"Final sale": Russia may be left without the remnants of its merchant fleet

32

The blue dream of our Western "partners" and their domestic fifth column henchmen is to turn Russia into a so-called great land power. The super-task of the enemy is to ensure that our country is surrounded by a dense ring of enemies and, in the literal sense of the word, is physically isolated from the rest of the world. And, unfortunately, they almost did it. Note that we are now talking not even about the Russian Navy with its many problems, but about the Russian merchant fleet, which has embarked on the path of extermination.

"Effective Management"


To understand the seriousness of the issue, it is necessary to take into account that our country is now faced with colossal economic problems, the scale of which few people have yet realized. Since the usual trade ties with Europe and the US have been artificially destroyed, Russia needs to look for new markets for its hydrocarbons in the region of Southeast Asia. But the geography is such that another pipeline, say, to India, cannot be extended. Only sea supplies of oil and LNG remain, and here the “bottleneck” for increasing the export of hydrocarbons and other raw materials is our very small merchant fleet.



The largest shipping company in Russia is PAO Sovcomflot, which owns or leases 134 vessels, including 108 tankers of various classes, 14 gas carriers and 11 specialized vessels. The company provides a wide range of services, from the transportation of energy resources to the management of ports and terminals. In early May 2022, the British edition of Lloyd's List, citing its sources, reported that Sovcomflot was selling a third of its ships:

At least 40 out of 121 vessels directly owned by Sovcomflot are being discussed with buyers from Dubai and China.

This decision was largely forced, since two months earlier, in March, the shipowner came under Western sanctions. Russian ships are now banned from entering European and British ports. The Fitch rating agency withdrew the ratings of Sovcomflot, and on April 25 the company was unable to make a payment on Eurobonds due to restrictive measures introduced against it. According to Lloyd's List, Sovcomflot's total bank loan debt could reach $2,1 billion. The British publication praises the leadership of the shipowner, who decided to sell a third of his tankers:

The process is conducted "sincerely and very professionally", which indicates that the top management of Sovcomflot is committed to maintaining relations with financiers and charterers. <...> High-ranking bankers proceed from the fact that the leadership is trying to ensure its possible return to the international market, when the sanctions are eventually lifted.

Indeed, Russia was lucky with "effective managers" who first drove the company into debt, and then did not find a better solution than to sell a third of its ships. True, Sovcomflot urges not to dramatize the situation, since only “old and unnecessary” tankers will be sold:

For sale on the market, age tonnage is offered, as well as ships, the operation of which does not seem appropriate due to the restrictions imposed on the Russian merchant fleet.


Yes Yes. In our country, according to the same scheme, famously sent to needles and warships. Why do we need some old vessels when we can buy or build new ones, right? Or is it already impossible?

"Great Land Power"


Here we must understand that domestic shipbuilding has largely lost its competence in terms of the production of large-capacity vessels, tankers and gas carriers. It was much easier for the "effective managers" of Sovcomflot to order them abroad, in particular in South Korea. For example, the Prospekt Gagarina oil tanker was built at the Hyundai Heavy Industries shipyard, the Shturman Albanov tanker was built at the Samsung Heavy Industries shipyard, and so on.

News Day: The South Korean shipbuilding company Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (DSME) terminated the contract for the construction of three Arc7 ice-class tankers for Sovcomflot at once with the following wording:

Due to the fact that the shipowner's payment for the construction of one LNG tanker was not made on time, we notified the company to terminate the contract to protect our rights.

It should be noted that the payment did not go through due to sanctions against only one of the tankers, but the contractor preferred to terminate the contract immediately for all three vessels. Very symptomatic.

Similar problems can be expected from another Russian company - Rosnefteflot JSC. To implement the ambitious oil and gas project Vostok Oil, a huge super-modern shipyard Zvezda was built in the Primorsky Territory. On it, for the needs of Rosneft, the first Russian Arctic shuttle tankers with a deadweight of up to 120 thousand tons with an ice class Arc were to be built. Alas, there were no foreigners here either. The South Korean shipyard Samsung Heavy Industries (SHI) has been selected as a partner and has signed on to design, partially build and supply equipment for the shuttle tankers. However, “partially” is not quite the right wording.

In fact, Zvezda received almost completely finished sets of gas tankers, with the exception of the bow, which was produced locally, and assembled them. The degree of localization of such a "screwdriver assembly" in the first ships was very insignificant. What will happen to the project if, or rather, when Samsung Heavy Industries (SHI) refuses to supply components and ship equipment to Russia, is completely incomprehensible. More precisely, everything is clear - we will be long and painfully replacing everything with imports.

This is to the question of whether Sovcomflot should so famously sell the existing tankers, which it is not known what and when it will be possible to replace. It is also a reproach to Russian officials, who may need to intervene in the management of a strategically important carrier company, solve problems with its debts and prevent the “final sale” of its ships.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    26 May 2022 15: 34
    The author is mistaken - it’s not the fifth column that drowns for the great land Russia, but super-patriots
    1. +3
      26 May 2022 16: 07
      Like you or what? Only your liberal brethren cannot be saved here. Only blame the West.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +2
        28 May 2022 10: 07
        Comrade. I don't know how he is. And I dumped just because your Russian elite paid 1/3 m2 (Moscow) per month to design engineers. For a year, you can earn money just for a place in a cemetery for two if you don’t eat and live under the table at the workplace. The fact that it was necessary to develop a standard project of a ship that could be a carrier of nuclear weapons & (and at the same time its trading version could be made) I spoke for a very long time. What did the Russian Federation do instead? Ah, the Mistrals! The money seemed to be returned ... But the ships were never built. Although if these funds had been spent on the development of their ships, and not on luxury real estate for the elite, there would be no such opposition.
        1. 0
          28 May 2022 16: 18
          We don't have an elite. Well, do not call the Chubais, the Medinas and other liberal burps the elite.
          The ship is the carrier of the nucleus? Duc is the same with nuclear submarines. Surface ships like aircraft carriers and cruisers are big tin cans.
          1. 0
            28 June 2022 03: 11
            Comrade... why do you need big ships? The larger the ship, the easier it is to hit. Do you remember what was in the special. trains? The drawings of these missiles were still being studied in the early 90s. Maybe even now you will find specialists who will raise technical documentation for you. The question was just to make cheap and cheerful, but more. Nuclear submarines are not visible. And here is the moment of persuasion - a certain number of ships with nuclear weapons on board in neutral waters are closer than Cuba - very convincing.
  2. +1
    26 May 2022 16: 36
    How can external intervention "solve the problems with its debts and prevent the "final sale" of its courts"?
    So that "the sheep are safe and the wolves are full" - this does not happen!
    In addition to the author's presentation, it would be interesting to know the position of Sovcomflot firsthand.
    1. -1
      28 May 2022 10: 12
      Oh, you don't have to be a chick like you're meeting a boy for the first time. This is simply called: the nationalization of the merchant fleet during the period of hostilities. Well, so that strategic things are not squandered, everyone involved in the attempt to sell off is given real terms. Someone must have said it first.
    2. 0
      13 July 2022 06: 55
      But there is no position, it should not be in the minds of those who are at the origins of this mess.
  3. +3
    26 May 2022 16: 47
    And who exactly is drowning for the "great land power"?
    If Peter the Great and Catherine the Second cut through a window in the Baltic and the Black Sea, then this was true. The fact that Russia should have a large merchant fleet is also beyond doubt.
    And who ruined this very fleet? Not patriots, but liberals and effective menagers. Here's who to ask.
    Gorshkov, in his "Sea Power of the State," indicates three basic principles on which this very sea power is based.

    It is necessary to restore ROPiT.
    And most importantly, send "effective managers" to advanced training courses. They need to start with working specialties.
    1. +2
      28 May 2022 10: 13
      Yes. They need to start with working specialties in places not so remote. But who will plant them, these managerial monuments?
  4. +2
    26 May 2022 16: 54
    Indeed, Russia was lucky with "effective managers" who first drove the company into debt, and then did not find a better solution than to sell a third of its ships. True, Sovcomflot urges not to dramatize the situation, since only “old and unnecessary” tankers will be sold:

    ? downtime is an expensive pleasure. it is logical to get rid of old ships if the market/volume of transported decreases/narrows. And secondly, where are the company's ships, in Russian ports or arrested abroad, on lease and sublease? I read about two or three arrested / detained bulk carriers in Europe, for example
  5. +3
    26 May 2022 20: 14
    Quote: Bakht
    send "effective managers" to advanced training courses.

    And what is being done at the Russian customs? Not only medicines for the Russian army are not allowed into the Donbass, but also weapons. Quadcopters and bulletproof vests in warehouses are arrested for no reason. After all, these are not customs officers, but real enemies of the Russian state.
    1. 0
      26 May 2022 22: 09
      Three customs officers are sitting and thinking what to give the fourth one for his birthday.
      First: — Let's give the 600th Merc? The rest: - Yes, he doesn’t already have it, they gave it to him for his last birthday.
      Second: - Then let's give a bungalow in the Canary Islands. The rest: - No, he already has.
      The third one: — I DID IT! Let's leave him alone to work the whole shift as a gift! The rest: - Yes, you are stunned. SUCH an expensive gift to make!
    2. +1
      27 May 2022 09: 59
      After all, these are not customs officers, but real enemies of the Russian state.

      Where is the FSB looking? Enemy agents are at work.
  6. +2
    26 May 2022 21: 15
    Well, business, nothing personal.
    joint-stock company subordinated to the state.
    No transportation - no income - sale of ships.
    Not military ships, where parking in the port is already a million rubles a day, but also not weak
  7. -1
    26 May 2022 22: 57
    The bourgeois have always looked over the hill ... There are a lot of green pieces of paper ...
  8. +4
    27 May 2022 00: 31
    The author, as always, is pessimistic. I recommend looking at the list of ships that are registered with Sovcomflot. Of the entire list, there are less than 10 modern large supertankers. Most of the ships were intended to deliver oil to the ports of Europe, which is no longer very relevant now.
    Rosneft received the first Aframax from the Moskovsky Prospekt Star, and the second one is currently under construction.
    Although I agree on one thing, Sovcomflot alone is not enough, it will probably be necessary to create another national carrier and purchase ships for it, including bulk carriers and container ships.
  9. 0
    27 May 2022 10: 02
    It is possible to conclude a military alliance with Mongolia and go to Russian merchant ships under the Mongolian flag. If anyone tries to wrest a ship from Mongolia, within the framework of a military alliance, plunder and sink a pirate.
  10. +1
    27 May 2022 13: 32
    Nationalize PAO Sovcomflot. If the ship is not needed now, then put it in for repairs or lay it down, this is a common practice, nothing new. The sale of ships is a diversion against Russia. Everyone knows how they deal with saboteurs.
    1. A B
      +2
      28 May 2022 16: 49
      Sucks, the life of a tanker is ten years. He's like a shark, he gets up - he dies. Take care of what you understand, otherwise the cooks will gather and let's manage)
  11. 0
    27 May 2022 15: 54
    Why are we talking about leftovers? How much is, all ours! Right now we don't have the capacity to set up fast heavy ships, there are few shipyards, and there is no investment. If the Western "friends" let go of their grip, then we will begin to develop in this direction as well.
  12. +1
    27 May 2022 18: 11
    The title is correct.
    What to do? The hair of Samson cut off by enemies does not grow.
    Or is this legend not applicable to Russia?
    It's about us, as a people. Shall we not sober up? This is how we, our Motherland, will we hand over to the West? Together with yourself, your children and the future. With the hopes of our fathers and grandfathers. Will our conscience awaken?
    1. 0
      28 May 2022 10: 37
      Quote: Alexey Davydov
      The title is correct.
      What to do? The hair of Samson cut off by enemies does not grow.
      Or is this legend not applicable to Russia?
      It's about us, as a people. Shall we not sober up? This is how we, our Motherland, will we hand over to the West? Together with yourself, your children and the future. With the hopes of our fathers and grandfathers. Will our conscience awaken?

      Won't wake up. In the issue of the fleet - nationalization and landing with a release. On the issue of heavy machinery (heavy engineering), it is impossible to transplant bureaucrats who have not coped with the work to other warm places. They need to be removed from their homes (and ideally, they should be planted, but this is from a fantasy series). Why? In the Russian Federation, the rule "with me, employees of strangers are very rare, more and more sisters, sister-in-law, children." Famusovshchina. The bureaucrat must know one thing: lured and with his paw, he SHOULD DO THE BUSINESS, otherwise, do not blow his head off. To do this, bureaucrats will look for specialists of the branch that is being "cut". Alas, it is impossible without corruption in the Russian Federation, Stalin tried and failed. But the USSR somehow existed. How? In addition to the "sons" in the offices there were intelligent, brainy engineers and specialists who pulled the strap. While in the Russian Federation there are ONLY Famusov's children with a feeder, and specialists have no power from the word at all, there will be a mess even where there are strategic points for the existence of the country.
      1. +1
        28 May 2022 13: 09
        Our advice in the comments alone will not change this. Russia needs to return the power of the people and the people to power. An acceptable balance for the country between the forces of good and evil in the USSR was only for this reason. The presence in power of the people brought into her an eye on her conscience. Litter in the hut was in front of everyone and interfered with everyone. Conscience and desire to continue their lives should force Russia to change the government. Without it, death
      2. +1
        28 May 2022 13: 50
        You yourself sum up the final line:

        While in the Russian Federation there are ONLY Famusov's children with a feeder, and specialists have no power from the word at all, there will be a mess even where there are strategic points for the existence of the country.

        What does this mean for Russia in its current position?
      3. The comment was deleted.
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. -1
    27 May 2022 21: 42
    The main thing in the economy is trade. For this, even in ancient times, trade routes were made, both by land and by sea. But for this government, the task is unsolvable, because even in the country there are no roads. As the kayak floats down the river, the cry rises that the inland river trade is flourishing.
  15. +2
    28 May 2022 09: 59
    Comrades. All these 22 years, I have been talking very seriously about the fact that the Russian Federation needs its own fleet, military. Well, it’s probably not necessary to talk about the fact that if there is a standard project, then a hundred or two standard ships should be riveted on it, only commercial ones, probably. But the patriots of the Russian Federation needed only a file of resources. Therefore, there could be no talk of any fleet. Patriots of All Russia were for SP-2. And my cautious statements that Germany could most ... deceive with the project were shattered by patriotic cries that I didn’t understand anything, the wrong patriot, a traitor from those who left and, in general (!!), de the SP-2 project is full it is profitable for European firms and Germany to be the European hub of Russian gas. And my warning that Germany, by the way, most ... deceived Sweden by 88 billion crowns, when we invested money in Germany for the development of the AU, was generally ignored. Moreover, in court on this occasion, Sweden lost to Germany, which shows that such transactions are legally "protected" in the EU, right? But in the Russian Federation, everyone wants to do well on their own. Comrades. There would be no such opposition in the Russian Federation if the Russian Federation would at least invest a little in its industry, and not in the luxury of the elites and the next palaces for the elite. Biden has done more for the Russian Federation in a YEAR of his reign than one comrade in 22 years. I just don’t know if the Russian elite will turn on the BRAIN in order to allocate loot to the defense industry (not tears, as usual, but normal loot, which you can project on without simultaneously being involved in the food program in the country, so as not to die of hunger) and whether they remained in the Russian Federation engineers who waited for that happy moment when the thieving Russian "elites" flooded out of the EU and the USA .... Heh ... are there any engineers of the Soviet school who can DESIGN, or FSE, scribe ... now you can downvote, I don't care, to be honest. But the WORD was said, their shipyards in the Russian Federation are needed more than ever ...
  16. +1
    28 May 2022 10: 24
    Quote: Nikolai Pigin
    The bourgeois have always looked over the hill ... There are a lot of green pieces of paper ...

    Comrade, what bourgeois? All your newly-minted financial "elite" know BOYS fingers like a fan, thieves, who in the 90s were not at a loss and sawed the budget so tightly that half of the SOVIET engineers went to shuttles, and half to the EU / USA, where they took it. Moreover, in the EU and the USA this has not been a secret for a long time, therefore, the "Russian elite" were cleaned up for loot, tough. Do you know how much a design engineer is paid for 3 years of experience they are waiting for the development of spacecraft from him / her? In 2019, it was 55 rubles per month. At my alma mater and former employer. Do you understand that
    55 rubles is nothing? Taking into account the fact that earlier engineers were provided free apartments? That's where the legs grow from the current problems. "The gnomes are still digging," as one Russian billionaire said. And now the gnomes are required to be patriotic and not scatter? Guys... have you tried to pay normal salaries (and not only to IT specialists)? Okay, it's too late for me, but at least you won't lose young specialists, huh?
  17. A B
    +1
    28 May 2022 16: 40
    A crooked and incompetent article with shifting from a sick throat to a healthy one. Where do you think managers should have ordered ships if they are not built in Russia? Build your own shipyard? They are sailors, not shipbuilders. Selling off the aging fleet in order to cut costs is the most reasonable move at the moment. Or did someone from the government come to them with a bag of money, like here you go? What is the point in ships that will stand on hold in the very first port if Sovcomflot steams payments? Yes, the author is right, with large-capacity shipbuilding we are still weak, or rather not weak, but more expensive, much more expensive. But it is completely incomprehensible why claims are being made to sailors and oilmen about this.
    1. 0
      11 June 2022 14: 00
      As for the money bag... they'll cut it up. It is possible to finance some% (discounts) from the budget for repairs, but the real loot will immediately go into the cut, alas. There are no holy businessmen, it is useless to punish for this. Then. If a ship can be sold, it means that you can go somewhere on it, otherwise they would not have bought it. Another thing is that repairs will be required (again, alas, most likely capital). But to sell my ships (when ... it is not known whether someone will sell new ships to the Russian Federation and when exactly and it is not entirely clear when OWN shipyards will start working) I think that such an approach to business is real sabotage. Well, or idiocy, which is no better. The government needs to get through to the repair of what is. Otherwise, in the Russian Federation, you can generally remain without a fleet, and then there will be an oppa.
  18. 0
    30 May 2022 11: 18
    It is clear that external special operations must begin with internal ones.
    1. +1
      11 June 2022 14: 15
      So without the beginning of the outer inside, everything was as if beautiful. I was most amused that ALL European firms left the Russian market in a friendly impulse ... but the Ukrainian patriots themselves are not in a hurry to leave their business in the Russian Federation. And Zelensky kept the animation company, and the Ukrainian patriots who own the sites Author Today (Ukrainian owner), Litnet (Ukrainian owner, Azov openly subsidized in general) and Prodaman (Ukrainian owner). That is, the book business of the Russian Federation is ALL under the Ukrainians. I wouldn't be surprised if LitRes is also Ukrainian. That is, the entire Russian stage was NOT Russian (huh?) And the entire literary beau monde was not Russian. A particularly funny moment is when Jews say that they are ashamed of being Russian (and from what side did Russian Jews become Russian, they are only called that in Israel). I am not at all ashamed of the fact that I was born in the USSR in Moscow. And that she lived in the Russian Federation and studied. But back to our sheep. Please tell me, for WHAT the hell do I need to pay for electricity and gasoline and food, the price is a third HIGHER "for the sake of Ukraine", when the rich Ukrainians themselves feed from the fat Russian market and are not going to leave, making excellent money for themselves on American or Cypriot cottage / villa with the help of the pockets of the "damned Muscovites"?
  19. The comment was deleted.