What could be the first Russian drone ship

16

A few days ago it became known about the launch in China of the first semi-autonomous drone ship called Zhu Hai Yun. This event is very remarkable, since the PRC was able to put into practice an extremely promising concept, which can also be useful for the Russian Navy.

Chinese drone carrier


Formally, the Zhu Hai Yun is a peaceful research vessel with a displacement of only 2000 tons. Its length is 88,5 meters, width - 14 meters. The maximum speed reaches 18 knots, cruising - 13 knots. The ship was built by Huangpu Wenchong Shipyard and is part of the Intelligent Mobile Ocean Stereo Surveillance System (IMOSOS) developed by the Southern Marine Science Laboratory and equipment Guangdong. It is semi-autonomous: in the port it is controlled remotely, and on the high seas, control passes to artificial intelligence.



Of greatest interest, in addition to the use of AI in the fleet, is the “weaponry” of the Chinese drone carrier, represented by air, underwater drones and unmanned small surface vessels with a total of 50 units. They allow both peaceful research of the World Ocean, and hypothetically - aerial reconnaissance and target designation, underwater reconnaissance and mining. They don’t talk about a possible military mission directly in the PRC, but it is implied by itself.

And this is a very interesting project, which clearly shows in which direction the Russian navy can go further.

Why are drones needed?


So much has already been said about why carrier-based aviation is needed at sea that there is little point in repeating. Who needs it, he knows himself, who doesn't need it, you can't convince him. But, perhaps, the only sound counterargument that the "aircraft carriers" put forward is that these are large and expensive ships that take a long time to build and then need infrastructure for basing and maintenance. Alas, this is true.

You have to pay dearly for versatility. If you build an aircraft carrier, then a full-fledged, heavy attack one, with a nuclear power plant, catapults, a large air wing, and you get something like the Ulyanovsk ATAVKR with a total displacement of almost 80 tons. If you look at the project 000 universal landing ship, then the designers tried to cram maximum functionality into it: a tank deck, landing aids, an infirmary, cockpits for the crew and a battalion of marines, hangars for helicopters, and much more useful. It turned out to be an excellent multi-tasking ship with a total displacement of 23900 tons. Need aircraft carriers and UDC fleet? Of course they are. But their construction is a long and expensive business, while part of their tasks could well be solved by ships of significantly smaller sizes and costs. In particular, drone carriers.

So, what tasks can a drone ship solve?

At first, this is aerial reconnaissance, over-the-horizon search and target designation. This will require the creation and "fading" of the AWACS UAV.

Secondly, anti-submarine warfare using helicopter-type drones equipped with radio buoys, magnetometers and submersible sonar.

Thirdly, delivering missile strikes against ground targets by reconnaissance and strike drones.

Fourthly, with the help of the promising Lancet kamikaze UAVs, the so-called air mining is possible, and underwater drones will be able to carry out real mining or, conversely, demining the water area.

Fifthly, the drone ship is capable of patrolling and guarding maritime borders over long distances thanks to the use of reconnaissance UAVs.

In other words, a very useful ship for the Russian Navy would have turned out. And I must say that rumors about the start of work in Russia on a platform ship for UAVs began to spread last year.

How it might look


We note right away that it will not be possible to completely and completely focus on the Chinese drone carrier. Zhu Hai Yun is still a purely peaceful ship, on which promising concepts and technologies are only being tested.

It is unlikely that anyone will seriously launch a drone carrier controlled by artificial intelligence into battle. Without a crew, preparing UAVs and underwater vehicles for a combat mission, refueling, repairing and performing other manipulations is unrealistic. Therefore, the team will still be, but its size could be reduced by means of automation. Therefore, premises will be needed on board to ensure its vital activity, but it will be possible to save on the size of the ship, forgetting about tank decks, infirmaries, and so on, as on the UDC.

Also, the modesty of displacement will benefit from the fact that neither catapults, nor hangars for aircraft, nor cellars with ammunition, nor a nuclear power plant, as on ATAVKR, will be needed. What is needed is a longitudinal deck with an “island” superstructure, moved to the right, where the air wing’s electronic control center will be located so that aircraft-type UAVs have space for acceleration and takeoff, as well as special nets for landing. Helicopter-type drones will be able to take off and land on a modest site. Drones-"kamikaze" in their last flight will be launched using a pneumatic catapult. Hangars for storing aviation, surface and underwater groups will be located below deck.

Such a drone carrier will never be used independently, only as part of a ship strike group (KUG), which will provide its anti-aircraft and anti-submarine protection. Nevertheless, a small-range air defense missile system such as the marine version of the "Shell" must be installed.

As a result, the displacement of our promising drone ship will increase from 2000 tons, like that of a "Chinese", to 6000-8000 tons, like that of a frigate or destroyer, but this is something that the domestic shipbuilding industry can master without strain. The benefits of an auxiliary aircraft carrier of this class are obvious, since it will significantly expand the capabilities of the KUG, in which it is located.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    2 June 2022 15: 58
    the respected author began for health describing the project of the wise Chinese, but ended up with completely erroneous reasoning about the fruitless increase in displacement, 8000 tons is a lot and there will be no more such drone carriers, but the wise Chinese will stamp 6000 drone carriers for the same money ..... obviously that the age of large surface ships does not go away, but is long gone .... they are vulnerable, too expensive to build and operate, low-volume ... in general, this is a pointless burden
  2. +2
    2 June 2022 17: 31
    ship-drone carrier

    without anglicisms anywhere.
    ((((merchandiser, clearing, outsourcing, carsharing, lockdown, ..... I want (if frankly) to punch the speaker in the face. and especially the one who distributes such
    1. +1
      2 June 2022 18: 52
      Well, to say “drone” instead of “drone” is even more or less euphonious, but the word “drone carrier” or “drone carrier” is unlikely to take root. In general, actively borrow foreign words in the tradition of the Russian language since the time of Peter. I wonder what will happen when Russia gets closer to China)
      1. 0
        2 June 2022 19: 01
        Quote: Colonel Kudasov
        Well, to say “drone” instead of “drone” is even more or less euphonious, but the word “drone carrier” or “drone carrier” is unlikely to take root. In general, actively borrow foreign words in the tradition of the Russian language since the time of Peter. I wonder what will happen when Russia gets closer to China)

        the people have become lazy, and why not flaunt knowledge. and so there is an institute of the Russian language. and not just one. let them work.
  3. 0
    2 June 2022 17: 50
    It can be seen that Russian aircraft carriers have come to grief ...

    The Chinese have launched an apparently civilian scientific small vessel. Well, they have a lot of small islands in the sea.

    A combat drone carrier will differ little from a small aircraft carrier, because. long distances, harsh operating conditions, waves and heavy equipment (bombs)....

    And the aircraft carriers ... kapets came. There are no drones .... marine ones. Capacities for mass production .... no.
    What is? there are articles, .Projects ... there are not even any projects.
    1. -1
      4 June 2022 09: 04
      Quote: Sergey Latyshev
      It can be seen that Russian aircraft carriers have come to grief ...

      At this stage, I agree with you. So far, Russia itself has to be a solid "aircraft carrier. But the article discusses a concept that is not without meaning.
      Small ships with air and surface drones to search for and destroy the submarine fleet are logical. Russia has endless maritime borders and electronic "outposts" can be a great help to the border guards.
      1. 0
        4 June 2022 13: 50
        IMHO, you are off topic.
        Small drones and ships - this is a chito citizen, slowly come back to back in good weather and study.
        Otherwise, they will be blown away, they will not take off, they will fall short and get lost.

        The military are heavy colossus, such as our hunters, loshariks or Amer's flying wing.
        And they need almost an aircraft carrier in size, a little less.
        And for 1-2 ala helicopters, pieces on board and the old ones will do.

        Small drones are not foot soldiers, look out for the enemy 3 km away ... a little bad weather - and it will blow away ....
  4. 0
    2 June 2022 18: 01
    I completely agree. I will add that there should be several types of such ships. With its own specialization and with a minimum set of minor weapons. Sea drones. Air drones. Search submarines, minesweepers. With naturally diverse equipment, mutually complementing each other and going on a mission as a group. The staffing of the group could be flexible, according to the task. I don’t stutter about tonnage - not my design profile.
  5. 0
    2 June 2022 18: 09
    Quote: Victorio
    ship-drone carrier

    without anglicisms anywhere.
    ((((merchandiser, clearing, outsourcing, carsharing, lockdown, ..... I want (if frankly) to punch the speaker in the face. and especially the one who distributes such

    Try to pronounce "parachute" in Russian. It will turn out long, stupid and wrong. Or replace the Russian word "fuselage", "rib", or in music, replace the concept of "flagelet". In mining, instead of "bremsberg" write the Russian name, and in geology, think of an analogue of the "anticline". What can you do, a person uses someone else's term more easily than trying to invent an analogue. We must thank the inventors of all these things, who gave mankind their invention, and named it in accordance with their linguistic tradition. Start STRONGLY inventing and fill this damn world with Russian terms, definitions and DEVICES.
    1. 0
      2 June 2022 18: 37
      Quote: dub0vitsky
      Try

      steamer, helicopter, plane, machine gun, etc. etc. maybe they don't sound very good, especially right away, but nothing got accustomed. there would be a desire.
      we have already talked, rudeness is not forgotten. For the future, please pass by.
      1. +1
        2 June 2022 19: 58
        the fuselage is just a body, and for other words I don’t know the meaning of, I could easily come up with a short Russian word that doesn’t cut the ear and is understandable, in general, anglicisms confuse thinking, because they have no root, and therefore it is difficult to associate with words describing the real world, they stand apart, but Anglicism enthusiasts think that with these new words, which are really incomprehensible to the end even to themselves, they seem smarter than those around them .... in their own eyes ... this is especially clearly shown in the comedy "The Marriage of Balsaminov" who wanted to surprise everyone with foreign words but was expelled in disgrace .... or "for two hares" where the dude and rake of bare-tails elegantly sprinkles foreign catchphrases being an Alphonse spendthrift and bankrupt
        1. +1
          2 June 2022 20: 51
          Quote: vladimir1155
          fuselage is just a body

          agree and support)
        2. 0
          3 June 2022 07: 23
          Fuselage is a word of French origin and found its way into many European languages, including Russian, as early as the beginning of the 20th century.
  6. +1
    2 June 2022 18: 36
    A combat unit armed to the teeth (any aircraft, ship, tank, ...) is over-armed for combat. One way or another, only what is suitable in specific conditions is used, and the rest is dangerous ballast. The cruiser "Moskva" confirms this. According to reviews, it was stuffed with artillery cellars of various weapons, which turned it into a powder keg. Without sufficient RARE and isolation of one species from another. Has anyone thought about the fact that a car is only good when it works in the environment for which it was designed. Ah, try to make it flying, floating, both on the water and under the water...... It won't be able to move anywhere. 10% of its useful features will be ruined by the rest. Specialized pieces of iron, collected in groups according to the purpose of the task. Here is the solution of a mobile, gloriously armed and little redundant squadron.
  7. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  8. 0
    2 June 2022 19: 53
    We'll make a bunch of drones, set up dronedromes, and fly to Australia.
    Almost like Trushkin, the kingdom of heaven to him ...
  9. 0
    2 June 2022 22: 22
    You can try to use, as linguists say, tracing paper and simply translate the word drone (drone) into Russian. It will turn out to be a drone) The Americans called the drone because of the characteristic chirping. Drone, of course, does not sound in Russian, but can be replaced with a "bumblebee"