TAC: In the West, there is an awareness of the need for a peaceful solution to the conflict in Ukraine


What the conflict in Ukraine has led to in the international system of relations seems to be out of control. This is well understood in Russia and, finally, they began to realize in the West, from the very beginning of the NWO, which succumbed to the “temptation” of fighting Moscow to the end. Requirements of individual Western politicians and entire groups of them, as well as famous people, government officials and officials, about to start solving the problem through diplomacy, have become more frequent.


Even the rejection by the White House of the petition of 30 congressmen from the Democratic Party for diplomatic pressure, redoubling efforts to find a realistic framework for a ceasefire did not change the situation: the need for de-escalation is overdue and the entire social stratum, both in the United States and in Europe, has long been promoting the agenda of at least a “freeze” conflict. As The American Conservative columnist Ted Snyder writes, the rhetoric in Washington and London, the voices coming from these "decision-making" capitals, has changed somewhat.

The tone has changed dramatically, the West is really looking for a way to show Moscow its readiness for negotiations even more clearly. The statement is extended by the author to Washington and even to London, which in general demonstrates demonstrative Russophobia and intransigence towards Russia.

However, even Ben Wallace, the British Minister of Defense, lowered the intensity of rhetoric against Moscow and once again declared that his country was not involved in the attacks on the Crimean bridge and the attack on the bay in Sevastopol on October 29 this year.

What the West wants is easy to understand. At the same time, Russia does not need a “freeze”, but a full-fledged solution to the conflict with long-term prospects and the resolution of decades of brewing problems. Therefore, if Snyder's statements are true, their value for the Russian Federation is minimal. The very appeals of Western politicians contain so far only the emergence of an awareness of the need for a peaceful solution, but the ways of its implementation have not yet been determined and are not an end in itself for the West.
  • Photos used: pixabay.com
8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. steelmaker Offline steelmaker
    steelmaker 30 October 2022 09: 16
    +2
    to start solving the problem through diplomacy, have become more frequent.

    So many of our children were imprisoned, and now it's up to diplomatic decision!? Fig you! At the Polish border, sign what we need!
  2. prior Offline prior
    prior (Vlad) 30 October 2022 09: 51
    +1
    The West, as always, slips us its vision and its solution to the problem.
    And as always wrong.
    Surrender!
    Not Ukraine. Capitulation of the West.
    This should be the result.
  3. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 30 October 2022 10: 05
    -2
    about "there was an awareness" they have been writing for 8 months ...
    but in reality, all new deliveries of weapons and all the new money allocated
  4. Uncle Borya Offline Uncle Borya
    Uncle Borya (Uncle Borya) 30 October 2022 10: 08
    +2
    As soon as the West once again begins to understand that Russia is winning, they immediately turn to negotiations.
  5. Watching Offline Watching
    Watching (Alex) 30 October 2022 10: 18
    -1
    Quote: Uncle Borya
    As soon as the West once again begins to understand that Russia is winning, they immediately turn to negotiations.

    And where is Russia "winning"? When they leave what was previously won, this is a defeat, not a victory.
  6. Jacques sekavar Offline Jacques sekavar
    Jacques sekavar (Jacques Sekavar) 30 October 2022 10: 48
    +1
    The West is beginning to realize that the stick turns out to be double-edged - anti-Russian sanctions and the war turned into problems for the West that need to be addressed somehow so as not to aggravate the situation and not to bring things to an extreme. Separate negotiations suit the West. preserve the statehood of Ukraine and the anti-Russian policy of the ruling class.
    The question is who benefits from this in the Russian Federation, who binds the RF Armed Forces hand and foot without allowing strikes on military and civilian governments at all levels, who benefits from maintaining intact the productive forces and transport infrastructure - the circulatory system that uninterruptedly supplies the Armed Forces of Ukraine with weapons and equipment
  7. In passing Online In passing
    In passing (Galina Rožkova) 30 October 2022 14: 25
    +2
    It only seems. True, the costs for the West turned out to be much more significant than they expected, and Russia is stronger than they hoped. Further escalation leads directly to a nuclear third world war. Nobody needs it. Getting ready for a deal, I think so. Under the carpet That's just Russia and its people need only Victory. As stated by Putin in Security Guarantees. Leaving at least a piece of what Ukraine is now, and especially its "retinue" in the face of the West, is extremely unreasonable. Only a victory.
  8. Siegfried Offline Siegfried
    Siegfried (Gennady) 31 October 2022 01: 40
    +1
    And this is despite the referendums and the annexation of territories, which actually closed the US way to "negotiations", because in such conditions the very beginning of negotiations means an act of capitulation. After all, it is clear that Russia will not return the territories that became part of the Russian Federation, and this understanding is already conditionally present in the very topic of the start of negotiations.

    It is precisely because of this that the United States so exaggeratedly connects its readiness for negotiations only after the return of Crimea, which is also impossible in the understanding of everyone. They do it through Zelensky, but this does not change the essence.

    Those who criticize the Russian leadership for their calls for negotiations, sometimes describing "negotiators" and setbacks, only demoralize our army, without taking into account the whole picture. Russia has taken an advantageous position in the Kraine offering constant negotiations, demonstrating its readiness for negotiations (the thing has already been done, what is cut off, you can’t glue it back). This is how Russia breaks Western propaganda, which paints the image of Russia as an aggressor, because they have to refuse negotiations.

    If you remember how it all began, then it was Russia's statement to NATO "gather your coins and get through to the borders of 1991" (so literally it was publicly said). After the start of the NWO and literally the day before yesterday again, Russia declared no more, no less than - the time of the United States as the world's sheriff has passed and it is time for them to know their place now. The statement is obviously not weak and the whole world, especially not the Western world, went nuts and with bated breath began to watch how the United States would react to such an unheard-of statement.

    For the United States, the very beginning of the negotiations means the recognition that yes, we are blown away, we will now live in a new world. That is why they are trying to scare Russia with almost nuclear terrorism, they no longer look at the consequences for their "allies", whom they are blowing to hell. The world sees this, sees the weakness of the United States, and many become more self-confident and bolder in relation to the United States, many even want to participate in this historical demolition of the world sheriff.

    The pressure to negotiate goes to the West, not to Russia. And this pressure is growing. They really want to stop it all, but they can't. But they can’t, because Russia closed the last exit loophole - held referendums and annexed territories.

    The only way out for the states to somehow retain part of their influence on the world, their authority, is a ostentatious readiness to go to the end, but in fact pushing Ukraine to self-flush into the toilet of history. They will force the ukrorezhim to active hostilities, to terrorist attacks and provocations, in order to force Russia to quickly end Ukraine by force. After all, then the United States will not have to humiliate itself and capitulate by the beginning of negotiations.

    Russia, in turn, is trying to play for time, in order to reach the point where the EU can no longer maintain this course. In a sense, this is a battle for the EU. Russia does not need a hostile EU at hand. In the EU, protest is growing, costs are rising, fear of escalation is growing, industry is outraged, US discontent is growing. Particularly gratifying is the change in the views of the European elites on the United States, which so unceremoniously bent the EU in their favor. These changes in sentiment will have an impact in the future. The US will now benefit in the short term through its LNG, weapons, etc., but in the medium term, all this will backfire on them.

    So there is a race against time, the United States wants the defeat of Ukraine in the war (no one there has ever really thought even about some victories of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the return of Crimea, etc.).

    Russia is playing for time, but slowly restores the reputation of the army. Although there are opinions that there is nothing to restore at all, the withdrawal from Liman could not be quite a "defeat", but some kind of giveaway in order to set the public on mobilization, which was necessary in any case. In any case, this winter the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be finished and I would like this to happen not through the grave of ukrovoyak, but through the surrender of the United States