The Israeli press is trying to analyze the situation with the "frequent" fall of Russian military aircraft

12

The Jerusalem Post focused its readers' attention on the "more frequent" crashes of Russian combat aircraft outside the NVO zone. The main reasons for air crashes involving military aircraft far from the line of contact, according to the sources of the publication, are the sanctions of the West, as well as the "outdated" fleet of the Russian Aerospace Forces.

Over the past few months, the publication has counted 6 cases of incidents involving aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces. Particular attention was drawn to the tragedy in Yeysk, where on October 17 a Su-34 bomber fell on a residential building. Analysts at The Jerusalem Post believe the cause of the disaster was a malfunction of the fuel supply system, which caused the plane to catch fire and detonate ammunition.



Recall that the examination of the wreckage found the remains of seagulls on the elements of the engines, which confirms the official version that the disaster occurred due to birds getting into the power plants of the Su-34. The aircraft was on a training flight, so there was no ammunition on board.

The reasons for the recent accidents involving the MiG-31, the publication considers technical problems due to the age of the aircraft, as well as the lack of highly qualified specialists who "could get into the NWO zone as part of partial mobilization."

Russian aircraft crashes may be caused by a shortage of qualified repairmen, due to President Putin's mobilization decisions

- Michael Bonert, an aeronautical engineer at RAND Corporation, told the publication, apparently "forgetting" that technical specialists from the military-industrial complex are not subject to mobilization in Russia.

Do not exclude in the Israeli press and difficulties in the production of new aircraft due to the imposed sanctions against Russia. An increase in the production of fighter jets could also affect quality, which will lead to further accidents, according to the publication.

At the same time, they forgot to mention that three American fighters crashed in the last month alone. A US Air Force F-19A crashed in Utah on October 35, a Saudi Arabian Air Force F-7 crashed into a civilian building on November 15, and a South Korean Air Force F-20 crashed due to engine failure on November 16. Why did they fall? Because of Russian retaliatory sanctions or because of the fact that US technical specialists were called somewhere? ..
12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    28 November 2022 12: 23
    Oh, that Jewish account...
  2. -1
    28 November 2022 12: 23
    And Soviet planes in the Great Patriotic War would have fallen with the same intensity if then the enemy was supported by the same percentage of the population as now.
    Did everyone notice how the usual idle conversations among fellow travelers in transport or in queues fell silent? All for the same reason.
    1. 0
      30 November 2022 22: 24
      Do you understand what you are writing?
  3. 1_2
    +4
    28 November 2022 14: 39
    and what will the Jews say about the small resource of their f35 engines (the blades burn out)? Ross planes have no problems with this
  4. +2
    29 November 2022 02: 36
    "Rand Corporation" is part of the Ukrainian conflict, it is not impartial... this organization already published in 2019 the form of the current conflict... they are prophets or wizards... NO, they are the thinking head of this conflict. The "Biden" government is a member of this organization, I would say a terrorist organization, because it plans wars.
  5. +4
    29 November 2022 10: 40
    The Israeli press is trying to analyze the situation with the "frequent" fall of Russian military aircraft

    I didn't even see any attempts. Any attempts to analyze aircraft crashes must begin with flight statistics.
    What are the air raids in the US and here? Where is the analysis?
    About old planes - generally nonsense. Su-34 is older than F-16 or what? Jewish iksperds would at least read Wikipedia. The Su-34 flew 3 years after the production of the F-22 was stopped. It was the last worthy aircraft from the United States. Even though it's already outdated.
    When the question arises of sending F-16s from storage to Ukraine, they come to the conclusion that these aircraft are outdated even compared to the MiG29 and Su27 that Ukraine had.
  6. +2
    29 November 2022 11: 22
    Yes, they don’t care what to write, as long as it’s disgusting about Russia
    1. -1
      30 November 2022 11: 15
      Their article should have started with "due to the decisions of President Putin", otherwise they put it in the middle of the article, so everything would immediately become clear
  7. -1
    29 November 2022 23: 56
    Russian aviation is generally one of the most catastrophic. Still safer than a car. In Soviet times it was no better.
  8. 0
    30 November 2022 11: 12
    Jewish analysts are no better than others. And of course, not without Putin

    which is due to the mobilization decisions of President Putin
  9. +1
    30 November 2022 14: 02
    it is possible that this is the work of saboteurs and traitors. With our slovenliness and irresponsibility, this is quite possible. it is enough to recall the story of the laying of mines by saboteurs on our helicopters standing at the airfield near the border with Estonia. Or undermining stacks with air bombs at an airfield in the Crimea, with the destruction of nearby aircraft. Or undermining and flooding the BDK right in the port of Berdyansk. Yes, there are many things to remember.
  10. 0
    4 December 2022 20: 16
    Well, yes, there was no ammunition on board, but what then exploded for half an hour ?, there were four strong explosions immediately after the fall, then 30mm shells were hollowed