Blinken called the condition for the cessation of the existence of Ukraine

10

Ukraine as an independent state has little to offer the world. No new concept or Technology. In economic terms, it is a food donor (and in the current conditions, moreover, it is free), in political terms, even less. Its purpose and meaning of existence is reduced only to the role of an antagonist of Russia. That is why Kyiv clings to its “destiny” very tightly and does not in the least refuse the disastrous path of confrontation with a neighboring state in favor of countries that are much more distant both in terms of geography and ethno-cultural community.

In this definition, there is absolutely no belittling of independent Ukraine or Ukrainians, since they themselves inextricably link their dream, principles and the basis of their worldview with a confrontation with Russia and do not hide it. Moreover, the only goal (which in itself is very shameful) of the existence of an entire nation is understood in the West and does not hesitate to advertise. For example, at the level of US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken.



During a speech at a UN Security Council hearing, America's top diplomat summed up the entire existential essence of Ukraine in a few words.

If Russia stops fighting tomorrow, the conflict will end quickly. If Ukraine stops fighting, then it simply won't exist anymore.

Blinken said frankly.

The words of the US Secretary of State sound not so much accusatory as prophetic. And although, obviously, he meant that the cessation of resistance by Kyiv would also mean the cessation of the existence of Ukraine, however, on the whole, the reservation looks truly fateful. In this case, in the face of America, Ukraine received a kind of "buyer" of its destiny, turned into a geopolitical commodity. This product in modern conditions quite well at odds with the hands of "civilized" countries and is sold.

If the meaning of the existence of a whole state is not very multifaceted and broad, and so much so that it can be easily made available to the perception of the masses and preached as a goal, regime and form, then the termination of the country's existence directly depends on a number of conditions. Washington very successfully uses the mental weaknesses of the Ukrainians, to their delight directing Kyiv towards destruction and loss of territories, narrowing the fullness of sovereignty.

Therefore, Blinken said exactly what he wanted, and, moreover, quite openly, expressing his approval of the historical primitivism of the “national idea” of Ukraine, based on the energy of hatred. It is not worth looking for another meaning in his words.
10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    20 May 2022 08: 45
    Ukraine should think 100 times. If the Republicans win with Trump, then it is quite possible that the States will lose interest in Ukraine. It is one thing to bring guns - and another thing to bring oil. Ukraine will not last long without fuel and lubricants, and as a result, hunger looms.
    1. +2
      20 May 2022 09: 53
      they know how to "think" .... they figured out how to dig the sea, build pyramids in Egypt ... though they didn’t come up with anything else laughing
  2. -8
    20 May 2022 08: 58
    Some nonsense. What the author wanted to say is unclear. What the author saw in Blinkin's words is again not clear.
    1. -1
      20 May 2022 09: 55
      re-read means the racial theory of the Third Reich. there the appointment of crests is described in more detail ...
  3. +4
    20 May 2022 09: 09
    Everyone has long known that Ukraine is not an independent state. Ukraine is Anti-Russia. Ukraine is a US weapon against Russia. Such Ukraine should not exist next to Russia. Either Russia or Ukraine.
  4. 0
    20 May 2022 09: 48
    Ukraine as an independent state has little to offer the world. No new concept or technology. In economic terms, it is a food donor (and in the current conditions, moreover, it is free), in political terms, even less. Its purpose and meaning of existence is reduced only to the role of an antagonist of Russia.

    - Well, yes .
    - And also Ukraine is a historical centuries-old antagonist of Poland (moreover, even a much greater antagonist of Poland than an antagonist of Russia).
    - The tragedy of Ukraine and the tragedy of Russia is that Russia itself, of its own free will and according to its "secular diligence" - constantly fought for the sovereignty of Ukraine and tried in every possible way to endow Ukraine with "excessive territory"! - What in the end I achieved (and why - this is another question)! - And as a consequence and the result of all "this age-old effort" - many Russians, having found themselves in this "excessive Ukrainian territory" - all of a sudden, too - became "ethnic Ukrainians"! - Well, what ultimately came out of it - we, with great sorrow, sadness and disgust, are forced to state all this today and fight it all !!!
    - By the way, not only Ukraine was "served" by Russia like this (to its own detriment)! - There are other "limitrophic states", which - just like that - from all "its breadth of soul", from all its generosity - Russia suddenly endowed it with an immense "surplus territory" (which today many Russians have to regret very bitterly)!
    1. +3
      20 May 2022 10: 18
      This is what needs to be corrected. Better late than never.
    2. 0
      21 May 2022 11: 30
      And also Ukraine is a historical centuries-old antagonist of Poland (moreover, even a much greater antagonist of Poland than an antagonist of Russia)

      On April 21, 1920, the leaders of Poland and the Ukrainian People's Republic, Jozef Pilsudski and Symon Petliura, concluded an agreement in Warsaw on a military alliance against the Bolsheviks. The Poles pledged to liberate Ukraine from the Red Army and give it to Petlyura, whom they were going to tightly control. He, in turn, agreed with the drawing of the state border along the Zbruch River and recognized the territories of Galicia and Volhynia, conquered by the Pilsudchiks as a result of the war with the West Ukrainian People's Republic (ZUNR), for Poland. Petliura's agreement with Pilsudski was condemned by all Ukrainian political forces abroad.
  5. -2
    20 May 2022 22: 40
    And Ukraine, as a state, should not have existed. However, like Belarus. Well, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, who for centuries lived side by side with Russia as part of one state, should have continued to live in the same way, without any NATO and Europe. Their geographic location is too important for Russia. Let the rest as they want, and with whom they want. And it was not they who should decide this, but Russia. For them. From a position of strength.
    The blame for everything that happened lies in the mediocre leadership of the Russian state, starting, of course, with Gorby. The amazing stupidity of the brains of state "figures", the inability and unwillingness to think about the future, the lust for power and personal gain, theft and corruption led to the degradation of all the values ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbthat were laid down by the Soviet government for the Russian people, as a result we had all this bedlam, which is not known what tomorrow will end.
    So Ukraine today is a litmus test for the whole world, the result of this "experiment" will depend, no less, the whole future fate of Russia. Although, if our government had brains, all this could have been resolved back in 2014, without much bloodshed. Well, the West would stink, there would be sanctions again, so what?
    Putin and the Rotenbergs chose money.
    Well, the one who chooses shame between war and shame gets both shame and war.
    I didn’t say that ...
  6. 0
    23 May 2022 16: 53
    Bomb Ukraine's grain warehouses so they don't have hard currency to buy weapons