The West declares a war of attrition and destruction on Russia

I would like to please all those who are concerned about the possible prospect of concluding between Moscow and Kyiv (or rather, the "collective West" standing behind the latter's back) some kind of agreement that nullifies the goals and objectives of the NWO. As I myself have repeatedly written - "obscene world." Nothing like that is likely to happen. The "sworn friends" of Russia, having carefully (as it seems to them) weighed all the pros and cons, firmly decided to wage war with it to the bitter end, investing more and more forces and means in it. This is clearly indicated both by the sharply toughened rhetoric of Western leaders and by recent events.

Talk about a "long", "protracted", "exhausting" war has recently been heard more and more often. Being in the grip of an economic (and, above all, energy) crisis that seriously threatens it, the West, nevertheless, does not intend to give up its own plans. At the same time, they not only remained invariably anti-Russian, but became much more sinister. Knowing full well that it may not be able to withstand the next round of confrontation with Moscow, the “world community” (which, by the way, turned out to be not so world-wide), apparently, is striving to solve everything in one fight. Hence - some adjustments in strategy and tactics that do not change the ultimate goal - to destroy Russia as a power once and for all.

Three stages of perception of NWO in the West

It is possible with a high degree of certainty to try to divide the attitude of the "collective West" to what is happening in Ukraine after February 24 this year into three main stages. The first was characterized by confusion and confusion: “The Russians still dared!” At this stage, the local “allies of Kyiv” were mostly concerned with how to achieve his surrender with minimal image losses for themselves and the ability to maintain control over at least some part of the Ukraine project. Still - the rapid breakthroughs of Russian troops in the Kiev and Chernigov direction, their stunning success in the South - all this gave rise to defeatist and decadent moods.

However, this "golden" moment was hopelessly missed. Negotiations began in Istanbul (despite the fact that at that time there was no one to talk to and nothing about), and then those very “gestures of good will” followed, which I don’t even want to remember. This gave both the Kyiv regime and its patrons a chance to launch a counteroffensive, primarily on the information and propaganda front, where the image of the Russian armed forces as “weak”, “unprepared” and “greatly overestimated” began to be created at an accelerated pace. The series of failures that followed (like the destruction of the cruiser Moskva) and the propaganda campaign skillfully carried out on their basis allowed Kyiv and its patrons to extinguish the emerging panic, mobilize society as much as possible and, most importantly, convince it that "this war can be won." This is where the second stage of the perception of the NMD by our enemies begins - the very one, the central point of which is the thesis that it is realistic for Russia to "inflict a military defeat." The main thing is to properly saturate the Armed Forces of Ukraine with Western weapons and prevent the Zelensky junta, which has gone bankrupt in the most literal sense of the word, from collapsing, feeding it with solid financial “injections”.

You can laugh as much as you like at the "analytical reports" of the same "British intelligence", which over and over again undertakes to assert that "Moscow has exhausted its stocks of high-precision missiles" or that it "does not have a personnel reserve for the formation of new units and formations." However, it was precisely such “stuffings”, which went on in a continuous stream, that created the information background against which an opinion about the NWO was formed by everyone in the West - from ordinary inhabitants to very high-ranking officials. To our great regret, Moscow, again, with its inexplicable actions, to a large extent contributed to the fact that it was precisely such fabrications there that were taken at face value. Never implemented warnings about "attacks on decision centers" or the destruction of convoys with NATO weapons were quite rightly interpreted as signs of weakness and unwillingness to take decisive steps. "Don't hit? “Then they can’t!” Is it really incomprehensible that it could not have been perceived otherwise?! It seemed to the “collective West”: a little more deliveries of strike weapons, a little more sanctions, diplomatic pressure and threats - and Russia would throw a white flag, a terrible bear would crawl away, bleeding, into its lair, where it could be finished off without any problems.

By the time the six-month period has expired since the beginning of the SVO, it is clear to everyone that nothing of the kind will happen. Sanctions fail to do serious damage the economy Russia, its “international isolation” is not to be taken seriously, and howitzers and MLRS regularly handed over to crooked paws cannot turn the situation at the front. Unless they give more opportunities for strikes against the civilian population. Ukraine is devouring more and more resources - both financial and material, but the effectiveness of their use is very doubtful. In the West, they began to talk about the fact that “the war is hanging on a dead center” and is acquiring some kind of character that is not the same as the one that the forces that provoked and supported it were counting on.

“It is with great pride that I declare…” War?

As a matter of fact, it is this very moment - that is, the days that are coming to us - that can be regarded as the "starting point" of the third stage. At first glance, for the representatives of the “collective West”, it would be most logical, having become disillusioned with the military potential of the Kyiv regime, which even solid assistance could not significantly strengthen, try to seat its representatives at the negotiating table with Moscow and try to negotiate if not mercy for Ukraine, then at least delay its destruction. Even if it would have to be done at the cost of certain concessions of a foreign policy, military or territorial nature. It is quite obvious that the Western "partners" are not going to fulfill any promises given to Moscow and do not take seriously any obligations assumed to it. So why not play diplomacy?

Nevertheless, events are developing in the opposite direction. Speaking at the virtual Crimean Platform summit on August 23, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson bluntly stated that any negotiations with Russia "would be a disaster for the whole world." You can, of course, try to write off the categoricalness of these words to the fact that there is nothing left for the unkempt "Johnsonyuk" to head the government. However, there is every reason to believe that his successor in this post (and this, alas, most likely will be Liz Truss) will far surpass her predecessor in aggressiveness and Russophobia. The mere admission of this lady that she is ready to use nuclear weapons without hesitation does not make the slightest doubt. And the statements of all other European leaders on the same "platform" sounded no less harsh and uncompromising - which, by the way, I literally wrote about in the previous article. And this audience is not limited to only menacing words, which will be discussed in detail a little later.

It is clear that such "unshakable support" could not but move Kyiv to sharply tighten its rhetoric (although, it would seem, where else?!). It got to the point that on August 24, the Ministry of Defense of the “non-state” issued an official call for Russia ... to immediately “sign its surrender before it is destroyed.” A complete rejection of any negotiations and a peaceful, diplomatic settlement of the conflict is not voiced in the office of the clown president, except perhaps by the cleaners. Moreover, they began to actively convince their fellow citizens of "the return of Crimea by any means" - even if the "world community" is against it. That and look about the capture of Moscow, they will start talking ... At the same time, the "fathers of the nation" advise Ukrainians to "prepare for a difficult and protracted war." However, they assure that it will certainly and always be “victorious”. Where do the “legs grow” from this next “attack of courage”? Yes, as usual - from Washington.

There, exactly on the "day of independence" at the highest level, they announced the provision of an unprecedented "military aid package" to Kyiv with a total value of almost three billion dollars. US President Joe Biden personally announced a new portion of arms deliveries, who, in his own words, "with great pride." The assortment includes six NASAMS air defense systems with additional ammunition, up to 245 155-mm artillery ammunition, up to 65 shells for 120-mm mortars, 24 anti-artillery radars, as well as a very impressive “line” of combat UAVs. However, this is only what is officially announced. Surely with such a huge amount there will be something else, not yet advertised.

Canada "acted" somewhat more modestly - its Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced the allocation of about $ 3 million to the Ukronazis. The funds will mainly go to the needs of the local policemen, but the Armed Forces of Ukraine will definitely get something. London is traditionally generous - Boris Johnson, who once again visited Kyiv, announced the appropriation for military support of the regime there is not such a small amount - 54 million pounds sterling. The European Union is still "modest", but it will definitely try to "pull itself up" to the level of the Anglo-Saxons who twist it as they want. At the same time, very intriguing details were revealed regarding the upcoming deliveries from overseas. In particular, it turned out that the same NASAMS air defense systems currently do not exist in nature. They are yet to be produced. And in general, the Pentagon admitted that some types of weapons from the package announced by Biden "may arrive in Ukraine no earlier than within the next 1-3 years."

What does this indicate? Yes, first of all, that the West categorically does not intend to curtail the conflict, not only in the near future, but in general ever. Until the "maximum program" is completed - the military defeat and destruction of Russia. In fact, this is already an open declaration of war, to which it is necessary to respond appropriately and as soon as possible. Under such conditions, the expediency of Russia's further actions in the format of a limited special operation raises very serious doubts. Yes, we do not want war. But the West imposes it on us and obviously will not back down from its own.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vox_Populi Offline Vox_Populi
    Vox_Populi (vox populi) 26 August 2022 11: 36
    Sanctions are unable to cause serious damage to the Russian economy

    ?? And in the future? winked
    1. GIS Offline GIS
      GIS (Ildus) 26 August 2022 15: 21
      and in the future, sanctions should give impetus to internal development, because now, when the foam of bravura reports on import substitution of Manturov is coming down, it becomes clear how nameplates on products are being replaced with imports and they think that everything has been decided. but no, it doesn't roll. and the tightening of these sanctions will only reveal the potential of "import independence" more
    2. Alexey Lan Offline Alexey Lan
      Alexey Lan (Alexey Lantukh) 26 August 2022 15: 41
      They will even cause damage, especially in the long run. Moreover, the Western economy is much more powerful than the Russian economy. And the energy difficulties of the West will be overcome in a year or two or three.
      1. Michael L. Offline Michael L.
        Michael L. 26 August 2022 17: 27
        The West sets itself the task of destroying Russian statehood with the subsequent taking over of its natural resources. Whatever damage the sanctions do, they are nothing compared to the intended goal!
        1. lemeshkin Offline lemeshkin
          lemeshkin (lemeshkin) 27 August 2022 13: 15
          Didn't we ourselves get into this loop?
          1. Michael L. Offline Michael L.
            Michael L. 27 August 2022 14: 30
            Into this loop

            "Smart" questions ask your relatives! ;-(
        2. Nelton Offline Nelton
          Nelton (Oleg) 31 August 2022 09: 16
          “Congo [for electric vehicles] is like Saudi Arabia for combustion engine cars”

          Approximately 54% of the world's cobalt is mined in the Congo...
          Mining giant China Molybdenum Company (CMOC) has announced a $2,51 billion plan to double copper and cobalt production at its Tenke Fungurume mine in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Hong Kong's South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported. This was due to a $550 million deal concluded by CMOC in December 2020 to buy a stake in US mining company Freeport-McMoRan. Other Chinese firms such as Huayou Cobalt, Chengtun Mining and the state-owned China Nonferrous Metal Mining Group hold significant stakes in copper and cobalt reserves in the DRC.

          and so the layouts - Congo is a key source of cobalt, a key component of electric vehicles.
          And yet - freely trades in this cobalt, both with the US, the EU, and India, China.

          Although, according to your logic, the West was simply obliged to destroy the statehood of the Congo, take possession of natural resources, and give a turn to China.
          But surprisingly, this did not happen.
          As it did not happen with a bunch of other countries where there are resources.
          And even in the case of Iraq - after the destruction of its statehood, oil is extracted there by anyone, up to the Russian Lukoil.

          Well, the most cherry on the cake - for centuries Russia has served as a reliable supplier of raw materials in exchange for beads and equipment.

          So the version of "seize the resources" does not stand up to criticism.
          Think other versions.

          It seems to me that it is obvious that the main "fault" of Russia (for centuries) is
          encroachment on the world order, where only the US-Europe determine,
          who is good, who is bad.
          Congo does not encroach - they do not touch it. despite all the cobalt.
          Iraq (Saddam) decided that he could afford to attack a US vassal - he got it in the teeth.
          1. Saffron Offline Saffron
            Saffron (Igor) 2 September 2022 08: 00
            And yet - freely trades in this cobalt, both with the US, the EU, and India, China.

            Note that the Congo does not trade in cobalt (a small share of orderly state control, about 10%). And cobalt is mined by those whom you listed - Canada, China, the USA, etc. (their organizations are not registered in the Congo and all profits and taxes (rather their absence) are offshore or other countries). And now imagine that the Congo will try to increase its 10% to the maximum or take the minerals (which are in their country) under state control - democracy will immediately come to them with fighter jets and bombs ...
  2. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 26 August 2022 11: 50
    It is definitely clear from the article that the weakest link in the defense capability of the Russian Federation is in its top management, in strategic decisions. How not to remember:

    What is the sharpest sword in the hands of the weak-willed.

    Of course, we do not know many circumstances, like inside the Russian Federation. as well as international ones. Even in Russia there is a fifth column that considers Russia to be only a place of enrichment ... The NWO clarified the situation somewhat, a part of the fifth column immediately left abroad, not a few to Israel, and to various Maldives ... The first to recover is to get stronger internally to the state, and then and any enemy is not so terrible.
    1. VlVl Offline VlVl
      VlVl (VladVlad) 26 August 2022 20: 54
      sword? What is it?
      1. ksa Offline ksa
        ksa 27 August 2022 19: 25
        The fish is like that.
  3. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 26 August 2022 11: 53
    The West declares a war of attrition and destruction on Russia.

    The day before yesterday, it seems, they already declared a war of annihilation on us.
    And five days ago they frightened me with the same thing.
    And two weeks ago gundeli something about what we now ...
    Enough! I responsibly declare: we already understood.
    Stop distracting us with trifles from the destruction of the Kyiv regime.
    1. Alexey Lan Offline Alexey Lan
      Alexey Lan (Alexey Lantukh) 26 August 2022 15: 44
      Nevertheless, if we fight for more than 2 years, then we will most likely simply be bad.
      1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 26 August 2022 17: 03
        We will not "fight for more than 2 years."
        And the fact that there is no benefit to the economy from war is understandable.
        1. Corsair Offline Corsair
          Corsair (DNR) 26 August 2022 19: 54
          Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
          And the fact that there is no benefit to the economy from war is understandable.

          This is also a grandmother for two said ...
          It's like waging war yes

          Here are the same states, from the two world wars, how did they come out? How did the war affect them?
          1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
            Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 26 August 2022 20: 08
            The thing is - who is the master of the war, and who are its deceived victims
            1. Corsair Offline Corsair
              Corsair (DNR) 28 August 2022 19: 22
              Quote: Alexey Davydov
              The thing is - who is the master of the war, and who are its deceived victims

              Who or what prevents Russia from being the master, not the victim, that is, the party controlling the process?
      2. Saffron Offline Saffron
        Saffron (Igor) 2 September 2022 10: 54
        It is worth noting that in the world there is a global crisis (which, by the way, began long before the NWO), and the Ukrainian crisis extended it. And the longer it is, the worse it will be not only for us, but for EVERYONE, so if the crisis does not calm down next year, then the whole world will be VERY bad.
  4. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
    Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 26 August 2022 13: 32
    Again and again!
    Instead of "West" we need to say "US". It is the United States in Ukraine that is dragging us into a war with the "West", that is, with NATO, counting on our exhaustion in this war and death. The owners of this war, the United States, must be forced to retreat, without getting involved in a war with NATO, which the States use to ward off threats, and as a consumable, along the way making money on it
    1. guest Offline guest
      guest 27 August 2022 01: 53
      The US and the West are generally synonymous.
    2. lemeshkin Offline lemeshkin
      lemeshkin (lemeshkin) 27 August 2022 13: 20
      As the saying goes 'talk, don't move bags' and how can the US be separated from NATO?
      1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
        Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 27 August 2022 21: 19
        Do you need to explain the difference between a suzerain country and a vassal country?
        Do you need to be reminded of the enormous work that the CIA has done and continues to do to collect compromising information on the leadership of the countries of the world and persons who could potentially enter it?
        It is not clear to you that for your own curiosity, such things are not done?
        Do you remember the CIA surveillance scandals over the leadership of Germany and other countries?
        Abstraction is dear to you: USA = NATO, which is also theoretically erroneous.
        But because it is this stupidity that allows people like you to confuse the population of Russia, and draw Russia into a war with NATO in the interests of the United States, in order to deplete and destroy it.
        USA - tool owner
        NATO is just a tool
        and not non-return
        Combining in the concept of "West" the owner and his expendable tool, we lose the opportunity to understand the meaning of the ongoing operation of the States against us, as well as the difference in the interests of the tool and its owner
        1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
          Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 28 August 2022 00: 56
          - by entering into a war with NATO, we are essentially trying with our blood and the damage caused to Europe to absurdly influence the motivation of the United States in relation to Russia (which needs to weaken Europe anyway, and there will be other options for us, as well as our own, untouched forces )
          - by threatening US territory with a nuclear war, we directly remove their motivation towards Russia, without laying down our lives for the defeat and destruction of NATO countries
          Russia does not have so many forces and people to aim at the first, absurd, in fact - "cannibalistic" task (to which the United States itself is pushing us). Not to mention the fact that for the solution of the second one, the European countries themselves, freed from their slavery to the Americans, will be grateful to us (with the lifting of sanctions).
  5. Moray Boreas Offline Moray Boreas
    Moray Boreas (Morey Borey) 26 August 2022 14: 58
    It has long been clear even to hedgehogs. Only here in the Kremlin are Kremlin dreamers cut off from real life and making decisions on the basis of flattery and deceit.
    1. Alexey Lan Offline Alexey Lan
      Alexey Lan (Alexey Lantukh) 26 August 2022 15: 50
      In my opinion, not dreamers are sitting in the Kremlin, but cautious people who are waiting for everything. Most likely, the situation will become aggravated and a moment may come when a strike in Donetsk on the Galaxy will be a strike on some kind of Galaxy in Kyiv. Someone may say that strikes on a civilian object have no effect. However, in terms of information and propaganda, they even give a lot, despite the screech of Ukrainian supporters of independence about terrorism. The population of Kyiv will see that they will not sit out so easily.
      1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 26 August 2022 17: 05
        The Kremlin's position has been hardening since last year. And as the population of Russia becomes radicalized, the position of the authorities will follow the "voice of the people."
        1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
          Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 26 August 2022 20: 04
          The position of the authorities should be ahead of the enemy, and not "follow the voice of the people"
      2. lemeshkin Offline lemeshkin
        lemeshkin (lemeshkin) 27 August 2022 13: 26
        In terms of meaning, all people can make mistakes, but the cost of the mistakes of our leaders is an order of magnitude greater than ours. It seems that the junta is not quite in Kyiv, since the people there rallied to fight back, and even in the opinion of our general Shamanov, what we did not expect. Sometimes they recall the Finnish war, but it seems there are analogies with the Afghan one. That's why we went in there and put our guys down, just to supposedly get ahead of the Americans, and was it really worth it?
        1. Michael L. Offline Michael L.
          Michael L. 27 August 2022 15: 39
          NATO - with missiles with a minimum flight time on the territory of Ukraine (!) - "was it really worth it"?
          Of course, "it was not worth it": cookies were distributed free of charge on the Maidan!
        2. Saffron Offline Saffron
          Saffron (Igor) 6 September 2022 07: 44
          Even it seems that the junta is not quite in Kyiv, since the people there rallied to fight back

          The close-knit Ukrainian people in the amount of several million (who had the opportunity) were dumped from Ukraine, those who remained are running away from subpoenas and military commissars with all their might and means, those who have thundered into the army always feel the muzzle of machine guns of the National Battalion detachments on their backs or are already lying in the ground. Here it is the reality of the Ukrainian "struggle", and not what you described with admiration ...
    2. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 26 August 2022 15: 59
      Aleksey Lantukh. Only here in the Kremlin are Kremlin dreamers cut off from real life and making decisions based on flattery and deceit

      You shouldn't feel sorry for them. You need to feel sorry for Russia. They are not dumber than you and me, only they have complete information. Unlike us, and all these 20 years. So all this is no mistake, and the definition of it is a word with the same ending, but different
      1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
        Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 26 August 2022 17: 09
        Sorry for the mistake with the address, but it does not change the essence
  6. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 26 August 2022 15: 15
    Another explanation...
    Straight from the joke about the coach and letters, they say go all to the west ...

    And the amounts in the article are ridiculous - what is there "54 million pounds" ??? plane floor? or one?
    1. aslanxnumx Offline aslanxnumx
      aslanxnumx (Aslan) 26 August 2022 15: 27
      We have exhausted ourselves. We buy everything over the hill, we produce little, we have built gas pipelines, and inside 50 percent of the territory is not gasified.
  7. Vlad Petrov Offline Vlad Petrov
    Vlad Petrov (Vladimir) 26 August 2022 15: 51
    The entire "military aid package" of the West is just expendable material. The RF Armed Forces fire 60 rounds per day, and the ammunition provided to Kuev will last for a week. NASAMS air defense systems in the amount of 6 pcs. will be in 1-3 years. Where there are "Abrams" F-16 aircraft in thousands of pieces to crush Russia, there is not and will not be. The West can grimace as you like, but you really need ten times more money. And the toad presses and there is no trust in Ukrainians.
    1. Alexander Dutov Offline Alexander Dutov
      Alexander Dutov (Alexander Dutov) 26 August 2022 23: 57
      Send an F-16 into battle?! Yes, it’s easier to immediately dispose of it, judging by the results of its use against the Indian MIG-21 or in the skies of the Middle East ...
  8. Colonel Kudasov Offline Colonel Kudasov
    Colonel Kudasov (Leopold) 26 August 2022 15: 59
    Whom the war will exhaust this winter
  9. viktor goblin Offline viktor goblin
    viktor goblin (viktor goblin) 26 August 2022 18: 16
    More gas!
  10. Ivanushka-555 Offline Ivanushka-555
    Ivanushka-555 (Ivan) 26 August 2022 19: 02
    500 billion rubles a month for the SVO - they say the most modest amount. Multiply by 12, we get 6 trillion rubles a year! But this money could be spent on the development of the economy and the infrastructure necessary for it. Isn't that exhaustion? ... The funny thing is that a coup d'état (or supporting the sinking Yanukovych) would cost us a thousand times cheaper!
    1. Michael L. Offline Michael L.
      Michael L. 26 August 2022 19: 30
      Accountant, my dear accountant.

      Worth a penny - your estimates.
      NATO missiles on the territory of Ukraine - a knife to the throat of the Russian Federation!
      Sit in a puddle and sit there, mister "professor" impostor!
      "Professor" - in the spelling of V. Yanukovych ("support for the sinking Yanukovych would have cost us a thousand times cheaper"). ;-(
      1. Ivanushka-555 Offline Ivanushka-555
        Ivanushka-555 (Ivan) 27 August 2022 04: 17
        I'm not against SVO, but only for. But in this case (in the context of the title of the article, and its content), I will only agree with the author's opinion that Russia is depleted, spending trillions of rubles on a "war against the fraternal people."
        1. Michael L. Offline Michael L.
          Michael L. 27 August 2022 10: 52
          Hypocritical statement! ;-(
        2. lemeshkin Offline lemeshkin
          lemeshkin (lemeshkin) 27 August 2022 13: 55
          Yes, those people are not particularly fraternal, for example, I understand their language very vaguely, but now it seems that many of them treat us like invaders.
          1. Michael L. Offline Michael L.
            Michael L. 27 August 2022 14: 36
            A vague understanding of the language

            individual - by no means a generalizing criterion.
            Cain killed Abel. Does that stop them from being brothers?
    2. Alexey Lan Offline Alexey Lan
      Alexey Lan (Alexey Lantukh) 26 August 2022 20: 17
      Where 500 billion comes from is unclear. Too much. Nobody knows how much. In the Russian budget, all defense spending is 3-4 trillion rubles. This includes science, pilot production and many other things not directly related to the war.
  11. Kapany3 Offline Kapany3
    Kapany3 26 August 2022 19: 10
    Quote: Morey Borey
    It has long been clear even to hedgehogs. Only here in the Kremlin are Kremlin dreamers cut off from real life and making decisions on the basis of flattery and deceit.

    Only hedgehogs are sitting in the Kremlin
    1. Moray Boreas Offline Moray Boreas
      Moray Boreas (Morey Borey) 26 August 2022 23: 49
      Yes, not hedgehogs, but worse than hedgehogs.
  12. InanRom Offline InanRom
    InanRom (Ivan) 26 August 2022 19: 52
    19.00 Voenkor Yuri Kotenok:

    “Unfortunately, part of our elite still does not fully understand what is happening. A coalition of at least 50 states is fighting against us. This coalition is using the Ukrainian theater of operations as a platform for attacking Russia. Their goal is to destroy Russia. This awareness should be the main result of six months of conducting a special military operation.

    The swift raid near Kyiv by Russian special forces this spring is a hugely successful example of professional action. During the hostilities, it was then possible to defeat the fourth brigade of the National Guard of Ukraine, one of the most equipped in terms of weapons, with “trained” personnel. She was unwound. We actually "horseshoe" held the five millionth capital of Ukraine with the forces of several battalion tactical groups.

    After six months since the beginning of the NMD, Russia lacks infantry, personnel in such a vast theater of operations. You don't have to be afraid to admit it.

    In order to move forward and gain a foothold, and not just “thresh” with artillery, people are needed, manpower. And it's not even about stormtroopers. People need rest, people need to be rotated, strengthened, rehabilitated. The attack aircraft should be followed by a second wave of infantry, which is fixed, cleared, and controls key communications. Partial, hidden mobilization is being carried out, but so far this is not enough.”
  13. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
    vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 26 August 2022 21: 16
    The Russian people should be afraid of another "good will gesture" from the "elite" of the Russian Federation. "Elite" sleeps and sees itself in the golden life of the West, as before. For the time being, the NWO is the best for the Russian Federation, this is a complete renunciation of trade, contacts with NATO countries, a ban on travel to NATO countries for everyone, without exception. It is mainly the "elite" and its keepers who are striving for the NATO countries. 99% of the Russian people the West does not shine, there is no money.
  14. cooper Offline cooper
    cooper (Alexander) 26 August 2022 22: 35
    I agree with the author. If only it came to Putin ...
  15. Neville Stator Offline Neville Stator
    Neville Stator (Neville Stator) 26 August 2022 22: 46
    Only the fifth column can deprive Russia of victory
  16. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. sacha1960 Offline sacha1960
    sacha1960 (Sasha Anton) 27 August 2022 16: 29
    The only way for Russia to quickly win this war against the Anglo-Saxons and their Jewish and Bandera puppets, while saving civilian infrastructure and the lives of hundreds of thousands of Slavs (both Ukrainians and Russians), is to use their special weapons INSIDE UKRAINE. , (NATO Article 5 does not apply).

    Thus, it is possible to immobilize the Ukrainian army, as well as isolate and blockade the cities of the East and South until they surrender.

    Sending a very clear and strong signal to the US, UK and their European vassals to stop helping Kyiv.

    In principle, 5 units would be enough (the first demonstration in an open field), the remaining 4 on military or railway infrastructure, so that the enemy knows for sure that if he moves from this moment, he will be destroyed.

    Other options are years (not months) of suffering, death and destruction for Russians and Ukrainians, as well as a very difficult post-war period, a very expensive reconstruction of the country, and a very long and difficult healing of wounds between brothers.
    1. Michael L. Offline Michael L.
      Michael L. 27 August 2022 17: 39
      Everyone imagines himself a strategist, seeing the battle from the side.

      (Shota Rustaveli)
    2. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
      vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 27 August 2022 19: 46
      Decipher what this "special weapon" is.
  21. Marat Salimgareev (Marat Salimgareev) 7 October 2022 11: 53
    Foreign states will not sell machine tools to Russia