"Lancets" easily crack down on Ukrainian air defense: a new selection of strikes


Another video of the use of the Lancet UAV against enemy air defenses, obtained using objective control means, has appeared on the Web.


The first arrival of the UAV damaged the two-coordinate radar station P-18 "Terek". This technique has been in service with Ukraine since the Soviet era and should detect and conduct air targets. But the Lancet could not detect the radar in a timely manner.

The second shown UAV attack struck a more complex three-coordinate radar station ST-68. This radar towed by KrAZ tractors is designed to detect and track low-altitude targets, including in the presence of interference and adverse weather conditions.

Two more strikes were made by kamikaze drones from the Kalashnikov concern on the launcher of the S-300 anti-aircraft missile system. The video shows how the operator directed loitering projectiles at one of the vehicles in the moving convoy of Ukrainian Armed Forces equipment.


Recently, the intensity of the use of besploniks has decreased. This is due to the lower efficiency of their use at negative temperatures. Cases of inexpensive Lancet or Geranium UAVs are made of frost-sensitive plastic.
5 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Irek Offline Irek
    Irek (Paparazzi Kazan) 5 December 2022 16: 53
    +1
    Again panic throughout Skotomazepiya. ...

  2. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 5 December 2022 17: 01
    +6
    Comment. The warhead lancet is insufficient and hits do not lead to complete destruction, which means most are maintainable. Hits are often not on important nodes or ammunition with detonation, not to mention the crews running away without much damage. There is still a lot of improvements to be done.
    1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 5 December 2022 17: 52
      +4
      Addendum. It looks like the lancet operators have not received enough training in the use of various targets, and make visible mistakes. An example with the S-300 convoy, the Lancet operator entered the head of the convoy correctly, but tried to maneuver and hit the car loaded with missiles from the side, it didn’t work, the blow fell next to the lower part of the body and wheels. The S-300 kit and the car were practically not seriously damaged. It is necessary to hit the cockpit in the forehead with subsequent damage to the equipment of the entire launch system, an elementary mistake in case of illiterate use.
      1. GIS Offline GIS
        GIS (Ildus) 6 December 2022 08: 49
        0
        workouts and more workouts. only this will help not to waste such opportunities to eliminate enemy equipment. well, everything comes with experience
  3. Boa kaa Offline Boa kaa
    Boa kaa (Alexander) 6 December 2022 17: 56
    +1
    Experience is clearly not enough. But there are questions about the "brisance" of the Lancet's warhead. yes
    It is urgently necessary to replace the BB with a more POWERFUL one, because. TNT clearly cannot cope with the task of destroying hardware. You need to put TGA or some other thread of crap with a coefficient of 20-25 in relation to tol. Then maybe. there will be a sense. fellow
    IMHO.