Moscow blames NATO for attacks on Russian airfields

December 9 2022 24

In the recent attack by Ukrainian drones on Russian airfields, the hand of Kyiv's Western "partners" is clearly visible. This was stated by the head of the Russian delegation, Konstantin Gavrilov, during the talks in Vienna on issues of military security and arms control.

The diplomat recalled that NATO is increasingly using its military-technical capabilities to help the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

And now, once again, the facts indicate that the member countries of the North Atlantic Alliance really had a hand in Kyiv's terrorist provocations against the Russian strategic airfields of Diaghilevo and Engels

Gavrilov noted in an interview RIA News.

According to the diplomat, the Ukrainians actually received a direct order from the Western bloc to carry out such an attack. At the same time, US experts took technical participation in the preparation of actions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. So, at the beginning of the year, the American corporation Raytheon Technologies was involved in the development of the Tu-141 Strizh drone, the range of which was 1000 km. Such a UAV was used by the Ukrainian armed forces in a raid on the territory of the Russian Federation.

Along with this, drones are aimed at targets using the American GPS satellite navigation system.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

calligrapher Lev_Nikolaevich

0

9 December 2022 10: 36

at the beginning of the year, the American corporation Raytheon Technologies was involved in the development of the Tu-141 Swift drone

And they didn’t finalize the Flights? I would like to know what else to expect in the foreseeable future.
Alex D

+1

9 December 2022 10: 43

They have all SVO, restaurants and shopping centers working! The middle class from their laziness even forgot how to cook. Liberals have weaned! The people in general are in a semi-conscious state, incapable of going into the liberation movement either psychologically or physically. Foreign agents in power both sat and sit. Sabotage every day, sabotage.
1. calligrapher Lev_Nikolaevich
  
  +3
  
  9 December 2022 10: 58
  
  Is that what it was about now? The note is not about that.
  1. GIS
    
    0
    
    9 December 2022 15: 34
    
    some weirdo mixed up VK ... they hired a newcomer to work in a cisso, he still confuses the sites))) he is excusable for a non-Russian
    1. calligrapher Lev_Nikolaevich
      
      0
      
      9 December 2022 18: 39
      
      Yes. Looks like "new". Alex without Eustace.
      Works without a soul. And what ? They pay money, and that's fine. But the nickname will have to be changed. This one is very memorable.
steelmaker

+3

9 December 2022 10: 49

Have you noticed that Russia does not publish its satellite images anywhere? Even after our successful missile strikes. Inappropriate questions arise.
1. GIS
  
  0
  
  9 December 2022 15: 35
  
  and I would not publish in place of the General Staff. why do enemies need to know where and which satellite is hanging and what can
2. calligrapher Lev_Nikolaevich
  
  0
  
  9 December 2022 18: 50
  
  They are simply not publicly available. The publications have enough other pictures to create content. Our images need to be ordered on the ROSCOSMOS GEOPPORTAL, and this is a long and dreary process. At the same time, it is not in our mentality to inflate the topic of destruction. Western media is another matter.
3. Accidentally
  
  0
  
  10 December 2022 15: 11
  
  I still remember the course of lectures for 70 years in one square meter of 250 lines. those through 4 mm you can see everything from space
Skipper

+3

9 December 2022 10: 56

I immediately had no doubt that the Americans with NATO were directly involved in this because the natives themselves could not organize and carry out this. There it was necessary to have data from satellites on the weak leaky places of the Russian air defense ... data on a clear route, and I also thought that the Soviet Swift ... or rather, it was an imitation of the Soviet Swift from which only a shell ... and the inside is all modern NATO ..... like specifically NATO and the United States chose just such a device to hide their aggression behind it.
1. Peace Peace.
  
  0
  
  10 December 2022 20: 57
  
  I think that's how it was. The NATO KR was welded on the outside with a hull from 141 and released back home.
Alexey Davydov

+5

9 December 2022 11: 12

Moscow blames NATO for attacks on Russian airfields

The words "imposed responsibility" have a certain status in diplomatic language and are used to formally justify decisive military retaliation.
Here it would have been more decent to write "Moscow mumbled something vague about NATO's involvement under its breath."
It is not worth projecting our "Wishlist" onto reality, distorting the picture of the surrender of positions by the authorities in the war with the Anglo-Saxons. As it is not regrettable for ourselves, but what is - is. In reality, so far
1. Watching
  
  +2
  
  9 December 2022 19: 55
  
  "To hold accountable" means to hold accountable or punish in some way. And here it is just ordinary chatter, not calling anyone anything.
Alex Samoletov

0

9 December 2022 11: 56

According to the nuclear doctrine signed by the GDP, Yao's strike can be inflicted in the event of a strike on Russian nuclear forces. It has already been inflicted. What is the answer ?? another expression of concern
1. The comment was deleted.
2. voland_1
  
  0
  
  9 December 2022 21: 10
  
  maybe and should - different things
Jacques sekavar

+2

9 December 2022 12: 39

Moscow has blamed NATO for the strikes on Russian airfields - what good is it that it has blamed on NATO?
NATO has been fighting for a long time on the part of the Russian Federation, there is no reaction to this, which encourages NATO to continue to wage war against the Russian Federation with impunity.
1. Vladimir Tuzakov
  
  +4
  
  9 December 2022 16: 38
  
  It sounds like a pun: Moscow laid it down, and NATO laid it down. On such impositions only lay down. An example of S. Lavrov, with frequent manifestations of concern, from which many have long been only ridiculous ...
Adm Hts

+5

9 December 2022 17: 47

Moscow blames NATO for attacks on Russian airfields

ok, who else... :)
not on their own inability to detect and intercept a target aircraft long before the target over 600 km ...
and they work competently - they tracked everything, recorded what and how we have in real life, just like during the attack on the Crimea ...
now they can make layouts for attacking strategists when they feel like it ...
Potapov

+2

9 December 2022 18: 20

I am indignant, along with the entire progressive public ... And I curse our sufferers ... The Nazis and the owners do what they want, they got to the strategists, you should scold them too ...
ALEXANDER UNKNOWN

0

9 December 2022 19: 11

Is this already a red line, or not yet?
vlad127490

+2

9 December 2022 20: 19

Moscow has blamed NATO for the attacks on Russian airfields. This was stated by the head of the Russian delegation Konstantin Gavrilov during the talks in Vienna on military security and arms control.

This is not an official note of protest from the Russian Federation. This is another Odessa noise. The official works out his travel allowance and a warm place.
The comment was deleted.
Jstas

0

10 December 2022 07: 31

Some troops went to Kyiv,
others set off for Moscow,
And there, and there f **** caught.
Crowd to the Dnieper, one by one ...
And the whole kahal was baptized in the Dnieper,
Well, how is Gerasim there-Mumu.
guest

+1

10 December 2022 15: 23

Moscow blames NATO for attacks on Russian airfields

To paraphrase, the authorities have signed their full impotence.
anti-aircraft gunner

0

13 December 2022 19: 05

It would be better to be silent. Wouldn't be considered a coward.