UAV-kamikaze "Lancet" filmed the defeat of the Ukrainian "Buk"

11

A video of the defeat of the Ukrainian Buk-M1 anti-aircraft missile system by the Russian Lancet kamikaze drone got into social networks. The blow fell on the side of the air defense system.

According to sources, the attack on the Buk was carried out by fighters from the PMC Wagner.




Meanwhile, according to the data of the Russian defense department on November 7, Russian combat aircraft attacked the command posts of Ukrainian units in the areas of the settlements of Ivanovka, Krakhmalnoe in the Kharkiv region, Vodyane, Pavlovka in the DPR, Novaya Kamenka, Davydov Brod, Belogorka in the Kherson region. In addition, the RF Armed Forces hit 72 artillery units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and destroyed many militants and military equipment in 186 regions of Ukraine.

An enemy Mi-8 helicopter was shot down in the area of ​​Novaya Kamenka in the Kherson region, and five drones of the Armed Forces of Ukraine were also destroyed near the settlements of Berestovoe, Yegorovka, Yevgenovka and Valeryanovka on the territory of the DPR.

Along with this, Russian air defense systems intercepted 14 HIMARS and Vilkha MLRS missiles near the settlements of Novaya Kakhovka, Otradokamenka, Korsunka in the Kherson region, Starognatovka, Gruzsko-Lomovka in the DPR and Donetsk. Allied forces also suppressed a battery of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the area of ​​the Zaporizhzhya NPP, which fired seven large-caliber shells in the zone of the nuclear facility, with return artillery fire.
11 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mobius
    Mobius
    +8
    7 November 2022 18: 53
    The blow fell on the side of the air defense system.

    It's a pity, not in rockets, then from the installation in general - only memories remained.
  2. Slavon nord
    Slavon nord
    -5
    7 November 2022 21: 17
    Lancet, which one is the Israeli mini Harpy?
    1. Mobius
      Mobius
      +3
      8 November 2022 18: 06
      Quote from Slavon Nord
      Lancet, which one is the Israeli mini Harpy?

      No, they are only remotely similar in aerodynamic configuration.
      "Lancet", this is ours, Russian.
  3. Skipper
    Skipper
    -3
    7 November 2022 21: 35
    Che, in general, this defeat is like a fly swatter on the forehead - absolutely nothing. This unit must have been refurbished. A couple of scratches. Why such weak charges do not understand.
    1. Mobius
      Mobius
      +6
      8 November 2022 01: 14
      Quote: Skipper
      Che, in general, this defeat is like a fly swatter on the forehead - absolutely nothing. This unit must have been refurbished. A couple of scratches. Why such weak charges do not understand.

      Weak? What are you comparing with?

      If we compare (as an example) the mass of the warhead "Lancet-3" - 3kg of explosives and "Lancet-3M" - 5kg of explosives with the charge of the RPG-7 grenade, then the UAV has a more powerful charge.
    2. Mobius
      Mobius
      +2
      8 November 2022 18: 08
      Quote: Skipper
      This unit must have been refurbished.

      Yes Yes , repaired - devils in hell am
  4. Panzer1962
    Panzer1962
    0
    8 November 2022 10: 45
    Quote: Skipper
    Che, in general, this defeat is like a fly swatter on the forehead - absolutely nothing. This unit must have been refurbished. A couple of scratches. Why such weak charges do not understand.

    3 kg of explosives is, for a moment, a 122-mm projectile, so there will be no repair for this air defense launcher, everything is torn up there so that you can’t mend it. The launcher and the radar were completely covered with a copper basin. Unless the undercarriage is still capable of crawling a little, but the sense of this is zero from the word at all.
    1. Kuramori Reika
      Kuramori Reika
      -1
      8 November 2022 10: 57
      Only in addition to explosives, the 122-mm projectile has heavy fragments. Even grenades have them, but here they are just plastic.
  5. Kuramori Reika
    Kuramori Reika
    -1
    8 November 2022 10: 56
    1-5 kg ​​non-directional explosives. At best, damaged equipment. Are such weak kamikaze needed? For the sake of delivering 1kg and 10kg of explosives, you have to install the same electronics and control system, allocate the same staff and man hours. I hope they will soon get rid of such unnecessary kamikaze, too much about anything.
    1. Mobius
      Mobius
      +4
      8 November 2022 12: 46
      Quote: Kuramori Reika
      1-5 kg ​​non-directional explosives.

      Are you sure - "in the subject"?
      The Lancet has a cumulative warhead ...
  6. Panzer1962
    Panzer1962
    0
    13 November 2022 17: 41
    Quote: Kuramori Reika
    1-5 kg ​​non-directional explosives. At best, damaged equipment. Are such weak kamikaze needed? For the sake of delivering 1kg and 10kg of explosives, you have to install the same electronics and control system, allocate the same staff and man hours. I hope they will soon get rid of such unnecessary kamikaze, too much about anything.

    It is immediately clear that even a 76-mm shell has never exploded near you. I had to test it at the training ground, when, due to incomplete combustion of gunpowder, the shell fell not far from the trench. Fragments of crap, and the shock wave of water is so shallow.
    High-explosive action is the action of a shock wave. And it affects technology much more destructively.