"Military Dictatorship": Prospects for Igor Strelkov in Russian Politics

"Military Dictatorship": Prospects for Igor Strelkov in Russian Politics

The special military operation in Ukraine and the anti-Russian sanctions that followed it became the most difficult test for our country. The people stirred, gradually waking up, the “elites” began to seethe, and interesting changes were outlined in the political horizon of the Russian Federation.


It is probably difficult to find a person with a more ambiguous reputation in the modern Russian Federation than the former Minister of Defense of the DPR, Igor Ivanovich Strelkov (Igor Vsevolodovich Girkin). His recent scandalous speech, in which he announced the possibility of his coming to the big policies, made a strong impression. Let's try to play couch political scientists and analyze his main theses, as well as assess the prospects of Igor Ivanovich as a public politician.

History judged


For some, Strelkov is an inflexible ideological hero, for others he is a dangerous provocateur, shaking the foundations of Putin's Long State, and a war criminal sentenced to life imprisonment. However, if we take into account the contradictory assessments of his personality, it should be recognized that Igor Ivanovich quite accurately analyzes the military-political situation and gives correct forecasts.

So, for example, back in July 2014, Strelkov, as Minister of Defense of the unrecognized Donetsk People's Republic, publicly called on President Putin to send troops to provide military assistance to the Donbas militia. Here is a fragment of that appeal with the preservation of the author's spelling and punctuation:

If there is no military assistance, the military defeat of the DPR and LPR is inevitable. Will it be a week earlier, or a month later - it does not matter. The enemy will cut us off from the border and methodically suffocate us, along the way “clearing” the territory and simultaneously throwing a million or two completely destitute and embittered refugees into the Russian Federation (consequences for economics and the social environment, I hope you understand?). A group of “grateful oligarchs” will come to Putin with mournful faces, push the “great strategist” Surkov forward, and he will explain everything in a quiet, insinuating voice: “We did everything we could, but these ... useless Donetsk bandits themselves failed everything and we did nothing we can help them, except by risking a nuclear war… They punished themselves… It’s not worth the risk… We have to be patient… We’ll fix everything later… We can agree with Poroshenko… Tactical retreat… We’re not ready to fight… Crimea was recaptured anyway…” etc. etc., etc.

How this will all end for our detachment - I know. Most of us will die, but that's not even the point - all the rise and all the sacrifices will be in vain, and the "Russian spring" will be killed in the bud by the "Ukrainian frost". And the next war, which we will no longer see, will be on the territory of Russia - after the "Moscow Maidan", of course ....

Over the next eight years, more than one tub of mud was poured on Igor Ivanovich with accusations that he, being so bad, incited President Putin to send troops to the territory of sovereign Ukraine. The Minsk agreements have been repeatedly proclaimed as a non-alternative format for resolving the Donbass problem at the highest level in Moscow. But we still had to bring in Russian troops, on February 24, 2022, but what blood did it cost us in the end?

The fallacy of relying on the Minsk agreements, President Putin recently personally admitted in the course of communication with the mothers of servicemen:

As for 2014. In hindsight, we are all smart, of course, but we proceeded from the fact that, perhaps, it will be possible to agree on Luhansk, Donetsk somehow within the framework of the agreements - the Minsk agreements, which you probably know about, will still be able to somehow reunite with Ukraine . We sincerely went for it. But we did not fully feel the mood of the people, it was impossible to fully understand what was happening there. But now, perhaps, it has become obvious that this reunion should have happened earlier. Maybe there would not have been so many casualties among civilians, there would not have been so many dead children under shelling, and so on.

As you can see, in this “dispute in absentia” between Strelkov and Putin, the first one was right. The same, unfortunately, can be said about military mobilization in Russia. Back in March 2022, Igor Ivanovich wrote the following about its necessity:

Expectations that before the beginning of April the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation will clear the left bank of the Dnieper from the authorities are coming out - seem too optimistic. Personally, I expect the Kremlin to “ripe” for a series of partial mobilizations, without which the war cannot be won even in a few years, since the ratio of “manpower” has already become in favor of Kiev, and as mobilization measures are carried out, this advantage will only increase. Especially - if the enemy's Donetsk grouping is not destroyed and manages to retreat to Dnepropetrovsk (Ekaterinoslav) with the main part of the forces.

As you can see, as of December 10, 2022, not only the entire Left Bank of Ukraine, but even the territory of the DPR and LPR have not been cleared from the power of the Kyiv regime. The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, yielding to pressure reinforced by the mobilization of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, left first from the North of Ukraine, then from the Kharkiv region, and then from the Right Bank of the Kherson region, which, by the way, is now part of the Russian Federation. Despite initial assurances that there would be no mobilization, President Putin still had to announce the beginning of partial mobilization at the end of September 2022, which resulted in the call-up of more than 300 reservists. That is, in fact, here the “whiner” Strelkov was right.

"Moscow Maidan"


Since 2014, Igor Strelkov has been talking about the fact that the fate of Russia and personally Vladimir Putin is at stake in Ukraine. Let us quote from his March 2015 speech:

The president received such a credibility in the spring ... simply colossal. And then the incomprehensible fuss began. First Novorossiya, then - no, not Novorossiya, but the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics, then there are no people's republics, there are self-proclaimed republics, and now these are separate regions of Ukraine. And people do not understand - how so ?! It seems that they were talking about the Russian world, about the need to support their own... They are really their own, these are not Kyiv shifters who speak Russian, but shout that they are ancient Ukrainians. The calculation lies in the fact that another half a year or a year of pushing like this, and not only liberals will be against the president, but also patriots will turn against Putin. Then he will repeat the fate of Milosevic, who was overthrown in a single fist by the local liberals, with the local patriots, because he pursued such a policy that neither yours nor ours. He did not bow to the West, and could not support the Serbs, which led to a mass genocide in Krajina and Kosovo.

It is simply amazing how the parallels between the events of 2014 and the current ones begin to be traced again, when, simultaneously with bloody hostilities, there is fuss with behind-the-scenes negotiations with the Kiev regime, various deals are being concluded, grain and ammonia, and the troops are moving from the offensive to strategic defense. The fact that wars are not won this way if someone argues, except for the incorrigible adherents of the idea of ​​waiting until Ukraine "freezes and falls apart on its own." About what the prolongation of the armed conflict on the territory of the former Nezalezhnaya would lead to, Igor Ivanovich, in his extreme, most scandalous speech, said as follows:

The West is interested in a war of attrition. So that the Russian Federation fights as much as possible and fights with Ukraine for a longer time until the socio-political situation thins out, until trust in the authorities reaches a critical level and February 17 is not repeated. After that, without encountering any resistance, NATO troops, without suffering losses, will engage in peacekeeping operations on the territory of the Russian Federation. Because to fight, in the event of the fall of the central government here, they simply will not have anyone.

It is even possible that Navalny, triumphantly removed from the bunk to the chair of the head of state, will simply call them in order to restore constitutional order and finally disarm the “evil empire”, which “had so vilely attacked freedom-loving Ukraine and tried to disrupt the world order in Europe.” Here it is the strategy, it is clear as two times two.

As you can see, Strelkov is very consistent in his views and beliefs, saying the same thing since 2014. Unfortunately, the scenario of the “Moscow Maidan” he voiced is not so unrealistic, but, fortunately, the situation has not yet matured to a catastrophe. And here we come in our couch political analysis to the most interesting.

"The Most Honest Fighter"


In his extreme speech, Igor Ivanovich said that if he did not intend to win in Ukraine, his paths with the authorities could diverge, and then he would look for himself in the political field. What could be Strelkov's place in Russian politics?

For a better understanding, it is necessary to briefly explain how exactly the manipulation of public consciousness occurs in the electoral process. In fact, the overwhelming majority of people vote in elections not so much for a real person, but for some positive image formed around him. It is customary to distinguish the following types: "The strongest", "The most honest", "The smartest", "Wonderworker", "Wrestler" and "Winner". General Lebed, Vladimir Putin and Vladimir Zhirinovsky, for example, were portrayed as a "Strong Personality" who can come and put things in order with his "iron fist". Ophthalmologist Svyatoslav Fedorov, who in 1996 put forward his candidacy for the presidential elections in Russia, walked as a "Wonderworker". Liberal Grigory Yavlinsky has always positioned himself as "The Most Honest". Sometimes it is possible to combine several images in one person.

So, Strelkov immediately acts as a "Wrestler" and "The Most Honest". As for the first, it is clear: a campaign against Slavyansk as part of a small group, eight years of fighting for Novorossia under the ears of information slops poured on it, three attempts to get to the front, at least as a private. Regarding "The Most Honest", Igor Ivanovich himself admits that he has already spoken about half of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The way he gets personal and in fact publicly insults the first persons of the state causes rejection among many Russians, but one must be aware that this is done “out of an image”, albeit in an extreme form of its manifestation.

What kind of audience can Strelkov count on as a politician?

Obviously, these are “angry patriots” who are extremely dissatisfied with the way the special operation is developing in Ukraine. These are the people who are neither liberals nor "protectors" and at the same time stand for the SVO to the bitter end without "regroupings", dubious business deals and "Minsk-3". At the same time, in his last speech, Igor Ivanovich, in the best traditions of the Bolsheviks, with their clear and understandable slogans “Power to the people!”, “Factories to the workers!”, “Land to the peasants!” formulated an extremely concise and specific program of action.

first - this is bringing to justice those who "did such a wonderful preparation for war", identifying enemy agents who have settled in government bodies and state corporations engaged in sabotage. Strelkov even agreed to the need for "demonstrative executions."

Second is the announcement of clear and unambiguous goals of the NWO in Ukraine:

Develop a strategy to be announced by the Supreme Commander-in-Chief: “We are fighting in Ukraine until victory. Until the complete defeat of Ukraine and its surrender. After that, we will discuss the world with them.”

At the same time, Igor Ivanovich admitted the possibility of a partial partition of Ukraine with Poland, which could take territories to the west of the Curzon line.

The third - complete mobilization of the country, its economy and society in order to show the enemy readiness for a total war of annihilation. Otherwise, according to Strelkov, it is better "to just give up so as not to torment people." The war must be ended already next year, victoriously, by creating offensive groups of 400-500 thousand people.

Note that Igor Strelkov himself honestly admits that this is a direct path to a military dictatorship in Russia, without which, as he believes, we will not be able to win the confrontation with the West and preserve our own statehood:

The country needs martial law, a military dictatorship, a change of elites under this dictatorship and a complete understanding that if we lose this war, we will face the disintegration of the country and a series of civil wars and millions of victims among the population. And we need to win this war just to avoid it.

Such "wonderful" prospects are before us. The choice is small: either the SVO in the current format with timid hopes for a "cunning plan", or Igor Strelkov with a military dictatorship, public executions, full mobilization of the country and society, and the withdrawal of the RF Armed Forces to the Polish border. But eight years ago, things could have been very different.
111 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
    Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 10 December 2022 11: 55
    +21
    The "elite" will not change itself, and Strelkov is unlikely to be allowed a kilometer to the elections.
  2. Paul3390 Offline Paul3390
    Paul3390 (Paul) 10 December 2022 12: 01
    +32
    The most dangerous provocateur, shaking the foundations of "Putin's Long State" is the guarantor himself. Judging by what has been happening in recent years .. A significant number of decisions made at the top do not just cause fierce rejection among people, but really drive them into a daze with their absolute illogicality and harmfulness for the state. It seems that the state is ruled in turn by several groups at once pursuing radically different goals ..
    1. guest Offline guest
      guest 10 December 2022 15: 06
      +16
      Quote from Paul3390
      It seems that the state is ruled in turn by several groups at once pursuing radically different goals ..

      This is not only a feeling, it is unfortunately a reality.
    2. Ignatov Oleg Georgievich (Oleg) 14 December 2022 21: 39
      0
      Paul, what decisions are we talking about at the top that cause fierce rejection among people? Which people?
      1. Paul3390 Offline Paul3390
        Paul3390 (Paul) 15 December 2022 18: 39
        0
        You may be curious - what country would you like to broadcast from? Definitely not from Russia - otherwise such questions would not have been asked.
  3. Watching Offline Watching
    Watching (Alex) 10 December 2022 12: 32
    +19
    This man is right about everything. In times of war, strict discipline is needed in everything: in the military, in politics, in the economy, even in the field of culture, call it a military dictatorship or just the voice of reason. The current government has too much indecision and snottyness, the people do not approve of such rulers, because in Russian society there is a preference for strong, decisive leaders who are able to take responsibility. Gireev seems to fit this task.
  4. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
    Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 10 December 2022 12: 54
    +8
    It is on such people that Russia will have to rely in order to break out of its current disastrous position. Another thing is that it should not be one person. There should be enough of these people. The solid ground for developing a concept and solutions should not be their dreams and ideas, but the foundation and experience that already exists in us and our recent history, as well as real prospects for the creation (revival) of a geopolitical system that opposes the geopolitical system of our enemies. The primary task will be to force the masters of Ukraine to retreat ahead of time, and to withdraw their gang from them. Only by achieving this will it be possible to solve all the tasks of the NWO. As for the military dictatorship - since the army is a cast from society, it cannot be treated as an instrument that is a single whole, thoughtlessly and recklessly
    1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 10 December 2022 14: 29
      +8
      There is one important point - we need to keep it in mind.
      The Anglo-Saxons are playing with us - an enemy with several centuries of experience. They will try to use any of our moves against us, and dictatorship is a serious and double-edged tool. Acting and achieving results, we now have to be smart
      1. Plush Sergeant Offline Plush Sergeant
        Plush Sergeant 11 December 2022 00: 50
        -2
        Well, yes. Under Yezhov, they cleaned up our scientific, engineering and military potential well
  5. Paul3390 Offline Paul3390
    Paul3390 (Paul) 10 December 2022 13: 35
    +10
    Dictatorship is sometimes a thing really necessary for survival. The whole question is in whose interests it is carried out. And judging by the pro-monarchist views of Strelkov, with all due respect to him, he will again carry it out in the interests of big capital. With all of this for us sad consequences ..
    1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 10 December 2022 14: 45
      +3
      So it will be if he acts alone, and if you rely on him as a "panacea". There is nothing wrong with a person with ideas, it is important that he be inside the organizing system, and not replace it.
      It is necessary to create a new mass people's party, which can include healthy active forces from all existing parties
  6. Michael L. Offline Michael L.
    Michael L. 10 December 2022 13: 39
    -10
    What Russia needs to win is not a military dictatorship, but a way out of Putin's (racial) economic stupor...as an example for Ukraine.
    It is doubtful that the "emergency" Igor Strelkov is capable of this!
  7. ivan2022 Offline ivan2022
    ivan2022 (ivan2022) 10 December 2022 14: 02
    +3
    Many people can say the right words, but a politician who is really able to implement them cannot do without a political party. Which is united by the idea and therefore can take power in a coordinated manner and act on the ground.

    Strelkov does not have a party and does not intend to join existing ones. Maybe this is our future and already the third non-partisan president? Maybe more precisely, the third project?

    Our mentality is such that the people do not take the party seriously .... But on the other hand, the Tsar, who is taken from where it is not clear - that's all.

    And if among the contenders for the throne one put on an overcoat (preferably a black-sea coat with a white scarf), the people will immediately recognize the Tsar by it! Strelkov - already in his overcoat .... And he was even at the front. All "adult" ... ..

    Heh ... Heh ... In fact, the party always stands behind the president! But she is like that .... with such ideas that unite her activists, which to declare honestly and publicly is political suicide.

    Therefore, Putin, who pursues the policy of the EP, is not a member of the EP ...... The experience of being Russian has shown that we can even do this !!!
    1. guest Offline guest
      guest 10 December 2022 14: 51
      +1
      Quote: ivan2022
      Maybe this is our future and already third consecutive non-partisan president?

      Can you list the other two?
      1. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
        Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 10 December 2022 16: 09
        0
        Quote: guest
        Can you list the other two?

        Easily. Yeltsin and Putin. You can put Gorbachev in the same group, but he was the president of the USSR.
      2. ivan2022 Offline ivan2022
        ivan2022 (ivan2022) 11 December 2022 09: 45
        0
        In general, we have such a tradition: if an image of a popular politician is created, it seems to be on its own. And he has no barriers. And this is taken for granted by the people, although this is fantasy .....

        Like that "an honest man and a truth-seeker came" .... Where did he come from? It doesn't matter...

        For example, what power did Yeltsin rely on in 1991? To the CPSU?

        So he banned the CPSU back in November. And he was supported by the security forces and legislators! Which, too, were all members of the CPSU. Although his powers were limited to the RSFSR, and the CPSU was an all-Union organization .... And even the court recognized this, but a year later .. When it was already too late to drink Borjomi.

        What force led and kept him and allowed him to do in the USSR what was contrary to all the laws of the USSR? Why did all his leaders suddenly obey and obey?

        Society should be developed enough to have realistic ideas about the state, not mythology... But so far we have not grown to that level.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  8. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 10 December 2022 14: 19
    +15
    "Military Dictatorship": Prospects for Igor Strelkov in Russian Politics

    None. All the figures of the Russian spring either died strangely, or were weightless and removed, in their place EDRO and officials.
    The dictatorship, in fact, is still half there - the objectionable and dissatisfied away, "their own" are all in warm places and untouchable.
    They are even legally protected from conscription.
    The Central Bank and others declare an unthinkable outflow of money from Russia .... which means that the elite is sucking money out of the country even more ...
    1. trampoline instructor (Cotriarch Peril) 10 December 2022 20: 33
      +3
      The Central Bank and others declare an unthinkable outflow of money from Russia .... which means that the elite is sucking money out of the country even more ...

      Sucks not only the elite, but also various diasporas, for example.
      Money itself, as it were, goes where it is calmer and more satisfying.
  9. rotkiv04 Offline rotkiv04
    rotkiv04 (Victor) 10 December 2022 14: 46
    +16
    Putin will eventually lead the country to collapse himself, for this there is no need for a Maidan, and Strelkov is unfortunately right, but there is no other way, now it is clear that Putin, with his snotty policy, has led to the fact that there is a big war ahead and it does not depend on Russia wants to fight or not, now in order to survive you have to fight, everything happened according to the classics - they got both shame and war
    1. Ignatov Oleg Georgievich (Oleg) 14 December 2022 21: 50
      -1
      rotkiv, according to the Strelkovskaya military dictatorship, shooters like you on the front line would have been shot in the first place. But this does not threaten you on the couch. Keep making people happy.
  10. Shelest2000 Offline Shelest2000
    Shelest2000 10 December 2022 15: 02
    +1
    I favor the second option because:

    Only two things can save Russia:

    1. Beauty.
    2. Mass executions of officials.

    The first is the most aesthetically pleasing.
    The second is the most efficient.
  11. guest Offline guest
    guest 10 December 2022 15: 03
    +6
    Prospects for Igor Strelkov in Russian politics

    There are no words at all.
  12. Uncle Borya Offline Uncle Borya
    Uncle Borya (Uncle Borya) 10 December 2022 15: 11
    +3
    I support Strelkov more than completely. However, the problem is that they don't last long. As soon as the authorities feel a real threat, he will be killed, as Mostovoy, Motorola, Givi, Zakharchenko and others were killed. I do not believe that crests killed them.
    1. ivan2022 Offline ivan2022
      ivan2022 (ivan2022) 10 December 2022 16: 05
      +3
      From your support, Strelkov is neither hot nor cold.

      But let's ask the question: why do you even know about it?

      There are many people who, being party activists, are now in prison. And you do not know anything about their existence ..... And it is not interesting to know.
      There are others who have become famous from supporting their parties. Who are not killed or imprisoned, but simply interfere with shit ...

      And against this background, Strelkov, who walks through the pages of the media, like a saint on water. Myself! No power seems to support him .... And he does not sink ..... How is it?
      1. Ulan.1812 Offline Ulan.1812
        Ulan.1812 (Boris Gerasimov) 10 December 2022 20: 28
        0
        Quote: ivan2022
        From your support, Strelkov is neither hot nor cold.

        But let's ask the question: why do you even know about it?

        There are many people who, being party activists, are now in prison. And you do not know anything about their existence ..... And it is not interesting to know.
        There are others who have become famous from supporting their parties. Who are not killed or imprisoned, but simply interfere with shit ...

        And against this background, Strelkov, who walks through the pages of the media, like a saint on water. Myself! No power seems to support him .... And he does not sink ..... How is it?

        You answered your own question. He is a figurehead and someone is behind him. As once for Navalny. Moreover, he really spoke about the article a long time ago.
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. guest Offline guest
        guest 14 December 2022 21: 59
        0
        Quote: Ignatov Oleg Georgievich
        killed Mostovoy

        Who is Mostovoy?
  13. old sargent Offline old sargent
    old sargent (Oleg) 10 December 2022 15: 12
    +7
    He gets into politics - he will be stupidly bang. For dangerous for the current government
    1. ivan2022 Offline ivan2022
      ivan2022 (ivan2022) 10 December 2022 16: 20
      +4
      And what, you can "get into politics" - without having attention from the media?
      And without relying on the resources of any political party?

      Moreover, the attention of the media can be such that they make you look like an idiot and poop from head to toe .... And they will attribute something that was not there. They did this with many, and it’s not necessary to “bang” ...

      Right now I went out to the square and "got into politics" and all of Russia found out, right ...?
    2. Ignatov Oleg Georgievich (Oleg) 14 December 2022 22: 03
      0
      Old, do not get into politics, but are elected by the population. Didn't you know? He will recruit so many like-minded people to pass a certain percentage in the elections and enter power. Or is it easier for you - No person has no problems. But I doubt that a person of monarchical convictions will find a massive response of support from the population. I would not have let this provocateur come to power even for a cannon shot. Read what the leaders of the republics say about him.
  14. mimocodil Offline mimocodil
    mimocodil (Mimicrocodil) 10 December 2022 17: 25
    -13
    Why are you all like a girl with a short memory? Glorifying Girkin, everyone has now quickly forgotten that it was this character who boasted that it was he who provoked the war in the Donbass. Everyone quickly forgot that Moscow didn’t need this war in 2014 either. Everyone quickly forgot that VVP personally asked Donetsk and Lugansk not to hold any referendums from the TV screen and live, because the Kremlin did not plan the Crimean scenario for Donbass and was not on the agenda. Nobody - neither Girkin, nor Donetsk, nor Lugansk - heeded the words from Moscow. So, as they say, now we have what we have. And largely thanks to the efforts of the "hero" and "people's favorite" Girkin. And you continue to glorify your idol further.
    1. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 10 December 2022 17: 54
      0
      Quote: Mimokpokodil
      Everyone quickly forgot that VVP personally from the TV screen and live asked Donetsk and Luhansk not to hold any referendums,

      Video in the studio.
      1. mimocodil Offline mimocodil
        mimocodil (Mimicrocodil) 10 December 2022 19: 24
        +2
        Have you been banned on Google?



        Putin asked to postpone the referendum in the south-east of Ukraine
        https://www.interfax.ru/world/375300
        1. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
          Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 10 December 2022 21: 18
          +1
          Great video! Like a naughty cat. Shit was poked in the muzzle, and he smeared all the Russians in shit. But he asked to postpone the referendum, not hold it. However, yes, radish horseradish is not sweeter.
          1. mimocodil Offline mimocodil
            mimocodil (Mimicrocodil) 11 December 2022 12: 09
            +1
            Translated from diplomatic into ordinary Russian, "to hold sometime later" means precisely "never." If you are an adult, and not a student from a parochial school, you should understand this.
            1. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
              Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 11 December 2022 12: 15
              0
              Quote: Mimokpokodil
              "spend sometime later"

              Well, they did it. Just too late. And before that, they refused to accept the DPR as part of the Russian Federation, they ordered to cancel Novorossia. Where the curve will lead now, and the late Vanga will not prophesy.
              1. mimocodil Offline mimocodil
                mimocodil (Mimicrocodil) 11 December 2022 12: 21
                0
                You seem to be practically unable to understand what you read and formulate your thought coherently. Well, it happens.
                1. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
                  Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 11 December 2022 12: 33
                  0
                  Quote: Mimokpokodil
                  You seem to be practically unable to understand what you read and formulate your thought coherently. Well, it happens.

                  You, Gena, have a contradiction. Did they hold a referendum in the LDNR? Spent.
          2. Ignatov Oleg Georgievich (Oleg) 14 December 2022 22: 09
            +1
            Mordvin, I really want to answer you as you like, but I have been repeatedly banned for frank statements.
            1. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
              Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 15 December 2022 08: 59
              0
              This is not an insult, but a statement of fact. However, I was already banned at VO for calling the president the harmless word "balabol", and now it is not known why for as much as three months.
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. Igor Ivanovich_2 (Igor Ivanovich) 10 December 2022 17: 33
    -2
    It is necessary to completely defeat homosexuality, otherwise it will be so - everything through ...! One Putin is fighting desperately against homosexuality, yes Khinshtein, and the rest are just making fun - a shame!
    1. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 10 December 2022 17: 45
      +3
      Quote: Igor Ivanovich_2
      One Putin fights desperately against homosexuality

      How is he dealing with it?
  17. Oleg V. Offline Oleg V.
    Oleg V. (Oleg Vladimirovich) 10 December 2022 18: 31
    +7
    The fallacy of betting on the Minsk agreements, President Putin recently personally admitted in the course of communication with the mothers of servicemen

    The tale of how a KGB lieutenant colonel was scammed by a GDR girl into one or two... laughing
    1. Ignatov Oleg Georgievich (Oleg) 14 December 2022 01: 04
      0
      Oleg, actually our president is a colonel.
      1. Oleg V. Offline Oleg V.
        Oleg V. (Oleg Vladimirovich) 15 December 2022 21: 05
        0
        Oh well, that changes everything! fellow
  18. Vlad Sirs Offline Vlad Sirs
    Vlad Sirs (Sirius NVL) 10 December 2022 18: 39
    -2
    Personally, I don’t have good scenarios for the Russian Federation, too many mistakes were made in the past, will Kyiv negotiate and make concessions to Moscow? No. Can Moscow defeat the Armed Forces of Ukraine and force Kyiv to make concessions? No. There remains a long positional war of attrition, and it seems that it is not Kyiv that will eventually sign the surrender. Strelkov is right, there is no need to torture and kill people on both sides for years. It is necessary to reach peace agreements next year.
  19. calligrapher Lev_Nikolaevich (Dmitriy) 10 December 2022 18: 59
    -6
    Military coups in Russia never succeeded.
    It's funny that there are few successful military coups in the world, and among them mainly those that were approved (if not organized) from the outside.
    That is, the military dictatorship is an instrument of external influence under the sauce of restoring order, which was violated with its help.
    If Putin had followed Strelkov's advice in 2015, it could have happened that she would simply not have survived the tsunami of sanctions against the Russian Federation.
    Neither the financial sector, nor the production sector, nor the food sector was ready for autonomy - independence in these areas had not been achieved to the required extent by this year, but nevertheless, something was done, and all this flurry prepared in advance turned out to be non-fatal.
    Now Strelkov is again calling for drastic movements that will definitely cause a sharp reaction already within the country. It is difficult to calculate it, but one thing is clear - it will not benefit society and the mood in it.
    1. trampoline instructor (Cotriarch Peril) 10 December 2022 23: 19
      +1
      Military coups in Russia never succeeded.

      Catherine I Alekseevna, Peter II Alekseevich, Anna Ioannovna, Elizaveta Petrovna, Catherine II, Alexander I. (The era of palace coups in Russia).
      foot ischo
      1. calligrapher Lev_Nikolaevich (Dmitriy) 10 December 2022 23: 49
        -2
        should not be confused with the palace.
        As a result, it was not the military who came to power.
        Switch to Albany - yours.
        1. trampoline instructor (Cotriarch Peril) 11 December 2022 00: 20
          -2
          Go read a Russian history textbook for the 7th grade of high school.
          1. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
            Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 11 December 2022 00: 39
            -1
            And what changed after Pavlush was hit with a snuff box on the cumpole? Aleksashka sat on the throne and said: "Everything will be like with my grandmother!" There were no cardinal changes.
  20. steelmaker Offline steelmaker
    steelmaker 10 December 2022 19: 05
    +1
    in which he announced the possibility of his coming into big politics,

    Early. It is clear that he is not a politician. Not only one wish. We need a lot of money, we need supporters, and preferably, at least in 20 regions. Time, for such statements, chose the wrong. Early, very early. Someone sets him up.
  21. trampoline instructor (Cotriarch Peril) 10 December 2022 20: 28
    -5
    that Igor Strelkov himself honestly admits that this is a direct path to a military dictatorship in Russia, without which, as he believes, we will not be able to win the confrontation with the West and preserve our own statehood:

    1) Still, Girkin, not Strelkov.
    2) Cromwell was just a Lord Protector, Napoleon was the first consul and emperor, Kolchak was the Supreme Ruler of Russia, but what would Girkin call himself?
    In my opinion, none of the three above would fit him even as orderlies.
    3) The confrontation between Russia and the West is an obsession of unhealthy people, reaching the paranoid manifestations of the last 110-120 years.
    1. Ulysses Offline Ulysses
      Ulysses (Alexey) 10 December 2022 21: 21
      +1
      3) The confrontation between Russia and the West is an obsession of unhealthy people, reaching the paranoid manifestations of the last 110-120 years.

      Before that, the West passionately loved everything that lay east of Poland? We were the object of colonization, like any other wild tribes. The very emergence of a centralized state on the eastern outskirts of "civilization" was a certain shock ..
      1. trampoline instructor (Cotriarch Peril) 10 December 2022 21: 37
        -2
        Approximately the same processes occurred in other periods of history in different parts of the Earth. It is not very clear what kind of centralized state we are talking about, Rurik with the Vikings adit?

        We were the object of colonization...

        "Who are "we?
        1. Ulysses Offline Ulysses
          Ulysses (Alexey) 10 December 2022 21: 52
          -1
          Rurik with the Vikings created what?. This is only a page in the formation of the Russian Empire.

          "Who are "we?

          Those who piled on the Teutons on the shores of Lake Peipsi. Who were we to them?
          1. trampoline instructor (Cotriarch Peril) 10 December 2022 22: 44
            -3
            Rurik with the Varangians created the Old Russian state in the second half of the 9th century. The Russian Empire died as a result of the February Revolution of 1917.

            On the shores of Lake Peipsi in 1242 there were not Teutons, but the Livonian Order. In 1223, the Mongols piled on someone at Kalka, in 1237 they piled on someone in Ryazan, and in 1240 the Mongols piled on someone in Kyiv.

            The Mongols did not reach Novgorod, and the winner of the Livonians, Alexander Nevsky, preferred to pay off them, and then went to the Horde to receive a label for reigning.
    2. guest Offline guest
      guest 10 December 2022 21: 38
      +2
      Quote: Trampoline area instructor
      Russia's confrontation with the West is an obsession of unhealthy people

      Western weapons don't kill Russians now?
      1. Just a cat Offline Just a cat
        Just a cat (Bayun) 10 December 2022 22: 09
        -1
        it’s not weapons that kill ... forelocks are generally great experts in choosing methods for killing civilians.
        1. guest Offline guest
          guest 10 December 2022 23: 41
          -1
          Quote: Just Cat
          guns don't kill

          And then what?
          1. mimocodil Offline mimocodil
            mimocodil (Mimicrocodil) 11 December 2022 12: 17
            -1
            Russian Orthodox Church: there is nothing unusual in the response of the patriarch to Kalashnikov's letter
            https://ria.ru/20140123/990975408.html
            Do you consider yourself smarter than Patriarch Kirill?
      2. trampoline instructor (Cotriarch Peril) 10 December 2022 22: 49
        -2
        In 1979-1989, in Afghanistan, Soviet (Russians) were killed, among other things, by Chinese weapons, which were created according to Soviet models.
        So, what is next?
    3. savage3000 Offline savage3000
      savage3000 (Savage) 11 December 2022 13: 05
      0
      are those Russia driving countries into the stone age by bombing? right? Russia staged a revolution in Ukraine and tried in other countries? So? Is Russia including non-market measures to kill competitors? is it all Russia?
  22. Vox_Populi Offline Vox_Populi
    Vox_Populi (vox populi) 10 December 2022 20: 51
    +1
    or Igor Strelkov with military dictatorship, public executions, full mobilization of the country and society

    This is a very ambiguous path, on what political and socio-economic platform will it be based, on the Orthodox oligarchs?
  23. Ulysses Offline Ulysses
    Ulysses (Alexey) 10 December 2022 21: 13
    -2
    But eight years ago, everything could have been completely different.

    It couldn't be otherwise. It would only get worse..
    1. guest Offline guest
      guest 10 December 2022 21: 44
      +2
      And why worse? The Armed Forces of Ukraine then were completely different, much weaker and more divided, many were then ready to go over to our side.
    2. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 10 December 2022 21: 45
      +1
      Quote: Ulysses
      It couldn't be otherwise. It would only get worse..

      It would be much better for the common people. Probably all these 8 years the authorities hid their loot.
  24. Vladimir80 Offline Vladimir80
    Vladimir80 10 December 2022 21: 38
    -1
    I remember a phrase from a joke

    He will eat something, but who will give it to him?

    The author's article, unlike his other articles, is similar to graphomania and entertaining the respectable public with "illusions".
    1. Michael L. Offline Michael L.
      Michael L. 10 December 2022 22: 42
      +2
      It's an anecdote, but the "graphomaniac" Author clearly stepped on the sore spot of the "professor", who is swaggering with his slavish psychology.
      If in the modern Russian Federation I. Girkin (like any other!) does not have a legitimate opportunity to climb the political Olympus, then why is Vladimir80 gloating? ;-(
      1. Vladimir80 Offline Vladimir80
        Vladimir80 10 December 2022 23: 07
        -3
        put no hope in princes and sons of men

        It is very naive to associate any changes with one person, or even with two, three, ten ...
        The situation that has developed with the "hero" of the publication at the front clearly shows the level of support for him in the military.
        1. Michael L. Offline Michael L.
          Michael L. 10 December 2022 23: 32
          +1
          Crisis - inevitably puts forward an extraordinary personality ...
          It is not for nothing that the "naive" authorities are afraid of the "unsupported" in the Armed Forces, and are trying in every possible way to compromise it!
    2. mimocodil Offline mimocodil
      mimocodil (Mimicrocodil) 11 December 2022 12: 23
      -1
      Quote: Vladimir80
      entertaining the respectable public with "illusions"

      Like all his "creativity"
  25. Norma51 Offline Norma51
    Norma51 (Nick) 11 December 2022 01: 09
    -1
    Putinism is a mixture of Yeltsinism and KGBism, embezzlement and suppression, all kinds of Abramoviches and clichés, compradors and bullies, a resource-based economy and a police state, a parasitic oligarchy and a rotten nomenklatura, anti-patriotism and anti-democratism.
    1. mimocodil Offline mimocodil
      mimocodil (Mimicrocodil) 11 December 2022 12: 27
      -4
      Your post is another confirmation of the lack of memory and elementary gratitude of the current generation. I hope you yourself will find in these tyrnets of yours a reliable description of what the GDP accepted from the hands of the drunk of all Rus'?
      1. savage3000 Offline savage3000
        savage3000 (Savage) 11 December 2022 13: 00
        +2
        what is there to look for. everything floats on the surface.

        1. key: accepted from the hands of an alcoholic. this already says a lot.
        2. took it with ever-increasing demand for oil, gas and raw materials. accepted with the constant rise in prices for these resources. immediately the WORLD managed to flood at the same time.

        it's all. Russia has remained the same as it was in the 90s. one has only to subtract the income from the export of resources. in different years they provided from 40 to 70% of federal budget revenues.

        at the same time, for 22 years, only curbs have learned to shift 5 times, and then in Moscow.

        even Iran managed during this time to copy the same 185 MW gas turbine. which, perhaps, the nagas want to buy. what are we? we will buy everything from Europe for oil!

        so you'd better keep quiet.
        1. mimocodil Offline mimocodil
          mimocodil (Mimicrocodil) 11 December 2022 13: 14
          -3
          Once again, you have confirmed folk wisdom

          The pig will find dirt everywhere
          1. savage3000 Offline savage3000
            savage3000 (Savage) 11 December 2022 13: 44
            +2
            yes, especially when the shore of this fetid sea is hidden far beyond the horizon. you've confirmed standard zombie behavior.

            ps and how many crises have we had? and the result of the Serdyukov-Shoiguy "reforms" of the army. such damn reforms that the form of the VKPO-VKPB, modern, is sold in tens of thousands on Avito.
  26. Kapany3 Offline Kapany3
    Kapany3 11 December 2022 08: 03
    -1
    Quote from Mikhail L.
    What Russia needs to win is not a military dictatorship, but a way out of Putin's (racial) economic stupor...as an example for Ukraine.
    It is doubtful that the "emergency" Igor Strelkov is capable of this!

    Such people should not be allowed to come close to power. With all his merits, he is now "playing" for people who are not really trying to think.
    1. Michael L. Offline Michael L.
      Michael L. 11 December 2022 09: 02
      +3
      I. Girkin is not an ideal.
      But to declare his supporters idiots is unworthy! ;-(
    2. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 11 December 2022 09: 05
      +1
      Quote: Kapany3
      Such people should not be allowed to come close to power. With all his merits, he is now "playing" for people who are not really trying to think.

      Expand your brilliant thoughts for not really thinking.
      1. Smirnoff Offline Smirnoff
        Smirnoff (Victor) 11 December 2022 11: 32
        +2
        He is an illiterate politician. To chop off the shoulder is idiocy. Let him educate himself. And it will show what he is good for. While Igor is ANYWHERE good for nothing. Neither in battle, nor in service, nor in politics. And few people believe all his nonsense.
        1. Mordvin 3 Offline Mordvin 3
          Mordvin 3 (Vladimir) 11 December 2022 11: 41
          -1
          Well, yes, where does he care about the multi-passer who brought the country into zutswang.
    3. Ignatov Oleg Georgievich (Oleg) 12 December 2022 00: 57
      -1
      Kapany, this Napoleon has already demonstrated military dictatorship in the Donbass by shooting two militiamen of a company commander and a platoon commander under the articles of 1941 by the decision of a military field tribunal. Who gave him such a right? It is no coincidence that he was thrown out of the territory of the republic.
  27. Smirnoff Offline Smirnoff
    Smirnoff (Victor) 11 December 2022 11: 29
    0
    Strelkov's prospects in Russian politics???

    - Strelkov politician WELL. For the most part, a demagogue and a speculator from politics.
    History DOES NOT tolerate subjunctive moods.
    In 2014, it was not possible to send Russian troops to the Donbass. And all his calls are populism and demagogy. Strelkov's assumptions are not correct. Neither historically nor politically. They did not correspond to the realities of that time.
    - Yes, there is an "opinion". It has every right, but it does not take into account historical reality and EXPECTABILITY!
    First of all, Igra Strelkov needs to STUDY the history of the Russian state FROM and TO. Read many works of politicians past and present.
    His political education and education itself is at ZERO!
    There is SOME experience of military operations, but this is not enough for him for political activities that correspond to the realities of today and tomorrow.
    All his predictions are WRONG!
    - no military dictatorship,
    - no public executions,
    - neither complete mobilization of the country and society,
    - nor the exit of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation to the Polish border.
    All these horror stories of Strelkov look like the vague and barbaric centuries of the Middle Ages. They are not needed by Russia and our people.

    - ... But eight years ago, everything could have been completely different ???
    IT COULD NOT BE OTHERWISE at the root!!! Only in the way it has taken place and is moving in the right direction for the cause of the World and Russia.
    The world history of the World and Russia has shown Strelkov and all other DREAMERS from demagoguery and speculation that the development of historical events has its own laws and prerequisites and expediency.

    - Historical time is on the side of Russia. This is a very big historical advantage of Russia over the USA. Russia will be able to defeat and destroy American democratic TERRORISM in Ukraine, in Europe and throughout the World. VICTORY will be for Russia!

    - No need to rush. Rush is not needed. The systematic and methodical defeat of the enemy will bring its results. Definitely.
    1. Ignatov Oleg Georgievich (Oleg) 12 December 2022 00: 48
      -1
      Smirnoff, You were not heard, and moreover, someone even put a minus. I'll try to fix the situation. I fully agree with your thoughts.
    2. guest Offline guest
      guest 12 December 2022 01: 16
      +1
      Quote: Smirnoff
      IT COULD NOT BE OTHERWISE at the root

      Even as you could, but you will always find a go-ahead for inaction.
  28. Vlad Burchilo Offline Vlad Burchilo
    Vlad Burchilo (Vlad) 11 December 2022 11: 35
    0
    The author, in general, there are no objections, but in particular.
    1) according to the "Minsk" talking shops 100 pounds is correct.
    2) what Strelkov did not say about V.V., I DO NOT SPIT.
    But I didn't like the way he and Gordon talked about our history. Kind of neglect.
    3) he contradicts himself: he used to say that in order to reach the Dnieper, you need about 2 million people, but now 450 are enough. Even less than the current 000 or 620 people.
    4) "general mobilization" sounds nice, but put on.
    The author does not remember how many were hiding from mobilization in Kazakhstan? Seems like 500? In Georgia and Belarus, at least 000
    If, I am not mistaken, the author himself says that 42% perceive the war in purple. Look at your surroundings, are there many patriots? Personally, I can name 3 of my acquaintances that, at best, they will be "green", and at worst, they will start shooting in the back.
    5) to whom to give unlimited power: V, V? And so much, Zyuganov? I don’t believe it: I promised not to allow the pension reform, but in reality? Opposes a progressive tax.. Grudin? Each iron praised him, and he, as the war began, shut up
    1. Rainy Online Rainy
      Rainy 11 December 2022 16: 30
      -2
      Concerning general mobilization. She won't.
      If anything happens, then only a general mobilization of the population. And this is a little different. When all the people are driven to war, but nothing will change in the rear, and the same people who brought the situation to the present will be in charge ...
      Accordingly, there will be a disaster.
    2. guest Offline guest
      guest 12 December 2022 01: 19
      +1
      Quote: Vlad Burchilo
      to whom to give unlimited power: V, V? And so much, Zyuganov?

      Zyuganov discredited himself back in 1996.
      1. Vlad Burchilo Offline Vlad Burchilo
        Vlad Burchilo (Vlad) 12 December 2022 18: 53
        +1
        100 pounds agree.
  29. Hiker Offline Hiker
    Hiker (Dmitriy) 11 December 2022 11: 49
    +1
    Strelkov expresses his opinion from below. From all kinds of people.
    But what we have at the top is certainly some kind of weakness in every sense.
    Thieving, without a vector, hysterical and insane bureaucracy in conjunction with court political scientists ...
    It turns out that Putin has been fooled since 2014.
    Or maybe all his terms fooled?
    They make a picture for us, push it in, but in reality - an empty trough.

    Well, why didn't the shelling of Donetsk cease in a year?
    Was this the BASIS for the beginning of the NWO and the order of the Commander-in-Chief?
    Because there are no forces, no army, no means, no mind, no opportunities.

    Therefore, the further the series of flight, defeat, surrender of cities, the more people like Strelkov will be in demand.
    They don’t like defeatists, although they call them Armageddon, etc.
    By all appearances... the situation has become worse than before the start of the NWO.
    Well, about the protection of Russians in Ukraine, I generally keep quiet.
    Were you afraid that they would arrange Srebrennitsa in Donetsk, and Kherson does not count?
    Isn't Srebrenica there?
    1. guest Offline guest
      guest 12 December 2022 01: 23
      0
      Quote from Hiker
      By all appearances... the situation has become worse than before the start of the NWO.

      This is not true, Lugansk has officially been completely liberated, water has returned to Crimea, a land corridor has appeared there, and much more.
  30. savage3000 Offline savage3000
    savage3000 (Savage) 11 December 2022 12: 53
    +3
    Any slop can be poured on Girkin ... but there is a fact: without him, there could not have been the LPR and LPR. he did not sit on the couch, he fought.

    it crosses out any slop.

    he is the right friend.
    1. mimocodil Offline mimocodil
      mimocodil (Mimicrocodil) 11 December 2022 13: 18
      -4
      Yes. And he boasted that it was he who unleashed the war in the Donbass. And he should sneeze at the position of his homeland and his state. Remind you what it should be fraught with for a civil servant, albeit a former one?
      1. savage3000 Offline savage3000
        savage3000 (Savage) 11 December 2022 13: 45
        +4
        I don't know where you get all this. The war was unleashed by the West, having arranged a revolution in Ukraine.
        1. mimocodil Offline mimocodil
          mimocodil (Mimicrocodil) 11 December 2022 15: 28
          -3
          First, there was no revolution in Ukraine. Ask grandfather Lenin what is a revolution and a revolutionary situation. You will learn a lot of new and interesting things for yourself.
          Secondly, where do I get it? Yes, right where you are. But I can only analyze what I read, and not just memorize turbopatriotic chants.
          1. savage3000 Offline savage3000
            savage3000 (Savage) 11 December 2022 16: 08
            +1
            those. Maidan, the overthrow of the president, the seizure of power, the killing of people - this is not a revolution?

            training by the West of national formations is also normal?
            1. guest Offline guest
              guest 11 December 2022 16: 34
              +1
              Quote from Savage3000
              is this not a revolution?

              No, just a coup d'état.
            2. mimocodil Offline mimocodil
              mimocodil (Mimicrocodil) 11 December 2022 18: 25
              -1
              Quote from Savage3000
              those. Maidan, the overthrow of the president, the seizure of power, the killing of people - this is not a revolution?

              Of course not. This is a vulgar coup/revolt (not even a rebellion). And it has nothing to do with the revolution. I beg you, read Lenin. And it doesn't matter that it's not socialism/communism now. The scientific provisions of his works do not lose their relevance.
              By the way, dear, what you call the trash of the winter of 2013/2014 a revolution without quotes in writing suggests some thoughts that are not very pleasant for you.

              Quote from Savage3000
              training by the West of national formations is also normal?

              Of course not.
          2. savage3000 Offline savage3000
            savage3000 (Savage) 31 January 2023 20: 09
            0
            это была именно революция. поинтересуйтесь что это такое.. революция.
      2. guest Offline guest
        guest 11 December 2022 14: 10
        0
        Quote: Mimokpokodil
        it was he who unleashed the war in the Donbass

        Do not confuse Strelkov with Turchinov.
        1. mimocodil Offline mimocodil
          mimocodil (Mimicrocodil) 11 December 2022 18: 58
          -2
          Strelkov said that he started the war in Ukraine
          https://www.rbc.ru/politics/20/11/2014/546e278acbb20f6cca05fb53
          1. guest Offline guest
            guest 11 December 2022 19: 05
            +1
            Why cite this garbage as a source?
            1. mimocodil Offline mimocodil
              mimocodil (Mimicrocodil) 11 December 2022 19: 45
              -1
              Firstly, since when has RBC become a garbage dump? Or do you prefer under-TG channels? So for me, they are the garbage.
              Secondly, how can your attitude towards RBC cancel the direct speech of the specified character?
              1. guest Offline guest
                guest 11 December 2022 19: 56
                +1
                Quote: Mimokpokodil
                direct speech of the specified character?

                What is direct speech? They attributed this to him such stupidity, he, with all my ambiguous attitude towards him, could not say.
                1. mimocodil Offline mimocodil
                  mimocodil (Mimicrocodil) 11 December 2022 21: 35
                  -2
                  A clear example that idolatry is incurable
                  1. guest Offline guest
                    guest 11 December 2022 21: 55
                    0
                    What idolatry, my attitude to this character is very ambiguous.
              2. guest Offline guest
                guest 11 December 2022 20: 09
                0
                Quote: Mimokpokodil
                Firstly, since when has RBC become a garbage dump?

                Here is from wikipedia:

                RBC restart, 2012-2016
                Prokhorov considered various options for the development of RBC, including a merger with the Snob magazine and the Zhivi! media group, the creation of a joint holding company with the SUP Media group of Alexander Mamut, merger with Dozhd TV channel.
  31. Ivan Ivanych 68743684 (Sergei) 11 December 2022 14: 09
    -1
    everyone who is now at the helm, as they say, they are all former communists, at one time they took an oath of allegiance to the Soviet Union, swore to fight the enemies of our country and defend our country to the last drop of blood, they were all atheists, moreover, convinced, and how they they famously changed their shoes right in the air, we also saw everyone, everyone without exception became "believers" but only to the public, each of them has a dollar hanging in the holy corner instead of an icon, our main clergyman is mired in luxury, and this is a terrible sin, worship of a golden calf an unforgivable sin, hence all this vile mouse fuss at the front, just someone who earns loot in this war
  32. Ignatov Oleg Georgievich (Oleg) 11 December 2022 14: 40
    -1
    I read up to - what is the place of Strelkov in politics and quit!
    There is no place for him to discredit himself at the very beginning. No one will ever forget his flight from Slavensk. Balabolka, in short!
  33. In passing Offline In passing
    In passing (Galina Rožkova) 11 December 2022 15: 06
    +1
    Strelkov is definitely a provocateur. But the Russian government is also a muddy swamp. Okay, they took the Crimea, because the Crimeans had everything clearly and unambiguously, and they were preparing, at least to remember the same Tuzla. And Donbass drinks a bitter cup, as if it is unnecessary to anyone. Well, who in Russia needed to get involved in internal Ukrainian affairs, if even before that they had been clapping their ears for thirty years? Only cheap gas was driven to the "brothers". Russians? Our? The oligarchs (the real Russian government) have all the interest in the size of their bank account, they don’t care about people. The fact that all the neighbors are moving away at different speeds does not care. There is nothing to offer but gas, cheap. And the oligarchs don't give a damn about how everyone fled from the mobilization. Yes, come now NATO, and where is the USSR, and where will Russia be? While we are being probed with Ukrainian blood. And what do we see? No idea, no meaning, no purpose. Strelkov - one, and inconvenient. You can’t let such people into politics, they’ll break firewood.
  34. Ignatov Oleg Georgievich (Oleg) 12 December 2022 00: 26
    -1
    The author doesn’t want to name Slavyansk at all (left by Strelkov the inhabitants of Slavyansk and the entire agglomeration to their fate. How many civilians who believed in him in Russia died during the cleansing of these territories of the Armed Forces of Ukraine will find out later when Strelkov is put in the dock) Butchey - 1. The feat of Strelkov’s escape halved the territory of the republic, gave the Ukrofascists the opportunity to turn this region into a well-prepared fortified area with hundreds of kilometers of trenches and iron bunkers, which are still difficult for our troops to recapture. And this in politics?