100 days of SVO: the special operation will last another six months at least


Today we will talk about the topic that most concerns you, how long the hostilities in Ukraine will last and whether they will develop into a larger-scale conflict; let's rummage a bit in Biden's dirty linen (believe me, such skeletons crawled out there that it's simply incomprehensible to the mind how such people still head the most influential state in the world); and think about how we should respond to Washington's supply of long-range MLRS to Kyiv, which can easily reach the territory of the Russian Federation (for those who think that this will not affect him, I will remind you that Crimea is the territory of the Russian Federation, but Kyiv does not think so, as and Washington, in fact, too). Some especially hotheads here are already proposing to use our tactical nuclear weapons (and maybe even strategic nuclear weapons), I have a slightly different plan on how to raise the bar to the maximum without breaking into an exchange of nuclear strikes.


Laws of War


But first things first. Let's start with the sickest one - how long the databases in Ukraine will last. Military theorists, discussing this topic, appeal to history, citing certain facts and conflicts, in particular, the White Finnish war of 1939-40 (better known in historiography as the winter or Soviet-Finnish war). It lasted 105 days, from November 30, 1939 to March 12, 1940, and ended with the defeat of the White Finns with the loss of 11% of Suomi's territory.

But before analyzing this conflict, which indeed has a number of parallels with the current one, starting with the fact that it was the Soviet Union that initiated it, and ending with the fact that it was the Finns who offered the most fierce and competent resistance to the Red Army, I would like to explain why we we are conducting in Ukraine precisely the NWO, and not the war. The fact is that war has a number of laws that describe it, and by getting involved in it, you become their hostage, whether you like it or not. Having declared an official war on Ukraine, the Kremlin will not be able to end it so easily of its own accord. He can’t finish it anyway, because the collective West intervened in the matter in the person of its two representatives - London and Washington (moreover, in that order, and not vice versa!), Who are vitally interested in this war to last for the Russian Federation as as long as possible, exhausting and exhausting its resources, becoming a second Afghanistan for it. If this leads to an increase in discontent and protests within Russian society, which will end in a change of political leadership, and preferably also the collapse of the Russian Federation, then both of these comrades (mentioned above) will consider that all the tasks they have set for their Ukrainian wards have been completed by 200 %. In order not to bring them such joy, the Kremlin does not declare war, because getting out of it will require compliance with a number of formalities that one did not really want to observe with a “gang of drug addicts and neo-Nazis.”

But, nevertheless, war has a number of laws and military theorists know them well. The most famous and most quoted of them, Carl Philipp Gottlieb von Clausewitz (1780-1831), claimed that

“The war is fought to victory and that’s it”, “The goal of any war is peace on the terms of the winner” and “From time immemorial, only great victories have led to great results.”

I think no one will argue with Clausewitz here, especially if we recall two more of his quotes:

“A statesman who sees that war is inevitable and cannot decide to strike first is guilty of a crime against his country” and “Tomorrow lies in today, the future is created in the present. While you are madly hoping for the future, it is already coming out mutilated from your lazy hands. Time is yours! What it becomes is up to you."

Therefore, why Putin was the first to strike this blow, we will not discuss here today. Inflicted, which means that he had no other ways to solve this problem (more precisely, the West did not give him any!). But in delivering this blow, Putin has fallen into the paradigm of events that already govern him, not him. Sorry, these are the laws of war, call it whatever you want, even a special operation, even peace enforcement, at least somehow. It was not in vain that I cited the Soviet-Finnish war as an example above. If you notice, it lasted 105 days. This is not at all accidental. All wars, subject to objective laws, have reference points, passing through which they can go in one direction or another. These are some kind of bifurcation points. The 100 day mark is one of them. If the war has not ended in 100 days, then the next reference point will be 9 months (you can calculate for yourself when this happens - November 24). What will we have in the first decade of November? That's right, the midterm elections to the US Congress, to its lower house, where the Republicans win with a 100% guarantee, after which the financing of the Kyiv regime will asymptotically begin to tend to zero. Grandpa Joe, of course, will still be able to demand money from congressmen to continue the war, but no one will give him this money (with the majority of Republicans in the lower house, the Potomac will flow back rather than this will happen). Moreover, by then America will have its own problems through the roof, and double-digit inflation is only the smallest part of them. The second participant in this conflict, London, is a goal like a falcon, he has not only money, but even his own weapons to continue this war. Boris Johnson will, of course, gather around him his reptiles of Polish-Baltic appearance, but these dwarfs can only bark, while the Russian caravan continues its movement in the direction he needs.

It is not at all necessary that the war will end in November, after all, this is a task with many unknowns, but the fact that it will not end earlier is already a medical fact. Take it for granted. Arguing here with me is pointless, all complaints and suggestions to Sportloto or the United Nations. For a more primitive explanation for people who do not believe in military theories, I advise you to turn to more illustrative examples for them, for example, to the institution of marriage. Here everyone already knows that it can most likely disintegrate in the first - 1 year, 3 years, 7 years and beyond with a frequency of 7 years. Not the fact that it will fall apart, but there are prerequisites.

What history teaches


Our war would have already ended if not for the external factor. Returning to history, on November 30, 1939, the USSR also invaded Finnish territory without declaring war and also fell like chickens in cabbage soup. In the 1st phase of the war, the USSR, due to underestimation of the enemy, poor awareness of his weapons, technical equipment and fortification capabilities, suffered tangible (if not colossal) losses in manpower and technologymany times greater than the losses of the enemy.

The offensive of the Red Army was also carried out on a wide front, from the Karelian Isthmus and the northern Ladoga region to the battles in the Arctic and northern Finland, and also almost ended in a complete fiasco (remember our 1st stage of the NWO). On the Karelian Isthmus, the troops of the Red Army ran into the Mannerheim line and stood up (a direct analogy with the Donbass fortified area of ​​the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which we still cannot take). In the northern Ladoga region, the 139th division of the 8th army was completely defeated and two more rifle divisions of the Red Army (168th and 18th) were surrounded while trying to get out of which in the "valley of death" the 18th division, together with the 34th th tank brigade suffered losses equal to 10% of all losses of the Red Army in this war. At the same time, the Finns used the “motti” tactic, when, taking advantage of the advantage in mobility, detachments of skiers blocked roads clogged with sprawling Soviet columns, cut off the advancing groups and then methodically destroyed them (no associations with the 1st phase of the NWO?). There are still questions why we withdrew our troops from the Kyiv, Chernihiv and Sumy directions, where they, stretching for a hundred kilometers, would be an ideal target for Ukrainian DRGs (especially with the onset of the “greenback”).

A similar situation developed in northern Finland, where the 163rd, 44th and 54th rifle divisions of the Red Army fell into the cauldron. The first two were completely destroyed by the smaller enemy forces. Stalin could not forgive this - most of the surviving commanders and commissars were removed from leadership and later shot, the brigade commander of the 34th tank brigade shot himself, and the brigade commander, commissar and chief of staff of the 44th division were shot right in front of the formation (almost the entire 44th division was destroyed or captured, only a small part managed to get out of the boiler, leaving all the equipment, weapons, including tanks, armored vehicles and artillery, and the convoy).

By the end of December, it became clear that attempts to continue the offensive would lead nowhere. There was a relative calm at the front. The command of the Red Army took a break (no associations with the NWO?). Throughout January and the beginning of February, the troops were strengthened, material supplies were replenished, and units and formations were reorganized. After that, from February 1, the artillery of the Red Army resumed daily shelling of the Karelian Isthmus, and 10 days later, on February 11, the troops of the newly created North-Western Front under the command of the commander of the 1st rank Timoshenko (later, following the results of the war, who replaced Voroshilov as People's Commissar of Defense), by forces The 7th and 13th armies, with the support of the ships of the Baltic Fleet and the Ladoga military flotilla created in October 1939, launched a general offensive along the entire isthmus and three days later broke through the Mannerheim line in the Lyakhde area, developing an offensive deep into Finnish territory.

By the beginning of March 1940, the Finnish government realized that, despite the demands of France and Britain to continue resistance, they would not receive any military assistance, except for volunteers and weapons, from the allies. And therefore, due to the impossibility of further restraining the offensive of the Red Army, a real threat of a complete seizure of the country loomed before them with an easily visible prospect of joining the USSR and the loss of statehood, or, at best, a change of leadership to a pro-Soviet one. As a result, the Finnish government turned to the USSR with a proposal to start peace negotiations. On March 7, a Finnish delegation arrived in Moscow, and on March 12 a peace treaty was signed, according to which hostilities ceased at 12 o'clock on March 13, 1940.

This fact is precisely the difference between the White Finnish war and the current events in Ukraine. The whole logic of the 100-day hostilities that took place there and a real assessment of their consequences in theory forces the Kiev leadership to agree to peace on any terms, if only to preserve statehood, albeit with the loss of territories. In the hope of accumulating strength and with the help of the collective West, later try to take revenge, recapture all the lost territories, including Crimea (I understand that this is nonsense, but it’s not harmful to dream). But the whole trouble is that Kyiv does not have any subjectivity, and no world is included in the plans of the West. On the contrary, they include war to the last Ukrainian. Therefore, the war will continue until the complete victory of one of the parties (guess which one three times?).

Foreign countries will help us


To finally convince you of the symmetry of events, I will give only the figures of Western military assistance to the Finnish side. Great Britain delivered to Finland 75 aircraft (24 Blenheim bombers, 30 Gladiator fighters, 11 Hurricane fighters and 11 Lysander reconnaissance aircraft), 114 field guns, 200 anti-tank guns, 124 automatic small arms, 185 thousand artillery shells, 17 bombs, 700 thousand anti-tank mines and 10 Boyce anti-tank rifles mod. 70.

France did not lag behind, which decided to supply Suomi with 179 aircraft (donate 49 fighters and sell another 130 aircraft of various types). However, in fact, during the war, only 30 MS406C1 fighters were donated (another 6 Caudron C.714 units arrived after the end of hostilities and did not participate in the war). Finland also received 160 field guns, 500 machine guns, 795 artillery shells, 200 hand grenades, 20 million rounds of ammunition, 400 sea mines and several thousand sets of ammunition. Sweden has supplied Finland with 29 aircraft, 112 field guns, 85 anti-tank guns, 104 anti-aircraft guns, 500 automatic weapons, 80 rifles, 30 artillery shells, 50 million rounds of ammunition, and other military equipment and raw materials.

Italy sent 35 Fiat G.50 fighters to Finland, but 5 aircraft were destroyed during their transfer and development by personnel. Also, the Italians handed over to Finland 94,5 thousand Mannlicher-Carcano rifles mod. 1938, 1500 Beretta pistols mod. 1915 and 60 Beretta M1934 pistols. Even the South African Union was noted, which donated 22 Gloster Gauntlet II fighters to Finland. The United States sold 44 Brewster F2A Buffalo fighters to Finland, but they arrived too late and did not have time to take part in the hostilities (what a shame, but the Yankees still got their money). In total, during the war, 350 aircraft, 500 guns, more than 6 machine guns and more were delivered to Finland. In addition, 12 thousand volunteers from Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Hungary, the USA, Great Britain, Estonia and a number of other states, including Russian white émigrés, took part in the war on the side of Finland.

The whole free world fit in with the Finns, and where is the result? An indicative fact, the Germans, with whom the USSR had at that time signed a non-aggression pact (the very famous Molotov-Ribbentrop pact), on December 21 concluded an agreement with the Swedes, according to which Germany undertook to supply to Sweden as many weapons as she would transfer to Finland from her own reserves (no associations with the current Germans and Poland?). History goes in a spiral, only the blind can not notice this. And for some reason, once again, everyone unites against us. Why don't you know?

He promised to tell you more about Grandpa Joe and his skeletons, as well as how we can minimize the threats posed by the supply of long-range mobile MLRS systems, again American-made, but that's next time (sorry, didn't fit here).

On this I say goodbye, but I do not put an end to it, your Mr. X.
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 5 June 2022 18: 19
    -2
    If the war has not ended in 100 days, then the next reference point will be 9 months (you can calculate for yourself when this happens - November 24)

    Wow, how it is! When I predicted that the war would end before winter, I confirmed somebody's scientific or pseudoscientific research.
  2. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 5 June 2022 18: 29
    -1
    The analogy with the Finnish war came to me immediately. But I confess that I did not know how "the whole world" helped the Finns. I only knew about the Swedes.

    History goes in a spiral, only the blind can not notice this.

    Yes. And after the war in Ukraine, we are waiting for the Third World War in which we will win again.
    But judging by how the attitude of our authorities to human losses has changed, we will win with much less blood than our enemies expect.
    1. guest Offline guest
      guest 5 June 2022 18: 50
      +2
      If we already draw parallels with the Finnish war, then it ended not so badly for the USSR. Strategically important territories then passed under our control.
      1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 5 June 2022 19: 13
        +2
        The Finnish war ended with the victory of the USSR and the full achievement of the goals set.
        Another thing is that it was necessary to finish off the enemies, but the USSR did not do this.
        1. guest Offline guest
          guest 5 June 2022 19: 15
          0
          It's just that in the West, and especially in Finland itself, it is presented differently.
          1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 5 June 2022 19: 28
            +2
            After Finland gets into NATO, there will be a possibility that Finland will lose part of its territories. Yes, it will be another Finnish victory over Russia. And this achievement will be described in 120 Finnish museums. And Russia will get a common border with Sweden.
            But we will lose the information war in Finnish museums. Alas)).
            1. art573 Offline art573
              art573 (Artyom Vladimirovich Yarovikov) 11 June 2022 14: 47
              0
              everything can be. I am upset by the stupidity of the leadership of Finland. Are they preparing themselves for slaughter? No one will help them if something starts. Neutral status is the best they ever had...
        2. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
          Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 5 June 2022 22: 44
          -2
          Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
          The Finnish war ended with the victory of the USSR and the full achievement of the goals set.

          The troops of the Red Army were divided into three groups. The southern one had the goal of reaching Helsinki (with the obvious goal of planting the Kuusinen government there). The central one was aimed at accessing the Gulf of Bothnia to the city of Oulu. The northern one was intended to reach the Norwegian border. Due to the underestimation of the combat effectiveness of the Finnish army and its ability to resist for a long time, only the northern one of the three groups completed the task.
          It's called a Pyrrhic victory. Losses are high, called into question the combat capability of the Red Army, when a country with a population smaller than the number of the Red Army was able to fight back. The big question would be whether Hitler would have decided on the Barbarossa plan without having the unsuccessful experience of the Winter War before his eyes.
          1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 6 June 2022 03: 02
            +3
            The Finnish war was aimed at pushing the border away from Leningrad so that enemy artillery could not fire on the city directly from its territory. This goal has been achieved.
            You should not consider people idiots and replace the cause of the war with tactical military tasks.
            About a pyrrhic victory. You should have read what that means. After the Finnish war, the USSR defeated Europe with Hitler at the head.
            And Hitler's fantasies, as history has shown, are his personal problems. And the problems of Europe, which believed him.

            Yes, I admit that people like you will argue that Germany won in WWII, since some military tasks facing the SA were not fulfilled. I admit that in the museums of Europe they already describe in detail how the Soviet Union lost the war. Yeah, and about losses, about doubts, and so on, so on, so on.
    2. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 5 June 2022 22: 23
      0
      Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
      We are waiting for the Third World War in which we will win again.

      There will be no winners in the third world. We all will die.
      1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 6 June 2022 03: 04
        0
        Then urgently put on a white dress and crawl to the cemetery.
        1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
          Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 6 June 2022 12: 52
          -1
          I have hope that we are run by sane people.
          http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67551
          And not inadequate dreaming to bang on the neighbors of nuclear weapons without thinking about the consequences.
          If you are right and they are really inadequate there and they will start a third world war, then of course I will crawl to the cemetery. Do you think it will console me that I will find you there in all white? It seems unlikely to me.
          1. isofat Offline isofat
            isofat (isofat) 7 June 2022 00: 57
            0
            Quote: Oleg Rambover
            ... then of course I'll crawl to the cemetery

            Oleg Rambover, what is immediately in the cemetery? Early. Your place is in room number 6. laughing
    3. Moray Boreas Offline Moray Boreas
      Moray Boreas (Morey Borey) 8 June 2022 01: 50
      0
      Hope. I really hope. The bot does not skip one word ... I had to add this after the first word ...
  3. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 5 June 2022 18: 59
    +2
    And for some reason, once again, everyone unites against us. Why don't you know?

    The war with the Finns began after long negotiations and attempts to find a compromise. The USSR was concerned about its security (does this remind you of anything?).
    By the way, the further course of history fully confirmed the validity of the fears of the Soviet leaders. Germany, Finns, Spaniards took Leningrad in a blockade ring. If the USSR had not moved the border further from St. Petersburg, Leningrad would most likely have fallen.

    But the USSR made a mistake. Did not finish off the Finnish reptile. Russia, I hope, will not make such a mistake.
  4. devil Offline devil
    devil (Alex) 5 June 2022 19: 04
    +4
    Go to the National Museum in Helsinki and see how the winter war and the Second World War are presented. They didn't work it out - that's the Finns almost in NATO. Let's not work in Ukraine - it will also be in NATO. Even if along the Dnieper.
    1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 5 June 2022 19: 17
      +1
      Finland fought on the side of Nazi Germany. That's all you need to know about Finland. What the Finns rave about may be of interest only to residents of b. Ukraine.
  5. Colonel Kudasov Offline Colonel Kudasov
    Colonel Kudasov (Leopold) 5 June 2022 19: 13
    +3
    An important moment, predetermining the inevitable escalation of the conflict, is the appearance in Ukraine and the very likely imminent use of American offensive weapons with a range of up to 500 km. And this is offhand the distance between Kharkov and Moscow. This cannot be allowed, but for this it will be necessary to act extremely harshly, up to the use of tactical nuclear weapons. Otherwise, there will be no end to the war
    1. guest Offline guest
      guest 5 June 2022 19: 29
      +1
      I wonder when it will fly directly to the Kremlin, will they once again express concern there?
      1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 6 June 2022 03: 20
        -1
        Read less Kyiv propaganda.
        People prone to unmotivated panic - this is contraindicated.
    2. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 5 June 2022 19: 33
      0
      War with b. With Ukraine, Russia will win before the start of winter. Without shelling Moscow and without the use of nuclear weapons. But during the war with NATO, several countries will have to be destroyed. Poland, UK, Holland, etc.
      However, many countries with adequate governments will leave NATO, ostensibly to create their own European army - Germany, France, Italy. And therefore, they will save their countries and populations.
      1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
        Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 5 June 2022 22: 50
        -2
        Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
        But during the war with NATO, several countries will have to be destroyed. Poland, UK, Holland, etc.

        What happened in your life that you do not want to live?
        1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 6 June 2022 03: 07
          -1
          To survive, you must be prepared to die. Stupid cowards are the ballast of the state, which pulls us to the bottom. However, these stupid cowards claim that even at the bottom you can adapt and eat deliciously and even drink German beer.
          1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
            Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 6 June 2022 09: 30
            -1
            Do not talk nonsense, in order to survive you must not die.

            Smart people tell you:

            We declare that there can be no winners in a nuclear war and it must never be unleashed.
      2. art573 Offline art573
        art573 (Artyom Vladimirovich Yarovikov) 11 June 2022 14: 51
        0
        Turkey is the first to leave NATO. This is obvious, they have nothing in common with Europe, both economically and religiously and culturally.
  6. guest Offline guest
    guest 5 June 2022 19: 35
    0
    Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
    However, many countries with adequate governments will leave NATO, ostensibly to create their own European army - Germany, France, Italy. And therefore, they will save their countries and populations.

    Where did you see adequate governments in these countries?
    1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 6 June 2022 03: 12
      0
      It seems that the process of awareness among the elites of some countries has begun. And the government does not need to change a lot of time. Or other people will come, or a new position will simply appear.
      1. guest Offline guest
        guest 25 November 2022 16: 39
        0
        Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
        And the government does not need to change a lot of time.

        Maybe so, but little has changed from the change of governments. In some of these countries, governments have changed, but the Russophobic position has not changed and even intensified.
  7. steelmaker Online steelmaker
    steelmaker 5 June 2022 20: 14
    -2
    100 days of SVO: the special operation will last another six months at least

    And someone by July assumed that Russia would solve the problems. I say: "Education should be received, not bought."
    And if in six months the CBO does not end, will the author change his name? You have to be responsible for the words.
    1. isofat Offline isofat
      isofat (isofat) 7 June 2022 01: 17
      0
      Quote: steel maker
      And if in six months the CBO does not end, will the author change his name?

      steelmaker, if in six months the CBO does not end, then the author will be right. Did you manage to get a secondary education?
  8. alexey alexeyev_2 (Alexey Alekseev) 5 June 2022 21: 05
    0
    At least six months. I didn’t even read further. The war with the Anglo-Saxons is forever .. Why did we seriously upset them, which historians kept silent about.
    1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 6 June 2022 03: 14
      -1
      I didn’t even read further. The war with the Anglo-Saxons is forever.

      They did absolutely right. Why read if what you read doesn't fit in your head?
      The author did not write anything about the timing of the war with the impudent Saxons.
      1. alexey alexeyev_2 (Alexey Alekseev) 6 June 2022 06: 01
        0
        Do not try to seem smarter or dumber than you really are. You know perfectly well who Russia is fighting with .. If there were no Ukraine, there would be the Baltic States .. Or Moldova Now Kazakhstan is on its way
        1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 6 June 2022 06: 24
          0
          Your claim to the author is unfounded. The author indicated the terms for the operation on the territory of the b. Ukraine. Specifically for her, and not in general - "it's forever."
  9. Bakht Offline Bakht
    Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 5 June 2022 21: 23
    0
    with a "gang of drug addicts and neo-Nazis"

    Smiled

    What are the gentlemen of the Nazis? Murderers and pederasts.

    Benito Mussolini.
  10. k7k8 Offline k7k8
    k7k8 (vic) 5 June 2022 21: 24
    0
    Quote: steel maker
    And if in six months the CBO does not end, will the author change his name?

    He will not change his name. Do not take phrases out of context. The author said so - "at least six months." And the fact that this war, at least until the end of this year, I wrote (not on this resource) back in February of this year.
    1. steelmaker Online steelmaker
      steelmaker 6 June 2022 08: 26
      0
      "Don't ask, don't dance." I had a dispute with this author. By July, not half a year.
      1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 6 June 2022 08: 39
        0
        By the way, yes, I remember. There was a dispute.
  11. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
    Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 5 June 2022 23: 08
    -8
    The author has a bad association with the Winter War. Then the USSR did not achieve its goals, being content with little. The USSR became an aggressor and a pariah country. The combat effectiveness of the Red Army was called into question, as it could not cope with the small Finnish army, which became one of the arguments for Hitler to implement the Barbarossa plan.
    1. alexey alexeyev_2 (Alexey Alekseev) 6 June 2022 05: 54
      +2
      And why did you decide that the USSR did not achieve its goal? The border was moved from Leningrad. The Baltic states were surrendered without a fight. Has the country become an outcast? Complete nonsense. Not a single issue was resolved without the USSR. The League of Nations had outlived its usefulness by that time.
      1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
        Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 6 June 2022 19: 55
        -2
        The troops were given targets. Exit to Helsinki, exit to the city of Oulu, exit to the Norwegian border. We went only to the Norwegian border.

        Quote: Aleksey Alekseev_2
        Not a single issue was resolved without the USSR.

        When, in 1940, during negotiations with Hitler, Molotov started a song about Finland, that it would not be bad to resolve the issue with her finally, he was sent on a hike to a well-known address. An embargo was introduced against the USSR.

        Quote: Aleksey Alekseev_2
        The League of Nations had outlived itself by that time. However, like the current UN

        It's true. I wonder what the UN will be reborn into. It is unlikely that the new organization will have the right of veto for the Russian Federation.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. opportunist Offline opportunist
    opportunist (dim) 6 June 2022 09: 20
    +1
    To date, more than 500 tanks, including combat aircraft, have been transported to Ukraine from Western countries. More than 30 foreign mercenaries are fighting on the side of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, a very large number, given that there were about 000 Donbass militia. If the supply of weapons and mercenaries from Western countries to Ukraine, then Russia will be forced to throw more forces in order to win the war, and this war will drag on even longer. I said from the very beginning that how quickly a Russian victory will come to Ukraine and what it will depend on the limits of Russia's tolerance for weapons , supplied by Western countries to Ukraine. when a country sends weapons, allows Ukrainian fighter jets to land at its airports, restores damaged Ukrainian tanks, participates in the war. If Russia shows determination to strike at airports and factories in Poland and Romania that produce Ukrainian tanks, and leaves Ukrainian warplanes unattended, then, I tell you, Western aid will cease.Ameri The Canadians believe that Russia will not hit NATO countries because it will be afraid. I personally do not think that we will go to a nuclear war with the United States if we hit some objects in Poland or Romania. The Kremlin must finally show determination, according to in fact, they are waging war against us using Ukrainian neo-Nazism. What if tomorrow they use Romanian fascism against the war in Transnistria. What if they do the same with Kazakhstan. We who talk about the use of tactical nuclear weapons are not crazy, we just mean the worst scenario, I hope we never get to that point.
  14. k7k8 Offline k7k8
    k7k8 (vic) 6 June 2022 09: 36
    -1
    Quote: opportunist
    more than 500 tanks transported from Western countries, including combat aircraft

    Quote: opportunist
    how fast the Russian victory will come to Ukraine

    Quote: opportunist
    strike on airports and factories in Poland and Romania that produce Ukrainian tanks

    Quote: opportunist
    use Romanian fascism against the war in Transnistria

    Dear, you should at least re-read what you wrote before clicking the "Submit" button

    Quote: opportunist
    we who talk about the use of tactical nuclear weapons are not crazy

    And what are you in this case? People with special needs?
  15. Moray Boreas Offline Moray Boreas
    Moray Boreas (Morey Borey) 8 June 2022 01: 32
    0
    Great article! Deep historical analysis! I thank the author for his work! I didn't get to read it right away, I was busy. Therefore, my review of this article is: super excellent! Regarding the last question in the article, my answer is: everyone wants cheap resources. All Anglo-Saxons and their vassals want to live better than they should. Therefore, they rock the boat on Russia as soon as it shows independence in the pricing policy for resources.
  16. Moray Boreas Offline Moray Boreas
    Moray Boreas (Morey Borey) 8 June 2022 01: 40
    0
    The author is a clever one, he caught the real objective pattern of the development of wars! This gives us the opportunity, based on his analysis and conclusions, to predict and explain from another higher level the course of events, both causes and effects. This is real logic is intelligence!
  17. art573 Offline art573
    art573 (Artyom Vladimirovich Yarovikov) 11 June 2022 15: 00
    0
    good analogy. If there is another war, then Ukraine will again fight with us, so the author of the article correctly gives this article. To the future. In this regard, the leadership of Russia naturally has a question about the future and about the aggressive states that are on our border and want to fight the Russians to the last Ukrainian, Estonian, Pole, Lithuanian and Latvian. Now the question is that they want to force the peaceful Finnish guys to fight the Russians and go to the slaughter. All this is in the elites of the West, and they do not have anti-government forces that could change this government / elite of the West, which is preparing them for suicide