Colonel Khodaryonok estimated the number of Caliber missiles in Russia

27 May 2022 13

A number of Ukrainian military "experts" believe that the Russian Federation is running out of high-precision weapons - allegedly the Russian side has already used more than 60 percent of such weapons during a special operation.

Thus, the representative of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Defense Ministry of Ukraine, Vadym Skibitsky, is sure that the threshold level for the use of Iskanders has almost come in the Russian army. In addition, the Russian army (unlike the Soviet one) is not capable of rapid resupply due to a lack of supplies due to Western sanctions.

However, military expert, reserve colonel Mikhail Khodarenok does not share this point of view. In his opinion, at the current pace of warfare, Moscow has stockpiles of bombs and missiles for several years to come. The Soviet Union had about 10 missiles for the Relief systems at its disposal, and Russia now has about the same number of Caliber missiles.

Considering that Russian units use about a dozen of these missiles every day, they will last for years to come.

The Liman has been taken, Mariupol has been taken, Kherson, Melitopol, and in many places there are no more points of tension. And this means that all missile flows will be redirected to the right place

- the analyst noted in his telegram channel.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Expert_Analyst_Forecaster

-3

27 May 2022 17: 02

Dialogue of "experts":

- Russia has few calibers, they will soon run out, - said the expert.
“Russia has a lot of calibers, enough for several years of war,” the second expert disagreed.
- You're not right.
No, I'm right, and you're wrong.
- The calibers are already running out.
Yes, they don't end. Why do you think so?

So the experts argued for two hours without a break.
Neither one nor the other knew how many Calibers Russia had at the beginning of the war, how many there are at the moment, and how many Calibers the Russian economy produces per month. But after all the expert is not, who knows something. The main thing is to have your own opinion and steadfastly defend it, despite the arguments of the opponent.
1. LammeGudzak
  
  +2
  
  28 May 2022 08: 59
  
  There is no need to argue. It is necessary to hammer on the ukrofascists.
dub0vitsky

-1

27 May 2022 17: 29

Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
Dialogue of "experts":

- Russia has few calibers, they will soon run out, - said the expert.
“Russia has a lot of calibers, enough for several years of war,” the second expert disagreed.
- You're not right.
No, I'm right, and you're wrong.
- The calibers are already running out.
Yes, they don't end. Why do you think so?

So the experts argued for two hours without a break.
Neither one nor the other knew how many Calibers Russia had at the beginning of the war, how many there are at the moment, and how many Calibers the Russian economy produces per month. But after all the expert is not, who knows something. The main thing is to have your own opinion and steadfastly defend it, despite the arguments of the opponent.

Earn like? Get a minus from me. It's a shame for the takenen EXPERT to talk nonsense. Actually, what if a thought does not enter the mind? Then something like this will do. Personally, from the very beginning, I thought that in vain we so demagnetized the Ukrainian layman. High precision, high precision. Here, I'm hiding and thinking that it won't cover his hut. He sits all the way, and becomes a shield for the Nazis. The corridors were slammed, and he ... If they had hit all the bombs with all-destroying popes, then the agility of these noobs would have manifested itself in advance, and there would have been fewer victims among them, and more among the Nazis. And it would be fair.
greenchelman

+4

27 May 2022 17: 52

The Soviet Union had about 10 thousand missiles for the Relief complexes

The complex and missiles were put into service in 1986. The design documentation was transferred for mass production to the Kalinin Machine-Building Plant in Sverdlovsk. Only the first pilot batch of the RK-55 "Relief" complexes was produced, which was destroyed under the INF Treaty at the end of 1988. The destruction of the complex's assets was carried out under the supervision of specialists from the USA at the Jelgava Air Force base. The first 4 missiles were destroyed on 20.09.1988/9/2413. The last 05.10.1988B1987 missile was blown up on 55/10/1988 with the remains of diesel fuel in the tank - the Americans demanded that a fully fueled rocket be weighed and diesel fuel from the tanker available at the base was used for weighing. The remains of diesel fuel after the destruction of the rocket were washed off by the fire brigade. Supervised the destruction of missiles Derevitsky Veniamin Kazimirovich - chief engineer of the Special Design Bureau of the Institute of Electric Welding. E.O. Paton of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR. In 6 - at the time of signing the INF Treaty, the only military unit with the RK-80 "Relief" systems in trial operation was located near the city of Jelgava (Latvia). On October 84, 80, in accordance with the INF Treaty, the last missile from 601 SPUs and XNUMX cruise missiles to be destroyed was destroyed. The official data published in the media mentions XNUMX missiles, according to eyewitnesses - XNUMX. http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-XNUMX.html
Perhaps the expert confuses these missiles with the sea-based S-10 Granat. These missiles can indeed be stored in some quantity.
1. Alemax
  
  0
  
  30 May 2022 00: 25
  
  Perhaps the expert confuses these missiles with the sea-based S-10 Granat.
  
  Strictly speaking, both there and there are the KS-122 rocket, modified for different launch conditions. So he just didn't express himself correctly.
Neville Stator

+1

27 May 2022 20: 15

The humorist Zelensky's calculations turned out to be wrong.
1. guest
  
  +1
  
  28 May 2022 01: 12
  
  And when they turned out to be true.
The comment was deleted.
shinobi

+4

28 May 2022 03: 22

A bit off topic, but an example about the competence of experts: Literally in October last year, one "expert" (ours) claimed that the Irkutsk aircraft plant had not been producing anything and had been in "ruins" since the mid-90s. As a local, I regularly see this plant in the sky " died. "As correctly noted above, the expert knows nothing. Only his opinion.
Peace Peace.

+3

28 May 2022 03: 40

Quote: dub0vitsky
Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
Dialogue of "experts":

- Russia has few calibers, they will soon run out, - said the expert.
“Russia has a lot of calibers, enough for several years of war,” the second expert disagreed.
- You're not right.
No, I'm right, and you're wrong.
- The calibers are already running out.
Yes, they don't end. Why do you think so?

So the experts argued for two hours without a break.
Neither one nor the other knew how many Calibers Russia had at the beginning of the war, how many there are at the moment, and how many Calibers the Russian economy produces per month. But after all the expert is not, who knows something. The main thing is to have your own opinion and steadfastly defend it, despite the arguments of the opponent.

Earn like? Get a minus from me. It's a shame for the takenen EXPERT to talk nonsense. Actually, what if a thought does not enter the mind? Then something like this will do. Personally, from the very beginning, I thought that in vain we so demagnetized the Ukrainian layman. High precision, high precision. Here, I'm hiding and thinking that it won't cover his hut. He sits all the way, and becomes a shield for the Nazis. The corridors were slammed, and he ... If they had hit all the bombs with all-destroying popes, then the agility of these noobs would have manifested itself in advance, and there would have been fewer victims among them, and more among the Nazis. And it would be fair.

These crests, like cattle for slaughter, are led by a Jew with Anglo-Saxons in an embrace
Ablet

+4

28 May 2022 08: 07

Firstly, not only calibers are used. For example, there are also "gadflies", there are more of them in the Russian Federation and they are cheaper. They fly about 300 km, but often this is enough.
Secondly, now they are probably producing modified calibers. For example, why does he need to fly 2000 km, if 800 km is enough - and he needs less fuel and the engine is simpler in terms of resource; the current ones do not need to be stored; immediately used on the first flight; now they are releasing a "summer" version (not for low temperatures). New calibers cannot fly over oceans, among high mountains, over deserts. Perhaps they make day versions, or, conversely, night ones. There are many ways to save on production and increase the number of new products.
1. Monster_Fat
  
  -1
  
  28 May 2022 12: 41
  
  Approximately 2500 calibers of all types were produced. Approximately 800 have already been spent.
  1. Ulysses
    
    +1
    
    29 May 2022 10: 19
    
    Approximately 2500 calibers of all types were produced. Approximately 800 have already been spent.
    
    You are missing one point.
    Currently, the daily production of Calibers exceeds their consumption.
Expert_Analyst_Forecaster

+3

28 May 2022 17: 01

Quote: Monster_Fat
Approximately 2500 calibers of all types were produced.

Why is "released" in the past tense? Have they been taken out of production?
I do not think so. Rather, increase the number, modify.