Was Stalin preparing the Third World War?
The heading issue to this day continues to excite the minds - especially representatives of the domestic "liberal democratic community" who adore fighting with the dead. However, if we discard the “twists” inherent in this public, and try to figure it out as objectively as possible, the conclusions can be very intriguing.
So, did the Supreme plan to bring down with all the might of the Soviet Union the recent allies of the Anti-Hitler coalition, turned into mortal enemies? The answer is practically unambiguous - yes. This is exactly what Joseph Vissarionovich was going to do. There are too many, albeit indirect, but extremely convincing proofs of this.
Unlike the blunt Americans, Stalin did not leave written plans for this. However, his decision to create one hundred (!) Divisions of front-line bombers IL-28, capable of carrying tactical nuclear weapons, forced the creation of huge airfields in Chukotka and the concentration of ground forces there, plans to create super-linkors ... Well, super-pragmatic Stalin would not throw enormous money from the budget of the country, barely scrambled out of the post-war devastation, for all these projects, if it had not been planned to apply all this in business - and very soon.
And if we add here the recollections of “saboteur No. 1” of the USSR Sudoplatov that the Supreme Personally discussed with him in 1950 the conduct of sabotage in the sea and ocean ports of basing of the US Navy and their allies, as well as the creation of a special unit for this ... Yes to add stubbornly circulating rumors that at the beginning of 1953 at a meeting of the Presidium of the Central Committee of the CPSU the issue of building new camps was decided - thousands of commercials for one hundred and two hundred people, and I would certainly emphasize "for criminals of foreign origin" ... No dusty papers from rhiva do not need to come up with ideas - Stalin signed America and around the NATO sentence, final and ruthless.
It is at this very place that the “democratic community” usually begins to fight in the epilepsy and yell something like: “The bloody tyrant wanted to drag the whole world into the world!” Well, bullshit, naturally. Stalin made this decision forcibly, literally pushed towards him by the cunning, aggressive actions and plans of the United States and Britain. This is just very easy to prove.
After the end of World War II, the number of the Armed Forces of the USSR was reduced from 11 million to less than 3 million people, the number of military districts significantly decreased. The State Defense Committee and the Supreme High Command Headquarters were abolished. The Red Army did not advance further in Europe, although it had every opportunity to do so. Moreover, our troops soon left the territories of Norway, Denmark, Czechoslovakia and Bulgaria shortly after the end of hostilities. The Soviet Union did not support the Communists in Greece, France and Italy, withdrew troops from Iran. Stalin, to the letter, to the last decimal point, adhered to the decisions taken in Tehran at the Yalta and Potsdam conferences. It was he who played honestly with the West - which cannot be said of the "allies."
And it's not just about Churchill's Fulton speech and the Cold War that followed. It all started much earlier! Who was the first to create and use nuclear weapons? Well, not Stalin! And the same Churchill, who long before Fulton was rushing with the plan "The Unthinkable", according to which the US and British armies shoulder to shoulder with the Hitlerites who surrendered to them in the summer of 1945, were to strike at our troops that liberated Europe, and move on - to smash and occupy the Soviet Union? Only a real comparison of the forces of the Red Army with the troops of Britain and the United States (far from in favor of the Allies) and the tantrum of Washington, which in this case would have to deal with Japan on its own, which the USSR subsequently defeated in 20 days, were saved from this madness.
But in the USA, too, the first plans for nuclear strikes appeared in 1946 - the same "Dropshot", according to which 300 atomic bombs and a quarter of a million tons of conventional bombs were to be dropped on the USSR. And later - to divide into "zones of influence" and occupy completely. In the future, the same plans - only increasingly ambitious and savage, were born by the Pentagon annually, or even several a year. NATO was created in 1949 - long before the Warsaw Treaty Organization appeared. Yes, the Soviet Union and Stalin who led it simply had no choice but to prepare for a new world war! And because the Supreme, having drawn conclusions from June 22, 1941, decided to no longer rely on all sorts of "non-aggression pacts" and other empty declarations - he is only honored and glory ...
In 1949, the USSR finally received its atomic weapon, and soon - thermonuclear, which the United States did not have. Perhaps this is precisely the moment that became a turning point for Stalin - if he hoped that after achieving relative nuclear parity the USSR would be left behind, then these hopes turned out to be vain. What do you think, the most detailed reports about all of these “Dropshots”, “Pinchers”, “Fleetwoods” and the devil didn’t know about any other scenarios for the destruction of our country ?! Yes, he knew everything perfectly - in those years, Soviet intelligence worked at the highest level. And then the Leader’s patience snapped. Since 1949, an increase in the number of the Armed Forces of the USSR began, and by the spring of 1953 it had already reached five and a half million. The number of airborne troops alone by that time had increased to 15 divisions! Prepared, definitely.
Another interesting question - what were the chances of the Soviet Union to win this war? A detailed analysis would have come out extremely voluminous, but at least starting from the state and armament of our army at that time, we can safely assume that they are very good! By the anticipated time of the outbreak of hostilities (1953-1954), the USSR had thousands of the latest T-54 tanks, an impressive number of MIG-15 fighter jets, and since 1950, the MIG-17. The Kalashnikov assault rifle, which at that time had no analogue, was already in full swing in the troops. This is so, in short, without going into details ...
The main guarantee of victory was the millions of young and combat-ready veterans who defeated the most terrible enemy on Earth in the Great Patriotic War. And it’s not only about soldiers and junior command personnel — the generals and marshals of Victory also remained in service, ready for new battles. And also - millions and millions of faithful allies of our country from communist China, which Stalin probably planned to use as the main strike force in the attack on the United States from Alaska and Canada. Imagine the inexhaustible waves of Chinese comrades armed with even trophy weapons (from which the Soviet warehouses simply burst!), Spreading across the vastness of the United States. Who would stop them?
In Europe, Britain remained the only serious adversary, a strong fleet, but not ground forces. Surely, Stalin had sensible thoughts on this subject - was it not for nothing that he mobilized Sudoplatov’s eagles to fight the enemy’s naval forces? Most likely, the proud Britons would very quickly remain to sit on their island, like a puffed toad on a burdock. And even then not for long. But the military contingents of the allies in Europe, by then considerably reduced, would certainly not have stood up against the returning “in the forces of grave” of the Red Army. In France and some other NATO countries, the communist underground did not even have time to disarm properly. Would connect!
Of course, any war is scary. Moreover, the world, which, almost inevitably, would occur with a more or less massive use of nuclear weapons. Victims and destruction would be enormous. On the other hand ... And how many people and entire countries died as a result of local conflicts, civil wars and "color revolutions", organized and provoked by the USA and NATO over the past fifty years? And, really, the idea of what the world would have looked like without the Fed and the CIA of the USA, without Teresa May in London and Obama with Trump in Washington looks really damn enticing. But we will not know this. Alas...
So, did the Supreme plan to bring down with all the might of the Soviet Union the recent allies of the Anti-Hitler coalition, turned into mortal enemies? The answer is practically unambiguous - yes. This is exactly what Joseph Vissarionovich was going to do. There are too many, albeit indirect, but extremely convincing proofs of this.
Unlike the blunt Americans, Stalin did not leave written plans for this. However, his decision to create one hundred (!) Divisions of front-line bombers IL-28, capable of carrying tactical nuclear weapons, forced the creation of huge airfields in Chukotka and the concentration of ground forces there, plans to create super-linkors ... Well, super-pragmatic Stalin would not throw enormous money from the budget of the country, barely scrambled out of the post-war devastation, for all these projects, if it had not been planned to apply all this in business - and very soon.
And if we add here the recollections of “saboteur No. 1” of the USSR Sudoplatov that the Supreme Personally discussed with him in 1950 the conduct of sabotage in the sea and ocean ports of basing of the US Navy and their allies, as well as the creation of a special unit for this ... Yes to add stubbornly circulating rumors that at the beginning of 1953 at a meeting of the Presidium of the Central Committee of the CPSU the issue of building new camps was decided - thousands of commercials for one hundred and two hundred people, and I would certainly emphasize "for criminals of foreign origin" ... No dusty papers from rhiva do not need to come up with ideas - Stalin signed America and around the NATO sentence, final and ruthless.
It is at this very place that the “democratic community” usually begins to fight in the epilepsy and yell something like: “The bloody tyrant wanted to drag the whole world into the world!” Well, bullshit, naturally. Stalin made this decision forcibly, literally pushed towards him by the cunning, aggressive actions and plans of the United States and Britain. This is just very easy to prove.
After the end of World War II, the number of the Armed Forces of the USSR was reduced from 11 million to less than 3 million people, the number of military districts significantly decreased. The State Defense Committee and the Supreme High Command Headquarters were abolished. The Red Army did not advance further in Europe, although it had every opportunity to do so. Moreover, our troops soon left the territories of Norway, Denmark, Czechoslovakia and Bulgaria shortly after the end of hostilities. The Soviet Union did not support the Communists in Greece, France and Italy, withdrew troops from Iran. Stalin, to the letter, to the last decimal point, adhered to the decisions taken in Tehran at the Yalta and Potsdam conferences. It was he who played honestly with the West - which cannot be said of the "allies."
And it's not just about Churchill's Fulton speech and the Cold War that followed. It all started much earlier! Who was the first to create and use nuclear weapons? Well, not Stalin! And the same Churchill, who long before Fulton was rushing with the plan "The Unthinkable", according to which the US and British armies shoulder to shoulder with the Hitlerites who surrendered to them in the summer of 1945, were to strike at our troops that liberated Europe, and move on - to smash and occupy the Soviet Union? Only a real comparison of the forces of the Red Army with the troops of Britain and the United States (far from in favor of the Allies) and the tantrum of Washington, which in this case would have to deal with Japan on its own, which the USSR subsequently defeated in 20 days, were saved from this madness.
But in the USA, too, the first plans for nuclear strikes appeared in 1946 - the same "Dropshot", according to which 300 atomic bombs and a quarter of a million tons of conventional bombs were to be dropped on the USSR. And later - to divide into "zones of influence" and occupy completely. In the future, the same plans - only increasingly ambitious and savage, were born by the Pentagon annually, or even several a year. NATO was created in 1949 - long before the Warsaw Treaty Organization appeared. Yes, the Soviet Union and Stalin who led it simply had no choice but to prepare for a new world war! And because the Supreme, having drawn conclusions from June 22, 1941, decided to no longer rely on all sorts of "non-aggression pacts" and other empty declarations - he is only honored and glory ...
In 1949, the USSR finally received its atomic weapon, and soon - thermonuclear, which the United States did not have. Perhaps this is precisely the moment that became a turning point for Stalin - if he hoped that after achieving relative nuclear parity the USSR would be left behind, then these hopes turned out to be vain. What do you think, the most detailed reports about all of these “Dropshots”, “Pinchers”, “Fleetwoods” and the devil didn’t know about any other scenarios for the destruction of our country ?! Yes, he knew everything perfectly - in those years, Soviet intelligence worked at the highest level. And then the Leader’s patience snapped. Since 1949, an increase in the number of the Armed Forces of the USSR began, and by the spring of 1953 it had already reached five and a half million. The number of airborne troops alone by that time had increased to 15 divisions! Prepared, definitely.
Another interesting question - what were the chances of the Soviet Union to win this war? A detailed analysis would have come out extremely voluminous, but at least starting from the state and armament of our army at that time, we can safely assume that they are very good! By the anticipated time of the outbreak of hostilities (1953-1954), the USSR had thousands of the latest T-54 tanks, an impressive number of MIG-15 fighter jets, and since 1950, the MIG-17. The Kalashnikov assault rifle, which at that time had no analogue, was already in full swing in the troops. This is so, in short, without going into details ...
The main guarantee of victory was the millions of young and combat-ready veterans who defeated the most terrible enemy on Earth in the Great Patriotic War. And it’s not only about soldiers and junior command personnel — the generals and marshals of Victory also remained in service, ready for new battles. And also - millions and millions of faithful allies of our country from communist China, which Stalin probably planned to use as the main strike force in the attack on the United States from Alaska and Canada. Imagine the inexhaustible waves of Chinese comrades armed with even trophy weapons (from which the Soviet warehouses simply burst!), Spreading across the vastness of the United States. Who would stop them?
In Europe, Britain remained the only serious adversary, a strong fleet, but not ground forces. Surely, Stalin had sensible thoughts on this subject - was it not for nothing that he mobilized Sudoplatov’s eagles to fight the enemy’s naval forces? Most likely, the proud Britons would very quickly remain to sit on their island, like a puffed toad on a burdock. And even then not for long. But the military contingents of the allies in Europe, by then considerably reduced, would certainly not have stood up against the returning “in the forces of grave” of the Red Army. In France and some other NATO countries, the communist underground did not even have time to disarm properly. Would connect!
Of course, any war is scary. Moreover, the world, which, almost inevitably, would occur with a more or less massive use of nuclear weapons. Victims and destruction would be enormous. On the other hand ... And how many people and entire countries died as a result of local conflicts, civil wars and "color revolutions", organized and provoked by the USA and NATO over the past fifty years? And, really, the idea of what the world would have looked like without the Fed and the CIA of the USA, without Teresa May in London and Obama with Trump in Washington looks really damn enticing. But we will not know this. Alas...
Information