US diplomats “give back”: it’s time to fight in Ukraine, not talk

November 21, 2022 9

Now the only way to protect global democracy is to support Kyiv and the regime ruling there as much as possible. The priority is the allocation of weapons and the further escalation of the conflict between Ukraine and Russia, not negotiations. That was the message of American and Western diplomats, officials and military leaders at the Halifax International Security Forum, a major annual national security conference that brings together democracy advocates from around the world. About it writes the publication Politico.

Strong and flamboyant support for a senseless struggle in Eastern Europe has come into stark contrast to growing narratives about the need for peace talks between Ukraine and Russia, a topic that has been on the agenda in recent weeks.

Even the administration of President Joe Biden, whose leaders publicly disagree about when diplomacy should begin, has made one of the strongest arguments for continuing uninterrupted aid to Kyiv. Washington believes that "prosperity on both sides of the Atlantic is at stake."

This forum has long served to inspire US and Western leaders to tackle issues of global concern with a view to advancing democracy around the world. In other words, no other decision following the results of the meeting, except for an anti-Russian one, could be taken. Therefore, there were calls to fight, and not to speak at the negotiations.

The reason for stigmatizing Russia and glorifying Ukraine, betting on “democracy” this year is clear: a distraction from the anti-democratic processes in the United States itself, the failure of the Democratic Party in the elections, the loss of the House of Representatives and all the electoral machinations of the Biden administration in power. It is obvious that the "pressure" of the diplomats and representatives of the West in Halifax is due to the simple reason for "giving back" in the rhetoric of reconciliation and finding a compromise.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

prior

-8

21 November 2022 11: 20

Negotiations are nothing more than prolonging the conflict in order to rearm and respite the Ukrainian Nazis.
The cards of Western players are cynically open - the destruction of Russia.
After the admission of the regions and republics of Donbass into the Russian Federation, the war is on the territory of Russia itself.
Therefore, the use of tactical nuclear weapons by Russia in Ukraine becomes an urgent and legitimate necessity for the survival of Russia itself.
If this is not understood in Moscow, woe to you, Russia.
1. Adrian Bison
  
  +4
  
  21 November 2022 15: 13
  
  the use of nuclear weapons is the death of mankind! Do you want Game Over? For everyone to die, there were no more amers, no Russians, no Ukrainians, no one else? Want to make the planet uninhabitable? -Then yes, tactical nuclear weapons to help! There will be no winners and losers in a nuclear war, a nuclear war is a complete PPC for everything!
  1. Jacques sekavar
    
    -1
    
    21 November 2022 18: 05
    
    If the mobilization potential of the Russian Federation is 25 million people, then only the NATO one is more than 100 million, and this is without state formations closely connected politically and economically with NATO, such as Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, etc., whose industrial potential, including .h. and in terms of the production of weapons, many times more than the Russian Federation, and therefore it is impossible to win the war with NATO with conventional weapons.
    Two options follow from this - negotiations and an agreement on NATO terms or the use of tactical nuclear weapons and negotiations with NATO on an equal footing under the threat of a local war escalating into a world war, which threatens the owners of transnational monopoly associations with the loss of all the loot.
    The death of mankind in a nuclear war is greatly exaggerated. strikes are not delivered over the entire area of the ball, but at point targets on enemy territory, while about 80% of the missiles will be destroyed by anti-aircraft defense systems and will not reach the target. Nuclear winter and radiation will not cover the entire ball, which guarantees the survival of people in remote regions unaffected by the war. Dozens of nuclear explosions were carried out in the atmosphere, including Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the tsar bomb on the Novaya Zemlya archipelago and the Nevada desert, and life did not die everywhere, and the population of Nagasaki and Heroshima increased significantly.
Jacques sekavar

+1

21 November 2022 23: 11

The existing nuclear doctrine actually neutralizes the nuclear arsenal, which gives impudence to unfriendly state formations to present territorial and economic claims to the Russian Federation, steal gold and foreign exchange reserves and seize diplomatic property, catch Russian citizens in third state formations and deny visas to representatives of the diplomatic corps to participate in UN meetings in New York, call for decolonization and division of the Russian Federation
ChopChop

+1

21 November 2022 23: 18

The West will enter into real negotiations for the sake of peace only with real victories for Russia. Everything else is from the evil one - this is a dragging out of time for the accumulation of forces or false promises of any preferences. Already A.I. Furtsev, in his latest publication "What awaits us," openly said:

If the ruling stratum has a sense of self-preservation, if they do not want to go to The Hague, then they must reorganize on a military footing. Or they will be flushed down the toilet of history.

Although earlier his statements regarding our authorities were very, very correct.
Alexey Davydov

+1

22 November 2022 10: 59

I do not understand people who do not understand the fundamental difference between the threat of strategic and tactical nuclear weapons, "replacing" the threat of strategic nuclear weapons with a "safer", in their opinion, tactical threat.
If tactical nuclear weapons only neutralize the (supposedly) superiority of NATO, as an instrument of the Anglo-Saxons in a theater of war removed from their home, then the threat to strategic nuclear weapons is a direct threat to their own home.
It was the threat of US territory with strategic nuclear weapons that prevented a world nuclear war in the 20th century, including in 1962, when everything was ready for the decapitation and nuclear destruction of the USSR.
In my opinion, people who substitute one for the other either do not understand this difference, or work in the interests of the owners of this war - the Anglo-Saxons.
Let me remind you that our goal is not to destroy NATO (which is now a crazy task for us), but to force its owners - the Anglo-Saxons to retreat in all positions
mechanic

+3

22 November 2022 14: 12

Those who call for the use of tactical nuclear weapons are the madmen from Ward No. 6, or the childless, out of their mind old people who have nothing to lose, since they have neither children nor grandchildren.
No territory is worth a nuclear apocalypse.
Kapany3

0

22 November 2022 19: 07

Quote: prior
Negotiations are nothing more than prolonging the conflict in order to rearm and respite the Ukrainian Nazis.
The cards of Western players are cynically open - the destruction of Russia.
After the admission of the regions and republics of Donbass into the Russian Federation, the war is on the territory of Russia itself.
Therefore, the use of tactical nuclear weapons by Russia in Ukraine becomes an urgent and legitimate necessity for the survival of Russia itself.
If this is not understood in Moscow, woe to you, Russia.

Fool-kam, the law is not written (folk saying)
vlad127490

0

26 November 2022 13: 45

Negotiations are needed personally by Putin and his oligarchs. All of them strive to return to the golden billion, to live there, but to rob Russia here. It is regrettable, but the unwillingness of the West to negotiate with Putin has a positive effect on the worldview of the Russian people.