In Kazakhstan, they started talking about the need for the country's accession to the EU

February 2 2023 34

Kazakhstan in the foreseeable future may apply for membership in the European Union. This was stated at a recent congress by the leader of the Kazakh Democratic Party "Ak Zhol" ("Bright Path") Azat Peruashev.

According to him, the country should now start introducing the European way of development and European approaches in relations between the state and society. In addition, according to Azat Peruashev, Kazakhstan should focus on European standards of quality of life.

Our choice - the choice of the Ak Zhol Democratic Party - is the European path of development

- quotes the words of Peruashev agency "Asia Plus".

According to analysts, the Peruashev-led Bright Path party has a reputation as a decorative sparring partner of the ruling political strength. And its leader is known for extraordinary and sometimes picturesque and emotional statements.

Such a reputation allows him to regularly make high-profile statements for which any other politician could be held accountable.

The Ak Zhol party, as a long-term perspective, considers not only the introduction of European approaches, but also the raising, sometime in the future, of the issue of Kazakhstan's accession to the European Union

- said Azat Peruashev.

We add that after the start of the special military operation of the Russian Federation in Kazakhstan, anti-Russian sentiments have noticeably grown. Experts believe that this was largely facilitated by the flight of Russians from the partial mobilization announced in September last year. Many residents of the Russian Federation have chosen Kazakhstan as their temporary place of residence.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Max Inquisitive

+4

2 February 2023 13: 49

Somewhere this has already happened
1. RUR
  
  +3
  
  2 February 2023 15: 34
  
  Yes, Turkey is a good example, they were waiting for och. long something like ok. 30-40 years old, the Asians of the South Caucasus also hurried there - geographically and historically they are there, and outwardly often there too - Armenia, Georgia ... they see themselves in NATO ... it seems that the farther from Europe, the more romantic candidates...
2. Vdars
  
  0
  
  2 February 2023 19: 35
  
  So it already happened. GUAM (Georgia, Ukraine, Armenia and Moldova) was called...
  1. Art Pilot
    
    +1
    
    2 February 2023 22: 43
    
    GUAM transformed into GUANO.
  2. Vfvxa
    
    -1
    
    3 February 2023 17: 25
    
    Guam - Georgia, Ukraine, AZERBAIJAN, Moldova. Amateur
    Azerbaijan, not Armenia, is included in this bloc!!!!!
Alexey P.

+5

2 February 2023 13: 59

the Ukrainian way does not teach fools anything
Vladimir Tuzakov

-4

2 February 2023 14: 07

The explanation is obvious, to be afraid of being swallowed by the neighboring clan RF, so they are looking for insurance. The problem in today's Russian Federation is not attractive to anyone and is not an example of such a state of statehood in the Russian Federation. The first to establish the statehood of the Russian Federation is legal, so that the law becomes effective, not clan, but the legal basis of the rule in the state, the rest of the problems only stem from the first. With the ongoing SIRS, all the sore spots of the state only appear (corruption, inconsistency, etc.) and the treatment is possibly more radical and of higher quality.
1. Dart2027
  
  +4
  
  2 February 2023 14: 52
  
  Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
  The first to establish the statehood of the Russian Federation is legal, so that the law becomes effective, not clan, but the legal basis of the rule in the state, the rest of the problems only stem from the first.
  
  Yes, yes, yes, in the EU everything is right according to the law and in accordance with the will of the people. I remember these tales of perestroika.
  1. Vdars
    
    +2
    
    2 February 2023 19: 40
    
    Some statements of their Ursula are worth something!
2. Vladimir80
  
  +4
  
  2 February 2023 15: 19
  
  the most fun to hear about "clanism" from the republics of Central Asia , this is a traditional and normal way of life for them ... even 70 years of Soviet power have changed almost nothing there - but here they want to become Europeans in 5 years ... it is clear that these are fantasies fed by grants from the USA and Soros - but if Turkey ( before Erdogan) they didn’t take it to the EU, then Central Asia can’t even dream of it ... if the United States needs to surround the Russian Federation with NATO bases, they will most likely simply place military bases in Kazakhstan when the time comes ("cheap and cheerful")
3. Nelton
  
  +1
  
  2 February 2023 16: 04
  
  Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
  be afraid of being swallowed by the neighboring clan RF
  
  Rather be afraid of being swallowed by China ...
4. GIS
  
  0
  
  3 February 2023 15: 09
  
  I've never seen a more dibile argument about insurance ... let's be honest. in the EU they want to get a piece of the pie (or poles, whatever you want to call it) from subsidies. it's like the "dream" of immigrants from the BV to get exactly to Germany. but this is the outer side., and the inner one is stupidly pulled by ... the strings of puppeteers from Britain or the USA. to "keep the RF in good shape"
5. Stanislas Vanboring
  
  0
  
  4 February 2023 15: 18
  
  Is Kazakhstan attractive to you? Where hundreds of miners are shot, who came for a salary. You do not interpolate stinking Nazis with bai manners into a common reality. Let's crush this scum, and to make it more fun, let's call the Uzbeks for the company.
Colonel Kudasov

+2

2 February 2023 14: 25

Kazakhstan in the foreseeable future may apply for membership in the European Union.

But he did not finish: And in NATO. But soon he will tell, there is no doubt. And for some reason I think that the application can slip
RUR

+2

2 February 2023 15: 38

Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
The explanation is obvious, to be afraid of being swallowed up by the neighboring clan RF,

In geopolitics, geography is a destiny that cannot be changed
vlad127490

+5

2 February 2023 20: 01

First they declare to the EU, then they will automatically join NATO.
Until the times of the USSR, there was never a state of Kazakhstan, there was never a Kazakh nationality, there was no Kazakh writing, there was no Kazakh culture. The modern territory of Kazakhstan is the territory of Russia, captured and torn away by the separatists with the help of NATO. The genocide of the Russian-speaking population, the renaming of cities, villages, the persecution of pro-Russian politicians, the transition to the Latin alphabet, the transfer of the capital from Almaty to secure the stolen Russian northern territories .... Now, they all seek to join NATO. This is the face of Nazarbayev, his successor Tokayev, and their cliques, duplicity, the hidden enemy of Russia.
All the republics of the USSR could exist only as part of the USSR. There is no USSR, no republics, all the territories on which the republics were located as part of the USSR are returned to the Russian Federation (Russia).
Russia (USSR) did not transfer, sell or donate its territories, as well as its foreign assets, to any of the Union republics of the USSR.
It is possible to artificially create a state (former republics of the USSR), writing, culture, Kazakh nationality, but they did not learn how to create artificial human brains, therefore it was not possible to create a nation, it seems that all the attributes of the form of the state are present, but the state itself is not. Conclusion, Kazakhstan must be returned to Russia in the form of regions, without asking anyone for permission, up to the use of the army. This is the territory of Russia.
1. Vox_Populi
  
  0
  
  2 February 2023 20: 52
  
  The modern territory of Kazakhstan is the territory of Russia, seized and torn away by separatists with the help of NATO. Genocide of the Russian-speaking population
  
  In your fantasies, at least for decency, observe a sense of proportion, otherwise they “aggravated” not the best picture of the current situation beyond recognition ...
  Or is it a state of mind?
2. Nikolay Volkov
  
  -2
  
  2 February 2023 22: 41
  
  I like this dense Great Russian chauvinism ... the Kazakhs did not have a written language before the USSR, there was no culture, there was no nationality ... and then the "historian" Strelkov is surprised: why did the Kazakhs raise an uprising against the tsar-father after labor mobilization??? it’s amazing ... people were kept for cattle, and they, apparently, should have said thank you or something ???
  
  in 1916, they raised an uprising, and in 41 they fought bravely for the Soviet Motherland ... I wonder what happened to the Kazakhs, who didn’t want to dig trenches in 16, and after 25 years, German tanks near Moscow stopped in the most difficult days of the battle for Moscow ??? Is it because they were made into human beings from cattle? 96 Kazakhs became Heroes of the Soviet Union ... in the Panfilov division of the future 8 guards out of 11000 soldiers, 4,5 were Russians, and 3,5 were Kazakhs ... I hope you don’t need to talk about the role of this division in protecting Moscow ???
  
  about the nationality, which was not:
  
  In Tsarist Russia and in Soviet times, from 1734 to 1925, the current Kazakhs were called Kirghiz-Kaisaks or Kirghiz, according to the official version, then this was done so as not to confuse the Kazakhs with the Cossacks, since until 1734 the Kazakhs were called Cossacks, and the Kazakh Khanate - Cossack Horde.
  
  In the literature and documents of the Russian state of the XNUMXth-XNUMXth centuries, the ethnonym Cossack was used in relation to the Kazakhs. For example, the Russian chronicler of the first half of the XNUMXth century Savva Esipov, reporting on the origin of Khan Kuchum, calls the Kazakh Khanate the “Cossack horde”.
  
  As early as 1827, A. I. Levshin argued that "the Kyrgyz is the name of a people of a completely different ... the name of the Cossacks ... belongs to the Kyrgyz-Kaisak hordes from the beginning of their existence, they do not call themselves otherwise."
  
  In the book of the Russian ethnographer and geographer E. K. Meyendorf “Travel from Orenburg to Bukhara”, written at the beginning of the XNUMXth century, it is noted that “they [Kazakhs] do not call themselves Kyrgyz, but they call them Cossacks, which means“ rider “- according to some, “warrior” - according to others. They claim that the Bashkirs are called them Kyrgyz, but they don’t know where this word came from. ”
  
  no need to throw stones at the Kazakhs ... Nazarbayev was one of the last to leave the Union, he was faithful to a single country when the Orthodox Russian alcoholic Yeltsin tore the country to pieces for the sake of personal power ... in a referendum on the preservation of the USSR, 94% of the inhabitants of Kazakhstan were FOR the preservation a single country, in the RSFSR 71%, and in some separately putrid cities like Yeltsin's homeland 17 ... and now oh, the "Guz" people are offended, you see, the Kazakhs did not exist ... these "Guz" themselves abandoned their historical lands and their relatives ... during the GKChP, the Riga OMON put things in order in a matter of hours in Latvia ... only the Russian Yeltsin did not need this order ... otherwise, how would he say "God bless America" ... but now everyone around is bad, but They built a whole center for Yeltsin and allocate 300 million a year from the state budget so that all sorts of Roizman-Venediktovs hang out there ...
  
  and yet, by the end of WWII, there were 73 countries in the world. now there are almost 200 of them. this is the question of who and when did not exist ... the historical process cannot be stopped. and the more you spit on the peoples around you, the more new countries will be formed on Earth ...
  1. vlad127490
    
    0
    
    3 February 2023 21: 23
    
    I will not argue with you. There is a census of the population of the Russian Empire in 1897. The census shows the number and ethnic composition of the Russian Empire, KAZAKH and UKRAINIANS are not there, this is the primary source. What nationalities and who means them or what kind of people they will become in the future is another discussion. If you, as a historian, present material, then use the primary sources and indicate them. In Central Asia, there is only one state, Uzbekistan, which had and still has a history, culture, language, script, and political institutions. The expression "dense Great Russian chauvinism" on your part can be considered an insult. 4 people took an active part in the murder of the Soviet Union, three were on everyone's lips, and the fourth was Nazarbayev. You look at the ethnic composition of Kazakhstan according to the 1989 census, what happened and what happened in 2021, and then draw conclusions.
    1. Nelton
      
      +2
      
      3 February 2023 22: 53
      
      Quote: vlad127490
      4 people took part in the murder of the Soviet Union, three are on everyone's lips, and the fourth was Nazarbayev.
      
      Interestingly, and at least purely theoretically, 3-4 people can kill the United States? Brazil? Mongolia?
      For this, it is accepted all over the world that significant decisions and treaties must be ratified by the parliament, where there are already several hundred people ....
      
      The Supreme Council of Ukraine at the end of 1991 would not ratify any other options, except for "independence".
      
      So feel free to add Fokine and Zelenko to the killers of the USSR in the first place.
      Secondly - 295 deputies of the Supreme Council of Ukraine, who ratified this.
      Thirdly, 30.5 million Ukrainians who voted in December 1991 for independence (and the current in Crimea was 50/50 of those who voted)
      Well, to the heap - the population of the Baltic states, Transcaucasia, Moldova, who even scored in a referendum in March 1991 ...
      
      And yes, Nazarbayev ruined everything .... the great Batyr ...
      
      But yes, all of the above criminals, you just had to send a police squad to arrest all of them.
      Well, a rather large outfit, the outfits sent a little earlier in Tbilisi and Vilnius turned out to be too small ...
  2. Stanislas Vanboring
    
    0
    
    4 February 2023 15: 35
    
    Kaisak is a warrior, mostly on horseback. Kirghiz it all started with them .... a drop group p1a1- There will be no winter! And please don't laugh, I learned it through Ian!
VAHOKA

+2

2 February 2023 20: 17

Ukraine 2.0. Merged in Belarus, merged in Kazakhstan, but now an attempt at revenge
Art Pilot

0

2 February 2023 22: 44

... and then to NATO. Yes?
Uncle Vlad

+2

2 February 2023 22: 59

The next sheep, with a European path of development, finally learned how to lift the toilet lid. They are very welcome there.
Uncle Vlad

+2

2 February 2023 23: 03

I'm interested in what these will put on their heads. You can see the basins.
Flight

0

3 February 2023 00: 41

There is no owner, so, the manager of the middle hand, so they relaxed ... They will not send the Canaries further to the EU ...
vbgfv

+2

3 February 2023 12: 03

how will they enter there if they do not border with countries that are members of the EU?
GIS

0

3 February 2023 15: 12

I look at the map of Kazakhstan and understand that they will enter the EU only through Russia ....

when Russia "absorbs" this EU. there are no other borders
who told them about it?))
https://u2.9111s.ru/uploads/202210/26/e1286c4eab4973047641f79706656ab2.webp
The comment was deleted.
In passing

0

4 February 2023 01: 08

The Bolsheviks should be "thanked", it was they who cut the territories of the republics. And none of the leaders especially asked the people, and everyone had the same life, and the country was one. Great, and for that country, and that life, everyone fought. Now everything is forgotten, the territory is someone's private asset, they are fighting for it in the former fraternal family of peoples. Kazakhs will not be accepted into the EU, they did not come out in the face. And in NATO right away, just like the Turks. And they will not see lace underpants, and they will be singing along with the British, enemies of Russia. , Turks out, they understood everything, and NATO will simply be "sent" one day. For Russia, the trouble is that it is no example for its neighbors, they are exactly the same, but Courchevel and Miami are located in other places, bank accounts are also in others. And that's it.
Watching

+1

4 February 2023 01: 25

Kazakhstan is located in Asia. How can it become a member of the European Union? Or is "Europe" just a synonym for Russon-haters?
zzdimk

+2

4 February 2023 13: 13

Return all the cities that the Russians founded - and get ready for Zhopes!.
mykola kovacs

+1

4 February 2023 17: 05

These lazy ..., every year arranging coups with the burning of cities, are they sure that stupid sheep are sorely lacking in the EU?
Kapany3

0

6 February 2023 19: 01

Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
The explanation is obvious, to be afraid of being swallowed by the neighboring clan RF, so they are looking for insurance. The problem in today's Russian Federation is not attractive to anyone and is not an example of such a state of statehood in the Russian Federation. The first to establish the statehood of the Russian Federation is legal, so that the law becomes effective, not clan, but the legal basis of the rule in the state, the rest of the problems only stem from the first. With the ongoing SIRS, all the sore spots of the state only appear (corruption, inconsistency, etc.) and the treatment is possibly more radical and of higher quality.

You need to go back to geyropu, everything is under the law there.
stepanhitri

0

7 February 2023 12: 33

As I understand it, the process of collecting Russian lands after Ukraine may continue in Kazakhstan. All northern regions of Kazakhstan are Russian and Russians live there. Kazakhs, let's live peacefully, don't provoke.