and an aircraft moving not due to jet thrust, but due to a pushing / pulling propeller, is not a rocket, even if with a wing / wings. Further. A drone is an aircraft without a crew on board. Those. this is an "aircraft", but call the projectile an aircraft ... although yes it flies. An aerial bomb, it’s more difficult here, in fact, it doesn’t fly, but falls. But, it depends on the method of application, for example, when cabling, we can say that it flies. Well, planning unambiguously - flies. But, LA is a flight device that acts as a vehicle. But the bomb and projectile are not vehicles. To summarize, a kamikaze drone is not a rocket, it is an aircraft, it is an unmanned aircraft, i.e. this is definitely an UAV. But why these are called "cheap cruise missiles" is simply by analogy with the intended use, the expected results and, of course, the method of delivering the combat load. In many languages ​​there are analogisms (a word according to the words of Makarov 1908) even worse, here we have, for example - "this is not a car, this is black lightning!" and where is the question of a car, as a vehicle and lightning as a substance in a completely different state of aggregation, and even in a state that never happens - black? :)
      1. +1
        16 March 2023 17: 54
        Well, wow, your discussion has unfolded here. The previous commentator, like me, to whom you put everything on the shelves (almost), I think I finished it)
      2. 0
        17 March 2023 12: 34
        Gorgeous, just class!
      3. 0
        20 March 2023 16: 20
        Traditions, play on words. Sometimes a literal translation is not possible, because. turns out to be complete bullshit. It's like the gas pedal in a car. There is a pedal, but where is the gas? Especially if it's an electric car. :-)))
  3. -7
    16 March 2023 10: 55
    Vaseline-95, Kamasutra-98, Wagtail-02, Crucian-09, Kingfisher-13, Silver Carp-17, Covid-19, Crossbow-21 ...

    Posons, you can make them there in a space assortment, I have already come up with names for them.
    1. +2
      16 March 2023 20: 19
      more -,, Salute", "Eaglet" ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. +10
    16 March 2023 12: 16
    Shame. Volunteers can make cheap and necessary armies of UAVs, but our military-industrial complex cannot be born in any way. There is always something stopping him.
    1. +5
      16 March 2023 12: 50
      Our military-industrial complex has long been born. But only here "cheap" this concept is not compatible with ours or with any military-industrial complex.
    2. -4
      16 March 2023 18: 02
      There is nothing shameful here! Do not forget that almost 40 years ago we lived in the USSR and the military-industrial complex was clumsy like the whole huge system. You will say that 40 years have passed, I will answer you, given the historical past during this period and the size of the country, then this is nothing!!!
      1. +6
        17 March 2023 03: 01
        The clumsy military-industrial complex has done so much that effective managers have been using and selling non-stop everything they can for 30 years. Clumsy ....
      2. GIS
        0
        17 March 2023 09: 11
        mdaaaa.
        it’s just that when the cost is voiced by military-industrial complex products, you think that they are either made of platinum, well, or of gold, but it turns out everything is simpler - human vices are not alien to anyone and it is such greed ....
    3. 0
      17 March 2023 10: 24
      Quote: wladimirjankov
      Shame. Volunteers can make cheap and necessary armies of UAVs, but our military-industrial complex cannot be born in any way. There is always something stopping him.

      The military-industrial complex can do anything. If there is an order from the Moscow Region. Well, since mo does not move, apparently they don’t really need drones. By the way, you can also ask if there is a position of a drone operator in the structure of the troops. That is, as part of, say, a company
  5. +1
    16 March 2023 12: 35
    A year has passed.
    IMHO, the internet is full of videos of how aircraft modellers made masterpieces from approximately foam alast, sticks and a fan, before CBO, and developed something already real from a UAV.

    Now everyone is wearing. write contradictory, misunderstandings with logistics, develop a bunch of models ...
    mess, imo
    1. +1
      16 March 2023 12: 54
      Half a century ago, in our yard there was one aircraft modeler-designer: he made a model of an aircraft from laths and plywood, attached an engine to it, filling it with some kind of combustible mixture; near VDNKh there was a special platform where the same modelers gathered from all over the city, they organized competitions in which their models flew in a circle, tied on metal cables 20-25 meters long; some did not want to fly and scattered into chips, hitting the asphalt.
      Is it a mess? These are different forms of movement.
      And Sasha Sushkov later became a civil aviation pilot.
      1. +3
        16 March 2023 13: 12
        This was done by just handy boys. The stores sell kits. From plywood, you just had to cut it out, glue it, sand it ... the most difficult thing was to beautifully cover the planes with paper or film. In addition to the instructions, the kits had everything you needed, even tin and tubes for the tank. Only the engine had to be bought separately. By the way, Soviet industry produced several types of engines for such creativity. Well, the problem was to get ether for mixing fuel. But despite the fact that it was not sold in pharmacies, it was decided, as usual in the Union - a chain of acquaintances :) Models flew attached to TWO cables connected directly to the elevator so that you could control it. Even fights were arranged - bright ribbons were attached to the tails and it was necessary to cut off the enemy with a screw
        1. -3
          16 March 2023 17: 05
          Malades! Competently stated, especially about TWO cables.
          Personally, I didn’t discover anything new for myself in this comment, but others may be interested.
      2. 0
        17 March 2023 10: 27
        Quote: trampoline instructor
        Half a century ago, in our yard there was one aircraft modeler-designer: he made a model of an aircraft from laths and plywood, attached an engine to it, filling it with some kind of combustible mixture; near VDNKh there was a special platform where the same modelers gathered from all over the city, they organized competitions in which their models flew in a circle, tied on metal cables 20-25 meters long; some did not want to fly and scattered into chips, hitting the asphalt.
        Is it a mess? These are different forms of movement.
        And Sasha Sushkov later became a civil aviation pilot.

        In the 80s there were already all sorts of radio-controlled models of airplanes and toy ships. We even had a submarine
        1. 0
          17 March 2023 18: 03
          Half a century ago in our yard...

          In the 80s..

          Hello, count what year it was half a century ago, and estimate with 80s. In 84, I already graduated from the university and did not play airplanes.

          Half a century ago, I had a submarine, swam in the bath; with remote control and wiring.
  6. +4
    16 March 2023 19: 27
    Privet-82 kamikaze drone developed by Russian volunteers began to be mass-produced

    Is anyone kidding? Volunteers have developed and are mass-producing a kamikaze drone? Seriously, this is not a joke? We have had pieces for exhibitions for many years, I won’t say they plundered, I’ll say that military corporations have “mastered” if not billions but hundreds of millions of rubles, and here volunteers and even modernization for 16kg of explosives and 250km of travel, but they are handsome.
    1. +2
      17 March 2023 03: 09
      In order for a drone to go to the troops, it must have a million different certificates. It does not shine in the sun or on a full moon, the applied paint fits the regulations chosen by the Admiral General, and the famous work at extreme temperatures against the troops of Nibiru and Titan.

      YES, and 80 pieces is so, for a week of launches. Unfortunately, there are no progress in the UAV and will not be in the troops, because as you know, everyone who said that UAV toys for children hold their positions
      1. 0
        17 March 2023 08: 04
        The head of the Crimea, Sergei Aksyonov, said that in the Crimea they began to produce drones for the needs of the Northern Military District. He spoke about this in an interview with TASS.

        “We have already begun self-assembly of drones, we have good equipment. The developments were even before the start of the SVO, they are ongoing, ”Aksenov said.

        the main thing is to spit in Russia, right?
        1. 0
          17 March 2023 12: 00
          Blah blah blah, these are just words. When they are in the army, then you will write these beautiful speeches.
          By the way, where are the Dobrynya UAVs, which were promised thousands of pieces? These were also just words.
          Fortunately, there are speechwriters and they will not tell such tales.
          You are an ordinary person who did not serve in the army. So you love beautiful speeches
          1. -1
            17 March 2023 19: 04
            how much self-confidence. does the RF Ministry of Defense personally report to you what he has? continue your

            Blah blah blah, those are just words.
  7. +1
    16 March 2023 20: 38
    Fine. What's next? How to finance the replication of this project?
  8. -2
    16 March 2023 20: 56
    The cheapest and most effective UAV is a big pile of air bombs from an airplane. All wars confirm this (from the Luftwaffe to Khmeinin). And the massive use of UAVs is out of desperation, from the lack of aviation as a class on the battlefield or a ban from above on its use
    1. +2
      16 March 2023 23: 41
      (Alexander D.) You are wrong, dear. A large pile of bombs must be dropped over the target, and there the air defense will not even reach, because our VKS mainly work with air-to-ground missile weapons more often from the territory of the Russian Federation .. Secondly, "cast iron" bombs are poured and often without an exact defeat. Here the UAV is not a pity, it is launched directly at the target, shot down. It’s not a big problem, it’s not a plane, but it hits exactly the target and then the power of a large warhead is not required. This is so, let me explain. According to the article, it’s true that amateurs make on their own that the military-industrial complex spends millions and at the output Lancet and Cube, and even those that are weak in warheads. (Created against terrorists without heavy weapons). The military-industrial complex system has been set up for decades to cut and kickbacks, with non-fulfillment of orders (that is, shifts to the left) it is difficult to reforge, here are the delays in sending weapons and not only ..
    2. 0
      17 March 2023 10: 30
      Quote: Alexander Dutov
      The cheapest and most effective UAV is a big pile of air bombs from an airplane. All wars confirm this (from the Luftwaffe to Khmeinin). And the massive use of UAVs is out of desperation, from the lack of aviation as a class on the battlefield or a ban from above on its use

      That is, Americans use drones out of desperation?
  9. 0
    16 March 2023 23: 56
    8=H
    2 = OVER

    82=HB

    Privet-82 = Hello Hunter Biden.

    hi
  10. +2
    16 March 2023 23: 59
    You can be sure that these people will create real things, and not ceremonial "analogue"
  11. 0
    17 March 2023 09: 55
    I wonder if MORF decides to buy them, will they enter the troops just as cheap?
    1. 0
      23 March 2023 23: 53
      will they enter the troops just as cheap?

      Cheap mx will be bought from volunteers by Shoigov's company gasket, and her MO wholesale at a price slightly more expensive than the cast-iron bridge kmk.
  12. +1
    17 March 2023 15: 36
    Quote: Saffron
    I wonder if MORF decides to buy them, will they enter the troops just as cheap?

    The question is interesting. But I would rephrase:
    I wonder if MORF decides to buy them or will they go to the troops just as cheap?
  13. 0
    23 March 2023 08: 48
    Stabilization is weak, from the word at all, you need a normal tail, this is not a bayraktar for you, it was made under stealth, and no one canceled the laws of aerodynamics, see Su-35.
  14. 0
    26 March 2023 00: 26
    We are waiting for the greetings to be sent to their destination