Terror has returned to Russia: this time children are being killed
Terror came to Russia again. And he appeared in the most, perhaps, the most terrible of his guises - not an enemy saboteur, not a religious fanatic, but a young boy who was ready to kill himself and other, completely unfamiliar people, in the name of a "bright future". Be that as it may, the explosion that occurred on October 31 in the FSB building in the Arkhangelsk Region is a fait accompli. So, the question again arises before Russia - what to do in order for such a wild case not to become an everyday reality for it.
Many today compare the actions of the 17-year-old "Arkhangelsk demolitionist", whose name has not yet been officially announced, and the 18-year-old "Kerch killer" Vladislav Roslyakov. Of course, they have a lot in common - in both cases, the most serious crimes were committed by young guys, not from a marginal environment, but outwardly respectable students who did not have a criminal past. However, the similarity, perhaps, ends here. If in the case of Roslyakov we have the offspring of the ugly globalized “new world” and the “culture” and “value system” created by it, then with the guy who blew up the bomb in Arkhangelsk, in my opinion, everything is much worse.
Alas, he is not a product of Hollywood and of Columbine, which is widely disseminated on the Internet. He's perfect - that's the worst thing! He saw himself as an ascetic, a martyr and a victim. This is just very much in our opinion ... I would like to ask a question: do you really consider a terrorist attack in the FSB building, which, according to the conviction of the young "bomber" who committed it, "fabricates cases and tortures people", committed literally the day after the Day memory of victims political repression by chance? Coincidence? Yes, completeness ... Such coincidences simply do not exist! There are quite real consequences of the frenzied screams about the "bloody gebna", lies about its "atrocities" and calls to "punish the executioners"! It is your will, but, in my opinion, there can be no other interpretation!
The situation is being pumped up day after day, “actions” conducted throughout the country, from pathos-mourning to frankly provocative, which openly sounded the demands to release all “innocently convicted” on “fraudulent FSB” cases. And here is the result! Satisfied, gentlemen ?! Indeed, it’s a pity that there will be no trial in this case - in connection with the death of the offender. During the trial, all the gorlopans and whitewashing brains under the guise of “returning memory” should have sat together in the dock. And at the same time, some domestic “oppositionists” who made a bet on involving young people in their “protest movement” in their unclean political games.
Russia has already faced the coming of young people with high ideas in their hearts and improvised bombs in their hands, burning with "righteous anger" and obsessed with the dream of a bright future for everyone. Ideas and bombs are a dangerous combination. At that time, alas, faced with "ideological terror", our country took a fundamentally wrong path. Which, in the end, led her to terrifying consequences, almost to complete destruction. Today these errors, about what “mercy” leads to those who choose the path of terror “from good intentions”, today simply need to be remembered. At least in order not to repeat them again.
The first, in fact, in the history of the Russian Empire classical terrorist act that had political motives, was committed on January 24, 1878 - 140 years ago. A graduate of the Institute of Noble Maidens, a noblewoman and revolutionary Vera Zasulich shot from a revolver at the St. Petersburg mayor, Adjutant General Fedor Trepov. It just so happened that just the girl entered the main page in the history of domestic terrorism. By the way, the revolutionary circle, in which she entered before the assassination attempt, was called "Young rebels." He acted, by the way, in the territory of modern Ukraine.
The reason for Zasulich’s actions was the order given by the general in the summer of 1887 to flogging one of the political prisoners - which, incidentally, was by the standards of that time a punishment unlawful, and the town governor, of course, wasn’t painting. It is impossible not to say that what happened was strongly inflated by the then liberal press, bowing the general in every way and savoring the "unbearable moral suffering" punished by him by the prisoner. This created what later the same liberals would call "a wave of popular anger." Only the one who would throw out this anger at the guilty was needed. Zasulich, whose revolutionary activity began in the organization with the cutest name - “People's Reprisal”, was the best suited for this.
“Extremely impressed” by the “mockery” that happened more than six months ago (as will be later stated at the trial), the young maiden appeared to be admitted to the mayor at his place of service, and calmly thrust several bullets at him point-blank! This is how new methods of “political struggle” came to Russia. Trepov miraculously survived, and Zasulich got, as one would expect, into jail awaiting trial and sentence. Her act was qualified under the articles of the Criminal Penal Code, which provided for the deprivation of all rights of the state and exile in hard labor for a term of 15 to 20 years.
The most amazing thing is that the jury trial of Vera Zasulich, held on March 31, 1878 ... acquitted! On the fact that you see, on the basis that her crime “did not have personal interests, personal revenge”, but only “the struggle for the idea”. Terrorist lawyer Peter Aleksandrov, who was in front of the jury with a nightingale, put at the forefront the “honest and noble impulse” that served as the motive for the crime. The most interesting thing is that Zasulich herself did not lock herself at all on the trial, admitting that she had shot Trepov with the aim of "killing or injuring him." However, a verdict was issued: "Not guilty." According to the surviving recollections of eyewitnesses, the hall met the verdict “with a thunder of applause”, and Zasulich, who went out onto the street, immediately fell “into the arms of an admiring crowd”. This court was widely covered in the foreign press. An unprecedented in its liberalism sentence was warmly welcomed in France and Germany, Britain and the United States. It is understandable - not their own countries have embarked on the path of self-destruction ...
Zasulich was released from custody in the courtroom and quickly emigrated to blessed Switzerland. But in Russia ... The acquittal of the terrorist turned out to be the same “signal to the public," the consequences of which came in such a way that, as they say, it seemed little. It was as if someone suddenly pulled out a cork from a bottle in which a powerful and evil evil spirit was sealed. The country was covered with a real rampart of political terror. Shots and explosions of bombs thundered. Blood poured in.
The Zasulich case was continued almost immediately - in the same year, the chief of the Russian gendarmerie Nikolai Mezentsev, who was killed literally in the center of St. Petersburg and headed by the gendarmerie of Odessa, Baron Gustav von Heinkin, the prosecutor of Kiev Kotlyarevsky, and others, became the victims of the assassination attempts. With the beginning of the new year, terror did not subside - literally at its beginning, the governor-general of Kharkov, Dmitry Kropotkin, was killed by terrorists (which is typical - a cousin of one of the future leaders of the anarchist movement in Russia). Meanwhile, the "fighters for national happiness" began to hunt for the autocrat of the all-Russian - Emperor Alexander II! And they still killed in 1881, albeit from the eighth (!) Attempt, sending to the other world and crippling along the way a lot of innocent people.
And it didn’t help that the new sovereign - Alexander III, whom the terrorists had the audacity to address with a real ultimatum, demanding “to voluntarily surrender the supreme power to the people” in order to stop the murders and save their own lives, and finally began to hang them. The madness of the Great Terror swept the country more and more. They killed ministers and governors, prosecutors and police chiefs, city governors and simply retired generals, gendarmes and the most ordinary city men. Particularly brutally dealt with the chiefs and overseers of prisons - their "fighters against the regime" were destroyed with special zeal
They shot and blew everywhere - in St. Petersburg, Moscow, Kiev, Penza, Sevastopol. By the way, regarding the latter - when on May 14, 1906, the city’s commandant General Neplyuyev was tried to blow up, he survived. And eight completely strangers, random people blew to pieces. So - the liberal, or, as they used to say, "progressive" press later demanded that the families of these victims ... should not be angry with their killers, since the next attack was committed "in the name of a holy cause"!
Further more! With the beginning of the new century, terrorism took on a catastrophic scale in the Russian Empire. There are official statistics according to which at least 1905 thousand people became victims of his adherents, both planned and random, in 1907-9. From the beginning of 1908 to the end of spring 1910, about 20 thousand terrorist acts and "expropriations" were committed in the country! Authoritative historians speak of 17 thousand victims of terror in the Russian Empire in just one decade, the years 1901-1911. And at the same time, almost the first law that was discussed in the State Duma of Russia created in 1905 was a bill on ... amnesty, which all criminals were subject to, if they committed their actions solely for political reasons! Just some kind of madness ...
What ended up today is known to everyone and everyone - the seventeenth year, the revolution and the civil war, which claimed millions of lives, well, and so on ... By the way, Vera Zasulich herself, who successfully survived until 1919, completely “enjoyed” the power of her own ideological lasts and called the dictatorship of the proletariat ... a mirror image of the tsarist regime! But how do you know if this dictatorship would become a reality if it itself had been fully received and deserved by the court’s verdict, and society would have been made clear once and for all that a revolver and a bomb can in no way be a means of expressing their own political views ?
Unfortunately, the same problems and questions today, after almost a century and a half, are again becoming relevant for Russia. The only difference is that the main cause of possible shocks this time is not internal contradictions in our country itself, but a colossal destructive influence directed at it from the outside. There is no doubt that the current government is not at all sinless and far from ideal, however, it only needs to give it slack at this critical moment - and Russia will again have to plunge first into the bloody abyss of terror, and then into the chaos of a new "revolution".
It must be recognized that a certain part of the youth may well become a "breeding ground" for these destructive processes, yielding to the cynical lies of professional and very well-paid "fighters against the regime." There is no doubt that if the guy who had set up the explosion in the Arkhangelsk FSB didn’t put an absurd and terrible point in his barely beginning life, today he would have made the next “innocent victim” and, worst of all, an idol and a hero for his peers. This is precisely what cannot be allowed in the first place!
Many today compare the actions of the 17-year-old "Arkhangelsk demolitionist", whose name has not yet been officially announced, and the 18-year-old "Kerch killer" Vladislav Roslyakov. Of course, they have a lot in common - in both cases, the most serious crimes were committed by young guys, not from a marginal environment, but outwardly respectable students who did not have a criminal past. However, the similarity, perhaps, ends here. If in the case of Roslyakov we have the offspring of the ugly globalized “new world” and the “culture” and “value system” created by it, then with the guy who blew up the bomb in Arkhangelsk, in my opinion, everything is much worse.
Alas, he is not a product of Hollywood and of Columbine, which is widely disseminated on the Internet. He's perfect - that's the worst thing! He saw himself as an ascetic, a martyr and a victim. This is just very much in our opinion ... I would like to ask a question: do you really consider a terrorist attack in the FSB building, which, according to the conviction of the young "bomber" who committed it, "fabricates cases and tortures people", committed literally the day after the Day memory of victims political repression by chance? Coincidence? Yes, completeness ... Such coincidences simply do not exist! There are quite real consequences of the frenzied screams about the "bloody gebna", lies about its "atrocities" and calls to "punish the executioners"! It is your will, but, in my opinion, there can be no other interpretation!
The situation is being pumped up day after day, “actions” conducted throughout the country, from pathos-mourning to frankly provocative, which openly sounded the demands to release all “innocently convicted” on “fraudulent FSB” cases. And here is the result! Satisfied, gentlemen ?! Indeed, it’s a pity that there will be no trial in this case - in connection with the death of the offender. During the trial, all the gorlopans and whitewashing brains under the guise of “returning memory” should have sat together in the dock. And at the same time, some domestic “oppositionists” who made a bet on involving young people in their “protest movement” in their unclean political games.
Russia has already faced the coming of young people with high ideas in their hearts and improvised bombs in their hands, burning with "righteous anger" and obsessed with the dream of a bright future for everyone. Ideas and bombs are a dangerous combination. At that time, alas, faced with "ideological terror", our country took a fundamentally wrong path. Which, in the end, led her to terrifying consequences, almost to complete destruction. Today these errors, about what “mercy” leads to those who choose the path of terror “from good intentions”, today simply need to be remembered. At least in order not to repeat them again.
The first, in fact, in the history of the Russian Empire classical terrorist act that had political motives, was committed on January 24, 1878 - 140 years ago. A graduate of the Institute of Noble Maidens, a noblewoman and revolutionary Vera Zasulich shot from a revolver at the St. Petersburg mayor, Adjutant General Fedor Trepov. It just so happened that just the girl entered the main page in the history of domestic terrorism. By the way, the revolutionary circle, in which she entered before the assassination attempt, was called "Young rebels." He acted, by the way, in the territory of modern Ukraine.
The reason for Zasulich’s actions was the order given by the general in the summer of 1887 to flogging one of the political prisoners - which, incidentally, was by the standards of that time a punishment unlawful, and the town governor, of course, wasn’t painting. It is impossible not to say that what happened was strongly inflated by the then liberal press, bowing the general in every way and savoring the "unbearable moral suffering" punished by him by the prisoner. This created what later the same liberals would call "a wave of popular anger." Only the one who would throw out this anger at the guilty was needed. Zasulich, whose revolutionary activity began in the organization with the cutest name - “People's Reprisal”, was the best suited for this.
“Extremely impressed” by the “mockery” that happened more than six months ago (as will be later stated at the trial), the young maiden appeared to be admitted to the mayor at his place of service, and calmly thrust several bullets at him point-blank! This is how new methods of “political struggle” came to Russia. Trepov miraculously survived, and Zasulich got, as one would expect, into jail awaiting trial and sentence. Her act was qualified under the articles of the Criminal Penal Code, which provided for the deprivation of all rights of the state and exile in hard labor for a term of 15 to 20 years.
The most amazing thing is that the jury trial of Vera Zasulich, held on March 31, 1878 ... acquitted! On the fact that you see, on the basis that her crime “did not have personal interests, personal revenge”, but only “the struggle for the idea”. Terrorist lawyer Peter Aleksandrov, who was in front of the jury with a nightingale, put at the forefront the “honest and noble impulse” that served as the motive for the crime. The most interesting thing is that Zasulich herself did not lock herself at all on the trial, admitting that she had shot Trepov with the aim of "killing or injuring him." However, a verdict was issued: "Not guilty." According to the surviving recollections of eyewitnesses, the hall met the verdict “with a thunder of applause”, and Zasulich, who went out onto the street, immediately fell “into the arms of an admiring crowd”. This court was widely covered in the foreign press. An unprecedented in its liberalism sentence was warmly welcomed in France and Germany, Britain and the United States. It is understandable - not their own countries have embarked on the path of self-destruction ...
Zasulich was released from custody in the courtroom and quickly emigrated to blessed Switzerland. But in Russia ... The acquittal of the terrorist turned out to be the same “signal to the public," the consequences of which came in such a way that, as they say, it seemed little. It was as if someone suddenly pulled out a cork from a bottle in which a powerful and evil evil spirit was sealed. The country was covered with a real rampart of political terror. Shots and explosions of bombs thundered. Blood poured in.
The Zasulich case was continued almost immediately - in the same year, the chief of the Russian gendarmerie Nikolai Mezentsev, who was killed literally in the center of St. Petersburg and headed by the gendarmerie of Odessa, Baron Gustav von Heinkin, the prosecutor of Kiev Kotlyarevsky, and others, became the victims of the assassination attempts. With the beginning of the new year, terror did not subside - literally at its beginning, the governor-general of Kharkov, Dmitry Kropotkin, was killed by terrorists (which is typical - a cousin of one of the future leaders of the anarchist movement in Russia). Meanwhile, the "fighters for national happiness" began to hunt for the autocrat of the all-Russian - Emperor Alexander II! And they still killed in 1881, albeit from the eighth (!) Attempt, sending to the other world and crippling along the way a lot of innocent people.
And it didn’t help that the new sovereign - Alexander III, whom the terrorists had the audacity to address with a real ultimatum, demanding “to voluntarily surrender the supreme power to the people” in order to stop the murders and save their own lives, and finally began to hang them. The madness of the Great Terror swept the country more and more. They killed ministers and governors, prosecutors and police chiefs, city governors and simply retired generals, gendarmes and the most ordinary city men. Particularly brutally dealt with the chiefs and overseers of prisons - their "fighters against the regime" were destroyed with special zeal
They shot and blew everywhere - in St. Petersburg, Moscow, Kiev, Penza, Sevastopol. By the way, regarding the latter - when on May 14, 1906, the city’s commandant General Neplyuyev was tried to blow up, he survived. And eight completely strangers, random people blew to pieces. So - the liberal, or, as they used to say, "progressive" press later demanded that the families of these victims ... should not be angry with their killers, since the next attack was committed "in the name of a holy cause"!
Further more! With the beginning of the new century, terrorism took on a catastrophic scale in the Russian Empire. There are official statistics according to which at least 1905 thousand people became victims of his adherents, both planned and random, in 1907-9. From the beginning of 1908 to the end of spring 1910, about 20 thousand terrorist acts and "expropriations" were committed in the country! Authoritative historians speak of 17 thousand victims of terror in the Russian Empire in just one decade, the years 1901-1911. And at the same time, almost the first law that was discussed in the State Duma of Russia created in 1905 was a bill on ... amnesty, which all criminals were subject to, if they committed their actions solely for political reasons! Just some kind of madness ...
What ended up today is known to everyone and everyone - the seventeenth year, the revolution and the civil war, which claimed millions of lives, well, and so on ... By the way, Vera Zasulich herself, who successfully survived until 1919, completely “enjoyed” the power of her own ideological lasts and called the dictatorship of the proletariat ... a mirror image of the tsarist regime! But how do you know if this dictatorship would become a reality if it itself had been fully received and deserved by the court’s verdict, and society would have been made clear once and for all that a revolver and a bomb can in no way be a means of expressing their own political views ?
Unfortunately, the same problems and questions today, after almost a century and a half, are again becoming relevant for Russia. The only difference is that the main cause of possible shocks this time is not internal contradictions in our country itself, but a colossal destructive influence directed at it from the outside. There is no doubt that the current government is not at all sinless and far from ideal, however, it only needs to give it slack at this critical moment - and Russia will again have to plunge first into the bloody abyss of terror, and then into the chaos of a new "revolution".
It must be recognized that a certain part of the youth may well become a "breeding ground" for these destructive processes, yielding to the cynical lies of professional and very well-paid "fighters against the regime." There is no doubt that if the guy who had set up the explosion in the Arkhangelsk FSB didn’t put an absurd and terrible point in his barely beginning life, today he would have made the next “innocent victim” and, worst of all, an idol and a hero for his peers. This is precisely what cannot be allowed in the first place!
Information