Deliveries of MLRS to Ukraine: Will Russia again warn “for the last time”?


The topic of the prospect of deliveries by the United States to the Kyiv regime of long-range multiple launch rocket systems has become the main one in the “Ukrainian direction” in recent days. There are all grounds for that. After all, their beginning, without a doubt, marks a new stage in the escalation of confrontation not only between the parties to the special military operation to denazify and demilitarize Ukraine, but also between Russia and the entire “collective West”. Statements made on June 1 by US President Joe Biden (moreover, set out by him for the most part in writing - in the form of an article published in The New York Times) indicate that Washington nevertheless decided to take this provocative step.


What could be the consequences of such a decision by the overseas puppeteers of Kyiv? What are all the statements made on this issue, both by the Americans and representatives of the Ukrainian regime, worth? What can and should Russia do in this situation, and what should it categorically not do? Let's try to find answers to all these questions as of the current moment, so to speak.

Biden's excuses, Zelensky's lies


The article of the American president mentioned above has a pretentious title: "What the US will and will not do in Ukraine." However, if we remove from it, so to speak, “verbal lace” and common places that are mandatory in a printed speech policy of such a rank, it becomes clear that the essence of what has been written boils down for the most part to an attempt to disown the possible consequences of the transfer of American arms supplies to the Ukronazi regime to a completely new level and to absolve oneself of any responsibility for them.

As one would expect, the text can be attributed to the number of reference examples of selective hypocrisy and the use of double standards inherent in both the United States itself and all its allies. The head of the White House pompously asserts: "America's goal is simple: we want to see a democratic, independent, sovereign and prosperous Ukraine, capable of deterring and defending itself from further aggression." And further elaborates:

Therefore, we quickly began to supply Ukraine with a significant amount of weapons and ammunition so that it could fight, and military successes provided it with a stronger position at the negotiating table. And I made a decision that we will provide the Ukrainians with more advanced missile systems and ammunition that will allow them to more accurately hit important targets on the battlefield in Ukraine.

Well, it’s clear - “peace is war” and further according to Orwell ... But, finally, on the case:

We do not encourage Ukraine to strike targets outside its borders and will not provide it with the means to do so. We don't want to drag out the war just to hurt Russia.

All this verbal smut, in principle, coincides with other statements made by US officials. So, literally on May 31, US Permanent Representative to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield said the following:

We do not provide weapons that would allow the Ukrainians to attack Russia from Ukrainian territory, and President Joe Biden has made that clear.

Obviously, this meant what the new "talking head" of the White House tweeted - his press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre at the next briefing for journalists. By all appearances, an extremely tense discussion on this issue really took place in Washington - since even such a “retired goat drummer” as the former US permanent representative to NATO, Kurt Volker, allowed himself to get into it. The well-remembered hawkish figure when he was America's chief watchdog on Ukraine lamented in an interview with the BBC that "Biden's decision not to transfer long-range missiles was dictated by fears of exacerbating relations with the Kremlin." After that, he stated that he considers such a position to be completely “erroneous”. There was nothing to be ashamed of - after all, "Russia will not be able to open a second front under the circumstances." So the United States should have been completely impudent and put rockets into the clutches of the Ukronazis, hitting not at some 80 kilometers (50 miles), but at all 100 or even 300 - so that the Russians know! A certain echo of such a “ferment of minds” in the United States was the speech of Vladimir Zelensky, who suddenly began to publicly assure overseas “benefactors” that he (as well as the leadership of the Armed Forces of Ukraine) had no idea of ​​hitting their MLRS on Russian territory:

The White House says we can use them to attack Russia. Look, we're not planning to attack Russia. We are not interested in the Russian Federation, we do not fight on its territory!

And he immediately added that the “nezalezhnaya” desperately needed “missile systems that hit further than 100 kilometers.

Yes, this reprise with good reason can be considered the funniest joke of the president-clown. And the most mediocre at the same time. I wonder who this primitive lie is designed for? It is enough to open any official (or unofficial) Ukrainian propaganda resource with their invariable calls for the murder of Russians and the destruction of Russia as a state, in order to appreciate the falsity of the words "we are not going to attack Russia." Not to mention the fact that the settlements of the Belgorod and Bryansk regions in this case, probably, were beaten by aliens ?!

Will Russia again warn “for the last time”?


It is quite natural that this clownery of a mediocre buffoon was not believed in Moscow for a penny. Russian presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov responded to Zelensky's false assurances as follows:

No, we don't. In order to be trusted, one must have experience of cases where promises were kept. Unfortunately, there is no such experience at all.

Peskov did not fail to recall that earlier Kyiv "did not keep its promise to end the conflict in the south-east of Ukraine." He summed up the topic of “trust in Zelensky” with the following words:

The Minsk agreements were not fulfilled, they have sunk into oblivion, moreover, through the fault of the Ukrainian side. Therefore, we do not have a special credit of confidence in the Ukrainian side...

What can I say? Even moving away from discussing the insignificant personality of the current Ukrainian "leader", who would not be more duplicitous, having another pair of eyes and another deceitful mouth at the back of his head, one cannot ignore the statements coming from the level from which real orders are given to Kyiv. On June 1, Pentagon Deputy Secretary for Political Affairs Colin Cole, at a special briefing for journalists, said literally the following:

Everything they do on the territory of Ukraine is defensive in this context. Official assurances have been received from Kyiv that they will not use these systems for attacks on Russian territory.

Yes, yes, yes... The devil, as usual, is in the details. In this particular case, in the fact that Washington stubbornly continues to consider Crimea, Donbass, and Kherson, as well as all other regions and settlements that have already been liberated by the Russian army from the Ukronazis, as “Ukrainian territory” as “Ukrainian territory”. What does it say? Exclusively that in the event that the Armed Forces of Ukraine start destroying Donetsk, Lugansk, Simferopol or other Crimean cities from American MLRS, the United States will say that all this is in the order of things. And they will refuse to accept any claims against Russia. However, it will be so in any case - is it really unclear?

In order to make sure that the assumptions regarding the possible places for the use of American MLRS are not abstract sophistication and "wang" of the author, it is enough to recall the words of none other than the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine Dmitry Kuleba, who, without any hesitation, called multiple launch rocket systems " the key to change in war." Then he clarified:

If we don't get multiple rocket launchers as soon as possible, the situation in Donbas will become even worse than it is now. I don't want everyone to have the feeling that everything is more or less okay with the war. The situation in Donbas is extremely bad. If we don't get multiple launch rocket systems, we won't be able to liberate Kherson, where there are people who are waiting for liberation. Leaving the Russians in Kherson is unacceptable - because they will have a strategic position to threaten Central Ukraine, as well as South-Western Ukraine in the direction of Odessa, and they will continue to steal our grain!

As they say - what more?

There is no doubt that, as soon as they receive these systems, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will begin to wipe out all the liberated cities and villages that they can reach from the face of the earth. After that, strikes on the same Belgorod (which, by the way, have been “announced” in Kyiv for a long time) will only be a matter of time. Can this be prevented? It's still possible. However, certainly not the next "expressions of extreme concern" and "one hundred and thirty-first last warnings." Those have already been voiced - Russian Ambassador to the United States Anatoly Antonov said that the supply of MLRS "is fraught with unpredictable consequences for global security." The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs also issued a corresponding statement:

US deliveries of MLRS to Ukraine undermine stability. Restoring the European security system on the same terms is no longer possible.

Does anyone in Moscow really think that Washington doesn't understand this? Then they should heed the words of Colin Cole, one of Lloyd Austin's deputies mentioned above:

We are not going to enter into a direct conflict with Russia. We have no interest in the conflict in Ukraine escalating into a wider conflict or escalating into a third world war, so we keep that in mind, but at the same time, Russia does not have the right to veto what we sent to the Ukrainians...

Sharp warnings that the weapons supplied to Kyiv from NATO countries "will be immediately destroyed" have already been heard so many times that it is impossible to count. If this time the MLRS so expected by the Ukronazis are not turned into scrap metal immediately after crossing the border of the “non-collateral” (or even better - when approaching such), this will mean that Russia really “does not have the right to veto”.

If universal launchers, which can also be used for medium-range tactical missiles, are at the disposal of Kyiv, sooner or later (and sooner rather than later) it will receive these missiles. Today we are talking about a fairly limited number of MLRS, which the Americans intend to transfer to Ukraine. However, if this really happens, our overseas enemies will be deprived of the last remnants of fear. Peskov said on this occasion:

Let's not talk about the worst-case scenarios...

It's just the opposite! It is about them that it is necessary to speak and think just today - so that tomorrow they do not come true.
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 2 June 2022 10: 11
    +7
    And next to it is an article about Russia's response: "Russian oil has "found its way" to the USA")))
    1. skeptic Offline skeptic
      skeptic 2 June 2022 14: 28
      +2
      Quote: Sergey Latyshev
      And next to it is an article about Russia's response: "Russian oil has "found its way" to the USA")))

      The main trouble is that those who decide do not connect the attacks with the answers. We are white, affectionate, fluffy, we don't want to get our hands dirty... but the world thinks differently. Maybe it's time to link the shelling with the destruction of the industrial infrastructure of western Ukraine. After each shelling - a response, with the transfer of information to the shellers, what is being destroyed, for their previous shelling. Make ukrozombi dependent on their activities, that for the shelling of the civilian population, the jobs of their relatives are destroyed. especially - the native places of artillery officers.
      Why are cement factories not being destroyed, enterprises producing ready-mixed concrete - this is no less necessary to destroy than tanks.
      1. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
        Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 2 June 2022 21: 30
        +1
        imho naive.
        1) Stalin and Hitler exchanged answers, what was this last shelling? And the Turks with the Syrians?
        2) You can see cement plants, etc. themselves are needed. If everything is destroyed, then what should be "optimized" after the capture?
  2. steelmaker Offline steelmaker
    steelmaker 2 June 2022 10: 49
    +4
    so that tomorrow they will not come true.

    Our government does not know how and does not want to think about tomorrow. The main thing now is that money is flowing into the treasury in a “river”.

    In April, the federal budget received 1,8 trillion rubles. oil and gas revenues, which is 50% more than in March and 85% more than in February. In one month, the budget received the same amount of oil and gas revenues as in the entire 1st quarter in 2021. The second reason for the surplus (more technical) is the abolition of the fiscal rule: now all additional oil and gas revenues at an oil price of more than $44,2/bbl. are sent to the federal budget, and not to the National Welfare Fund, as before.

    https://www.fontanka.ru/2022/05/14/71330207/
  3. Colonel Kudasov Offline Colonel Kudasov
    Colonel Kudasov (Boris) 2 June 2022 11: 13
    +1
    The trick is that the “wunderwaffe” from the USA will most likely be used in the near future and the results of its use cannot be hidden or mixed. From now on, Russia's hands will be completely untied
    1. guest Offline guest
      guest 2 June 2022 13: 09
      +4
      Do you propose to wait until they hit the Russian decision-making centers?
    2. assault 2019 Offline assault 2019
      assault 2019 (assault 2019) 2 June 2022 21: 08
      +7
      And now how are Russia's hands tied?
      Russian territory was shelled
      from Ukraine many times already, there are dead, wounded, dozens of destroyed houses ....
      What else do you have to wait?
      When will they hit the Kremlin? Then you can wake up...
  4. devil Offline devil
    devil (Alex) 2 June 2022 12: 11
    +2
    Can it slightly cool the excitement of the Anglo-Saxons by supplying, or at least promising to supply, similar types of weapons that could be used against bases that are like peas? Or rockets to Argentina, aiming at the Falklands?
  5. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 2 June 2022 12: 32
    -2
    Peskov said on this occasion:

    "Let's not talk about the worst-case scenarios..."

    It's just the opposite! It is about them that it is necessary to speak and think just today - so that tomorrow they do not come true.

    And I agree with Peskov. Got the talker. Including in the media. You have to think, calculate options, possibilities. The same author did not offer anything. He threw a tantrum - "Everything is lost, everything is lost!".
    Personally, I see a bunch of possible responses. But they will only frighten our layman, who does not care about those cities that can be attacked by the new weapons of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Maybe that's why the author did not write about the possible, but unpopular options for the answer of our army.
  6. Anton Sheremetev (Anton Sheremetev) 2 June 2022 12: 44
    +1
    we will warn and we will warn
  7. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 2 June 2022 13: 05
    +1
    Quote: Colonel Kudasov
    From now on, Russia's hands will be completely untied

    Are they connected now? Why wait for the one hundred and fifth reason?
  8. guest Offline guest
    guest 2 June 2022 13: 05
    -1
    Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
    Maybe that's why the author did not write about the possible, but unpopular options for the answer of our army.

    Can you write then?
    1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 2 June 2022 13: 36
      -3
      Already wrote. In a recent article about how our tunnel in Western Ukraine seemed to be destroyed. (Ukraine has lost ...) Copying from there is lazy.
      1. guest Offline guest
        guest 2 June 2022 13: 39
        -1
        You wrote a lot of things there, which of your three posts are you talking about now?
        1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 2 June 2022 13: 45
          -3
          It is obvious! To put moral pressure on Zelensky so that he refuses the weapons of the United States and Great Britain. This is the main comment. The rest can not be read.
  9. sapper2 Offline sapper2
    sapper2 (Minesweeper2) 2 June 2022 13: 54
    +2
    Usually such events unfold from bad to very bad scenario. I’m sure they will hit at the maximum range. In settlements .... No countermeasures will be taken, we will get snot .... An adequate response is a blow to Kyiv, to government quarters .... Maybe it’s enough to chew snot and apologize to the West ?? ?
    1. Valentine Offline Valentine
      Valentine (Valentin) 2 June 2022 19: 38
      +1
      Quote: sapper2
      An adequate response to a blow to Kyiv, to government quarters ....

      And what will it give? We urgently need to turn the entire five hundred-kilometer border of Western Ukraine-Galicia with Poland into a lunar landscape so that not a single gopher slips from the EU to Galicia without our supervision. The Yankees did not care about all our concerns and "Chinese warnings" about the delivery of total weapons through this the border, and the Galician descendants of Bandera and Shukhevych will, without the slightest doubt, hit our cities, and no matter what anyone says, they will be right - there is an undeclared war on both sides, and the warring parties are snarling as best they can, but I just can’t understand one thing , why do we not destroy the entire military and industrial infrastructure in western Ukraine, because the prevailing majority of the national battalions and the Armed Forces of Ukraine consist of residents of these areas, who, in case of serious exacerbations on our part, in their "sealands", will rush to save their relatives and stolen from the inhabitants of Donbass their property from cars to toilets, which will make it easier for our guys to liberate our former lands. Washington will stop at nothing until they finish off Russia, weaken it with the help of Galician Banderism, these will end, they will set the Poles on us, and then off we go, and with our human and military resources we will not be able to compete with them for a long time because of their tenfold advantage in these same resources, and I say again that we can only survive with the help of tactical nuclear weapons, and this is just a start, but this, I think, will be enough for the eyes to reason with the too violent heads of Europe and the United States.
  10. Kade_t Offline Kade_t
    Kade_t (Igor) 2 June 2022 14: 22
    +2
    The HIMARS APU will use 100% on our territory, if they gave us a nuclear weapon, they would also use it right away, you can’t give a grenade to a monkey. But she will get it, what will happen next ?, but nothing good ...
    1. forester18 Offline forester18
      forester18 (yuri) 3 June 2022 06: 57
      +1
      the first target is obviously the Crimean bridge and airfields, they will not shoot at nuclear power plants -100% .. as well as at cities .. "HIMARS" is an accurate weapon and military objects are subject to destruction
    2. guest Offline guest
      guest 4 June 2022 01: 33
      0
      Well, they will be given nuclear weapons soon.
  11. Defense Offline Defense
    Defense 2 June 2022 16: 05
    0
    There is not such a radical solution as tactical nuclear weapons - it is necessary to demolish a couple of enemy reconnaissance and GPS satellites in a revealing manner. Well, as it were, American MLRS systems, satellites too - bash on bash. Well, kill two birds with one stone: the ukrovermacht will lose intelligence and target designations (the same MLRS), and mattress covers will have to think hard
  12. Kuramori Reika Offline Kuramori Reika
    Kuramori Reika (Kuramori Reika) 2 June 2022 16: 53
    0
    I think Russian citizens were given enough time to leave the EU countries. Now, if a nuclear attack on Warsaw, Germany and other countries follows, those who decide to stay there will have to share the fate of our enemies.
    1. Swiffer25 Offline Swiffer25
      Swiffer25 (Mario Kramer) 3 June 2022 06: 39
      0
      What always happens with nuclear strikes? Once given and never again, don't you want to understand it or actually prefer to experience it, once and never again!
  13. svit55 Offline svit55
    svit55 (Sergey Valentinovich) 2 June 2022 20: 23
    +1
    There have already been about ten "last" warnings, but there are no strikes on the centers! They don't care if ours behave this way. It was necessary after the first time to smash the government quarter in Kyiv, this would have been a warning to everyone. And now what to expect a strike on the Kursk nuclear power plant?
  14. wasp Offline wasp
    wasp 2 June 2022 21: 18
    +2
    101st Putin's warning!
  15. Pavel_2 Offline Pavel_2
    Pavel_2 (Julius Sintsov) 2 June 2022 21: 45
    +2
    Who is the president's adviser, that is, who is looking after him, the son-in-law of Bori drunks of corrupt skins and what to expect from him? They will not hammer the Benderni infrastructure until our best warriors die.
  16. Viktor Viktor_2 Offline Viktor Viktor_2
    Viktor Viktor_2 (Victor Victor) 3 June 2022 03: 44
    +2
    Why not smash the entire western Ukraine, cues, lions, with rockets ... I don’t care, on civilians ... Saving time and leveling the entire western Ukraine to ashes, it will be necessary to raze Poland to the ground into coal ... Well, when will we begin to appreciate their soldiers, and answer for the words. Hasn't the red line been crossed already... Winners are not judged! Stalin is not a pity, Stalin's hand would not tremble ....
  17. forester18 Offline forester18
    forester18 (yuri) 3 June 2022 06: 54
    0
    declared by American officials ... we will supply such missiles - what ZSU will order ..
  18. Krilion Offline Krilion
    Krilion (Krilion) 3 June 2022 07: 58
    +3
    the passivity of the Russian leadership regarding the supply of weapons to Ukraine by Western countries is striking .. there is no reaction at all ... no response at all, neither economic nor political ... as I understand it, the Russian leadership does not care about the lives of Russian fighters .. about the fact that the Kyiv regime still feels safe in general, a separate conversation .. neither the General Staff, nor the Security Service, nor the president were injured and do not feel any threat ... morons and traitors sit in the Russian leadership ..
  19. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 3 June 2022 09: 21
    -2
    Quote: Krilion
    ... no response at all, neither economic nor political ...

    Yes Yes. It is necessary, like the imbeciles of the West, to announce sanctions or threaten their politicians with a finger.

    Only a military response will be clear. But unfortunately, in reality, in order to deliver a strong military strike, one must have information in order to carry out such a strike. This information is confidential. Therefore, there are fewer successful strikes than I would like.

    Another thing is that another strategy is possible. But this requires political courage. Well, or endure and wait for a favorable moment to deliver the usual strong military strike.
  20. k7k8 Offline k7k8
    k7k8 (vic) 3 June 2022 09: 37
    0
    Quote: skeptic
    with the destruction of the industrial infrastructure of western Ukraine

    Quote: skeptic
    especially - the native places of artillery officers

    Take the TV off your shoulders. The founders of the national battalions were natives of Kharkov and Kyiv. What is Western Ukraine like? Avakov did not live in Ukraine for only the first two years of his life, he was the head of the Kharkov regional administration. Nalyvaichenko is from Zaporozhye, he lived his entire adult life in Kharkov and Kyiv. Do you have more examples? The East and South-East of Ukraine have long been hotbeds of ultranationalism. That is why the war is going so hard.
  21. guest Offline guest
    guest 4 June 2022 01: 37
    0
    Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
    But unfortunately, in reality, in order to deliver a strong military strike, one must have information in order to carry out such a strike. This information is confidential. Therefore, there are fewer successful strikes than I would like.

    And what's the secret where are the decision-making centers? I can give you the exact address and coordinates.
    1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 4 June 2022 06: 20
      0
      You will not give anything. Another blah blah blah from an uninvited guest.

      However, there are options. For example, launch a massive missile attack on Kyiv and Lvov. Destroy access to electricity, water and cell service. Bomb government offices, military installations together with those who work there. Destroy the offices of large banks. That is, to make these two cities unsuitable for the population to live in.
      Rabies from Kyiv and Lvov will be accepted by Poland and other Europe with a bang.
      Well, the question of the exhaustion of Caliber and other missile weapons from Russia will be removed. What will become a "pleasant" fact for the remnants of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
  22. Sidor Bodrov Offline Sidor Bodrov
    Sidor Bodrov 9 June 2022 10: 14
    0
    We have a "fifth column" in power. The most unpleasant thing is that having received HIMARS, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be able to shoot down our Sushki and cruise missiles. And the detection and destruction of these MLRS will be very difficult for us. And range is already the fifth thing. It is necessary to clean out the traitors in Russia - methodically and steadily.