The UN said that the ship from the "grain deal" format could not carry an explosive device to undermine the Crimean bridge

10

The day before, while in Kazakhstan, Russian President Vladimir Putin said, answering journalists' questions, that the work of humanitarian corridors in the Black Sea could be called into question if the involvement of a grain carrier in transporting explosive cargo, which was used during the undermining of the Crimean bridge, is revealed. The UN reaction to this was predictable.

The UN assured that all ships (vessels) that go to and from Ukrainian ports, transporting agricultural products under the “grain deal”, cannot transport explosives or explosive devices, as they are inspected (inspected). It should be noted that the “grain deal” is an agreement between the Russian Federation, Ukraine, Turkey and the UN. According to the agreements, three Ukrainian ports were unblocked, including Odessa, which, according to the FSB, is one of the links in a long logistics chain for the delivery of explosives to the Crimean bridge.



The "grain deal" expires at the end of November. The UN has so far been unsuccessfully trying to get an extension of the agreement. However, the Kremlin calls it “an outright swindle,” as the cheap products exported from Ukraine end up not in countries experiencing acute food problems, but in Turkey and the rich states of Europe. Moreover, the UN has promised to help lift Western sanctions that prevent Russia from exporting its agricultural products, but there is no clarity on this issue.

On August 3, the first grain carrier left the port berth in Odessa. During this time, 305 ships took out 6,8 million tons of grain, legumes, oilseeds from Ukrainian territory. Kyiv earned currency and spent it on equipping the Armed Forces of Ukraine for further confrontation with Moscow. Therefore, the Russian Federation does not see any reason to support this format in the future, because it should also have some benefit.
10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. blackcat190463
    blackcat190463
    +8
    15 October 2022 18: 12
    I DON'T BELIEVE, they didn't swear, and they didn't say "I give a tooth", that's how you can search a grain carrier without getting grain out of the hold? And at the place of loading and unloading, just their own people or bought inspectors from the UN, after all, it was already in the Donbass, they passed, therefore, I DO NOT BELIEVE am
  2. Sydor Kovpak
    Sydor Kovpak
    +4
    15 October 2022 18: 20
    It was all a farce from the start. Grain must be transported through Russia. And then there are no guarantees. And here the whole UN is responsible .... Already ridiculous.
  3. Pat Rick
    Pat Rick
    0
    15 October 2022 18: 30
    The UN assured that all ships (vessels) that go to and from Ukrainian ports, transporting agricultural products under the “grain deal”, cannot transport explosives or explosive devices, as they are inspected (inspected).

    They are inspected only before passing through the straits. When coasting along the coast, there are no inspections. If the ship, leaving Odessa, then enters the mouth of the Danube, and even will be under the Bulgarian or Romanian flag, Russia will not be able to inspect it.
  4. Sergey Kuzmin
    Sergey Kuzmin
    +2
    15 October 2022 18: 50
    but what's the difference - could or could not a grain ship carry an explosive device ... ??? !!! We just don't like that the NATO countries, where the main flow of grain goes through Odessa, supply the Ukronazis with weapons that kill RUSSIAN PEOPLE! Why should we care, to provide food for those who supply weapons to the Ukronazis?! Close the export of grain in all directions: both by sea and by rail - let them starve. On an empty stomach, maybe a smart idea will come to stop the supply of weapons to the Ukronazis.
    1. Pat Rick
      Pat Rick
      +2
      15 October 2022 20: 45
      Close the export of grain in all directions: both by sea and by rail - let them starve. On an empty stomach, maybe a smart idea will come to stop the supply of weapons to the Ukronazis.

      It's all nonsense. Everything could have been wiped off the face of the earth long ago. Including the Druzhba oil pipeline, through which Russian oil goes to Europe, and the Ukronazis receive money for transit, and with this money ... hereinafter.
      Practice shows that there are things more important than RUSSIAN PEOPLE. It is easy to destroy - it will be difficult to restore later. Russia sells 85% of titanium, why won't it block exports? - Because it is profitable for her to sell this titanium. And so on many positions. The entire economy of Ukraine rests on seven bridges and roads, if they are destroyed, a complete collapse of everything and everything will come in Ukraine. But they do not destroy - then it will be very difficult and expensive to restore.
      1. Pat Rick
        Pat Rick
        0
        15 October 2022 22: 46
        A strike is being carried out with such a goal that the nuclear power plant does not explode. And, you see, now there is an imbalance in the system. If it is not done carefully, you can get undesirable consequences.
        Alexey Leonkov, Military expert

        There is a transit communication that connects Russia and Europe. It carries a huge amount of strategic resources. This is titanium, this is aluminum in the first place and much more. Konstantin Sivkov,
        military expert
  5. svit55
    svit55
    +2
    15 October 2022 20: 35
    If not a grain carrier, then who? Other ships are prohibited from leaving the ports. Is the UN on the side of terror?
  6. boriz
    boriz
    +1
    16 October 2022 01: 32
    The UN assured that all ships (vessels) that go to and from Ukrainian ports, transporting agricultural products under the “grain deal”, cannot transport explosives or explosive devices, as they are inspected (inspected).

    Unsubstantiated and irresponsible chatter. Under the grain there can be anything.
    But even on the way to Odessa, ships (according to the text of the agreement) are inspected only by the Turks and only in the straits. And who prevents such a ship from entering Varna, Constanta and loading up with any weapons, ammunition? These are, for a moment, the ports of NATO countries. And they do not differ in special love for Russia.
  7. Alexander Al
    Alexander Al
    0
    16 October 2022 08: 28
    Shameless lies!
  8. i232323b
    i232323b
    -2
    17 October 2022 06: 34
    If Himars, tanks, howitzers, Harpoons are flowing to Ukraine, then what kind of explosives that a simple truck can transport should be transported by ship? And what, the ship brought this explosive right under the bridge? I'm almost sure that it was our doing, the FSB or someone else ... beat your own people so that strangers are afraid ... who stopped the train with gasoline on the bridge, on whose orders? They have no right to stop there .. so turn on your brains