Warsaw allowed war with Russia in case of use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine


Polish Russophobes continue to demonstrate their belligerence towards Moscow, making statements for others, currying favor with London and Washington. Warsaw allows the entry of the NATO bloc into the war against Russia in the event of the use of nuclear weapons by the Russian Armed Forces in Ukraine in the course of the SVO, which has been held since the end of February. Polish Foreign Minister Zbigniew Rau spoke about this in an interview with the first commercial Polish radio station RMF FM.


The functionary noted that before that no one seriously considered the possibility of using nuclear weapons at all.

In such a situation, the response of NATO countries would probably be the same as presented by the head of the US National Security Council, Jake Sullivan. This would lead to a non-nuclear response on the territory of Ukraine

- he said.

The minister did not rule out that the North Atlantic Alliance would send its troops to Ukrainian territory in the event of a negative development of events. However, whether Sullivan had such a scenario in mind, Rau does not know. But the chief Polish diplomat believes that this cannot be ruled out. At the same time, he clarified that “this would not be a necessary procedure,” since conventional weapons can be used against Russia, and not necessarily from Ukrainian territory.

If it came to the use of nuclear weapons, then at the same time there would definitely be a violation of the consensus of the members of the Security Council. I'm talking about the permanent members of the UN Security Council who are the owners of nuclear weapons.

He summed up.

We remind you that before that, on NBC News, Rau threatened Russia with a “destructive response” from NATO in the event of the use of WMD in Ukraine. At the same time, high-ranking Americans have recently been talking about "catastrophic consequences" for Moscow.
14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Igor Viktorovich Berdin 29 September 2022 16: 15
    +1
    I would give Poland 24 hours to close the border with Ukraine for the supply of weapons and mercenaries to Ukraine. If after 24 hours the supplies do not stop, then inflict a poison strike to a depth of 100 km. and at the same time iron Galicia for the same 200-100 km. They won’t shut up, after another 200, to finally resolve the issue with Poland.
    1. Valentine Offline Valentine
      Valentine (Valentin) 29 September 2022 17: 29
      +2
      Quote: Igor Viktorovich Berdin
      inflict poison.strike to a depth of 100 200 km

      I have been repeating since the beginning of the NWO that it is urgently necessary to cover the entire border between Poland and Galicia from north to south for 550 km. a virtual fence of rockets with TNF, but before that, make a loud statement at an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council that if supplies of Western weapons continue to be used to kill civilians in Donbass, then do not blame me and you will get it, and I am 101% sure that after that no one will blather, and the hegemon himself will shut up.
    2. alexandre II Offline alexandre II
      alexandre II (Alexander) 29 September 2022 18: 07
      +1
      The Poles to us Ukrainians (not to be confused with the Bandera bastard) are eternal enemies, this is exactly what should be done with them ... and it will not be habitual for others ...
      1. Valentine Offline Valentine
        Valentine (Valentin) 29 September 2022 18: 57
        +1
        Explain to me, Alexander, how a small bunch of rabid Galician Bandera brought FORTY MILLION Ukraine to its knees and brought it to such a state? After all, it was not Russia that carried out a coup d'etat in your country, replacing one rogue president with another swindler, and then with a clown.
        1. Igor Viktorovich Berdin 30 September 2022 13: 41
          0
          The fact is that in every society, 5% of the active population disturbs the rest of the population. Especially if they are supported abroad. Stupid people are simply deceived. Remember how, before the referendum for Independence, Kravchuk promised to make 5-France in 2 years ... The October Revolution in 1917 was carried out by 0,04% of the population. All the rest were either deceived or intimidated. Either they went to work. They had no time to Maidan ...
  2. Irek Offline Irek
    Irek (Paparazzi Kazan) 29 September 2022 17: 10
    +2
    Bestiality, Churchill was right.
    1. alexandre II Offline alexandre II
      alexandre II (Alexander) 29 September 2022 18: 08
      0
      Exactly..
  3. Bakht Offline Bakht
    Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 29 September 2022 17: 24
    0
    This war cannot be won by the old methods. We must admit the failure of the SVO.

    The war must be translated into an economic plane. Rather, it should have started with her. At the front, one must stand on the defensive. This is not very good, but now the main thing is to hold the front and prevent new breakthroughs. And grind the manpower of the enemy. And do not allow large losses of their troops.

    The main focus should be on the economy. It is necessary to record financial losses, both joint ventures are scrapped, and the supply of resources to the West should be stopped. This also applies to Turkish flows and transit through Ukraine.
    First of all, stop the supply of food, fertilizers and hydrocarbons. And to admit that there are simply no "friendly countries" like Turkey or India, as well as China in nature.

    It will be bad and hard. This must also be acknowledged. The main goal should be the de-industrialization of Europe. By any means and methods. This is a top priority at the moment.
    1. isofat Offline isofat
      isofat (isofat) 29 September 2022 17: 42
      0
      Quote: Bakht
      The war must be translated into an economic plane.

      I don't know what you mean by the term war. It seems to me that the economic war, if it died out, did not last very long. smile

      For SVO. Apparently it has become a revelation for you who is behind the events in Ukraine. How serious it is. On whom should we have declared war, as some believe?
      1. Bakht Offline Bakht
        Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 29 September 2022 18: 13
        0
        I think there was a mistake in the first place. So many different versions have already been written that it makes no sense to repeat.

        The economic war has been going on for a long time and has never died down. It only intensifies. But the position of the Russian leadership is incomprehensible to me. Contracts continue to be fulfilled, the enemy regime in Ukraine is supported (transit money). I don't understand much. And I don't think I'm the only one.

        I just stand (and stood) on the position that no one needs to declare war. It is necessary to break contracts due to the imposition of sanctions. Sanctions themselves are already force majeure and grounds for breaking economic ties.

        Let's assume this option. Just an alternative, nothing more.
        In January 2022, in view of the obvious preparation by Kyiv of a military operation against the Donbass, not to send troops to the territory of Ukraine, but to send 100 troops to the Donbass. Reinforce it with artillery, air defense and grind the Ukrainian troops on the defensive. The fact that the Armed Forces of Ukraine could break through the defense of the Russian army is unbelievable. And of course, impose sanctions against European countries.
        Would such an option be worse or better than the current state of affairs?
        1. isofat Offline isofat
          isofat (isofat) 29 September 2022 18: 56
          0
          Quote: Bakht
          Would such an option be worse or better than the current state of affairs?

          Bakhtiyar, any option, given the forces behind this confrontation, is devastating. And against the illegitimate government that started a civil war, it is not very correct to declare war on all of Ukraine.
  4. svit55 Offline svit55
    svit55 (Sergey Valentinovich) 29 September 2022 19: 02
    -1
    Now all armies are analyzing NWO, the analysis is not in our favor. The weakness or complete absence of certain types of modern weapons, the stupidity of the chief generals .. It turns out that we are not as formidable as the whole world thought. Of course, Psheks are "hyenas", but now there will be more and more of them, and they will warm up each other. And this is bad with the complete inactivity of our military leadership.
    1. Smilodon terribilis nimis 30 September 2022 04: 53
      +1
      Analyzing the war in Russia is a bad example. Today it is weak, tomorrow it is strong. Russia is an anomaly. How many of those who have already made unequivocal conclusions have laid down their heads.
  5. Vladimir Orlov Offline Vladimir Orlov
    Vladimir Orlov (Vladimir) 30 September 2022 00: 15
    0
    It's good that such ideas as the use of tactical nuclear weapons and "The whole world is in ruins ..." are still marginal. It is bad that with the escalation they become more real.
    But to seriously scare Poland with them is too much. They themselves are ready to crap themselves at the first opportunity, and their "elite" - there are more and more clearly expressed evil clowns. Just look at the photo of the head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs or Pan Morawiecki - they are skewed so that the plastic is powerless. Physiognomy...