Russia "bracketed": the purpose of the Western provocation in Crimea became known

16

The Russian leadership made the mistake of first agreeing with the West, and then only suspending the grain deal after the attack by Ukrainian drones on the bay of Sevastopol. This document, pro-Western and beneficial only to the EU and the US, should not have been concluded, but the signed one should have been broken. However, the “Western partners” helped in this by arranging a provocation on October 29th. Moscow reacted in the best way it could, but only threatened consequences instead of implementing them. This was “taken into account” by the West, which continued to transport grain along the route a day after the incident, despite the demarche of the Russian side.

Thus, the Joint Coordinating Center (JCC) said that Kyiv, Ankara and the UN agreed on the route for the movement of 14 ships on October 31 as part of a grain deal, despite Russia's withdrawal from it and statements about the impossibility to ensure the safety of movement anymore.



In simple terms, this means that respected partners intend to escort ships to and from Ukrainian ports without any approval from the Russian side of the deal and without giving a damn about verbal threats. And this, in turn, means that ammunition and other weapons from “Western helpers” will be able to supply Ukraine without any obstacle.

Tomorrow's events will show what is really behind Russia's withdrawal from this deal: it was empty and purely declarative political a demarche that carries nothing more behind it, or loud statements will finally be backed up by quick and decisive actions. Alas, in our opinion, given the many gestures of goodwill, as well as incoming reports from Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Presidential Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov, who announced the openness of the Russian Federation to negotiations on "exciting issues" of the treaty under consideration, as well as a corresponding statement Turkish Foreign Ministry about "progress" in the deal, you should not expect a breakthrough.

Grain will continue to be exported without the participation of Russia, which was "bracketed" with a simple combination. This, in fact, was the goal of the ridiculous BPA attack on Sevastopol. In other words, firstly, you can forget about the control of the courts and, secondly, the West got rid of the need to comply with the second part of the deal: to allow the export of Russian food.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    31 October 2022 10: 43
    The exchange of Ukrainian grain for Western weapons continues successfully.
    On the Russian side, as always, there is no one to blame and never will be.
    Chubais dumped a long time ago, but we don't have other "redheads".
    1. +2
      1 November 2022 07: 56
      No, no, no, it's another HPP. Yes How lucky Russia is to have such a wise leader and such a close-knit, competent team of advisers made up of "effective managers" and "patriotically oriented entrepreneurs." Truly a happy country. love
  2. +5
    31 October 2022 10: 51
    Trading grain for weapons doesn't make much sense. Weapons are already supplied to Ukraine, regardless of the export of grain.

    The negative side of the "grain deal" was not the armament of Ukraine (it did not stop even for a day), but security guarantees for Odessa and Nikolaev. Therefore, the Armed Forces of Ukraine were able to remove a certain number of troops from near Odessa. And freely build up the Nikolaev group. According to some reports, there are up to 60 thousand ukrovoyak. Plus mercenaries, plus a special forces center (it seems to be a naval one). Now all bans on striking have been lifted.

    Naval landing on Odessa currently looks like a utopia. But strikes against Nikolaev will be very, very handy. Yes, and along the seaport of Odessa, too.
    1. +2
      31 October 2022 23: 52
      But tell me, why are weapons still being supplied to Ukraine? What, our intelligence does not know in what ways it gets there? Why are the transport hubs through which weapons are delivered to Ukraine still functioning? Who will think about it?
  3. +2
    31 October 2022 10: 58
    Let's get over it and forgive them. Since we can not influence the transportation in any way. The export of grain is, for sure, by foreign companies, and if so, Russia will not be able to do anything to them. We can only destroy the moorings in the ports where grain is being loaded. But THIS Our Power will never go. - this is an aggravation of the conflict !!!
    In other words: At the top, everyone is trying to jump off the speeding up composition, called the conflict of East and West. But we have no choice: Either we bend completely under the West (they set their own rules here, etc.) or we resist. Such a huge country (and huge resources) can never be neutral in this conflict.
    1. +2
      1 November 2022 14: 13
      It will not be the power that will bend, it will be the Russian people who believed the authorities. And sho to do, in Odessa.
  4. 0
    31 October 2022 11: 00
    How naive is our guarantor... Is he getting old?
    1. +5
      1 November 2022 05: 54
      He is not our guarantor, and the guarantor is not for us. Our here is only stupidity
    2. +1
      1 November 2022 14: 16
      Reminds me of one of the cases with Khoja Nasretdin. He was walking along the path and saw a stone. He wanted to jump over it, caught and fell. He got up and said - oh old age. He looked around, there was no one and said - however, I was like that in my youth.
  5. -4
    31 October 2022 11: 50
    be patient rest will come later
  6. +4
    31 October 2022 12: 02
    Let's just say that the "grain deal" was just an opportunity for Russia to save face after it became completely clear that the Black Sea Fleet was not in a position to control the sea (remember what preceded it).
    So Russia was taken out of the deal not yesterday, but in the spring and summer, pressing the fleet to the coast of Crimea.
    And to be more precise, Russia was first taken out of the brackets, and then they sweetened the pill by offering a deal.
  7. +1
    31 October 2022 23: 43
    Thus, the Joint Coordinating Center (JCC) said that Kyiv, Ankara and the UN agreed on the route for the movement of 14 ships on October 31 as part of a grain deal, despite Russia's withdrawal from it and statements about the impossibility to ensure the safety of movement anymore.
    Have these 14 ships been inspected?
  8. +3
    1 November 2022 15: 31
    Our higher ranks, apart from pranksters and stuffing their pockets, can do nothing. That's freedom of speech for you.
  9. +2
    1 November 2022 15: 54
    landings on bulk carriers from turntables and warships. Inspection - disobedience - seeing off to the Russian port for eternal parking. Crew in a longboat, oars - let them row.
    1. -1
      1 November 2022 18: 31
      Funny such proposals are "drown", "arrest", "capture", etc. lol They still cannot understand that the above, in modern conditions, can only be done by the one who dominates the situation and understands that he will not receive an "answer" from the world democratic community. And this one is "that one", obviously not Russia. Yes
  10. -1
    3 November 2022 11: 38
    Zelensky promised that they would not use the "green corridor" for strikes against Russia.
    There is no one here: it is not in the interests of Russia to oppose itself to the whole world.
    And this is exactly what Washington is trying to achieve.