Bloomberg: Putin offered the Russians the role of spectators, not participants in the NWO

August 20 2022 29

Russia portrays its struggle in Ukraine as a right to Russia's very survival. The conflict changed the national identity, with which the head of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin linked the fate of all his power. This is an existential struggle. Perhaps that is why he is focused on rethinking the past and surviving the present while ignoring the future. Bloomberg analyst Clara Ferreira Marquez writes about this.

In her opinion, Putin offers Russia a "Potemkin future", a screen. Marquez is sure that Russians ignore the present and believe in a brighter tomorrow. But what happens when good news turn out to be a facade?

Giving free rein to fantasy, the observer paints an unsightly picture, a scenario that she prophesies for the Russian Federation. Russia will be isolated and rejected for years to come. The country faces a future of low-quality goods with poor safety standards, meager foreign direct investment and declining real incomes.

So far, the Russians prefer not to think about it. The authorities favor this, calling their actions a special military operation and not mobilizing, so as not to affect the interests of the people

writes Marquez.

It's not that today's problems are invisible, but that more people now expect them to pass, and less pessimism about the future. Indeed, most do not expect wage delays, cuts or job losses. Perhaps it helps that fewer Russians are looking for news from the front. Many are waiting for the end of the SVO.

All of this matters because it suggests that public support is conformist, not unconditional—Russians do not expect to pay for government actions. This important detail did not escape the attention of Putin, who allowed his citizens to be spectators, not participants in the NWO.

Drawing conclusions, Marquez writes that the Russians know how to survive - they have already survived the 90s, when there was no economic growth at all. Russians do not see reality because they hope for a short-term crisis, like in the past. Putin, on the other hand, offers a Potemkin future - a kind of saving "facade" necessary for the authorities, Marquez summed up.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

shinobi

+7

20 August 2022 08: 29

The lady voiced her wishes. Apparently the Bloomberg label should make everyone believe this nonsense.
Pound

+4

20 August 2022 08: 30

Another wang.
Alexander Popov

-3

20 August 2022 08: 32

Putin offers a Potemkin future...

Right.
A state has been created in Russia that has no future.
Unfortunately, many do not understand this yet.
1. Nikolay Volkov
  
  -2
  
  20 August 2022 10: 15
  
  everything is correct. as an example, here we will produce 1000 civilian aircraft ... and from what, where, who will produce ??? these questions are brushed aside ... then the announced deadlines come up, there are no results, but there are regular fairy tales that we will definitely produce in 10 years. and so on in a circle
  1. wichera65
    
    +2
    
    20 August 2022 11: 50
    
    Who and what produces and will produce, read on the Internet, do not be lazy.
2. Grei grin
  
  -1
  
  20 August 2022 22: 50
  
  A state has been created in Russia controlled by hucksters and speculators both above and below!
3. Alex777
  
  0
  
  21 August 2022 00: 12
  
  Quote: Alexander Popov
  A state has been created in Russia that has no future.
  
  Wali, hurry up.
4. Bobik012
  
  0
  
  22 August 2022 05: 55
  
  Alexander Popov
  
  Do you know a joke about self-hypnosis - "I didn't crap, I didn't crap..."? It's about you
  And it's not about Putin. The Mongol yoke came, time of troubles, revolution, perestroika, etc. Nothing, survived. We will outlive you. The future will be bright or not bright, it will be seen. But there will be a future. And you won't be there
Sergey Latyshev

-6

20 August 2022 08: 40

The lady simply said in her own words what all sorts of Rosstats write about politically correct ...
Rising prices, unemployment, PR
ksa

+3

20 August 2022 10: 04

Good article. True. What is surprising, if we replace the word "Russia" with "Europe" in it, it will remain good and truthful.
1. GIS
  
  +2
  
  21 August 2022 10: 31
  
  true only if you replace the words Russia with Europe, I agree.
  and let many here begin to complain about the living conditions in our country. They will begin to minus. but I’ll ask you one thing: WHAT WOULD YOU DO ON THE EVE of March 8, when, under the cover of NATO, the Nazis climbed up to us, having previously trampled on the DLNR? what would you do????
  ps and I don’t need to write the answer “what if it hadn’t happened” and other garbage. everyone knows perfectly well that there was a tender for the reconstruction of buildings in the Crimea for NATO, but they stubbornly pretend that the United States would not touch our fleet in Sevastopol. yeah.
  1. Alexey Davydov
    
    0
    
    22 August 2022 22: 06
    
    I'll try to tell you what I would do.
    Back in 2014, instead of a deal with the States on Crimea in exchange for formal sanctions, I would have gone all the way to Ukraine, and the States would have been kept in place by the threat of a nuclear war on their territory, the same with regard to increasing sanctions and expanding NATO.
    If we count from 2022, in response to the refusal of the States to our ultimatum by the threat of nuclear war on their territory, I would force them to fulfill all its conditions from point to point. They themselves would have canceled all the operations planned against us - or they would have burned down with us. With independent actions of Ukraine, I would send troops only to the territory of the LDNR, and the rest would be done by remote strikes on the centers of "decision-making from the Americans" and military groups on the borders of the LDNR.
    "Those who want to do it are looking for opportunities, and those who do not want an excuse" - a saying from the time of Peter the Great. The point is the unwillingness of power.
    Our enemy is not Ukraine, and not even Europe. Our bitter enemy is the States, and so far we have done absolutely NOTHING, even just to beat off his appetite.
    This is how Ildus
    1. GIS
      
      0
      
      23 August 2022 07: 39
      
      thanks for the answer.
      like you, I assumed that the United States can be kept from any decisions (directed against us) by threatening them with nuclear destruction ... which the GDP demonstrated. was there an effect? I think it was, since the states did not introduce their armed forces to Ukraine. whether the problem of US non-intervention in the conflict was solved, we see that it is not. I don’t have a clear answer on how to press on the “states pain point” so hard that they would understand. but thanks again for your opinion.
      1. Alexey Davydov
        
        0
        
        23 August 2022 12: 28
        
        was there an effect? I think it was, since the states did not introduce their armed forces to Ukraine.
        
        threatening them with nuclear destruction ... which the GDP demonstrated
        
        The states did not send troops to Ukraine because they are at war with us by proxy.
        There was no threat of nuclear annihilation, GDP did not demonstrate anything (except to its own population).
        Urosis - not the presence of weapons and timid hints to the enemy about it. Even putting strategic nuclear forces on pompous alert without appropriate threats to be the first to use them is just a demonstration of shitty defense against a nuclear attack.
        A threat is a readiness to make a decision on the use of weapons against the enemy and his unintentional warning about this. Not only words, but also actions. GDP and Lavrov did exactly the opposite - they declared that they would not allow a nuclear war.
        The threat is what the USSR did in 1962, placing strategic missiles in Cuba and firing a warning shot with a nuclear weapon at the test site on Novaya Zemlya
Anatoly-68

+4

20 August 2022 10: 10

Clara Ferreira Marquez is some kind of great thinker to print and discuss her fabrications?
Colonel Kudasov

+1

20 August 2022 10: 21

And what kind of lady offers a way out for Russia? Disintegrate and disappear from the world map, while not forgetting to provide the West with resources?
Vladimir Tuzakov

+1

20 August 2022 15: 23

After all Yeltsin's criminal stagnation, hope came with V.V. Putin. I do not want to lose this hope, but what is happening does not suit many ordinary citizens. The country needs a second wind, it needs V. Putin-2, but something is wrong with this, some beautiful promises of Putin-1, and not fully fulfilled by Russian executors in power. (Government, Central Bank of the Russian Federation, etc.). And what's next?...
1. Grei grin
  
  +2
  
  20 August 2022 22: 48
  
  As the fifth column sat and sits, the hucksters are also in place and pump everything that the West needs, and they hang noodles on our ears!
2. GIS
  
  +2
  
  21 August 2022 10: 36
  
  Well, I would first introduce legislative recall of deputies, + I would limit their work (they don’t have their own work like doing garbage in the State Duma) and the payment would be set at 2 minimum wages. + a fixed amount for allowances (about 1 minimum wage) + a public report on financial conditions their relatives. The constitution does not allow you to interfere in your personal life? so it’s not personal, deputyship is NATIONAL. Personal data law? - so the declarations of deputies should be equated with the declarations of their relatives (or civil spouses ... although who is this mistress?)
Vladimir1155

+2

20 August 2022 22: 34

the future development of Russia is based on two factors, the spiritual revival of the people, and economic revival, for the first, a clear information and educational policy is needed, for the second, the abolition of any bureaucratic supervision of extortionists and tax cuts
1. GIS
  
  +1
  
  21 August 2022 10: 41
  
  How about tax cuts?
  maybe lowering non-core expenses is better? The salary of all officials (the State Duma is also officials. No?) count from the minimum wage and set the difference not 10-50 times between the first and last links of the structure
  1. Vladimir1155
    
    0
    
    21 August 2022 19: 10
    
    now taxes in Russia set by the IMF exceed 100% of profits, as a result, only small businesses survive on black money or offshore companies (foreign companies) that do not pay taxes at all, this is done to destroy domestic industry and agriculture, so we even bring nails from China, .. .. budget revenues have nowhere to go and nabiulina is going to buy yuan rupees and Turkish lira, that is, again to support foreigners, only others .... if we are no longer a colony, then we need to cancel the IMF's settings, bringing the level of taxes to Chinese, that is, reduce the total three times the size, simplify the taxation structure, then our industry will show Chinese growth, and by the way, the tax base will increase, and taking into account oil and gas revenues (which are not in China), the Russian budget will not suffer at all
Peace Peace.

+1

20 August 2022 22: 39

The West went downhill, being carried away by the temptations of the devil presented by one "God's chosen nation" as the most truthful and righteous method of the existence of society. But the Lord does not like this and he changes such societies for more God-pleasing ones, putting competent people at the head and helping with armaments with finances, etc. What we are seeing now.
Grei grin

+2

20 August 2022 22: 45

I never believed the muddy one, while he is in power, do not wait for good Russia!
1. GIS
  
  -2
  
  21 August 2022 10: 42
  
  muddy who is this?
  if about GDP, then argue what they have done to the detriment of the country?
  1. Alexey Davydov
    
    0
    
    23 August 2022 00: 21
    
    what have they done to the detriment of the country?
    
    Nothing has been done to its advantage, except that the process of destruction has been stopped exactly where it was necessary in order to preserve its functions as a reliable supplier of raw materials to the West and a source of enrichment for our oligarchs.
    All the country's money beyond that basically went to the West. Which has already appropriated most of them.
    The country for 20 years, after the destruction in the 90s, practically did not develop, losing its geopolitical positions and population. While the West bypassed it from all sides.
    The stunning result that we have reached has become visible to us only now. The authorities calmly observed this picture all this time, all 20 years.
    Programs with high-profile names (for example, import substitution) were accepted only as a distraction and failed successfully. Why? Yes, because no one was going to fulfill them.
    And now it’s not going to, because absolutely NOTHING has changed since then
opportunist

0

20 August 2022 23: 58

mi6 analyzes
1. nov_tech.vrn
  
  +1
  
  21 August 2022 00: 11
  
  and they hide that they analyzed feces or urine
Atol vedaslav

0

23 August 2022 14: 17

The outlook of this lady is concentrated exclusively in the Western paradigm. But the world is already different, there is a world war and the fourth industrial revolution, in which there is no place for the united states of America. This slut will soon be asking for Siberia