Kyiv is trying to deceive Moscow on the issue of joining NATO

10

Policy often make "loud" statements, which are a means of raising their status, and sometimes survival. During crises, the number of promises and oaths only increases. Despite the support of the West, Ukraine is still on the verge of life and death, determining its future post-war goals. In order to survive, one has to give hope to neighbors and international organizations, political blocs.

Now Ukraine is trying to defeat Russia, which is conducting a special military operation. This can be done, obviously, in a non-military way, removing the reasons why the NWO began. One of the main reasons for the start of the special operation is the frantic, unjustified desire of Ukraine to become a member of the NATO bloc. At the same time, Kyiv was well aware that for Moscow this was a “red line”, beyond which there was a point of no return.



The Russian leadership has long sought from the rulers of Ukraine to cancel the plans enshrined in the country's Constitution to join the military bloc. However, the first signals about this sounded only now, after almost four months of a special military operation. Pleasant for the Kremlin news entrusted to voice the Deputy Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine Igor Zhovkva. Although the compromise on the part of Kyiv looks too vague.

In an interview with the eminent edition of The Financial Times, the official said that from now on, Kyiv will not take concrete steps to join NATO, since the members of the alliance did not behave correctly and frankly expressed their disagreement with the admission of Ukraine to the bloc.

Zhovkva admitted that the decision not to join NATO is difficult, but it is justified, since joining the alliance is impossible in the short term. The maximum that Kyiv hoped for was to grant the status of a partner, but so far there are problems with this.

However, a more detailed analysis of the words of the Ukrainian functionary shows that, in fact, Ukraine set out to simply deceive Russia about its membership in NATO, most likely for the sake of gaining bargaining chips in negotiations with Moscow, or even stopping the NWO on this basis.

Although the deception is too obvious to be believed in the Kremlin: the North Atlantic constitutional norm has not been abolished, since incorrigible nationalists and Russophobes have been selected in the Ukrainian parliament, the intensity of anti-Russian and pro-Western propaganda is not decreasing, and no other specific actions are foreseen for Ukraine to acquire a non-bloc status. Zhovkva's soft, streamlined expressions are in no way connected with the "fear of nationalists", most likely they were dictated "according to the prompter" from Europe, a large delegation of which visited the "square" on June 16.

Brussels fulfilled its part of the tacit deal by granting Kyiv the status of an EU candidate. Now it is time to fulfill the instructions received from the European envoys. In Ukraine, they did it specifically - they gave an interview to a well-known publication, instead of clear legal actions. Of course, this is not what is necessary in order to be convinced of the decisiveness of the Ukrainian authorities. And so the SVO continues.
10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    26 June 2022 09: 31
    The NWO will end with the moment the Russian troops reach the Russian-Polish border.
    And if the Poles foolishly climb on b. Ukraine, then the NWO will end at the Russian-German border.
  2. +2
    26 June 2022 10: 03
    The practice of recent years has shown that the West easily violates any treaty. And there is no trust in written agreements or contracts.
    The only thing that can satisfy Moscow (or maybe not) is the deployment of Russian military bases on the territory of Ukraine. This is the only guarantee of Russia's security. Everything else can (and should) not be discussed.
  3. -2
    26 June 2022 10: 17
    Before the start of the NWO, V.V. Putin threatened Ukraine with a possible loss of statehood, but it seems he got excited because we are not talking about the occupation of the entire territory and the change of pro-Western power in Ukraine.
    After the completion of the SVO and the will of the population in the occupied territories, one will only have to dream of recognizing the results of the division of Ukraine by the UN.
    Ukraine sought to kill two rabbits - to become a member of NATO and the EU. Having received the status of a candidate, she essentially achieved what she was striving for - expanding the economic ties of the EU and at the same time receiving the “roof” of NATO, which is designed to protect NATO members in the EU, candidates for the EU and EU-associated state entities around the world, which justifies the global review of NATO tasks from the original sphere of activity within the boundaries of the northern tropic of the Atlantic to activities around the world, including the Asia-Pacific region and outer space.
    1. +1
      26 June 2022 10: 27
      expands the economic ties of the EU and at the same time receives the “roof” of NATO, which is designed to protect NATO members in the EU

      Both claims are dubious. Ukraine has achieved the loss of its statehood. This is the actual achievement.
      1. +1
        27 June 2022 00: 11
        What does the loss of statehood mean? The disappearance of the state, because if it exists even in a truncated form, then statehood is preserved.
        Association with the EU provides many benefits, and the status of a candidate is practically equivalent to informal EU membership.
        Having received the status of a candidate, Ukraine killed two rabbits with one shot, or do you think that NATO is separate, and the EU is separate?
        1. -1
          27 June 2022 04: 57
          Statehood implies responsibility. And consistency in decision making. I do not consider a colony as a state.
          Candidate for EU membership is an empty phrase. There are several states that received this status many years ago. And so they remained in this position. And then, what privileges does membership in the EU give? Before answering, read what restrictions are being introduced for the country. Open your market and get export limits?
          NATO and the EU are two different structures. And NATO has officially declared that it will not fight in Ukraine and protect it.
          So both of your statements are dubious. I just chose the soft one. Actually, they are both wrong.
  4. 0
    26 June 2022 10: 37
    Quote: Jacques Sekavar
    Having received the status of a candidate

    Russia this status ... twirled!
  5. 0
    26 June 2022 20: 29
    Even the dumbest of the dumbest knows this. There is no way out but to dump Zelensky
  6. 0
    27 June 2022 11: 06
    To believe in the outskirts is simply not to respect yourself, has the history of Minsk-2 really not taught anything, it’s not decent to even talk about any agreements with the Ukronazis
  7. 0
    27 June 2022 23: 56
    If you leave Ukraine as it is (even without Kherson) and end the conflict with a certain Minsk 3, the West will turn the Armed Forces of Ukraine into the main military potential against Russia. They see that the Ukrainians can fight, there is motivation, they are not sorry (losses are not reflected in the West), this will be a constant threat to Russia in the future. In this case, time will work against Russia.

    Or take as many territories as possible and leave a Ukraine that will not be a particular threat even in NATO. In this case, Russia will not be able to get any guarantees from Ukraine, which also opens the way for NATO to confront Russia, but the main threat (Ukraine) will not be too big. New territories, if they are part of the Russian Federation and if their standard of living differs from Ukraine for the better, may well believe in the Russian world, become patriots of their country, forget Ukraine like a nightmare. In this case, time will work for Russia.

    One should not expect any security treaties from NATO.